Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Indonesia’s Presidential Debates: The Score Midway Through
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO24009 | Indonesia’s Presidential Debates: The Score Midway Through
    Irman Gurmilang Lanti

    10 January 2024

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Indonesians will be going to the polls next month to elect their next president. Meanwhile, the three candidates and their vice-presidential running mates have participated in three nationally-televised debates organised by the General Election Commission. Public surveys conducted following the debates indicate that the popularity standings of the candidates have not changed much. Two debates remain to be held and if they do not produce a decisive outcome, it is likely that the election will go on to a run-off.

    CO24009 Indonesias Presidential Debates The Score Midway Through
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    Next month, Indonesia will be having its fifth direct presidential election since its experiment with the system in 2004. This election is considered important for the country’s future as Indonesia will be having a new president after a decade-long presidency under Joko Widodo (popularly known as Jokowi).

    This has turned out to be a contentious election because of the controversial circumstances surrounding the choice of Gibran Rakabuming Raka (Jokowi’s son) as the running mate of Gen. Prabowo Subianto (the current Defence Minister who also ran against Jokowi in the previous two elections). The controversy revolves around the ruling of the Constitutional Court – headed by the Chief Justice who happens to be Gibran’s uncle-in-law – that lowered the minimum age of the presidential and vice-presidential candidates from 40 to 35, effectively allowing the 36-year-old Gibran to run for office.

    Despite this overhanging shadow, the Prabowo-Gibran pair has consistently been leading in public opinion surveys, which is most likely due to the high regard Indonesians have for Jokowi. The pair’s popularity is around 45 per cent, quite close to the threshold of 50 per cent that is needed to win the presidential election in one round.

    However, the surveys also indicated that there are many voters still undecided. One survey by Kompas Daily in early December showed that 28.7 per cent of voters were still unsure who they will vote for. This figure was considered exceptionally high as the election was then merely a couple of months away. That was why the presidential and vice-presidential debates became important.

    Outcome of the Debates Held so Far

    Thus far, two presidential debates and one vice-presidential debate have taken place out of three presidential and two vice-presidential debates scheduled by the General Election Commission. These debates cover politics, human rights, the economy, foreign relations, and security and defence.

    The first presidential debate was held on 12 December 2023 with Anies Baswedan emerging quite strong. He was confident and well-prepared, and demonstrated a good grasp of politics and human rights. Ganjar Pranowo also made a strong appearance and was able to defend his position well while discomfiting the other candidates, especially Prabowo Subianto, with difficult questions. Compared with the other two candidates, the latter appeared defensive and often let his emotions get the better of him.

    The immediate impressions of Indonesian netizens who watched the debate, as recorded by Drone Emprit, a website specialising in analysing the content of social media postings, indicated that Anies received 64 per cent of positive sentiments, Ganjar received 58 per cent, and Prabowo at a distant 39 per cent.

    The second debate held on 22 December 2023 was for the vice-presidential hopefuls. Focused on economic issues, many analysts had predicted before the debate that Gibran would face an uphill task given his lack of experience (having only served as the Mayor of Solo for two years) in contrast to Ganjar’s running mate, the senior professor and Coordinating Minister of Politics, Law, and Security, Mahfud MD; and Anies’ running mate, the seasoned politician and head of the traditionalist Muslim PKB party, Muhaimin Iskandar.

    Surprisingly, Gibran not only proved masterly in the art of debating, but he was often on the offensive. His public speaking style was quite similar to his father’s, which burnished his image as the ideological descendant of the revered Jokowi. On the other hand, Mahfud was not able to ruffle Gibran despite many attempts, while Muhaimin appeared to be rudderless and ineffective.

    The results posted by Drone Emprit after the debate showed that Gibran had received the highest positive sentiments among netizens with 70 per cent, followed by Mahfud with 69 per cent, and Muhaimin with 48 per cent. Whatever ground Prabowo had lost in the first debate was recovered by Gibran in the second debate. Conversely, Anies’ achievement in the first debate was undone by Muhaimin.

    The third debate held on 7 January 2024 was another presidential debate, this time focusing on foreign policy, defence and security issues. These should have been easy for Prabowo to handle as he was a retired military officer and the current defence minister. However, contrary to public expectations, Prabowo’s performance was dismal as he defended himself from the incessant attacks by Anies and Ganjar throughout much of the debate.

    According to Drone Emprit, Anies again received the highest positive sentiments from netizens with 76 per cent, followed by Ganjar with 72 per cent, and Prabowo with 40 per cent.

    Conclusions from the Debates

    The debates had a relatively high viewership and were expected to reduce the number of undecided voters. However, surveys have shown that the order of popularity of the three candidates remained unchanged after the three debates.

    Several conclusions can be inferred from the debates and surveys held so far:

    i) First, Prabowo is consistently leading in the polls. This appears to be influenced by the popularity of Jokowi, and the latter’s increasing public association with Prabowo and Gibran.

    ii) Despite Prabowo’s popularity, it does not seem likely that he will win the election in one round.

    iii) Anies standing has been rising in the surveys. The mobilisation of the Muslim vote and his consistent positioning against Jokowi seem to be the reason for his rising popularity.

    iv) Ganjar has been decreasing in popularity. This is most likely due to the dilemmatic position that he has been dealt with: as a candidate from the PDI-P, the main party supporting Jokowi, while at the same time having to show some opposition to Jokowi.

    If nothing dramatic occurs before 14 February, it is likely that the election will go to the second round, with Prabowo and Anies facing each other in the run-off.

    About the Author

    Dr Irman Lanti is a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia, and a veteran analyst of contemporary Indonesian politics and political Islam in Indonesia. He is currently a Visiting Senior Fellow with the Indonesia Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Indonesians will be going to the polls next month to elect their next president. Meanwhile, the three candidates and their vice-presidential running mates have participated in three nationally-televised debates organised by the General Election Commission. Public surveys conducted following the debates indicate that the popularity standings of the candidates have not changed much. Two debates remain to be held and if they do not produce a decisive outcome, it is likely that the election will go on to a run-off.

    CO24009 Indonesias Presidential Debates The Score Midway Through
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    Next month, Indonesia will be having its fifth direct presidential election since its experiment with the system in 2004. This election is considered important for the country’s future as Indonesia will be having a new president after a decade-long presidency under Joko Widodo (popularly known as Jokowi).

    This has turned out to be a contentious election because of the controversial circumstances surrounding the choice of Gibran Rakabuming Raka (Jokowi’s son) as the running mate of Gen. Prabowo Subianto (the current Defence Minister who also ran against Jokowi in the previous two elections). The controversy revolves around the ruling of the Constitutional Court – headed by the Chief Justice who happens to be Gibran’s uncle-in-law – that lowered the minimum age of the presidential and vice-presidential candidates from 40 to 35, effectively allowing the 36-year-old Gibran to run for office.

    Despite this overhanging shadow, the Prabowo-Gibran pair has consistently been leading in public opinion surveys, which is most likely due to the high regard Indonesians have for Jokowi. The pair’s popularity is around 45 per cent, quite close to the threshold of 50 per cent that is needed to win the presidential election in one round.

    However, the surveys also indicated that there are many voters still undecided. One survey by Kompas Daily in early December showed that 28.7 per cent of voters were still unsure who they will vote for. This figure was considered exceptionally high as the election was then merely a couple of months away. That was why the presidential and vice-presidential debates became important.

    Outcome of the Debates Held so Far

    Thus far, two presidential debates and one vice-presidential debate have taken place out of three presidential and two vice-presidential debates scheduled by the General Election Commission. These debates cover politics, human rights, the economy, foreign relations, and security and defence.

    The first presidential debate was held on 12 December 2023 with Anies Baswedan emerging quite strong. He was confident and well-prepared, and demonstrated a good grasp of politics and human rights. Ganjar Pranowo also made a strong appearance and was able to defend his position well while discomfiting the other candidates, especially Prabowo Subianto, with difficult questions. Compared with the other two candidates, the latter appeared defensive and often let his emotions get the better of him.

    The immediate impressions of Indonesian netizens who watched the debate, as recorded by Drone Emprit, a website specialising in analysing the content of social media postings, indicated that Anies received 64 per cent of positive sentiments, Ganjar received 58 per cent, and Prabowo at a distant 39 per cent.

    The second debate held on 22 December 2023 was for the vice-presidential hopefuls. Focused on economic issues, many analysts had predicted before the debate that Gibran would face an uphill task given his lack of experience (having only served as the Mayor of Solo for two years) in contrast to Ganjar’s running mate, the senior professor and Coordinating Minister of Politics, Law, and Security, Mahfud MD; and Anies’ running mate, the seasoned politician and head of the traditionalist Muslim PKB party, Muhaimin Iskandar.

    Surprisingly, Gibran not only proved masterly in the art of debating, but he was often on the offensive. His public speaking style was quite similar to his father’s, which burnished his image as the ideological descendant of the revered Jokowi. On the other hand, Mahfud was not able to ruffle Gibran despite many attempts, while Muhaimin appeared to be rudderless and ineffective.

    The results posted by Drone Emprit after the debate showed that Gibran had received the highest positive sentiments among netizens with 70 per cent, followed by Mahfud with 69 per cent, and Muhaimin with 48 per cent. Whatever ground Prabowo had lost in the first debate was recovered by Gibran in the second debate. Conversely, Anies’ achievement in the first debate was undone by Muhaimin.

    The third debate held on 7 January 2024 was another presidential debate, this time focusing on foreign policy, defence and security issues. These should have been easy for Prabowo to handle as he was a retired military officer and the current defence minister. However, contrary to public expectations, Prabowo’s performance was dismal as he defended himself from the incessant attacks by Anies and Ganjar throughout much of the debate.

    According to Drone Emprit, Anies again received the highest positive sentiments from netizens with 76 per cent, followed by Ganjar with 72 per cent, and Prabowo with 40 per cent.

    Conclusions from the Debates

    The debates had a relatively high viewership and were expected to reduce the number of undecided voters. However, surveys have shown that the order of popularity of the three candidates remained unchanged after the three debates.

    Several conclusions can be inferred from the debates and surveys held so far:

    i) First, Prabowo is consistently leading in the polls. This appears to be influenced by the popularity of Jokowi, and the latter’s increasing public association with Prabowo and Gibran.

    ii) Despite Prabowo’s popularity, it does not seem likely that he will win the election in one round.

    iii) Anies standing has been rising in the surveys. The mobilisation of the Muslim vote and his consistent positioning against Jokowi seem to be the reason for his rising popularity.

    iv) Ganjar has been decreasing in popularity. This is most likely due to the dilemmatic position that he has been dealt with: as a candidate from the PDI-P, the main party supporting Jokowi, while at the same time having to show some opposition to Jokowi.

    If nothing dramatic occurs before 14 February, it is likely that the election will go to the second round, with Prabowo and Anies facing each other in the run-off.

    About the Author

    Dr Irman Lanti is a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia, and a veteran analyst of contemporary Indonesian politics and political Islam in Indonesia. He is currently a Visiting Senior Fellow with the Indonesia Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info