Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP23050 | From an Underdog to a Frontrunner: Understanding Prabowo’s Polls Surge
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP23050 | From an Underdog to a Frontrunner: Understanding Prabowo’s Polls Surge
    Alexander Raymond Arifianto

    05 July 2023

    download pdf


    Prabowo Subianto’s presidential candidacy has been boosted by several recent opinion surveys that show him as the frontrunner over Ganjar Pranowo and Anies Baswedan. The surge, according to ALEXANDER R. ARIFIANTO, is due to his rivals’ strategic miscalculations, which have led to Prabowo increasingly being considered a safe, middle ground choice by the Indonesian political establishment and regular voters alike.

     

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    Over the past month or so, Prabowo Subianto’s presidential candidacy has been boosted by several recent public opinion surveys indicating that he is leading Indonesia’s presidential race.

    For instance, a recent survey by Kompas – Indonesia’s leading newspaper – indicates that the defence minister has the support of 24.5% of likely voters, followed by the other two prospective candidates, respectively Central Java governor Ganjar Pranowo (22.8%) and former Jakarta governor Anies Baswedan (13.6%). A survey published on 4 June 2023 by Indikator Politik – one of the country’s more reliable survey companies – also puts Prabowo in the lead with 38%, ahead of Ganjar (34%) and Anies (19%).

    When Prabowo declared his candidacy last year, most analysts considered him the candidate least likely to win the contest due to his age and his two previous failed presidential bids against incumbent president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo in 2014 and 2019. Why then is Prabowo currently leading in the polls?

    The answer lies in the fact that Prabowo seems to benefit from the strategic miscalculations of both his opponents, who misread the responses from both the political establishment and the general public once their strategies were enacted.

    Ganjar Considered “Too Close” to Megawati

    Specifically, Ganjar miscalculated by portraying himself as a loyal cadre of the Indonesian Democratic Party Struggle (PDIP), while Anies miscalculated by launching a strategy calling for political change, not realising that the majority of the Indonesian electorate prefer continuity.

    Similar to Jokowi’s initial campaign in 2014, Ganjar’s campaign roll-out was largely set up as a way for him to highlight his loyalty to PDIP and to its leader, former president Megawati Soekarnoputri. Ganjar undertook this approach notwithstanding Megawati’s decision to postpone the formal announcement of his appointment as PDIP’s presidential candidate for more than six months, denying him the status of an early frontrunner.

    Ganjar also remained loyal to the PDIP party line even though the party often takes up positions that are not popular with the general public. One such position is PDIP’s decision in March 2023 objecting to Israel’s participation in the U-20 Football World Cup tournament in Indonesia that was scheduled for May–June 2023. He followed the rest of PDIP politicians in supporting the party’s stand, which eventually led to the tournament’s cancellation by FIFA. Thereafter, Ganjar’s popularity took a hit, especially among Indonesia’s Gen-Z football fans.

    Ganjar’s loyalty to Megawati also created concerns among members of Jokowi’s political coalition who are not from PDIP. Over the past few months, rumours emerged that Megawati would exercise an exclusive right to pick Ganjar’s cabinet appointments, which was interpreted as a sign that, unlike Jokowi, who balanced his cabinet appointments with politicians from PDIP, other political parties and independents, Ganjar’s cabinet was likely to be dominated by PDIP personnel.

    After these rumours became widespread, leaders from other members of Jokowi’s coalition – including Airlangga Hartarto, chair of Golkar party, and Zulkifli Hasan of the National Mandate Party (PAN) – began to hold meetings with Prabowo, seemingly distancing themselves from Ganjar and indicating their displeasure over Megawati’s prominent behind-the-scenes role in the latter’s campaign.

    Several groups of “independent volunteers” who had played a crucial role in ensuring Jokowi’s electoral victories in 2014 and 2019 have endorsed Prabowo’s candidacy. These include a “volunteer” group led by Gibran Rakabuming – Jokowi’s eldest son and current Solo mayor – which seems to indicate the president’s tacit endorsement of Prabowo.

    Hence, Ganjar’s strategy of relying on Megawati’s personal endorsement and PDIP’s political machinery has seemingly backfired, resulting in many non-PDIP politicians viewing Prabowo – instead of Ganjar – as the presidential candidate who would be more willing to accommodate their interests.

    Anies Misreads Voters’ Mood

    Anies Baswedan has also made miscalculations in his strategy, which have led him to underperform against the other two candidates in recent polls. His campaign’s major miscalculation is to use the theme of political change as his campaign tagline – primarily indicated in the naming of his coalition as a “change coalition” (koalisi perubahan). In addition, Anies’s op-ed published by Kompas Daily on 19 February 2023, which set his campaign’s mission statement, indicated that he rejects “blind obedience” towards the leader, advocates a “democratic strengthening” agenda, and would promote policies for “economic equality” to improve the welfare of poor Indonesians who have not benefited from economic growth over the past decade.

    These statements are implicit criticisms of President Jokowi, who has been accused by some of encouraging policies that promote Indonesia’s “democratic decline” during his near-decade-long rule and a developmentalist economic policy that has left poor Indonesians falling behind. In essence, Anies is signalling that his agenda of political and economic reforms would be noticeably different from Jokowi’s.

    What Anies and his campaign team had not foreseen, however, is that the majority of the Indonesian electorate overwhelmingly approve Jokowi’s policies, including his infrastructure-building policy and his policy of constructing Nusantara, the nation’s new capital.

    An April 2023 poll by Saiful Mujani Research and Consultancy (SMRC) indicates that the president enjoys 82% approval from prospective voters – his highest approval rating ever. This indicates that the majority of the Indonesian electorate endorse Jokowi and his policy agenda and do not seem keen to endorse presidential candidates who advocate major political change like the one that Anies is promoting.

    The only two political parties that express misgivings regarding Jokowi’s policies and support Anies as an alternative are the nationalist-leaning Democratic Party of former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Islamist Prosperous Justice Party (PKS). Altogether both comprise only 16% of the seats in Indonesia’s House of Representatives (DPR). Hence, only a small percentage of Indonesians seek major change from the Jokowi era, and candidates perceived to be close to Jokowi – Ganjar and Prabowo – would benefit from his high approval rating.

    Hence, Prabowo seems to benefit the most from the strategic miscalculations of his opponents. He has been receiving endorsement from both nationalist politicians who are concerned regarding Ganjar’s close ties to Megawati and PDIP and Islamist politicians who are not confident about Anies’s electoral prospects, given his low approval rating in the polls.

    IP23050
    Although most analysts had considered Prabowo Subianto as the candidate least likely to win when he declared his candidacy last year, Prabowo is currently leading in the polls as he seems to have benefitted from his political opponents’ strategic miscalculations. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

    Prabowo Seen As a Safe, Middle Ground Choice

    Prabowo is increasingly perceived as a safe, middle ground choice by both the political establishment and voters who seek continuity over change. However, they also prefer that Megawati and PDIP should not have too much influence over the political appointments and policies to be enacted by Jokowi’s successor.

    Prabowo’s various missteps have not affected his approval rating in the polls. These include his proposal announced during last June’s Shangri-La Dialogue to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which came under severe criticism from many foreign policy analysts. The proposal was essentially an effort by Prabowo and his team to bolster his stature domestically as an international statesman rather than a serious proposal to end the conflict.

    There are eight months left until the first round of polls, scheduled for 14 February 2024. In the intervening months, there will be numerous tosses and turns that that could affect each candidate’s electability. Nonetheless, at this time, Prabowo has a greater chance of winning the presidency than in the previous two elections, given that his middle ground status has earned him support from both established politicians and the electorate alike.

     

    Alexander R. Arifianto is a Senior Fellow in the Indonesia Programme at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General / Southeast Asia and ASEAN


    Prabowo Subianto’s presidential candidacy has been boosted by several recent opinion surveys that show him as the frontrunner over Ganjar Pranowo and Anies Baswedan. The surge, according to ALEXANDER R. ARIFIANTO, is due to his rivals’ strategic miscalculations, which have led to Prabowo increasingly being considered a safe, middle ground choice by the Indonesian political establishment and regular voters alike.

     

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    Over the past month or so, Prabowo Subianto’s presidential candidacy has been boosted by several recent public opinion surveys indicating that he is leading Indonesia’s presidential race.

    For instance, a recent survey by Kompas – Indonesia’s leading newspaper – indicates that the defence minister has the support of 24.5% of likely voters, followed by the other two prospective candidates, respectively Central Java governor Ganjar Pranowo (22.8%) and former Jakarta governor Anies Baswedan (13.6%). A survey published on 4 June 2023 by Indikator Politik – one of the country’s more reliable survey companies – also puts Prabowo in the lead with 38%, ahead of Ganjar (34%) and Anies (19%).

    When Prabowo declared his candidacy last year, most analysts considered him the candidate least likely to win the contest due to his age and his two previous failed presidential bids against incumbent president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo in 2014 and 2019. Why then is Prabowo currently leading in the polls?

    The answer lies in the fact that Prabowo seems to benefit from the strategic miscalculations of both his opponents, who misread the responses from both the political establishment and the general public once their strategies were enacted.

    Ganjar Considered “Too Close” to Megawati

    Specifically, Ganjar miscalculated by portraying himself as a loyal cadre of the Indonesian Democratic Party Struggle (PDIP), while Anies miscalculated by launching a strategy calling for political change, not realising that the majority of the Indonesian electorate prefer continuity.

    Similar to Jokowi’s initial campaign in 2014, Ganjar’s campaign roll-out was largely set up as a way for him to highlight his loyalty to PDIP and to its leader, former president Megawati Soekarnoputri. Ganjar undertook this approach notwithstanding Megawati’s decision to postpone the formal announcement of his appointment as PDIP’s presidential candidate for more than six months, denying him the status of an early frontrunner.

    Ganjar also remained loyal to the PDIP party line even though the party often takes up positions that are not popular with the general public. One such position is PDIP’s decision in March 2023 objecting to Israel’s participation in the U-20 Football World Cup tournament in Indonesia that was scheduled for May–June 2023. He followed the rest of PDIP politicians in supporting the party’s stand, which eventually led to the tournament’s cancellation by FIFA. Thereafter, Ganjar’s popularity took a hit, especially among Indonesia’s Gen-Z football fans.

    Ganjar’s loyalty to Megawati also created concerns among members of Jokowi’s political coalition who are not from PDIP. Over the past few months, rumours emerged that Megawati would exercise an exclusive right to pick Ganjar’s cabinet appointments, which was interpreted as a sign that, unlike Jokowi, who balanced his cabinet appointments with politicians from PDIP, other political parties and independents, Ganjar’s cabinet was likely to be dominated by PDIP personnel.

    After these rumours became widespread, leaders from other members of Jokowi’s coalition – including Airlangga Hartarto, chair of Golkar party, and Zulkifli Hasan of the National Mandate Party (PAN) – began to hold meetings with Prabowo, seemingly distancing themselves from Ganjar and indicating their displeasure over Megawati’s prominent behind-the-scenes role in the latter’s campaign.

    Several groups of “independent volunteers” who had played a crucial role in ensuring Jokowi’s electoral victories in 2014 and 2019 have endorsed Prabowo’s candidacy. These include a “volunteer” group led by Gibran Rakabuming – Jokowi’s eldest son and current Solo mayor – which seems to indicate the president’s tacit endorsement of Prabowo.

    Hence, Ganjar’s strategy of relying on Megawati’s personal endorsement and PDIP’s political machinery has seemingly backfired, resulting in many non-PDIP politicians viewing Prabowo – instead of Ganjar – as the presidential candidate who would be more willing to accommodate their interests.

    Anies Misreads Voters’ Mood

    Anies Baswedan has also made miscalculations in his strategy, which have led him to underperform against the other two candidates in recent polls. His campaign’s major miscalculation is to use the theme of political change as his campaign tagline – primarily indicated in the naming of his coalition as a “change coalition” (koalisi perubahan). In addition, Anies’s op-ed published by Kompas Daily on 19 February 2023, which set his campaign’s mission statement, indicated that he rejects “blind obedience” towards the leader, advocates a “democratic strengthening” agenda, and would promote policies for “economic equality” to improve the welfare of poor Indonesians who have not benefited from economic growth over the past decade.

    These statements are implicit criticisms of President Jokowi, who has been accused by some of encouraging policies that promote Indonesia’s “democratic decline” during his near-decade-long rule and a developmentalist economic policy that has left poor Indonesians falling behind. In essence, Anies is signalling that his agenda of political and economic reforms would be noticeably different from Jokowi’s.

    What Anies and his campaign team had not foreseen, however, is that the majority of the Indonesian electorate overwhelmingly approve Jokowi’s policies, including his infrastructure-building policy and his policy of constructing Nusantara, the nation’s new capital.

    An April 2023 poll by Saiful Mujani Research and Consultancy (SMRC) indicates that the president enjoys 82% approval from prospective voters – his highest approval rating ever. This indicates that the majority of the Indonesian electorate endorse Jokowi and his policy agenda and do not seem keen to endorse presidential candidates who advocate major political change like the one that Anies is promoting.

    The only two political parties that express misgivings regarding Jokowi’s policies and support Anies as an alternative are the nationalist-leaning Democratic Party of former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Islamist Prosperous Justice Party (PKS). Altogether both comprise only 16% of the seats in Indonesia’s House of Representatives (DPR). Hence, only a small percentage of Indonesians seek major change from the Jokowi era, and candidates perceived to be close to Jokowi – Ganjar and Prabowo – would benefit from his high approval rating.

    Hence, Prabowo seems to benefit the most from the strategic miscalculations of his opponents. He has been receiving endorsement from both nationalist politicians who are concerned regarding Ganjar’s close ties to Megawati and PDIP and Islamist politicians who are not confident about Anies’s electoral prospects, given his low approval rating in the polls.

    IP23050
    Although most analysts had considered Prabowo Subianto as the candidate least likely to win when he declared his candidacy last year, Prabowo is currently leading in the polls as he seems to have benefitted from his political opponents’ strategic miscalculations. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

    Prabowo Seen As a Safe, Middle Ground Choice

    Prabowo is increasingly perceived as a safe, middle ground choice by both the political establishment and voters who seek continuity over change. However, they also prefer that Megawati and PDIP should not have too much influence over the political appointments and policies to be enacted by Jokowi’s successor.

    Prabowo’s various missteps have not affected his approval rating in the polls. These include his proposal announced during last June’s Shangri-La Dialogue to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which came under severe criticism from many foreign policy analysts. The proposal was essentially an effort by Prabowo and his team to bolster his stature domestically as an international statesman rather than a serious proposal to end the conflict.

    There are eight months left until the first round of polls, scheduled for 14 February 2024. In the intervening months, there will be numerous tosses and turns that that could affect each candidate’s electability. Nonetheless, at this time, Prabowo has a greater chance of winning the presidency than in the previous two elections, given that his middle ground status has earned him support from both established politicians and the electorate alike.

     

    Alexander R. Arifianto is a Senior Fellow in the Indonesia Programme at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info