Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP23065 | ASEAN-ROK Relations in the Indo-Pacific: Comprehensiveness and Competitiveness
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP23065 | ASEAN-ROK Relations in the Indo-Pacific: Comprehensiveness and Competitiveness
    Sarah Teo, Louis Tion

    15 September 2023

    download pdf

    The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the authors and RSIS. Please email to Editor IDSS Paper at [email protected].

     


    As ASEAN-ROK ties approach their 35th anniversary in 2024, SARAH TEO and LOUIS TION suggest that a focus on comprehensiveness and competitiveness would contribute towards shoring up their relations in the Indo-Pacific.

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    The 24th ASEAN-Republic of Korea (ROK) Summit, convened on 6 September 2023 in Jakarta, Indonesia, highlighted key advancements in ASEAN-ROK relations made under President Yoon Suk-yeol’s administration thus far. Beyond the usual affirmations of furthering collaboration and joint efforts towards regional capacity building, ASEAN and the ROK also issued a Joint Statement on Cooperation on the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP), which briefly mentioned commonalities between the AOIP and the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.

    If successful and sustained in the longer term, these initiatives would likely go some way towards addressing the image problem surrounding the ROK’s (lack of) strategic profile in the Indo-Pacific. As reflected in recent editions of the annual The State of Southeast Asia surveys, there is a tendency for the ROK to fall behind other regional actors when it comes to perceptions about influence and leadership in regional political and economic agendas. To some extent, the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and the accompanying Korea-ASEAN Solidarity Initiative (KASI) aim to rectify such perceptions.

    As ASEAN-ROK ties approach their 35th anniversary in 2024, a focus on comprehensiveness and competitiveness would contribute towards shoring up relations in the longer term. Considering ASEAN’s importance in the regional multilateral architecture – notwithstanding the current challenges it faces – stronger ASEAN-ROK relations would also help buttress the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.

    IP23065
    ASEAN-Republic of Korea (ROK) relations would benefit from a comprehensive and competitive approach. This includes paying attention to the strategic aspects of the ASEAN-ROK partnership amid an evolving Indo-Pacific and leveraging the ROK’s strengths vis-à-vis the region. Image from the ASEAN Secretariat.

    Comprehensiveness

     Alongside the 35th anniversary of ASEAN-ROK diplomatic relations, Seoul and ASEAN intend to establish a comprehensive strategic partnership (CSP) next year. This would build on the expansion and deepening of ASEAN-ROK ties over the past few decades, including the ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreement (AKFTA) launched in the late 2000s; the elevation of relations to a strategic partnership in 2010; former President Moon Jae-in’s New Southern Policy introduced in 2017; and now, President Yoon’s KASI unveiled in 2022. For the CSP to be meaningful, however, it would have to reflect a significant step-up from existing ASEAN-ROK relations.

    One way to proceed would be the proposed strengthening of defence and strategic aspects of the ASEAN-ROK partnership. Among other initiatives, KASI’s eight core lines of effort seek to enhance exchanges with ASEAN in defence consultations and engagement, expand maritime and cybersecurity cooperation, as well as broaden defence industrial cooperation with individual ASEAN member states.

    The challenge here would be to ensure the sustainability of these efforts and their role in supporting the overarching objectives of the ASEAN-ROK partnership. After all, the New Southern Policy had a “peace” pillar targeted at political and security cooperation, but ultimately was regarded to have fallen short of responding to the shifting geopolitical dynamics in the region. This has reinforced the view that the ROK has largely been absent from the regional geostrategic calculus. For KASI and the CSP to make a substantive difference in the tenor of ASEAN-ROK relations, the pursuit of strengthened strategic and security cooperation within the Indo-Pacific context would have to be consistent.

    Comprehensiveness also calls for the ROK to engage more equally with all ASEAN member states. As several observers have noted, Seoul’s relations with Vietnam have largely outweighed its ties with other ASEAN member states in the recent past. This is mainly driven by economic reasons and the potential to expand cooperation with Vietnam in the defence industry. While acknowledging that the progress and state of the ROK’s relations with individual ASEAN countries are ultimately a function of shared interests and political will, a more balanced engagement with all ASEAN member states would help reinforce Seoul’s presence in the region.

    Competitiveness

    The ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and KASI also underscore Seoul’s competitive strengths among regional actors. Amidst major power rivalry threatening to disrupt cooperation across a range of issues and deepening divisions within the region, the ROK’s initiatives could present a compelling alternative for ASEAN member states seeking to diversify their foreign relations beyond the major powers. The initiatives proposed by the ROK include bolstering the resilience of supply chains, narrowing the digital gap, as well as leading regional cooperation on climate change.

    As a middle power with limited resources and diplomatic sway, it is all the more important for the ROK to leverage its competitive advantages. This will serve to differentiate it from its regional counterparts and consequently maximise its value to its partners.

    In the areas of digitalisation and technological innovation, for instance, the ROK is a leading player. According to the 2022 Global Innovation Index, the ROK is ranked sixth amongst high-income countries and first amongst the 17 economies in Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania, based on indicators such as technological outputs, research and development, as well as human capital. By adopting a forward-looking approach, the ROK has been able to make headway in the digital space, with a well-established digital infrastructure to fuel business activities.

    These attributes and assets provide the ROK with opportunities to boost collaboration with regional actors on digitalisation and technology. The ROK could continue to share its technical know-how and best practices to assist Southeast Asia’s emerging economies embarking on digitalisation as well as to narrow the digital and development gaps in the region. These would be pertinent tasks for ASEAN, particularly with its recent announcement to launch negotiations on the Digital Economy Framework Agreement.

    ASEAN-ROK Relations: Looking Ahead

     As the ROK and ASEAN work towards the CSP’s establishment in 2024 and more consistent engagement over the longer term, Seoul’s approach towards the Southeast Asian grouping would benefit from the guiding principles of comprehensiveness and competitiveness. The two principles may sound mutually exclusive, but they are fundamentally complementary. Comprehensiveness is targeted towards a more balanced and wide-ranging engagement between the ROK and ASEAN, while competitiveness emphasises the distinctive contributions that the ROK can make to those balanced and wide-ranging relations. An approach grounded in competitiveness would likely help the ROK achieve more comprehensive relations with ASEAN and its member states.

    The ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and KASI offer opportunities for Seoul to enhance its profile and take on a more active role in the region. Amid the evolving regional order and geopolitical shifts in the Indo-Pacific, a stable and resilient ASEAN-ROK partnership would be instrumental towards fulfilling the ROK’s foreign policy goals in the Indo-Pacific.

     

     

    Sarah TEO is an Assistant Professor in the Regional Security Architecture Programme and Deputy Coordinator of the MSc (International Relations) programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Louis TION graduated from the RSIS MSc (International Relations) programme in July 2023.

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the authors and RSIS. Please email to Editor IDSS Paper at [email protected].

     


    As ASEAN-ROK ties approach their 35th anniversary in 2024, SARAH TEO and LOUIS TION suggest that a focus on comprehensiveness and competitiveness would contribute towards shoring up their relations in the Indo-Pacific.

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    The 24th ASEAN-Republic of Korea (ROK) Summit, convened on 6 September 2023 in Jakarta, Indonesia, highlighted key advancements in ASEAN-ROK relations made under President Yoon Suk-yeol’s administration thus far. Beyond the usual affirmations of furthering collaboration and joint efforts towards regional capacity building, ASEAN and the ROK also issued a Joint Statement on Cooperation on the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP), which briefly mentioned commonalities between the AOIP and the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.

    If successful and sustained in the longer term, these initiatives would likely go some way towards addressing the image problem surrounding the ROK’s (lack of) strategic profile in the Indo-Pacific. As reflected in recent editions of the annual The State of Southeast Asia surveys, there is a tendency for the ROK to fall behind other regional actors when it comes to perceptions about influence and leadership in regional political and economic agendas. To some extent, the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and the accompanying Korea-ASEAN Solidarity Initiative (KASI) aim to rectify such perceptions.

    As ASEAN-ROK ties approach their 35th anniversary in 2024, a focus on comprehensiveness and competitiveness would contribute towards shoring up relations in the longer term. Considering ASEAN’s importance in the regional multilateral architecture – notwithstanding the current challenges it faces – stronger ASEAN-ROK relations would also help buttress the ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.

    IP23065
    ASEAN-Republic of Korea (ROK) relations would benefit from a comprehensive and competitive approach. This includes paying attention to the strategic aspects of the ASEAN-ROK partnership amid an evolving Indo-Pacific and leveraging the ROK’s strengths vis-à-vis the region. Image from the ASEAN Secretariat.

    Comprehensiveness

     Alongside the 35th anniversary of ASEAN-ROK diplomatic relations, Seoul and ASEAN intend to establish a comprehensive strategic partnership (CSP) next year. This would build on the expansion and deepening of ASEAN-ROK ties over the past few decades, including the ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreement (AKFTA) launched in the late 2000s; the elevation of relations to a strategic partnership in 2010; former President Moon Jae-in’s New Southern Policy introduced in 2017; and now, President Yoon’s KASI unveiled in 2022. For the CSP to be meaningful, however, it would have to reflect a significant step-up from existing ASEAN-ROK relations.

    One way to proceed would be the proposed strengthening of defence and strategic aspects of the ASEAN-ROK partnership. Among other initiatives, KASI’s eight core lines of effort seek to enhance exchanges with ASEAN in defence consultations and engagement, expand maritime and cybersecurity cooperation, as well as broaden defence industrial cooperation with individual ASEAN member states.

    The challenge here would be to ensure the sustainability of these efforts and their role in supporting the overarching objectives of the ASEAN-ROK partnership. After all, the New Southern Policy had a “peace” pillar targeted at political and security cooperation, but ultimately was regarded to have fallen short of responding to the shifting geopolitical dynamics in the region. This has reinforced the view that the ROK has largely been absent from the regional geostrategic calculus. For KASI and the CSP to make a substantive difference in the tenor of ASEAN-ROK relations, the pursuit of strengthened strategic and security cooperation within the Indo-Pacific context would have to be consistent.

    Comprehensiveness also calls for the ROK to engage more equally with all ASEAN member states. As several observers have noted, Seoul’s relations with Vietnam have largely outweighed its ties with other ASEAN member states in the recent past. This is mainly driven by economic reasons and the potential to expand cooperation with Vietnam in the defence industry. While acknowledging that the progress and state of the ROK’s relations with individual ASEAN countries are ultimately a function of shared interests and political will, a more balanced engagement with all ASEAN member states would help reinforce Seoul’s presence in the region.

    Competitiveness

    The ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and KASI also underscore Seoul’s competitive strengths among regional actors. Amidst major power rivalry threatening to disrupt cooperation across a range of issues and deepening divisions within the region, the ROK’s initiatives could present a compelling alternative for ASEAN member states seeking to diversify their foreign relations beyond the major powers. The initiatives proposed by the ROK include bolstering the resilience of supply chains, narrowing the digital gap, as well as leading regional cooperation on climate change.

    As a middle power with limited resources and diplomatic sway, it is all the more important for the ROK to leverage its competitive advantages. This will serve to differentiate it from its regional counterparts and consequently maximise its value to its partners.

    In the areas of digitalisation and technological innovation, for instance, the ROK is a leading player. According to the 2022 Global Innovation Index, the ROK is ranked sixth amongst high-income countries and first amongst the 17 economies in Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania, based on indicators such as technological outputs, research and development, as well as human capital. By adopting a forward-looking approach, the ROK has been able to make headway in the digital space, with a well-established digital infrastructure to fuel business activities.

    These attributes and assets provide the ROK with opportunities to boost collaboration with regional actors on digitalisation and technology. The ROK could continue to share its technical know-how and best practices to assist Southeast Asia’s emerging economies embarking on digitalisation as well as to narrow the digital and development gaps in the region. These would be pertinent tasks for ASEAN, particularly with its recent announcement to launch negotiations on the Digital Economy Framework Agreement.

    ASEAN-ROK Relations: Looking Ahead

     As the ROK and ASEAN work towards the CSP’s establishment in 2024 and more consistent engagement over the longer term, Seoul’s approach towards the Southeast Asian grouping would benefit from the guiding principles of comprehensiveness and competitiveness. The two principles may sound mutually exclusive, but they are fundamentally complementary. Comprehensiveness is targeted towards a more balanced and wide-ranging engagement between the ROK and ASEAN, while competitiveness emphasises the distinctive contributions that the ROK can make to those balanced and wide-ranging relations. An approach grounded in competitiveness would likely help the ROK achieve more comprehensive relations with ASEAN and its member states.

    The ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and KASI offer opportunities for Seoul to enhance its profile and take on a more active role in the region. Amid the evolving regional order and geopolitical shifts in the Indo-Pacific, a stable and resilient ASEAN-ROK partnership would be instrumental towards fulfilling the ROK’s foreign policy goals in the Indo-Pacific.

     

     

    Sarah TEO is an Assistant Professor in the Regional Security Architecture Programme and Deputy Coordinator of the MSc (International Relations) programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Louis TION graduated from the RSIS MSc (International Relations) programme in July 2023.

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info