Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP23069 | Long-Term Side Effects: Why Southeast Asia Should Be Cautious about Western Industrial Policy
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP23069 | Long-Term Side Effects: Why Southeast Asia Should Be Cautious about Western Industrial Policy
    Kevin Chen Xian An

    21 September 2023

    download pdf


    Southeast Asian economies may be benefitting from ongoing supply chain realignments, but they should keep an eye on the future as Western countries embrace industrial policy. The policy and its geopolitical drivers can hinder the growth of regional economies at best or expose them to punitive tariffs at worst. There are serious longer-term challenges that Southeast Asian governments must reckon with, as KEVIN CHEN XIAN AN argues.

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    In a recent Bloomberg interview, Malaysian Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz observed that ASEAN member states have emerged as the biggest beneficiaries of supply chain realignment amid rising geopolitical tensions.

    Tengku Zafrul’s views on investments are likely to be welcomed by his fellow Southeast Asian trade ministers. After the economic doldrums caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Southeast Asian countries would be happy to attract more investments to boost their economies. A similar opportunity arose during the 2019 trade war, where countries such as Vietnam benefitted handsomely as manufacturers embarked on “China+1” strategies.

    Yet, the Malaysian minister also made an important qualification: that there are challenges in the longer term. The rise of industrial policy in the United States and the European Union could disrupt the flow of investments into Southeast Asia, while the fragmentation of the global trading order along political lines threatens to undermine future partnerships.

    Just as they benefitted from the earlier trade war, Southeast Asian governments should continue to attract new investors. However, they must also be clear-eyed about the broader threats that Western industrial policy and geopolitical competition pose to their economic well-being.

    Reaping the Benefits of the 2019 Trade War

    The US-China trade war began in earnest when the United States placed 25% duties on US$34 billion of Chinese imports in 2018, sparking a tit-for-tat cycle that left companies scrambling to relocate their manufacturing operations. American personal computer makers such as HP and Dell explored moving up to 30% of their notebook production out of China, and Chinese firms such as electronics company TCL planned similar moves.

    Southeast Asia was a key destination for these investors. With low labour costs and friendly regulations, the region accounted for US$177 billion out of US$1.39 trillion in global foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2019, far ahead of other developing economy regions such as Africa. Vietnam, in particular, was a major beneficiary, with Chinese FDI into the country growing 5.6-fold year-on-year to US$1.56 billion between January and May 2019.

    This is not to say that the trade war was wholly positive for Southeast Asia. The conflagration was an early sign of Washington’s turn away from free trade and towards what then-President Donald Trump called “fair trade” – a model that claims to be reciprocal, but ultimately prizes US trade balance over comparative advantages. Trump also had a tendency to lash out at countries that crossed his path, labelling Vietnam the “single worst abuser of everybody” for allegedly allowing Chinese companies to reroute their exports. There were fears that a prolonged trade war would have severe consequences for the global trade environment.

    Industrial Policy Strikes Back

    These immediate concerns faded as Trump left office and a new wave of investments into Southeast Asia began. Tesla is planning to establish a regional headquarters in Malaysia. Indonesia is leveraging its nickel resources to pursue aspirations to account for over 75% of global nickel supplies from 2022 to 2029. GlobalFoundries opened a US$4 billion fabrication plant for semiconductor chips in Singapore, expecting a rebound in global demand.

    However, early tremors from the Trump-era trade war have intensified. One of the most notable developments is Washington and Brussels’ embrace of industrial policy, or government efforts to shape the economy by targeting specific industries, often going against market forces. While shunned for decades as an inefficient doctrine, “the Policy That Shall Not Be Named” was given a new lease on life as climate ambitions and geopolitical tensions intensified.

    The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was a key symbol of this change. The act offers US$7,500 in tax credits for each EV assembled in or containing battery components from the United States or one of its free trade partners, while excluding “foreign entities of concern”, evidently referring to China.

    While the IRA was criticised by the European Union, it also led to Brussels implementing its own tax breaks and benefits to support the European EV industry. The European Union has also started viewing China’s EV imports with suspicion, even launching an investigation to determine whether they should implement tariffs.

    IP23069
    Southeast Asian countries are poised to benefit from ongoing supply chain realignments, just as they benefitted from a rise in investments during the US-China trade war. However, regional governments should also be wary of a rise in industrial policy in the West, such as the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) on the assembly of EVs. While current trends can bring some short-term benefits, the West’s turn towards industrial policy creates long-term challenges. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

    Making the Best of a Bad Situation

    As more major economies adopt industrial policies, their deeper pockets may create an FDI shift away from Southeast Asian economies as manufacturers clamour for better deals. Moreover, the increasing fragmentation of the global trading order along political lines poses significant risks.

    Many Southeast Asian economies rely on Chinese expertise or funding to develop their industries, and they may find their market access restricted by wary Western governments. If manufacturer attitudes turn insular, moving from “China+1” to “anyone but China” to escape tariffs, it will be difficult for Southeast Asian economies to continue business as usual. At best, this turn would hinder their growth; at worst, a bad decision could expose them to punitive tariffs.

    As such, while manufacturing realignment may bring abundant opportunities, Southeast Asian economies should prepare for stormy weather ahead. Economies that secure investments should leverage them to upgrade their workforce and industrial capacity. Intra-regional economic integration efforts such as the Digital Economic Framework Agreement (DEFA) should be prioritised at the ASEAN level, both to share economic strengths and enhance ASEAN’s collective appeal to external investors.

    Above all, Southeast Asian governments should understand that the global trading order that supported their growth for decades may be a thing of the past. They can still benefit from the ongoing supply chain realignment but should also make plans to prepare for the coming turbulence.

    Kevin CHEN is an Associate Research Fellow with the US Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Americas / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global


    Southeast Asian economies may be benefitting from ongoing supply chain realignments, but they should keep an eye on the future as Western countries embrace industrial policy. The policy and its geopolitical drivers can hinder the growth of regional economies at best or expose them to punitive tariffs at worst. There are serious longer-term challenges that Southeast Asian governments must reckon with, as KEVIN CHEN XIAN AN argues.

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    In a recent Bloomberg interview, Malaysian Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz observed that ASEAN member states have emerged as the biggest beneficiaries of supply chain realignment amid rising geopolitical tensions.

    Tengku Zafrul’s views on investments are likely to be welcomed by his fellow Southeast Asian trade ministers. After the economic doldrums caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Southeast Asian countries would be happy to attract more investments to boost their economies. A similar opportunity arose during the 2019 trade war, where countries such as Vietnam benefitted handsomely as manufacturers embarked on “China+1” strategies.

    Yet, the Malaysian minister also made an important qualification: that there are challenges in the longer term. The rise of industrial policy in the United States and the European Union could disrupt the flow of investments into Southeast Asia, while the fragmentation of the global trading order along political lines threatens to undermine future partnerships.

    Just as they benefitted from the earlier trade war, Southeast Asian governments should continue to attract new investors. However, they must also be clear-eyed about the broader threats that Western industrial policy and geopolitical competition pose to their economic well-being.

    Reaping the Benefits of the 2019 Trade War

    The US-China trade war began in earnest when the United States placed 25% duties on US$34 billion of Chinese imports in 2018, sparking a tit-for-tat cycle that left companies scrambling to relocate their manufacturing operations. American personal computer makers such as HP and Dell explored moving up to 30% of their notebook production out of China, and Chinese firms such as electronics company TCL planned similar moves.

    Southeast Asia was a key destination for these investors. With low labour costs and friendly regulations, the region accounted for US$177 billion out of US$1.39 trillion in global foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2019, far ahead of other developing economy regions such as Africa. Vietnam, in particular, was a major beneficiary, with Chinese FDI into the country growing 5.6-fold year-on-year to US$1.56 billion between January and May 2019.

    This is not to say that the trade war was wholly positive for Southeast Asia. The conflagration was an early sign of Washington’s turn away from free trade and towards what then-President Donald Trump called “fair trade” – a model that claims to be reciprocal, but ultimately prizes US trade balance over comparative advantages. Trump also had a tendency to lash out at countries that crossed his path, labelling Vietnam the “single worst abuser of everybody” for allegedly allowing Chinese companies to reroute their exports. There were fears that a prolonged trade war would have severe consequences for the global trade environment.

    Industrial Policy Strikes Back

    These immediate concerns faded as Trump left office and a new wave of investments into Southeast Asia began. Tesla is planning to establish a regional headquarters in Malaysia. Indonesia is leveraging its nickel resources to pursue aspirations to account for over 75% of global nickel supplies from 2022 to 2029. GlobalFoundries opened a US$4 billion fabrication plant for semiconductor chips in Singapore, expecting a rebound in global demand.

    However, early tremors from the Trump-era trade war have intensified. One of the most notable developments is Washington and Brussels’ embrace of industrial policy, or government efforts to shape the economy by targeting specific industries, often going against market forces. While shunned for decades as an inefficient doctrine, “the Policy That Shall Not Be Named” was given a new lease on life as climate ambitions and geopolitical tensions intensified.

    The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was a key symbol of this change. The act offers US$7,500 in tax credits for each EV assembled in or containing battery components from the United States or one of its free trade partners, while excluding “foreign entities of concern”, evidently referring to China.

    While the IRA was criticised by the European Union, it also led to Brussels implementing its own tax breaks and benefits to support the European EV industry. The European Union has also started viewing China’s EV imports with suspicion, even launching an investigation to determine whether they should implement tariffs.

    IP23069
    Southeast Asian countries are poised to benefit from ongoing supply chain realignments, just as they benefitted from a rise in investments during the US-China trade war. However, regional governments should also be wary of a rise in industrial policy in the West, such as the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) on the assembly of EVs. While current trends can bring some short-term benefits, the West’s turn towards industrial policy creates long-term challenges. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

    Making the Best of a Bad Situation

    As more major economies adopt industrial policies, their deeper pockets may create an FDI shift away from Southeast Asian economies as manufacturers clamour for better deals. Moreover, the increasing fragmentation of the global trading order along political lines poses significant risks.

    Many Southeast Asian economies rely on Chinese expertise or funding to develop their industries, and they may find their market access restricted by wary Western governments. If manufacturer attitudes turn insular, moving from “China+1” to “anyone but China” to escape tariffs, it will be difficult for Southeast Asian economies to continue business as usual. At best, this turn would hinder their growth; at worst, a bad decision could expose them to punitive tariffs.

    As such, while manufacturing realignment may bring abundant opportunities, Southeast Asian economies should prepare for stormy weather ahead. Economies that secure investments should leverage them to upgrade their workforce and industrial capacity. Intra-regional economic integration efforts such as the Digital Economic Framework Agreement (DEFA) should be prioritised at the ASEAN level, both to share economic strengths and enhance ASEAN’s collective appeal to external investors.

    Above all, Southeast Asian governments should understand that the global trading order that supported their growth for decades may be a thing of the past. They can still benefit from the ongoing supply chain realignment but should also make plans to prepare for the coming turbulence.

    Kevin CHEN is an Associate Research Fellow with the US Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info