Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP23076 | The Indonesian Solidarity Party and Jokowi’s Post-2024 Game Plan
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP23076 | The Indonesian Solidarity Party and Jokowi’s Post-2024 Game Plan
    Jefferson Ng Jin Chuan

    30 October 2023

    download pdf


    The Indonesian Solidarity Party is shaping up as a key component of President Jokowi’s strategy to retain his political influence after he steps down in 2024. JEFFERSON NG analyses the president’s end game and the likely PDIP response.

       

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    The Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) is a small political party that recently made headlines as a result of the appointment of incumbent President Jokowi’s youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, as the new party chairman, barely two days after he had joined the party. It currently does not have seats in the national parliament as it failed to cross the 4% vote threshold in the 2019 parliamentary elections.

    However, PSI has become a significant political player at the regional level, with its MPs present in many major cities in Indonesia. The party has also developed a reputation for its stringent anti-corruption and anti-intolerance stance, as well as high quality constituency work.

    Under Kaesang’s leadership, the party is expected to draw significant support from Jokowi volunteer groups and make a push to enter the national parliament during the 2024 legislative elections. Given the party’s special relationship with Jokowi and with his son now helming it, PSI is well-placed to influence the trajectory of the national legislative elections and the post-Jokowi political settlement.

    IP23076
    During his first speech as Chairman of the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI), Jokowi’s youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, called for the PSI to embrace a style of politics that is more polite (santun) and relaxed (santuy), in marked contrast to its previous confrontational approach with other political parties. Image from author.

    PSI’s Origins and Development

     PSI was formed in late 2014 by a group of Jokowi supporters and volunteers. They include former journalist and pollster Grace Natalie, former model and journalist Isyana Bagoes Oka, current vice-minister for Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Raja Juli Antoni, and investor cum party funder Jeffrie Geovanie.

    Consciously styling itself as a youth/millennial party (partai anak muda), PSI successfully made inroads into the Jakarta regional legislature in 2019, with eight MPs performing best in urban areas with large numbers of educated, middle-class youths who are frequent social media users.

    The party has pioneered various initiatives that have been broadly popular. These include recruitment of the party’s legislative candidates through a public debate and panel review process, rejecting potential candidates convicted of corruption, hiring professional and full-time party employees, encouraging greater transparency in the budget process, and promoting the interests of vulnerable groups, such as the disabled community and victims of sexual assault.

    Yet, as a small party in Indonesia seeking to swim against the political current, PSI in late 2022 and early 2023 faced a significant exodus of members who were pessimistic about the party’s future prospects. Finding a political patron who is able to protect it from attacks by other political parties was key. This imperative has influenced the party’s special relationship with Jokowi.

    PSI’s Relationship with Jokowi

    PSI’s close relationship with Jokowi is borne out of mutual admiration and necessity. The party’s semi-official ideology is “Jokowism”, which seeks to realise Jokowi’s dream of making Indonesia a developed country by 2045 and calls for leaders to be close to the people and to actively serve the public interest. At the same time, the PSI national leadership calculated that latching on to Jokowi (through Kaesang) presents them with their best shot of entering national politics.

    PSI’s need for political protection from a powerful politician is best exemplified by the fact that it nearly failed the party verification exercise required by the Election Commission to contest in the 2024 election. At one point, many of PSI’s regional offices in Central Java failed the verification exercise because some of the regional Election Commission offices were staffed by political party members hostile to PSI. It was only through high-level political intervention that PSI was able to clear these administrative obstacles.

    On the other side of things, Jokowi has praised PSI for being a political “unicorn” that disrupted Indonesian politics and upended the old ways of doing things. Indirectly supporting PSI benefits Jokowi because after he steps down from power, he will be an ordinary cadre of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) without influence in the party. In that regard, with so many PSI members being Jokowi fans, PSI offers a readymade vehicle for Jokowi to influence the political scene post 2024.

    PSI’s Electoral Impact

    Based on PSI’s anti-corruption and anti-intolerance electoral platform, the party is a good ideological fit for many educated and urban middle-class young voters across Indonesia, especially in major cities. At the same time, PSI is expected to pull support from PDIP voters who are disappointed with its performance in government (especially on the issue of corruption) and would prefer a political alternative to PDIP matriarch Megawati Sukarnoputri.

    As a significant number of PDIP voters come from minority groups (Chinese, Christian, Hindu, etc) that have traditionally voted for PDIP’s inclusive nationalist platform, PSI provides an alternative for such groups and centrist voters who are disappointed with PDIP but still want to see a more religiously inclusive Indonesia. Finally, the appointment of Kaesang as chairman is likely to have a demonstrable electoral impact. A recent survey simulation showed that the proportion of PSI voters increased from 1.1% to 3.5% when Kaesang was mentioned as the PSI chairman.

    If PSI is able to cross the threshold, it is then likely to pare down PDIP’s current dominance in the national parliament. This prospect explains why the Gerindra party (the second largest Indonesian party) has been very friendly towards and welcoming of PSI.

    Jokowi’s End Game and his Relationship with PDIP

    Jokowi’s recent political manoeuvres to place his family members in key political positions look unfriendly, if not hostile, to PDIP’s interests. Kaesang’s leadership of PSI has led a flood of Jokowi volunteers (many of whom are PDIP voters) to join the party – some 13,000 new members joined the party in the one week following Kaesang’s assumption of the chairmanship. The largest Jokowi volunteer group ProJo and PSI have now declared their support for the presidency of Prabowo Subianto. This means that the bulk of Jokowi volunteers have joined Prabowo’s camp.

    At the same time, Jokowi’s eldest son, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, is now Prabowo’s vice-presidential candidate and is expected to be parachuted into the Golkar party’s leadership board. This turn of events has upended PDIP’s hopes that Jokowi, as a PDIP cadre, will at least stay neutral between the competing candidates or ideally endorse the candidacy of the PDIP’s Ganjar Pranowo. Instead, Jokowi will support Prabowo through proxies, avoiding an explicit endorsement or burning bridges with the PDIP.\

    Jokowi’s indirect endorsement of Prabowo puts Ganjar and PDIP in a deeply awkward position. Ganjar has long referred to Jokowi as a mentor and wants to position himself as Jokowi’s successor. However, the deepening rift between PDIP and Jokowi has torpedoed those hopes. PDIP’s appointment of Mahfud MD as Ganjar’s running mate without consulting with Jokowi indicates that the party has confidence in its internal party machinery and that it is moving decisively towards a post-Jokowi era.

    Thus far, PDIP seems content to carry on the charade that all is well between itself and the president, and that it is focused on Ganjar’s campaign. However, it is clear that with Jokowi’s support thrown behind Prabowo, PDIP will face an uphill struggle. The party will need to run a politically savvy campaign that takes advantage of its internal cohesion and discipline to win against the far better resourced but also unwieldy coalition supporting Prabowo.

     

     

    Jefferson NG is an Associate Research Fellow with the Indonesia Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General / Southeast Asia and ASEAN


    The Indonesian Solidarity Party is shaping up as a key component of President Jokowi’s strategy to retain his political influence after he steps down in 2024. JEFFERSON NG analyses the president’s end game and the likely PDIP response.

       

     

     

    COMMENTARY

    The Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) is a small political party that recently made headlines as a result of the appointment of incumbent President Jokowi’s youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, as the new party chairman, barely two days after he had joined the party. It currently does not have seats in the national parliament as it failed to cross the 4% vote threshold in the 2019 parliamentary elections.

    However, PSI has become a significant political player at the regional level, with its MPs present in many major cities in Indonesia. The party has also developed a reputation for its stringent anti-corruption and anti-intolerance stance, as well as high quality constituency work.

    Under Kaesang’s leadership, the party is expected to draw significant support from Jokowi volunteer groups and make a push to enter the national parliament during the 2024 legislative elections. Given the party’s special relationship with Jokowi and with his son now helming it, PSI is well-placed to influence the trajectory of the national legislative elections and the post-Jokowi political settlement.

    IP23076
    During his first speech as Chairman of the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI), Jokowi’s youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, called for the PSI to embrace a style of politics that is more polite (santun) and relaxed (santuy), in marked contrast to its previous confrontational approach with other political parties. Image from author.

    PSI’s Origins and Development

     PSI was formed in late 2014 by a group of Jokowi supporters and volunteers. They include former journalist and pollster Grace Natalie, former model and journalist Isyana Bagoes Oka, current vice-minister for Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Raja Juli Antoni, and investor cum party funder Jeffrie Geovanie.

    Consciously styling itself as a youth/millennial party (partai anak muda), PSI successfully made inroads into the Jakarta regional legislature in 2019, with eight MPs performing best in urban areas with large numbers of educated, middle-class youths who are frequent social media users.

    The party has pioneered various initiatives that have been broadly popular. These include recruitment of the party’s legislative candidates through a public debate and panel review process, rejecting potential candidates convicted of corruption, hiring professional and full-time party employees, encouraging greater transparency in the budget process, and promoting the interests of vulnerable groups, such as the disabled community and victims of sexual assault.

    Yet, as a small party in Indonesia seeking to swim against the political current, PSI in late 2022 and early 2023 faced a significant exodus of members who were pessimistic about the party’s future prospects. Finding a political patron who is able to protect it from attacks by other political parties was key. This imperative has influenced the party’s special relationship with Jokowi.

    PSI’s Relationship with Jokowi

    PSI’s close relationship with Jokowi is borne out of mutual admiration and necessity. The party’s semi-official ideology is “Jokowism”, which seeks to realise Jokowi’s dream of making Indonesia a developed country by 2045 and calls for leaders to be close to the people and to actively serve the public interest. At the same time, the PSI national leadership calculated that latching on to Jokowi (through Kaesang) presents them with their best shot of entering national politics.

    PSI’s need for political protection from a powerful politician is best exemplified by the fact that it nearly failed the party verification exercise required by the Election Commission to contest in the 2024 election. At one point, many of PSI’s regional offices in Central Java failed the verification exercise because some of the regional Election Commission offices were staffed by political party members hostile to PSI. It was only through high-level political intervention that PSI was able to clear these administrative obstacles.

    On the other side of things, Jokowi has praised PSI for being a political “unicorn” that disrupted Indonesian politics and upended the old ways of doing things. Indirectly supporting PSI benefits Jokowi because after he steps down from power, he will be an ordinary cadre of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) without influence in the party. In that regard, with so many PSI members being Jokowi fans, PSI offers a readymade vehicle for Jokowi to influence the political scene post 2024.

    PSI’s Electoral Impact

    Based on PSI’s anti-corruption and anti-intolerance electoral platform, the party is a good ideological fit for many educated and urban middle-class young voters across Indonesia, especially in major cities. At the same time, PSI is expected to pull support from PDIP voters who are disappointed with its performance in government (especially on the issue of corruption) and would prefer a political alternative to PDIP matriarch Megawati Sukarnoputri.

    As a significant number of PDIP voters come from minority groups (Chinese, Christian, Hindu, etc) that have traditionally voted for PDIP’s inclusive nationalist platform, PSI provides an alternative for such groups and centrist voters who are disappointed with PDIP but still want to see a more religiously inclusive Indonesia. Finally, the appointment of Kaesang as chairman is likely to have a demonstrable electoral impact. A recent survey simulation showed that the proportion of PSI voters increased from 1.1% to 3.5% when Kaesang was mentioned as the PSI chairman.

    If PSI is able to cross the threshold, it is then likely to pare down PDIP’s current dominance in the national parliament. This prospect explains why the Gerindra party (the second largest Indonesian party) has been very friendly towards and welcoming of PSI.

    Jokowi’s End Game and his Relationship with PDIP

    Jokowi’s recent political manoeuvres to place his family members in key political positions look unfriendly, if not hostile, to PDIP’s interests. Kaesang’s leadership of PSI has led a flood of Jokowi volunteers (many of whom are PDIP voters) to join the party – some 13,000 new members joined the party in the one week following Kaesang’s assumption of the chairmanship. The largest Jokowi volunteer group ProJo and PSI have now declared their support for the presidency of Prabowo Subianto. This means that the bulk of Jokowi volunteers have joined Prabowo’s camp.

    At the same time, Jokowi’s eldest son, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, is now Prabowo’s vice-presidential candidate and is expected to be parachuted into the Golkar party’s leadership board. This turn of events has upended PDIP’s hopes that Jokowi, as a PDIP cadre, will at least stay neutral between the competing candidates or ideally endorse the candidacy of the PDIP’s Ganjar Pranowo. Instead, Jokowi will support Prabowo through proxies, avoiding an explicit endorsement or burning bridges with the PDIP.\

    Jokowi’s indirect endorsement of Prabowo puts Ganjar and PDIP in a deeply awkward position. Ganjar has long referred to Jokowi as a mentor and wants to position himself as Jokowi’s successor. However, the deepening rift between PDIP and Jokowi has torpedoed those hopes. PDIP’s appointment of Mahfud MD as Ganjar’s running mate without consulting with Jokowi indicates that the party has confidence in its internal party machinery and that it is moving decisively towards a post-Jokowi era.

    Thus far, PDIP seems content to carry on the charade that all is well between itself and the president, and that it is focused on Ganjar’s campaign. However, it is clear that with Jokowi’s support thrown behind Prabowo, PDIP will face an uphill struggle. The party will need to run a politically savvy campaign that takes advantage of its internal cohesion and discipline to win against the far better resourced but also unwieldy coalition supporting Prabowo.

     

     

    Jefferson NG is an Associate Research Fellow with the Indonesia Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).

    Categories: IDSS Papers / General

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info