Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Public Education
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      Public EducationAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • Singapore’s Total Defence: Overcoming Complacency
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO19062 | Singapore’s Total Defence: Overcoming Complacency
Neo Loo Seng

02 April 2019

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

The absence of terror attacks in Singapore has led many Singaporeans to become complacent about the threat landscape. This could in turn, undermine national crisis preparedness. How can Singaporeans avoid this complacency mindset?

COMMENTARY

THE FREQUENCY of terrorist attacks may have decreased in the region, but the periodic occurrence of new attacks such as the Jolo Cathedral bombings in the Philippines, the Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand, and the persistent spread of radical online propaganda, serve as a grim reminder: the threat from terrorism has not disappeared. The recent arrests of two Singaporeans in January 2019 under the Internal Security Act (ISA) further attest to the threat of terrorism to Singapore.

The detection and disruption of these threats by local security agencies can be attributed to the prevailing security approach as well as assistance from the community at large. Recognising that active community involvement is vital in responding to the terrorist threat, a spate of initiatives has also been rolled out by the Singapore Government to sensitise, train, and mobilise Singaporeans to deal with terror attacks and their aftermath. However, according to the Ministry of Home Affair’s 2019 Threat Assessment Report, a survey conducted in 2018 revealed that “fewer Singaporeans saw the threat [from terrorism] as imminent, even though more recognise[d] Singapore as a target for terrorists”.

Understand the ‘Human’ Dimension: Complacency

This mindset is problematic as it adversely affects Singapore’s ‘Psychological Defence’ by lulling the community at large into a false sense of security. As Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam shared, “… given that we are and have been a very safe place, the first and most difficult task is getting people to understand that this is real and this is serious”.

If left unaddressed, this complacency can undermine Singapore’s Total Defence and in particular her national crisis preparedness efforts. The complacent mindset arises from human beings’ cognitive biases that serve as mental shortcuts to help people make sense of their surroundings, and make faster decisions in their lives. In the context of terrorism, for example, the absence of attacks in Singapore has been interpreted that Singapore will not be targeted by terrorists.

This perception may lead many to dismiss the slew of security-related messaging from the government as irrelevant. Some may even feel overwhelmed by existing announcements and initiatives, which not only result in messaging fatigue but also impair their ability to learn, actively engage in preparedness efforts, as well as be adequately prepared.

Complacency may also arise from the view that many believe the role of securing Singapore is primarily the job of the government. While the government has taken necessary measures and precautions to mitigate the threat of terrorism, it is important to be cognisant that there are no foolproof approaches that can insulate any country completely from the threat today. This seeming over-reliance on the government therefore raises concerns of unrealistic expectations and dependency.

Overcoming Complacency through Virtual Reality

The inherent complacency suggests that efforts to raise awareness of ‘good preparatory practices’ through education might not be persuasive to individuals who see no value in doing so. Nor would scholastic arguments alone do the job.

Rather, overcoming complacency involves creating a realistic representation of the physical and psychological sensations associated with an attack. Currently, simulated terror attacks organised by the government at the community level, such as Exercise Northstar, seek to physically reproduce actual attack scenarios to help familiarise Singaporeans on what to do in the event of an attack.

The participants’ experience can be further enhanced by actually immersing them in the ‘real’ conditions of an attack. At present, they are merely playing the role of ‘spectators’ without any real or relatable means of experiencing how an attack may unfold and the resulting devastation.

It is suggested that Virtual Reality (VR) technology can be deployed for this purpose. VR simulations basically imbue users with a sense of presence by allowing them to experience a virtual representation, where they can receive instantaneous feedback on the sensations and emotions induced by the phenomenon.

Run, Hide, Tell

For example, VR simulations can be used during training to expose the participants to a realistic situation that they may potentially face during an actual attack. In fact, studies have shown that people generally benefited more from training simulations that are realistic.

VR simulations therefore serve as an opportunity for participants to understand the rationale behind government advisories such as ‘run, hide, tell’. More importantly, this approach has the potential to get ‘buy-in’ and encourage cooperation from the community in the event of an attack as they would be more aware of why and what they should do in such situations.

That said, it is important to recognise that such simulation trainings may induce trauma for the participants. There is therefore the need to strike a balance between the realism of the attack with the potential harm that the participants may be exposed to.

What does all this mean for the future? Put simply, it is difficult to say for certain how Singaporeans will react to an attack, particularly when we have not exactly experienced one yet. The proposed use of VR simulations can help overcome this issue and help Singaporeans better appreciate the rationale of getting prepared for an attack. This can increase the resilience of the country as there will be a greater pool of people who are mentally prepared and contribute to national crisis preparedness efforts.

About the Author

Neo Loo Seng is a Visiting Associate with the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is also a PhD Candidate at NTU’s School of Social Sciences (SSS).

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
comments powered by Disqus

SYNOPSIS

The absence of terror attacks in Singapore has led many Singaporeans to become complacent about the threat landscape. This could in turn, undermine national crisis preparedness. How can Singaporeans avoid this complacency mindset?

COMMENTARY

THE FREQUENCY of terrorist attacks may have decreased in the region, but the periodic occurrence of new attacks such as the Jolo Cathedral bombings in the Philippines, the Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand, and the persistent spread of radical online propaganda, serve as a grim reminder: the threat from terrorism has not disappeared. The recent arrests of two Singaporeans in January 2019 under the Internal Security Act (ISA) further attest to the threat of terrorism to Singapore.

The detection and disruption of these threats by local security agencies can be attributed to the prevailing security approach as well as assistance from the community at large. Recognising that active community involvement is vital in responding to the terrorist threat, a spate of initiatives has also been rolled out by the Singapore Government to sensitise, train, and mobilise Singaporeans to deal with terror attacks and their aftermath. However, according to the Ministry of Home Affair’s 2019 Threat Assessment Report, a survey conducted in 2018 revealed that “fewer Singaporeans saw the threat [from terrorism] as imminent, even though more recognise[d] Singapore as a target for terrorists”.

Understand the ‘Human’ Dimension: Complacency

This mindset is problematic as it adversely affects Singapore’s ‘Psychological Defence’ by lulling the community at large into a false sense of security. As Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam shared, “… given that we are and have been a very safe place, the first and most difficult task is getting people to understand that this is real and this is serious”.

If left unaddressed, this complacency can undermine Singapore’s Total Defence and in particular her national crisis preparedness efforts. The complacent mindset arises from human beings’ cognitive biases that serve as mental shortcuts to help people make sense of their surroundings, and make faster decisions in their lives. In the context of terrorism, for example, the absence of attacks in Singapore has been interpreted that Singapore will not be targeted by terrorists.

This perception may lead many to dismiss the slew of security-related messaging from the government as irrelevant. Some may even feel overwhelmed by existing announcements and initiatives, which not only result in messaging fatigue but also impair their ability to learn, actively engage in preparedness efforts, as well as be adequately prepared.

Complacency may also arise from the view that many believe the role of securing Singapore is primarily the job of the government. While the government has taken necessary measures and precautions to mitigate the threat of terrorism, it is important to be cognisant that there are no foolproof approaches that can insulate any country completely from the threat today. This seeming over-reliance on the government therefore raises concerns of unrealistic expectations and dependency.

Overcoming Complacency through Virtual Reality

The inherent complacency suggests that efforts to raise awareness of ‘good preparatory practices’ through education might not be persuasive to individuals who see no value in doing so. Nor would scholastic arguments alone do the job.

Rather, overcoming complacency involves creating a realistic representation of the physical and psychological sensations associated with an attack. Currently, simulated terror attacks organised by the government at the community level, such as Exercise Northstar, seek to physically reproduce actual attack scenarios to help familiarise Singaporeans on what to do in the event of an attack.

The participants’ experience can be further enhanced by actually immersing them in the ‘real’ conditions of an attack. At present, they are merely playing the role of ‘spectators’ without any real or relatable means of experiencing how an attack may unfold and the resulting devastation.

It is suggested that Virtual Reality (VR) technology can be deployed for this purpose. VR simulations basically imbue users with a sense of presence by allowing them to experience a virtual representation, where they can receive instantaneous feedback on the sensations and emotions induced by the phenomenon.

Run, Hide, Tell

For example, VR simulations can be used during training to expose the participants to a realistic situation that they may potentially face during an actual attack. In fact, studies have shown that people generally benefited more from training simulations that are realistic.

VR simulations therefore serve as an opportunity for participants to understand the rationale behind government advisories such as ‘run, hide, tell’. More importantly, this approach has the potential to get ‘buy-in’ and encourage cooperation from the community in the event of an attack as they would be more aware of why and what they should do in such situations.

That said, it is important to recognise that such simulation trainings may induce trauma for the participants. There is therefore the need to strike a balance between the realism of the attack with the potential harm that the participants may be exposed to.

What does all this mean for the future? Put simply, it is difficult to say for certain how Singaporeans will react to an attack, particularly when we have not exactly experienced one yet. The proposed use of VR simulations can help overcome this issue and help Singaporeans better appreciate the rationale of getting prepared for an attack. This can increase the resilience of the country as there will be a greater pool of people who are mentally prepared and contribute to national crisis preparedness efforts.

About the Author

Neo Loo Seng is a Visiting Associate with the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is also a PhD Candidate at NTU’s School of Social Sciences (SSS).

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info