Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO08025 | Politics, Pluralism And The Polls: A Changing Scenario?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO08025 | Politics, Pluralism And The Polls: A Changing Scenario?
    Yang Razali Kassim

    03 March 2008

    download pdf

    Commentary

    The March 8 general election in Malaysia is significant in many ways. It is also about an old rivalry between Abdullah Badawi and Anwar Ibrahim and what they represent. Both have much at stake. Abdullah will succeed if Anwar fails to deny the ruling coalition a two-thirds majority. If Anwar succeeds, it could start a new approach to managing race and religion.

    MALAYSIA’s coming general election will either lead to more of the same in politics. Or it may set in motion some long-term changes in the approach to race, religion and the whole question of how to run an ethnically and religiously diverse society.

    While the significance of Pilihan Raya Umum, or General Election 2008, can be read in many ways, one less obvious dimension is the old rivalry between two key personalities – Abdullah Badawi and Anwar Ibrahim – and what they respectively represent.

    Abdullah and Anwar: Contending approaches

    At the core, both leaders embody the politics of moderation in a plural society; they draw from the same wellspring of centrist Islamic values of wasata or wasatiyah which upholds the “middle way” principles of Islam. Wasata is accommodationist, universalist and humanistic in essence which accords respect for all regardless of race or creed.

    Prime Minister Abdullah is defending the status quo in the politics of moderation, which is now under stress. Anwar, informal leader of the opposition, promises a new approach to the same thing — but through the opposition route. He seeks to build a viable alternative to the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) by reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable pillars of the Malaysian opposition spectrum — one Islamist and Malay-based (Parti Islam Se-Malaysia or PAS) and the other secularist and Chinese- based (Democratic Action Party or DAP).

    Abdullah is also defending his reputation. This general election may confirm criticism that he is at best a one-term prime minister. Or it may prove that he is capable of surprises — and therefore long-term leadership — in the same way the 2004 elections he won for BN stumped many with its unprecedented

    victory.

    For Anwar, 2008 may prematurely end his future as a political leader, even before he can make a formal return. Or it will point to what he claims is a new dawn for him — and for Malaysian politics. For decades, Abdullah and Anwar have had a cool relationship, despite both coming from the same state of Penang, and both originating from the same wellspring of wasata values, which moulded their original image as Islamic leaders.

    New Cosmic Battle

    For Anwar, this general election is the beginning of a new cosmic battle to re-make Malaysian politics – ironically not unlike the one in the 1950s when the founder of UMNO, Onn Jaafar, tried but failed miserably. Anwar’s battle begins with his own re-invention as a political leader, and with the tough but necessary struggle to revive the shaky opposition coalition called the Barisan Alternatif (BA).

    Notice two things: First, Anwar’s metamorphosis from an Islamic leader and then Malay nationalist into a universalist all-embracing politician claiming to represent all groups. Second, the creeping compromises made by the erstwhile ideological nemesis, the DAP and PAS. It is a mistake to dismiss these less-than-subtle changes as political gimmickry.

    Despite all the talk about Anwar eventually returning to UMNO, the mutual rejection between him and his former party means there is no other way to become prime minister except the alternative route. Elections 2008 is but only his first step. It is part of a series of elections that he must fight, and win, if he is to return to power – which is an uphill task, if at all possible.

    So what will make a successful general election for the two old nemesis? For Abdullah, he may lose many seats, but success will be redeeming enough if he captures Kelantan – the only state still in opposition hands. Or if he snatches away Permatang Pauh, Anwar’s long-standing – and his party’s sole — parliamentary seat now defended by his wife. The fall of Permatang Pauh in Penang could deal a symbolic, even severe blow to Anwar’s political comeback.

    A “semi-1969” scenario?

    For Anwar, success is to secure anything between 35-40 seats – or about half the 75 seats that will deny the Abdullah-led BN a two-thirds majority.

    Officially, the opposition says it wants to repeat 1999 when it pulled the best showing in the wake of Anwar’s sacking in 1998. The now re-energised opposition is again talking about denying the BN a two-thirds majority. This is a pipedream because the BN is too entrenched to take this lying down. Even in the best of years in 1999, the opposition failed to deny the BN that control. I suspect the real opposition target this time is to capture half of that decisive number for 2008 – or 37 seats.

    This will be enough to create a psychological threshold, which could then trigger a “1969 scenario” in which major policies are eventually reviewed. In 1969, the Opposition successfully denied the ruling Alliance its two-thirds majority, leading to major policy shifts such as the creation of the larger BN coalition, and the introduction of the New Economic Policy and the nation-building principles of Rukunegara.

    A 2008 general election in which the opposition wins half its target of denying the BN its two-thirds majority, yet triggering a longer-term change of policies or realignment of politics is what I call the “semi-1969 scenario”.

    In 2004, when the BN under Abdullah pulled its best showing, the opposition won 20 seats. So in 2008, the opposition needs to win between 17 to 20 more seats to secure that psychological breakthrough. This is not too far-fetched a goal given the current anti-government mood amongst the all the major communities – Chinese and Indians, even the Malays. I would regard as an opposition failure if it cannot win 30 parliamentary seats – or 10 more than in 2004.

    New formula under severe test

    A psychological victory will embolden the opposition for a stronger showing at the next general election five years from now. By then, Anwar will become a bigger threat to the BN as a formal opposition leader. Even PAS, increasingly entering what some call the “post-Islamist” phase, has become more realistic and accepting of political cooperation with both the Chinese-led DAP and the Malay-led People’s Justice Party (PKR), Anwar’s own party.

    Most critical now is Anwar’s attempt at non-communal politics. This has never been tried before by any Malay leader since the disastrous experiment by Onn Jaafar to open up UMNO to all races 50 years ago. Going by history, Anwar’s challenge is humongous. But if the BA under him makes inroads, performs better than in 2004 and sustains it for the next two elections, it will sow the seeds for the emergence of a viable two-coalition system and realign the system.

    There is one big difference this time. The Anwar-led opposition coalition is pushing for a “new” approach to politics that is not fixated with the goal of an Islamic state, or the supremacy of Malay rights, while offering to embrace all the minorities, yet will need a “middle way” Malay/Muslim leadership to be viable. It is a new formula that is being floated, and will now be severely tested.

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is a Senior Fellow with the S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is the author of Transition Politics in Southeast Asia: Leadership Change and Succession in Indonesia and Malaysia. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Commentary

    The March 8 general election in Malaysia is significant in many ways. It is also about an old rivalry between Abdullah Badawi and Anwar Ibrahim and what they represent. Both have much at stake. Abdullah will succeed if Anwar fails to deny the ruling coalition a two-thirds majority. If Anwar succeeds, it could start a new approach to managing race and religion.

    MALAYSIA’s coming general election will either lead to more of the same in politics. Or it may set in motion some long-term changes in the approach to race, religion and the whole question of how to run an ethnically and religiously diverse society.

    While the significance of Pilihan Raya Umum, or General Election 2008, can be read in many ways, one less obvious dimension is the old rivalry between two key personalities – Abdullah Badawi and Anwar Ibrahim – and what they respectively represent.

    Abdullah and Anwar: Contending approaches

    At the core, both leaders embody the politics of moderation in a plural society; they draw from the same wellspring of centrist Islamic values of wasata or wasatiyah which upholds the “middle way” principles of Islam. Wasata is accommodationist, universalist and humanistic in essence which accords respect for all regardless of race or creed.

    Prime Minister Abdullah is defending the status quo in the politics of moderation, which is now under stress. Anwar, informal leader of the opposition, promises a new approach to the same thing — but through the opposition route. He seeks to build a viable alternative to the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) by reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable pillars of the Malaysian opposition spectrum — one Islamist and Malay-based (Parti Islam Se-Malaysia or PAS) and the other secularist and Chinese- based (Democratic Action Party or DAP).

    Abdullah is also defending his reputation. This general election may confirm criticism that he is at best a one-term prime minister. Or it may prove that he is capable of surprises — and therefore long-term leadership — in the same way the 2004 elections he won for BN stumped many with its unprecedented

    victory.

    For Anwar, 2008 may prematurely end his future as a political leader, even before he can make a formal return. Or it will point to what he claims is a new dawn for him — and for Malaysian politics. For decades, Abdullah and Anwar have had a cool relationship, despite both coming from the same state of Penang, and both originating from the same wellspring of wasata values, which moulded their original image as Islamic leaders.

    New Cosmic Battle

    For Anwar, this general election is the beginning of a new cosmic battle to re-make Malaysian politics – ironically not unlike the one in the 1950s when the founder of UMNO, Onn Jaafar, tried but failed miserably. Anwar’s battle begins with his own re-invention as a political leader, and with the tough but necessary struggle to revive the shaky opposition coalition called the Barisan Alternatif (BA).

    Notice two things: First, Anwar’s metamorphosis from an Islamic leader and then Malay nationalist into a universalist all-embracing politician claiming to represent all groups. Second, the creeping compromises made by the erstwhile ideological nemesis, the DAP and PAS. It is a mistake to dismiss these less-than-subtle changes as political gimmickry.

    Despite all the talk about Anwar eventually returning to UMNO, the mutual rejection between him and his former party means there is no other way to become prime minister except the alternative route. Elections 2008 is but only his first step. It is part of a series of elections that he must fight, and win, if he is to return to power – which is an uphill task, if at all possible.

    So what will make a successful general election for the two old nemesis? For Abdullah, he may lose many seats, but success will be redeeming enough if he captures Kelantan – the only state still in opposition hands. Or if he snatches away Permatang Pauh, Anwar’s long-standing – and his party’s sole — parliamentary seat now defended by his wife. The fall of Permatang Pauh in Penang could deal a symbolic, even severe blow to Anwar’s political comeback.

    A “semi-1969” scenario?

    For Anwar, success is to secure anything between 35-40 seats – or about half the 75 seats that will deny the Abdullah-led BN a two-thirds majority.

    Officially, the opposition says it wants to repeat 1999 when it pulled the best showing in the wake of Anwar’s sacking in 1998. The now re-energised opposition is again talking about denying the BN a two-thirds majority. This is a pipedream because the BN is too entrenched to take this lying down. Even in the best of years in 1999, the opposition failed to deny the BN that control. I suspect the real opposition target this time is to capture half of that decisive number for 2008 – or 37 seats.

    This will be enough to create a psychological threshold, which could then trigger a “1969 scenario” in which major policies are eventually reviewed. In 1969, the Opposition successfully denied the ruling Alliance its two-thirds majority, leading to major policy shifts such as the creation of the larger BN coalition, and the introduction of the New Economic Policy and the nation-building principles of Rukunegara.

    A 2008 general election in which the opposition wins half its target of denying the BN its two-thirds majority, yet triggering a longer-term change of policies or realignment of politics is what I call the “semi-1969 scenario”.

    In 2004, when the BN under Abdullah pulled its best showing, the opposition won 20 seats. So in 2008, the opposition needs to win between 17 to 20 more seats to secure that psychological breakthrough. This is not too far-fetched a goal given the current anti-government mood amongst the all the major communities – Chinese and Indians, even the Malays. I would regard as an opposition failure if it cannot win 30 parliamentary seats – or 10 more than in 2004.

    New formula under severe test

    A psychological victory will embolden the opposition for a stronger showing at the next general election five years from now. By then, Anwar will become a bigger threat to the BN as a formal opposition leader. Even PAS, increasingly entering what some call the “post-Islamist” phase, has become more realistic and accepting of political cooperation with both the Chinese-led DAP and the Malay-led People’s Justice Party (PKR), Anwar’s own party.

    Most critical now is Anwar’s attempt at non-communal politics. This has never been tried before by any Malay leader since the disastrous experiment by Onn Jaafar to open up UMNO to all races 50 years ago. Going by history, Anwar’s challenge is humongous. But if the BA under him makes inroads, performs better than in 2004 and sustains it for the next two elections, it will sow the seeds for the emergence of a viable two-coalition system and realign the system.

    There is one big difference this time. The Anwar-led opposition coalition is pushing for a “new” approach to politics that is not fixated with the goal of an Islamic state, or the supremacy of Malay rights, while offering to embrace all the minorities, yet will need a “middle way” Malay/Muslim leadership to be viable. It is a new formula that is being floated, and will now be severely tested.

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is a Senior Fellow with the S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is the author of Transition Politics in Southeast Asia: Leadership Change and Succession in Indonesia and Malaysia. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info