Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO08038 | Repositioning US Engagement in Southeast Asia: A Case for Non-traditional Security
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO08038 | Repositioning US Engagement in Southeast Asia: A Case for Non-traditional Security
    Mely Caballero-Anthony

    25 March 2008

    download pdf

    Commentary

    Southeast Asian officials and analysts have complained about the waning US interest in the region due to the US preference for a bilateral approach to Southeast Asia. This US approach is out of sync with the rapidly changing security environment of the region, which can be redressed by looking at non- traditional security threats.

    IN A RECENT speech delivered at Washington’s Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the new ASEAN Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan has called for more US engagement in the region. Dr. Surin remarked that while ASEAN was “the fulcrum of the power base in the region, the US was absent and absent conspicuously”. He argued that since the US is the only power in the region that could provide a sense of security and a sense of stability, “it needs to be present more and needs to be consistent”.

    The ASEAN Secretary-General has not been alone in expressing such sentiments. Many officials in the region and analysts have harped on and even lamented the waning US interest in the region, made more pronounced during the two-term administration of President George W. Bush’s and a foreign policy largely defined by unilateralism and preference for ‘coalitions of the willing’.

    The US preoccupation with the war in Iraq and the events in the Middle East have led to the downgrading of its level of representation at the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) meetings and the postponement of the commemorative US-ASEAN Summit that was supposed to have taken place in September 2007. At a time when ASEAN is reorganizing itself with the adoption of the ASEAN Charter, the conspicuous absences of the US are therefore seen as ‘missed opportunities’.

    Why the lack of US interest?

    The perfunctory commitment of the US has been partly explained by its impatience with so-called multilateral ‘talk fests’ that are seen to achieve few solid outcomes, coupled with the ‘end-of-cycle feeling to regional affairs’. Perceptions of declining US interest have stood in stark contrast to the active engagement of rising powers China and India in regional affairs. These in turn have fueled animated discourses on the emerging world order and possibility of a new ‘concert in Asia’.

    But while US interest in the region may be waning, its bilateral relations with some countries in the region have remained robust. What is often missed in the analysis of US-ASEAN relations is the latter’s preference to approach the region largely on bilateral terms, pursued in the context of Washington’s ‘hub-and-spokes’ strategy. Thus, the lack of interest goes deeper than Washington’s preoccupation with the Middle East. The difference in strategic culture between the US and Southeast Asia cannot be ignored.

    Re-calibrating US-ASEAN Relations

    Many have argued that the US approach of hub and spokes has become increasingly out of sync with the security requirements of the region and no longer suited to meet the more complex security challenges posed by non-traditional security (NTS) issues like pandemics, climate change and transnational crimes. The transboundary nature of these threats has compelled states to re-examine the conventional approaches to security, and stress the merits of multilateral, cooperative approaches to effectively address new and complex problems.

    Hence, Dr. Pitsuwan’s point about “more U.S. presence and consistency” reflects the region’s desire for deeper commitment to multilateralism instead of Washington’s predilection for ad hoc multilateralism. However, fundamental differences notwithstanding, finding spaces where there is convergence of interests to respond to a wide array of emerging security challenges remain possible. A place to start is the area of non-traditional security (NTS).

    Non-Traditional Security as the entry point

    The growing list of NTS challenges offers the entry point for recalibrating US-ASEAN relations. If fact, one can argue that this is the area where the US has already done some work. We note for example how the US came to the aid of the victims of the 2004 tsunami by providing the much needed logistical and financial support for disaster relief. We have also seen how the US has lent support to ASEAN’s efforts on pandemic preparedness. But more can certainly be done to enhance cooperation in this area if Washington’s policies and/or aid programmes are integrated with the wider multilateral efforts being undertaken within the ASEAN, ARF and the East Asia Summit (EAS) framework.

    It has been observed that most of US assistance appears to be conducted at the bilateral level, hence the impression that it is not doing enough. But while bilateral engagement is good and effective, it is equally important to weave these engagements into the open and inclusive multilateral settings that Southeast Asian countries are more comfortable with. The intention therefore is not to replace current arrangements but to build upon and complement.

    Make the US part of the global solution

    In the run-up to the next US presidential elections, candidates for presidential nomination like Hillary Clinton have declared that the next US president will have “to reintroduce America to the world and restore leadership”. Barack Obama speaks of “renewed”, “visionary” American leadership “grounded in the understanding that the world shares a common security and common humanity”, while John McCain calls for a leader who can “revitalize our country’s purpose and standing in the world.” Such themes are a welcome relief to a world that has become wary and weary of a ‘troubled hegemon’ with the predilection for going it alone and for military activism.

    Reclaiming that ‘lost’ global leadership status however comes with high expectations, not least from states in Southeast Asia. As with the rest of the world, Southeast Asia would want to see how the rhetoric of change will be translated into action by the new US administration. This is especially so in the way its foreign policy will take shape and the extent to which the country can lead in the promotion of global norms while tempering the tendency to be preachy and sovereignty-busting.

    As a preponderant power, the US needs to be part of the solution to many global challenges which are not limited only to the war against terrorism and proliferation. Climate change, energy security, pandemics—these are areas where the region, like the rest of the world, expects the US to lead. But, against America’s withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol and its reticence to commit to reducing its own carbon emissions—the new administration will be hard pressed to restore its credibility to lead the international community in seeking a global consensus around shared goals.

    In this regard, an interesting question is whether the United States will follow the example set by Australia of signing the Kyoto Protocol immediately after the new administration took office? This powerful symbolism was certainly not lost on the people in this region.

    Indeed, as pointed out in a recent policy brief issued by the US Stanley Foundation, the ultimate objective for revitalizing America’s cooperation internationally “is to have more of the world feel stronger kinship with the United States, in part through a more concerted effort toward increased prosperity and peace”. In this context, no better region finds convergence with the vision of common security and common humanity than Southeast Asia with its long standing practices of comprehensive and cooperative security, its emphasis on inclusiveness and its focus on human security.

    About the Author

    Mely Caballero-Anthony is Associate Professor at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), and Head of the soon to be launched RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security. She is the author of Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the Asean Way (2005) and co-editor of Non- Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation (2006). 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Commentary

    Southeast Asian officials and analysts have complained about the waning US interest in the region due to the US preference for a bilateral approach to Southeast Asia. This US approach is out of sync with the rapidly changing security environment of the region, which can be redressed by looking at non- traditional security threats.

    IN A RECENT speech delivered at Washington’s Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the new ASEAN Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan has called for more US engagement in the region. Dr. Surin remarked that while ASEAN was “the fulcrum of the power base in the region, the US was absent and absent conspicuously”. He argued that since the US is the only power in the region that could provide a sense of security and a sense of stability, “it needs to be present more and needs to be consistent”.

    The ASEAN Secretary-General has not been alone in expressing such sentiments. Many officials in the region and analysts have harped on and even lamented the waning US interest in the region, made more pronounced during the two-term administration of President George W. Bush’s and a foreign policy largely defined by unilateralism and preference for ‘coalitions of the willing’.

    The US preoccupation with the war in Iraq and the events in the Middle East have led to the downgrading of its level of representation at the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) meetings and the postponement of the commemorative US-ASEAN Summit that was supposed to have taken place in September 2007. At a time when ASEAN is reorganizing itself with the adoption of the ASEAN Charter, the conspicuous absences of the US are therefore seen as ‘missed opportunities’.

    Why the lack of US interest?

    The perfunctory commitment of the US has been partly explained by its impatience with so-called multilateral ‘talk fests’ that are seen to achieve few solid outcomes, coupled with the ‘end-of-cycle feeling to regional affairs’. Perceptions of declining US interest have stood in stark contrast to the active engagement of rising powers China and India in regional affairs. These in turn have fueled animated discourses on the emerging world order and possibility of a new ‘concert in Asia’.

    But while US interest in the region may be waning, its bilateral relations with some countries in the region have remained robust. What is often missed in the analysis of US-ASEAN relations is the latter’s preference to approach the region largely on bilateral terms, pursued in the context of Washington’s ‘hub-and-spokes’ strategy. Thus, the lack of interest goes deeper than Washington’s preoccupation with the Middle East. The difference in strategic culture between the US and Southeast Asia cannot be ignored.

    Re-calibrating US-ASEAN Relations

    Many have argued that the US approach of hub and spokes has become increasingly out of sync with the security requirements of the region and no longer suited to meet the more complex security challenges posed by non-traditional security (NTS) issues like pandemics, climate change and transnational crimes. The transboundary nature of these threats has compelled states to re-examine the conventional approaches to security, and stress the merits of multilateral, cooperative approaches to effectively address new and complex problems.

    Hence, Dr. Pitsuwan’s point about “more U.S. presence and consistency” reflects the region’s desire for deeper commitment to multilateralism instead of Washington’s predilection for ad hoc multilateralism. However, fundamental differences notwithstanding, finding spaces where there is convergence of interests to respond to a wide array of emerging security challenges remain possible. A place to start is the area of non-traditional security (NTS).

    Non-Traditional Security as the entry point

    The growing list of NTS challenges offers the entry point for recalibrating US-ASEAN relations. If fact, one can argue that this is the area where the US has already done some work. We note for example how the US came to the aid of the victims of the 2004 tsunami by providing the much needed logistical and financial support for disaster relief. We have also seen how the US has lent support to ASEAN’s efforts on pandemic preparedness. But more can certainly be done to enhance cooperation in this area if Washington’s policies and/or aid programmes are integrated with the wider multilateral efforts being undertaken within the ASEAN, ARF and the East Asia Summit (EAS) framework.

    It has been observed that most of US assistance appears to be conducted at the bilateral level, hence the impression that it is not doing enough. But while bilateral engagement is good and effective, it is equally important to weave these engagements into the open and inclusive multilateral settings that Southeast Asian countries are more comfortable with. The intention therefore is not to replace current arrangements but to build upon and complement.

    Make the US part of the global solution

    In the run-up to the next US presidential elections, candidates for presidential nomination like Hillary Clinton have declared that the next US president will have “to reintroduce America to the world and restore leadership”. Barack Obama speaks of “renewed”, “visionary” American leadership “grounded in the understanding that the world shares a common security and common humanity”, while John McCain calls for a leader who can “revitalize our country’s purpose and standing in the world.” Such themes are a welcome relief to a world that has become wary and weary of a ‘troubled hegemon’ with the predilection for going it alone and for military activism.

    Reclaiming that ‘lost’ global leadership status however comes with high expectations, not least from states in Southeast Asia. As with the rest of the world, Southeast Asia would want to see how the rhetoric of change will be translated into action by the new US administration. This is especially so in the way its foreign policy will take shape and the extent to which the country can lead in the promotion of global norms while tempering the tendency to be preachy and sovereignty-busting.

    As a preponderant power, the US needs to be part of the solution to many global challenges which are not limited only to the war against terrorism and proliferation. Climate change, energy security, pandemics—these are areas where the region, like the rest of the world, expects the US to lead. But, against America’s withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol and its reticence to commit to reducing its own carbon emissions—the new administration will be hard pressed to restore its credibility to lead the international community in seeking a global consensus around shared goals.

    In this regard, an interesting question is whether the United States will follow the example set by Australia of signing the Kyoto Protocol immediately after the new administration took office? This powerful symbolism was certainly not lost on the people in this region.

    Indeed, as pointed out in a recent policy brief issued by the US Stanley Foundation, the ultimate objective for revitalizing America’s cooperation internationally “is to have more of the world feel stronger kinship with the United States, in part through a more concerted effort toward increased prosperity and peace”. In this context, no better region finds convergence with the vision of common security and common humanity than Southeast Asia with its long standing practices of comprehensive and cooperative security, its emphasis on inclusiveness and its focus on human security.

    About the Author

    Mely Caballero-Anthony is Associate Professor at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), and Head of the soon to be launched RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security. She is the author of Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the Asean Way (2005) and co-editor of Non- Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation (2006). 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info