Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO08111 | RUSSIAN ARMS SALES: The Other Story behind Somalia’s Piracy
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO08111 | RUSSIAN ARMS SALES: The Other Story behind Somalia’s Piracy
    Collin Koh Swee Lean, Ron Matthews

    17 October 2008

    download pdf

    Commentary

    The piracy problem in Somali waters highlights the challenges and dilemmas facing Russia’s arms exporters despite phenomenal sales growth since 2000. A combination of factors, including fierce competition in the global defence market, may compel Russia to sell to less-demanding clients, shunned by Western defence contractors. This could potentially result in intensified geopolitical clashes between Russia and the West.

    THE RECENT capture by Somali pirates of a Ukrainian ship laden with Russian armaments highlights yet again the global reach of Russian arms exports. These arms, allegedly destined for Sudan, represent a microcosm of Russia’s recent billion dollar deals to nations as far-flung as Indonesia and Venezuela. In the latter case, Russia raised the ante by also sending warships and long-range bombers to conduct joint military manoeuvres. Russia’s expanded military and diplomatic influence, through the cultivation of arms sales, signals not only the rising competitiveness of Russian military kit but also perhaps the growth of global anti-US sentiment.

    Russian Arms Exports: Choppy Waters Ahead?

    Yet, but for substantial arms sales to China and India in the 1990s Russia’s military-industrial complex would not have survived. Vladimir Putin’s succession as the president of Russia marked an end to the chaos then afflicting Russia’s defence economy. Increased military appropriations afforded by huge energy revenues allowed new capital infusions into defence-related research and development. Also, a state decree which designated Rosoboronexport as the single arms trading authority helped reposition Russia in the global defence market.

    Since then, Russia has become the world’s second largest arms exporter after the United States, with earnings growth from US$3 billion at the close of the 20th century to around US$7 billion in 2007. This is a remarkable growth trend, given the competitive challenges Russia faces. However, whilst Rosoboronexport, as Russia’s arms exporting agency, aims to sell US$6.1-billion worth of military equipment in 2008, Moscow’s future arms exporting prospects look less than certain.

    Russia’s New Arms Export Reality

    Russia’s arms export successes since the late 1990s can be attributed mainly to sales of higher-end weapons. Having inherited substantial Cold War-era military hardware and industrial capacities within their territories, some of the former Soviet republics have become arms exporters in their own right, filling lower-end arms niches. Ukraine, for example, is ranked as the world’s tenth largest arms supplier, marketing weapons equivalent to, yet cheaper than, Russian kit.

    Poland and Ukraine have also been actively promoting indigenous derivatives of the Soviet-era T-72 main battle tank – 33 of which are embroiled in the piracy of the Ukrainian vessel MV Faina and its Africa-bound lethal cargo. Yet, whilst the arms on the MV Faina are definitely of Russian design, mystery continues to surround the origins of this vessel’s cargo and also its ultimate destination. Rumours have now surfaced that the shipment was handled by the Ukrainian arms exporter, Ukrspetsexport, and its destination was not Sudan, but another, as yet, unknown African country.

    Due to the increased competition that Russia increasingly faces in the global arms market, Rosoboronexport has become obliged to market the more sophisticated hardware in its stable, including advanced Sukhoi Su-27/30-series fighters, submarines, T-90 tanks and missile systems. Even in this high-end arena, Russia faces stiff competition from an emerging network of lower-order arms exporters. For instance, using original Russian technology, obtained through huge arms deals, China has been able to reverse-engineer hardware such as the J-11 fighter – widely seen as a cheaper carbon copy of the high-tech Su-27 – with huge potential sales to the developing world’s militaries.

    Similarly, the new Chinese PHL03 artillery rocket system bears striking resemblance to the Russian 9K58 ‘Smerch’. While most Chinese makes are essentially duplicates of Cold War Soviet weapons, such as the F-7 (MiG-21) fighter or the Type-59/69 tank (T-55), emerging Chinese copies of high-end Russian hardware can increasingly compete with the ‘originals’ in terms of price competitiveness. These newer models thus challenge Russia’s primacy in quality-price ratios, especially in the developing world’s arms markets.

    More attractive terms

    To effectively compete in the international arms bazaar, Russia not only has to churn out newer and more sophisticated military technologies but also has to offer more attractive terms, such as lower costs, and deal sweeteners, including credits and technology transfers. Sales of high-end equipment like Su-30 fighters and ‘Kilo’-class submarines have therefore created an export boom for Russia’s defence contractors, positioning them amongst the top echelon of global arms suppliers. Yet, surprisingly, Russian defence contractors are presently under enormous financial pressure. Notwithstanding the availability of funding underpinning state defence procurement, Russia’s generals have complained about slow delivery and low quality of supposedly sophisticated hardware.

    Foreign complaints have also surfaced. For instance, in May 2008 Algeria pointedly rejected further deliveries of the MiG-29 fighter – another high-end Russian export – because of its inferior build quality. These woes are caused by an aging military-industrial infrastructure, high overhead and raw material costs, and declining quality of manpower. In January this year, a senior Russian military- industrial official stated that 25% of the countries’ defence companies are on the brink of bankruptcy. Deterioration in product quality has begun to affect even the high-end hardware that Russia aggressively markets abroad. Previous restructuring, such as the ‘strategic’ amalgamation of aerospace and maritime firms into separate and consolidated unitary corporations, have failed to ease these problems; rather they have engendered opportunities for corruption and mismanagement of state funds.

    As the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) noted in March 2008, Russia’s defence-industrial decay combined with Moscow’s paranoia over potential technology leakage, is beginning to have an impact on established markets. China, for instance, has reduced imports of Russian arms by a gargantuan 62%, albeit over the limited period, 2006-2007. In the face of potentially shrinking import orders from traditional major markets and a threatened reduction in its share of the global arms trade, Russia has sought to peddle arms to new, and some times less demanding, clients.

    Such sales may be at the expense of contravening international norms and clashing with Western interests. Despite having ruled out unauthorized arms exports to conflict areas, Moscow can be tempted. An example of this is the alleged sale of MiG-29s – allegedly through Belarus – to Sudan; this carried with it the further unwanted controversy surrounding the reported death of a Russian MiG- 29 pilot during last May’s Darfur fighting.

    Emerging Dilemma for Russia’s Arms Exports

    Russia’s arms export prospects will be shaped by an emerging dilemma. On the one hand, Russia aspires to become the world’s top arms supplier, expanding its share of the market while retaining traditional large buyers such as China and India. On the other hand, in order to sell more arms in the highly competitive global defence market, Russia needs to push incentive deals, such as technology transfer, but with the caveat, of course, that such transfers may act to undermine national security.

    To circumvent this, and to cope with the real, or potential, threat of new-entry high-end arms sellers offering competitive contractual packages, Russia will be obliged to expand the geographical scope of its arms sales, as evident in Russia’s recent forays into Southeast Asia and Latin America. Yet, Moscow’s arms trade with such countries, especially those shunned by Western states, will likely be mired in controversy. Notwithstanding its record-breaking sales over recent years, the prospects for Russia’s arms exports are shrouded in uncertainty.

    About the Authors

    Collin Koh is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Ron Matthews is a Professor and British-trained defence economist and the Deputy Director of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies at RSIS. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Europe

    Commentary

    The piracy problem in Somali waters highlights the challenges and dilemmas facing Russia’s arms exporters despite phenomenal sales growth since 2000. A combination of factors, including fierce competition in the global defence market, may compel Russia to sell to less-demanding clients, shunned by Western defence contractors. This could potentially result in intensified geopolitical clashes between Russia and the West.

    THE RECENT capture by Somali pirates of a Ukrainian ship laden with Russian armaments highlights yet again the global reach of Russian arms exports. These arms, allegedly destined for Sudan, represent a microcosm of Russia’s recent billion dollar deals to nations as far-flung as Indonesia and Venezuela. In the latter case, Russia raised the ante by also sending warships and long-range bombers to conduct joint military manoeuvres. Russia’s expanded military and diplomatic influence, through the cultivation of arms sales, signals not only the rising competitiveness of Russian military kit but also perhaps the growth of global anti-US sentiment.

    Russian Arms Exports: Choppy Waters Ahead?

    Yet, but for substantial arms sales to China and India in the 1990s Russia’s military-industrial complex would not have survived. Vladimir Putin’s succession as the president of Russia marked an end to the chaos then afflicting Russia’s defence economy. Increased military appropriations afforded by huge energy revenues allowed new capital infusions into defence-related research and development. Also, a state decree which designated Rosoboronexport as the single arms trading authority helped reposition Russia in the global defence market.

    Since then, Russia has become the world’s second largest arms exporter after the United States, with earnings growth from US$3 billion at the close of the 20th century to around US$7 billion in 2007. This is a remarkable growth trend, given the competitive challenges Russia faces. However, whilst Rosoboronexport, as Russia’s arms exporting agency, aims to sell US$6.1-billion worth of military equipment in 2008, Moscow’s future arms exporting prospects look less than certain.

    Russia’s New Arms Export Reality

    Russia’s arms export successes since the late 1990s can be attributed mainly to sales of higher-end weapons. Having inherited substantial Cold War-era military hardware and industrial capacities within their territories, some of the former Soviet republics have become arms exporters in their own right, filling lower-end arms niches. Ukraine, for example, is ranked as the world’s tenth largest arms supplier, marketing weapons equivalent to, yet cheaper than, Russian kit.

    Poland and Ukraine have also been actively promoting indigenous derivatives of the Soviet-era T-72 main battle tank – 33 of which are embroiled in the piracy of the Ukrainian vessel MV Faina and its Africa-bound lethal cargo. Yet, whilst the arms on the MV Faina are definitely of Russian design, mystery continues to surround the origins of this vessel’s cargo and also its ultimate destination. Rumours have now surfaced that the shipment was handled by the Ukrainian arms exporter, Ukrspetsexport, and its destination was not Sudan, but another, as yet, unknown African country.

    Due to the increased competition that Russia increasingly faces in the global arms market, Rosoboronexport has become obliged to market the more sophisticated hardware in its stable, including advanced Sukhoi Su-27/30-series fighters, submarines, T-90 tanks and missile systems. Even in this high-end arena, Russia faces stiff competition from an emerging network of lower-order arms exporters. For instance, using original Russian technology, obtained through huge arms deals, China has been able to reverse-engineer hardware such as the J-11 fighter – widely seen as a cheaper carbon copy of the high-tech Su-27 – with huge potential sales to the developing world’s militaries.

    Similarly, the new Chinese PHL03 artillery rocket system bears striking resemblance to the Russian 9K58 ‘Smerch’. While most Chinese makes are essentially duplicates of Cold War Soviet weapons, such as the F-7 (MiG-21) fighter or the Type-59/69 tank (T-55), emerging Chinese copies of high-end Russian hardware can increasingly compete with the ‘originals’ in terms of price competitiveness. These newer models thus challenge Russia’s primacy in quality-price ratios, especially in the developing world’s arms markets.

    More attractive terms

    To effectively compete in the international arms bazaar, Russia not only has to churn out newer and more sophisticated military technologies but also has to offer more attractive terms, such as lower costs, and deal sweeteners, including credits and technology transfers. Sales of high-end equipment like Su-30 fighters and ‘Kilo’-class submarines have therefore created an export boom for Russia’s defence contractors, positioning them amongst the top echelon of global arms suppliers. Yet, surprisingly, Russian defence contractors are presently under enormous financial pressure. Notwithstanding the availability of funding underpinning state defence procurement, Russia’s generals have complained about slow delivery and low quality of supposedly sophisticated hardware.

    Foreign complaints have also surfaced. For instance, in May 2008 Algeria pointedly rejected further deliveries of the MiG-29 fighter – another high-end Russian export – because of its inferior build quality. These woes are caused by an aging military-industrial infrastructure, high overhead and raw material costs, and declining quality of manpower. In January this year, a senior Russian military- industrial official stated that 25% of the countries’ defence companies are on the brink of bankruptcy. Deterioration in product quality has begun to affect even the high-end hardware that Russia aggressively markets abroad. Previous restructuring, such as the ‘strategic’ amalgamation of aerospace and maritime firms into separate and consolidated unitary corporations, have failed to ease these problems; rather they have engendered opportunities for corruption and mismanagement of state funds.

    As the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) noted in March 2008, Russia’s defence-industrial decay combined with Moscow’s paranoia over potential technology leakage, is beginning to have an impact on established markets. China, for instance, has reduced imports of Russian arms by a gargantuan 62%, albeit over the limited period, 2006-2007. In the face of potentially shrinking import orders from traditional major markets and a threatened reduction in its share of the global arms trade, Russia has sought to peddle arms to new, and some times less demanding, clients.

    Such sales may be at the expense of contravening international norms and clashing with Western interests. Despite having ruled out unauthorized arms exports to conflict areas, Moscow can be tempted. An example of this is the alleged sale of MiG-29s – allegedly through Belarus – to Sudan; this carried with it the further unwanted controversy surrounding the reported death of a Russian MiG- 29 pilot during last May’s Darfur fighting.

    Emerging Dilemma for Russia’s Arms Exports

    Russia’s arms export prospects will be shaped by an emerging dilemma. On the one hand, Russia aspires to become the world’s top arms supplier, expanding its share of the market while retaining traditional large buyers such as China and India. On the other hand, in order to sell more arms in the highly competitive global defence market, Russia needs to push incentive deals, such as technology transfer, but with the caveat, of course, that such transfers may act to undermine national security.

    To circumvent this, and to cope with the real, or potential, threat of new-entry high-end arms sellers offering competitive contractual packages, Russia will be obliged to expand the geographical scope of its arms sales, as evident in Russia’s recent forays into Southeast Asia and Latin America. Yet, Moscow’s arms trade with such countries, especially those shunned by Western states, will likely be mired in controversy. Notwithstanding its record-breaking sales over recent years, the prospects for Russia’s arms exports are shrouded in uncertainty.

    About the Authors

    Collin Koh is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Ron Matthews is a Professor and British-trained defence economist and the Deputy Director of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies at RSIS. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info