Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09023 | Global Crisis and Climate Change: Will Recession Undermine Climate Change Negotiations?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09023 | Global Crisis and Climate Change: Will Recession Undermine Climate Change Negotiations?
    Barry Desker

    04 March 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    While climate change has been getting attention for nearly 20 years, the connection between climate change and trade is only now being recognised. But the risk of market failure is real due to the current global economic crisis.

    UNTIL RECENTLY, only activists, scientists and governments were concerned with climate change and its impact on the future of the global environment. Former US presidential candidate Al Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” drew wide public attention to the ramifications of climate change.

    We may have followed the debates as individuals and taken steps to reduce our carbon footprints — replacing light fixtures with energy-efficient bulbs, changing the temperature settings in our homes or offices, or increasing our commitment to recycling and reusing materials. But we have only recently been devoting sustained attention to how climate change mitigation strategies might impact international trade.

    Three Challenges for Global Solutions

    The Copenhagen Summit in December 2009 will discuss the replacement for the Kyoto Protocol. Whatever comes out of Copenhagen will likely involve significantly more states following more stringent rules designed to mitigate the environmental damage from global warming and climate change. A global issue like climate change will require global solutions. These discussions in Copenhagen will have a direct impact on the making of trade policy.

    Three inter-linked challenges face us in tackling the relationship between climate change and trade. First, the impact of climate change is not evenly distributed across states. Second, the contribution of each state to the problem is different with some states contributing more greenhouse gases and some less. Finally, the ability to invest in mitigation strategies varies across states.

    There are three other significant features to note about climate change.

    First, its impact is uneven; the poorest people and the poorest countries may end up suffering the most. Developing regions are already warmer, on average, than the developed world. They rely heavily on agriculture, but must deal with a high variability in rainfall totals. Changes to the climate that negatively affect the ability of farmers in the developing world to grow crops will have many economic and trade-related impacts.

    Second, since each state contributes different levels of carbon emissions and other sources of climate change, any regime to address the impact will have different rules for different categories of states. These distinctions give rise to potentially unfair outcomes.

    Some of the trade implications include a possible environmental “race to the bottom” as firms relocate to states with more lax policies. Firms that face fewer constraints on pollution emissions can set lower prices for goods than those subject to higher costs. To offset this trade advantage, many states are planning a range of state interventions for climate-related trade businesses, including subsidies and direct support.

    Some states have obvious barriers to the transfer of mitigation technologies, including high tariff walls. Investment regimes, environmental regulations, intellectual property rights protections or laws regarding energy usage can be crafted to offset perceived unfair trade advantages or to provide a boost to domestic firms.

    Under any sort of expanded carbon trading scheme, the issue of competitiveness will be front and centre. Border carbon adjustment schemes will likely vary by country, at least at the outset. We have not yet thought through the implications of different designs. We may need to adjust or revise existing trade rules in the WTO or free trade agreements to account for these kinds of new regulations.

    Third, the ability of states to develop, deploy and pay for mitigation strategies varies enormously. Take, for example, the prospect of more extreme weather events. Some states will simply be unable to prepare adequately for such calamities as floods or droughts. Others will be overwhelmed by events when they occur.

    Moreover, the very classification of items into environmental goods and services (EGS) categories has not been straightforward. Even if we get these problems straightened out, we have a new set of practical problems in the trade realm, as most schemes for handling goods and services imports and exports are not suitable for accommodating these environmental categories. Instead, products are lumped together in ways that makes it difficult to untangle green goods from non-green goods.

    Issues in the Trade-Climate Change Nexus

    Three other issues should also be considered in discussing the nexus between climate change and international trade. First, some observers have suggested that climate change disputes could be handled by the World Trade Organization (WTO). After all, the WTO has the best mechanisms already in place for addressing disputes. Since many of the disputes will have trade implications, the WTO might be well-positioned to resolve many of these state-to-state disagreements.

    Yet the attempt to do so might well overwhelm the WTO system. There is a significant risk today that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism may be over-loaded because member states and customs territories recognise that it is effective and will result in legally enforceable decisions. Some new mechanism will need to be created to resolve climate change disputes.

    A second area of concern is that climate change negotiations are increasingly being led by trade negotiators who cut their spurs at the WTO. There is a risk of mercantilist mindsets and the search for a package deal in Copenhagen in December. If we export the concept that “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed”, a staple of GATT/WTO negotiations, we are setting the stage for failure in Copenhagen.

    Risk of Market Failure

    This brings me to my final point. While climate change has been getting attention for nearly 20 years, the connection between climate change and trade is only now being recognised. Most governments traditionally regarded attention to climate change as imposing a cost to economies and an impediment to a focus on economic growth.

    With the global economy heading into recession, governments will increasingly focus on immediate threats rather than those that appear over the horizon. As long range issues, climate change and global warming are unlikely to be handled adequately by market mechanisms. We run the risk of market failure. The ability to reach significant binding agreements in Copenhagen may be threatened by the current gloomy global economic outlook.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He was previously CEO of the Trade Development Board (TDB). 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / Global

    Commentary

    While climate change has been getting attention for nearly 20 years, the connection between climate change and trade is only now being recognised. But the risk of market failure is real due to the current global economic crisis.

    UNTIL RECENTLY, only activists, scientists and governments were concerned with climate change and its impact on the future of the global environment. Former US presidential candidate Al Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” drew wide public attention to the ramifications of climate change.

    We may have followed the debates as individuals and taken steps to reduce our carbon footprints — replacing light fixtures with energy-efficient bulbs, changing the temperature settings in our homes or offices, or increasing our commitment to recycling and reusing materials. But we have only recently been devoting sustained attention to how climate change mitigation strategies might impact international trade.

    Three Challenges for Global Solutions

    The Copenhagen Summit in December 2009 will discuss the replacement for the Kyoto Protocol. Whatever comes out of Copenhagen will likely involve significantly more states following more stringent rules designed to mitigate the environmental damage from global warming and climate change. A global issue like climate change will require global solutions. These discussions in Copenhagen will have a direct impact on the making of trade policy.

    Three inter-linked challenges face us in tackling the relationship between climate change and trade. First, the impact of climate change is not evenly distributed across states. Second, the contribution of each state to the problem is different with some states contributing more greenhouse gases and some less. Finally, the ability to invest in mitigation strategies varies across states.

    There are three other significant features to note about climate change.

    First, its impact is uneven; the poorest people and the poorest countries may end up suffering the most. Developing regions are already warmer, on average, than the developed world. They rely heavily on agriculture, but must deal with a high variability in rainfall totals. Changes to the climate that negatively affect the ability of farmers in the developing world to grow crops will have many economic and trade-related impacts.

    Second, since each state contributes different levels of carbon emissions and other sources of climate change, any regime to address the impact will have different rules for different categories of states. These distinctions give rise to potentially unfair outcomes.

    Some of the trade implications include a possible environmental “race to the bottom” as firms relocate to states with more lax policies. Firms that face fewer constraints on pollution emissions can set lower prices for goods than those subject to higher costs. To offset this trade advantage, many states are planning a range of state interventions for climate-related trade businesses, including subsidies and direct support.

    Some states have obvious barriers to the transfer of mitigation technologies, including high tariff walls. Investment regimes, environmental regulations, intellectual property rights protections or laws regarding energy usage can be crafted to offset perceived unfair trade advantages or to provide a boost to domestic firms.

    Under any sort of expanded carbon trading scheme, the issue of competitiveness will be front and centre. Border carbon adjustment schemes will likely vary by country, at least at the outset. We have not yet thought through the implications of different designs. We may need to adjust or revise existing trade rules in the WTO or free trade agreements to account for these kinds of new regulations.

    Third, the ability of states to develop, deploy and pay for mitigation strategies varies enormously. Take, for example, the prospect of more extreme weather events. Some states will simply be unable to prepare adequately for such calamities as floods or droughts. Others will be overwhelmed by events when they occur.

    Moreover, the very classification of items into environmental goods and services (EGS) categories has not been straightforward. Even if we get these problems straightened out, we have a new set of practical problems in the trade realm, as most schemes for handling goods and services imports and exports are not suitable for accommodating these environmental categories. Instead, products are lumped together in ways that makes it difficult to untangle green goods from non-green goods.

    Issues in the Trade-Climate Change Nexus

    Three other issues should also be considered in discussing the nexus between climate change and international trade. First, some observers have suggested that climate change disputes could be handled by the World Trade Organization (WTO). After all, the WTO has the best mechanisms already in place for addressing disputes. Since many of the disputes will have trade implications, the WTO might be well-positioned to resolve many of these state-to-state disagreements.

    Yet the attempt to do so might well overwhelm the WTO system. There is a significant risk today that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism may be over-loaded because member states and customs territories recognise that it is effective and will result in legally enforceable decisions. Some new mechanism will need to be created to resolve climate change disputes.

    A second area of concern is that climate change negotiations are increasingly being led by trade negotiators who cut their spurs at the WTO. There is a risk of mercantilist mindsets and the search for a package deal in Copenhagen in December. If we export the concept that “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed”, a staple of GATT/WTO negotiations, we are setting the stage for failure in Copenhagen.

    Risk of Market Failure

    This brings me to my final point. While climate change has been getting attention for nearly 20 years, the connection between climate change and trade is only now being recognised. Most governments traditionally regarded attention to climate change as imposing a cost to economies and an impediment to a focus on economic growth.

    With the global economy heading into recession, governments will increasingly focus on immediate threats rather than those that appear over the horizon. As long range issues, climate change and global warming are unlikely to be handled adequately by market mechanisms. We run the risk of market failure. The ability to reach significant binding agreements in Copenhagen may be threatened by the current gloomy global economic outlook.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He was previously CEO of the Trade Development Board (TDB). 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info