Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09026 | Elizabeth Wong, Karpal Singh and Hudud: Can Pakatan Survive Differences?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09026 | Elizabeth Wong, Karpal Singh and Hudud: Can Pakatan Survive Differences?
    Goh Nur Firdaus Firoz

    13 March 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    Since its success at the 8 March 2008 general election, Malaysia’s opposition Pakatan Rakyat has seen challenges that often test the coaliton’s fundamental differences. Can Pakatan stay glued and gain strength from these trials or will it give way to ideological differences?

    MALAYSIA’S OPPOSITION coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, is facing more testing times with the recent Elizabeth Wong saga. As if the tussle over hudud law and Perak has not hurt the party’s intra-coalition relations enough, this latest incident, if not managed well, will expose the coalition’s fundamental differences that have threatened, time and again, to split the opposition.

    Thus far, Pakatan (or PR for short) has won voters over based on its promise of change in Malaysian politics. It hopes to build a new Malaysia, different from the nation-state of the UMNO-led Barisan Nasional (BN) which is premised on ketuanan Melayu or Malay supremacy. Pakatan’s eclectic mix of an Islamist party, the Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), a secular Chinese-based Democratic Alliance Party (DAP), and strongman Anwar Ibrahim’s multiracial Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), has been both its strength and its weakness. The opposition alliance has lasted due to each component party’s appeal to different sections of Malaysian society. It has grown from strength to strength with each passing contest at the ballot-box. Pakatan is now touted to win the coming by-elections in April following its strong showing at the 8 March 2008 general election, followed by the by-election victories at Permatang Pauh (Penang) and Kuala Terengganu (Terengganu) recently.

    Pakatan has however long been under pressure to keep its disparate components together. Although united by the same goal to ensure citizen equality and freedom, in a country rife and alive with racial politics, each component party moves with different heads based on their respective electoral appeal. But the very different party ideologies have surfaced ever so often, threatening to split the coalition.

    As ideological cracks become more obvious with each subsequent strife, will Pakatan’s coalition members be able to withstand such fundamental differences to see them through the long term, or will they remain at best by-election buddies whose friendship is going downhill? Three issues are currently testing their cohesion:

    PAS, DAP and hudud

    PAS’ agenda of implementing hudud law has been a big thorn in the flesh of Pakatan, particularly the DAP. The Chinese-based party has often crossed swords with PAS over the Islamist party’s insistence on creating an Islamic state. While PAS has often danced around the ambiguity of what it means by hudud or Islamic criminal law, nevertheless, constant calls for it has threatened to drive away Pakatan’s non-Muslim supporters. Despite PAS’ new strategy of downplaying the notion of an Islamic state and hudud, such tension sometimes arise unexpectedly. One example is PAS vice-president Husam Musa’s recent statement made during a debate that PAS would implement hudud laws should it come to power. His statement came just days before the Kuala Terengganu by-election last December. Support for this statement by party president Hadi Awang and spiritual leader Nik Aziz has disturbed the non-Muslim members of the coalition who had stood by Pakatan’s new emphasis on equality and freedom for all. PAS and the DAP however managed to close ranks ahead of the Kuala Terengganu by-election. PAS’ subsequent electoral success in thát by-election has kept Pakatan together despite their ideological differences.

    Perak Frogs, Karpal Singh and Anwar Ibrahim

    The ongoing Perak debacle has become another important testing ground for Pakatan. The rift between DAP chairman Karpal Singh and Pakatan de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim threatened to tear apart the coalition. Karpal’s outspoken call for Anwar’s resignation to take responsibility for the fall of Perak to BN through defections once again exposed the inherent weakness in the opposition despite the pulling power of Anwar. While party-hopping had been the hope for change in Anwar’s initial plans to capture federal power in September 2008, this tactic has now been used by BN to deadly effect against Pakatan. Thus far, other DAP strongmen Lim Kit Siang and secretary-general Lim Guan Eng have shown continued support for Anwar, leaving Karpal isolated and showing that the DAP leadership remains committed to Anwar’s leadership of Pakatan. For the sake of political expediency, these differences seem to have been again set aside so as not to jeopardise opposition unity ahead of the three by-elections scheduled in April.

    Elizabeth Wong

    Nude pictures of Pakatan assemblywoman, Elizabeth Wong, surfacing recently do not bode well for the coalition. Whether or not Wong is a victim of unlawful dissemination remains secondary. Different parts of Malaysian society have stamped their brand of morality on the issue. The more conservative Muslims dictate that the exploration of female sexuality is immoral and should be punished by law; the more liberal quarters sympathise with Wong, seeing her as a victim whose privacy has been cruelly trespassed.

    Representatives of Malaysian society and coalition parties are not spared from the strain of moral judgement. PAS has been compelled to comment, while DAP maintains its support for Wong and the ideals of equality and individual freedom. Again, under such duress do the differences between coalition members become painfully obvious. While PAS cannot be seen as supporting promiscuity and pre-marital sex, it also cannot impose Islamic law and morality on a non-Muslim. This is a rather tricky situation for the coalition members to be in; to acquiesce to one side may mean the loss of another section of its supporters. Although Wong has tendered her resignation, how the issue is dealt with and how PAS positions itself on this question would be scrutinised..

    These three instances highlight the fundamental differences among member parties, straining the already fragile inter-party relations within Pakatan. It must be remembered that the coalition has failed before, with DAP throwing in the towel in 2001 after it suffered a massive loss of support among its Chinese majority electorate following its alliance with PAS in the formation of Barisan Alternatif, Pakatan’s predecessor.

    BN, and more importantly, UMNO, stands to gain from Pakatan’s weaknesses. How the opposition coalition survives depends on its ability to weather through storms and avoid being manipulated by party rivals. To do this, Pakatan needs to be wary of who it allows to join its ranks, and how it conducts itself in times of discord. Unity is key in trying times, and internal factions and rebel individuals should be handled and resolved swiftly.

    The Pakatan alliance is only as good as it gets; any fallout will render the opposition maimed and thrown further away from its target of taking over parliament. While the Anwar factor holds the coalition together, Pakatan can only be as great as the sum of all its parts. Without a proper system of managing inter-party relations, whether it will withstand internal discord remains questionable; for now, however, it appears to be surviving.. If Pakatan continues to display its staying power in the face of the growing attacks on it, there is a future for the opposition.

    About the Author

    Goh Nur Firdaus Firoz is a Research Analyst at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / South Asia

    Commentary

    Since its success at the 8 March 2008 general election, Malaysia’s opposition Pakatan Rakyat has seen challenges that often test the coaliton’s fundamental differences. Can Pakatan stay glued and gain strength from these trials or will it give way to ideological differences?

    MALAYSIA’S OPPOSITION coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, is facing more testing times with the recent Elizabeth Wong saga. As if the tussle over hudud law and Perak has not hurt the party’s intra-coalition relations enough, this latest incident, if not managed well, will expose the coalition’s fundamental differences that have threatened, time and again, to split the opposition.

    Thus far, Pakatan (or PR for short) has won voters over based on its promise of change in Malaysian politics. It hopes to build a new Malaysia, different from the nation-state of the UMNO-led Barisan Nasional (BN) which is premised on ketuanan Melayu or Malay supremacy. Pakatan’s eclectic mix of an Islamist party, the Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), a secular Chinese-based Democratic Alliance Party (DAP), and strongman Anwar Ibrahim’s multiracial Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), has been both its strength and its weakness. The opposition alliance has lasted due to each component party’s appeal to different sections of Malaysian society. It has grown from strength to strength with each passing contest at the ballot-box. Pakatan is now touted to win the coming by-elections in April following its strong showing at the 8 March 2008 general election, followed by the by-election victories at Permatang Pauh (Penang) and Kuala Terengganu (Terengganu) recently.

    Pakatan has however long been under pressure to keep its disparate components together. Although united by the same goal to ensure citizen equality and freedom, in a country rife and alive with racial politics, each component party moves with different heads based on their respective electoral appeal. But the very different party ideologies have surfaced ever so often, threatening to split the coalition.

    As ideological cracks become more obvious with each subsequent strife, will Pakatan’s coalition members be able to withstand such fundamental differences to see them through the long term, or will they remain at best by-election buddies whose friendship is going downhill? Three issues are currently testing their cohesion:

    PAS, DAP and hudud

    PAS’ agenda of implementing hudud law has been a big thorn in the flesh of Pakatan, particularly the DAP. The Chinese-based party has often crossed swords with PAS over the Islamist party’s insistence on creating an Islamic state. While PAS has often danced around the ambiguity of what it means by hudud or Islamic criminal law, nevertheless, constant calls for it has threatened to drive away Pakatan’s non-Muslim supporters. Despite PAS’ new strategy of downplaying the notion of an Islamic state and hudud, such tension sometimes arise unexpectedly. One example is PAS vice-president Husam Musa’s recent statement made during a debate that PAS would implement hudud laws should it come to power. His statement came just days before the Kuala Terengganu by-election last December. Support for this statement by party president Hadi Awang and spiritual leader Nik Aziz has disturbed the non-Muslim members of the coalition who had stood by Pakatan’s new emphasis on equality and freedom for all. PAS and the DAP however managed to close ranks ahead of the Kuala Terengganu by-election. PAS’ subsequent electoral success in thát by-election has kept Pakatan together despite their ideological differences.

    Perak Frogs, Karpal Singh and Anwar Ibrahim

    The ongoing Perak debacle has become another important testing ground for Pakatan. The rift between DAP chairman Karpal Singh and Pakatan de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim threatened to tear apart the coalition. Karpal’s outspoken call for Anwar’s resignation to take responsibility for the fall of Perak to BN through defections once again exposed the inherent weakness in the opposition despite the pulling power of Anwar. While party-hopping had been the hope for change in Anwar’s initial plans to capture federal power in September 2008, this tactic has now been used by BN to deadly effect against Pakatan. Thus far, other DAP strongmen Lim Kit Siang and secretary-general Lim Guan Eng have shown continued support for Anwar, leaving Karpal isolated and showing that the DAP leadership remains committed to Anwar’s leadership of Pakatan. For the sake of political expediency, these differences seem to have been again set aside so as not to jeopardise opposition unity ahead of the three by-elections scheduled in April.

    Elizabeth Wong

    Nude pictures of Pakatan assemblywoman, Elizabeth Wong, surfacing recently do not bode well for the coalition. Whether or not Wong is a victim of unlawful dissemination remains secondary. Different parts of Malaysian society have stamped their brand of morality on the issue. The more conservative Muslims dictate that the exploration of female sexuality is immoral and should be punished by law; the more liberal quarters sympathise with Wong, seeing her as a victim whose privacy has been cruelly trespassed.

    Representatives of Malaysian society and coalition parties are not spared from the strain of moral judgement. PAS has been compelled to comment, while DAP maintains its support for Wong and the ideals of equality and individual freedom. Again, under such duress do the differences between coalition members become painfully obvious. While PAS cannot be seen as supporting promiscuity and pre-marital sex, it also cannot impose Islamic law and morality on a non-Muslim. This is a rather tricky situation for the coalition members to be in; to acquiesce to one side may mean the loss of another section of its supporters. Although Wong has tendered her resignation, how the issue is dealt with and how PAS positions itself on this question would be scrutinised..

    These three instances highlight the fundamental differences among member parties, straining the already fragile inter-party relations within Pakatan. It must be remembered that the coalition has failed before, with DAP throwing in the towel in 2001 after it suffered a massive loss of support among its Chinese majority electorate following its alliance with PAS in the formation of Barisan Alternatif, Pakatan’s predecessor.

    BN, and more importantly, UMNO, stands to gain from Pakatan’s weaknesses. How the opposition coalition survives depends on its ability to weather through storms and avoid being manipulated by party rivals. To do this, Pakatan needs to be wary of who it allows to join its ranks, and how it conducts itself in times of discord. Unity is key in trying times, and internal factions and rebel individuals should be handled and resolved swiftly.

    The Pakatan alliance is only as good as it gets; any fallout will render the opposition maimed and thrown further away from its target of taking over parliament. While the Anwar factor holds the coalition together, Pakatan can only be as great as the sum of all its parts. Without a proper system of managing inter-party relations, whether it will withstand internal discord remains questionable; for now, however, it appears to be surviving.. If Pakatan continues to display its staying power in the face of the growing attacks on it, there is a future for the opposition.

    About the Author

    Goh Nur Firdaus Firoz is a Research Analyst at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info