Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Public Education
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      Public EducationAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • CO09031 | In Defence of High Seas Freedoms
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO09031 | In Defence of High Seas Freedoms
Patrick J. Neher, Raul A. "Pete" Pedrozo, J. Ashley Roach

24 March 2009

download pdf

Commentary

An article in RSIS Commentaries on the recent clashes in China’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) between Chinese patrol vessels and US ocean surveillance ships cited differing interpretations about rights and responsibilities in EEZs as a factor. The following commentary offers an alternative view.

ON 13 MARCH 2009, Dr Sam Bateman wrote in RSIS Commentaries about China’s most recent harassment of United States naval ships operating in the Chinese exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Dr Bateman noted that the USNS Impeccable and USNS Victorious were involved in marine data collection for military purposes, and thus were exercising high seas freedoms in accordance with the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Dr Bateman also noted that marine data collection for military purposes does not fall within the legal regime of marine scientific research, which under UNCLOS may be regulated by the coastal state. We agree with Dr Bateman on these points.

Dr Bateman opined further, however, that the operations of military survey ships, such as the USNS Bowditch, may be interpreted as marine scientific research. In his view, those ships are engaged in oceanography, which falls within marine scientific research. We respectfully disagree.

Coastal State Authority

We would like to respond to Dr Bateman’s discussion of the balance of interests in the EEZ, as reflected in UNCLOS. In particular, we would like to include the distinction in coastal state authority in the territorial sea compared to the EEZ; the exclusive authority of sovereign states to exercise jurisdiction and control over their warships, naval auxiliaries, military aircraft, and other public vessels; and the difference between marine data collection by naval vessels and marine scientific research.

The US accepts that the provisions in UNCLOS relating to traditional uses of the ocean reflect customary international law. We agree, therefore, with Dr Bateman’s overarching point that in accordance with UNCLOS, the EEZ is a zone of shared rights and responsibilities, in which the coastal state and the international community are obligated to exercise due regard for the rights and duties of each other. As the US noted on 8 March 1983, in exercising its right of reply at the Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea:

This [EEZ] concept, as set forth in the Convention, recognises the interests of the coastal State in the resources of the zone and authorises it to assert jurisdiction over resource-related activities therein. At the same time, all States continue to enjoy in the zone traditional high seas freedoms of navigation and overflight and the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to those freedoms, which remain qualitatively and quantitatively the same as those freedoms when exercised seaward of the zone.

Military operations, exercises and activities have always been regarded as internationally lawful uses of the sea. The right to conduct such activities will continue to be enjoyed by all States in the exclusive economic zone.

That UNCLOS preserves high seas freedoms in the EEZ — to include the exercise of military operations — is well-settled. In addition to the express terms of articles 58 and 87 (and by incorporation therein all of articles 88-115), and article 236 of the Convention, state practice indicates that navies routinely conduct operations in foreign EEZs without providing prior notice to or seeking consent from coastal states.

It is not uncommon for China, for example, to conduct submarine operations and intelligence collection activities in foreign EEZs, including in EEZ waters of the US in the western Pacific. It was also not uncommon for the then Soviet Union to loiter its intelligence collection vessels just outside the 3 nautical mile limit of the US territorial sea, and then later its 12 nautical mile limit.

Immunities and Sovereignty

Likewise, coastal states regularly recognise, in their respective domestic laws relating to the EEZ, the sovereign immunity of foreign warships, naval auxiliaries, other public vessels, and state aircraft. International bodies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), also recognise that in matters affecting the EEZ — such as the establishment of particularly sensitive sea areas and associated protective measures in the EEZ — coastal states must not purport to extend authority or control over foreign warships, naval auxiliaries, or other public vessels.

With regard to Dr Bateman’s distinction between the Bowditch and the Impeccable, it is important to note that the law of the sea itself draws no distinction between the immunities afforded to warships and naval auxiliaries based on design, mission, classification, propulsion, or cargo. Both Bowditch and Impeccable are naval auxiliaries entitled to full sovereign immunity.

If, hypothetically, without the consent of the coastal state, they were to conduct intelligence collection activities in its territorial sea, or if they were to conduct hydrographic or military survey activities in its territorial sea, then under article 19 of the Convention they could not claim to have engaged in innocent passage. Under article 25, the coastal state would be within its rights to demand that such activities stop. But a coastal state enjoys no like rights vis-à-vis foreign warships and auxiliaries in the EEZ.

With regard to marine data collection, the US accepts the right of coastal states to regulate marine scientific research within their respective EEZs. Marine scientific research was intentionally not defined in the Convention. But it is widely understood to describe activities undertaken in ocean and coastal waters to expand scientific knowledge of the marine environment and its processes. The results of such research are publicly available.

In the view of the US, marine scientific research is but one of four categories (and seven sub- categories) of marine data collection. The other three categories are surveys (hydrographic and military), operational oceanography, and exploration and exploitation of natural resources and underwater cultural heritage.

Military surveys are inherently different than marine scientific research. Military surveys constitute data collection for military purposes only. The results are not disseminated to the public, and the data is often classified. Military surveys, conducted by naval vessels, are a form of military activities protected under the law of the sea as an exercise of high seas freedoms.

They may be conducted in EEZs without requirement to provide notice to the coastal state or gain coastal state permission. The Bowditch is a military survey vessel, and it conducts military activities, for military purposes, in the same vein as the Impeccable and the Victorious.

Freedoms of the Seas

From the Chinese perspective, when they asked the US to stop surveillance activities in the East and South China Seas and the US refused, it signified a lack of respect. The irony, of course, is that there is no surer sign of greatness in a nation or its Navy than to acknowledge and accept the exercise of navigational rights and freedoms by others. But why shouldn’t the US curtail its military activities in and above the Chinese EEZ, in the interests of comity?

The answer is two-fold. First, it is an exceedingly thin line between comity and acquiescence to an excessive claim. Second, the navigational rights and freedoms established in the law of the sea are fundamental to the maintenance of public order and the development of international trade upon which depends our shared economic prosperity. As China expands its naval capability, we hope it will join other nations of the world as guarantors of freedoms of the seas.

About the Authors

Captain Patrick J. Neher, JAGC, USN is Director, International and Operational Law at the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the US Navy; Captain Raul A. “Pete” Pedrozo, JAGC, USN, is the Staff Judge Advocate to Commander, United States Pacific Command; and Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (Ret.) recently retired from the Office of the Legal Adviser, US Department of State, where he specialised in law of the sea. They contributed this joint article specially to RSIS Commentaries. The views expressed are personal and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Government. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Maritime Security / Global

Commentary

An article in RSIS Commentaries on the recent clashes in China’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) between Chinese patrol vessels and US ocean surveillance ships cited differing interpretations about rights and responsibilities in EEZs as a factor. The following commentary offers an alternative view.

ON 13 MARCH 2009, Dr Sam Bateman wrote in RSIS Commentaries about China’s most recent harassment of United States naval ships operating in the Chinese exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Dr Bateman noted that the USNS Impeccable and USNS Victorious were involved in marine data collection for military purposes, and thus were exercising high seas freedoms in accordance with the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Dr Bateman also noted that marine data collection for military purposes does not fall within the legal regime of marine scientific research, which under UNCLOS may be regulated by the coastal state. We agree with Dr Bateman on these points.

Dr Bateman opined further, however, that the operations of military survey ships, such as the USNS Bowditch, may be interpreted as marine scientific research. In his view, those ships are engaged in oceanography, which falls within marine scientific research. We respectfully disagree.

Coastal State Authority

We would like to respond to Dr Bateman’s discussion of the balance of interests in the EEZ, as reflected in UNCLOS. In particular, we would like to include the distinction in coastal state authority in the territorial sea compared to the EEZ; the exclusive authority of sovereign states to exercise jurisdiction and control over their warships, naval auxiliaries, military aircraft, and other public vessels; and the difference between marine data collection by naval vessels and marine scientific research.

The US accepts that the provisions in UNCLOS relating to traditional uses of the ocean reflect customary international law. We agree, therefore, with Dr Bateman’s overarching point that in accordance with UNCLOS, the EEZ is a zone of shared rights and responsibilities, in which the coastal state and the international community are obligated to exercise due regard for the rights and duties of each other. As the US noted on 8 March 1983, in exercising its right of reply at the Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea:

This [EEZ] concept, as set forth in the Convention, recognises the interests of the coastal State in the resources of the zone and authorises it to assert jurisdiction over resource-related activities therein. At the same time, all States continue to enjoy in the zone traditional high seas freedoms of navigation and overflight and the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to those freedoms, which remain qualitatively and quantitatively the same as those freedoms when exercised seaward of the zone.

Military operations, exercises and activities have always been regarded as internationally lawful uses of the sea. The right to conduct such activities will continue to be enjoyed by all States in the exclusive economic zone.

That UNCLOS preserves high seas freedoms in the EEZ — to include the exercise of military operations — is well-settled. In addition to the express terms of articles 58 and 87 (and by incorporation therein all of articles 88-115), and article 236 of the Convention, state practice indicates that navies routinely conduct operations in foreign EEZs without providing prior notice to or seeking consent from coastal states.

It is not uncommon for China, for example, to conduct submarine operations and intelligence collection activities in foreign EEZs, including in EEZ waters of the US in the western Pacific. It was also not uncommon for the then Soviet Union to loiter its intelligence collection vessels just outside the 3 nautical mile limit of the US territorial sea, and then later its 12 nautical mile limit.

Immunities and Sovereignty

Likewise, coastal states regularly recognise, in their respective domestic laws relating to the EEZ, the sovereign immunity of foreign warships, naval auxiliaries, other public vessels, and state aircraft. International bodies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), also recognise that in matters affecting the EEZ — such as the establishment of particularly sensitive sea areas and associated protective measures in the EEZ — coastal states must not purport to extend authority or control over foreign warships, naval auxiliaries, or other public vessels.

With regard to Dr Bateman’s distinction between the Bowditch and the Impeccable, it is important to note that the law of the sea itself draws no distinction between the immunities afforded to warships and naval auxiliaries based on design, mission, classification, propulsion, or cargo. Both Bowditch and Impeccable are naval auxiliaries entitled to full sovereign immunity.

If, hypothetically, without the consent of the coastal state, they were to conduct intelligence collection activities in its territorial sea, or if they were to conduct hydrographic or military survey activities in its territorial sea, then under article 19 of the Convention they could not claim to have engaged in innocent passage. Under article 25, the coastal state would be within its rights to demand that such activities stop. But a coastal state enjoys no like rights vis-à-vis foreign warships and auxiliaries in the EEZ.

With regard to marine data collection, the US accepts the right of coastal states to regulate marine scientific research within their respective EEZs. Marine scientific research was intentionally not defined in the Convention. But it is widely understood to describe activities undertaken in ocean and coastal waters to expand scientific knowledge of the marine environment and its processes. The results of such research are publicly available.

In the view of the US, marine scientific research is but one of four categories (and seven sub- categories) of marine data collection. The other three categories are surveys (hydrographic and military), operational oceanography, and exploration and exploitation of natural resources and underwater cultural heritage.

Military surveys are inherently different than marine scientific research. Military surveys constitute data collection for military purposes only. The results are not disseminated to the public, and the data is often classified. Military surveys, conducted by naval vessels, are a form of military activities protected under the law of the sea as an exercise of high seas freedoms.

They may be conducted in EEZs without requirement to provide notice to the coastal state or gain coastal state permission. The Bowditch is a military survey vessel, and it conducts military activities, for military purposes, in the same vein as the Impeccable and the Victorious.

Freedoms of the Seas

From the Chinese perspective, when they asked the US to stop surveillance activities in the East and South China Seas and the US refused, it signified a lack of respect. The irony, of course, is that there is no surer sign of greatness in a nation or its Navy than to acknowledge and accept the exercise of navigational rights and freedoms by others. But why shouldn’t the US curtail its military activities in and above the Chinese EEZ, in the interests of comity?

The answer is two-fold. First, it is an exceedingly thin line between comity and acquiescence to an excessive claim. Second, the navigational rights and freedoms established in the law of the sea are fundamental to the maintenance of public order and the development of international trade upon which depends our shared economic prosperity. As China expands its naval capability, we hope it will join other nations of the world as guarantors of freedoms of the seas.

About the Authors

Captain Patrick J. Neher, JAGC, USN is Director, International and Operational Law at the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the US Navy; Captain Raul A. “Pete” Pedrozo, JAGC, USN, is the Staff Judge Advocate to Commander, United States Pacific Command; and Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (Ret.) recently retired from the Office of the Legal Adviser, US Department of State, where he specialised in law of the sea. They contributed this joint article specially to RSIS Commentaries. The views expressed are personal and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Government. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Maritime Security

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info