Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09034 | Avoiding Unnecessary Radicalization in Bangladesh:Learning from Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Experiences in FATA
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09034 | Avoiding Unnecessary Radicalization in Bangladesh:Learning from Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Experiences in FATA
    Ryan Clarke, Clint Lorimore

    02 April 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    The recent incident involving the mutiny and possible infiltration of the Bangladesh Rifles by a terrorist group has raised concerns among security experts that Dhaka may be considering changing its current approach to dealing with terrorist groups by adopting a military-led strategy instead of maintaining its current policy of engagement through police and intelligence action. This brings front and centre the classical debate over police versus military action in combating terrorism. Before adopting such an approach it would be wise for the Bangladeshi government to examine Pakistan’s counter-terrorism experience in its Federally Administered Tribal Areas in order to avoid unnecessary radicalization in the country.

    Use of Police Versus Military Action in Combating Terrorists

    Pakistan’s counter-terrorism experience in the country’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), where the government, while under tremendous American pressure, chose to rely on large scale military operations to pursue terrorist groups did more to exacerbate the issue of radicalization in the region than it did to solve the problem. In late 2003 and early 2004, Pakistan engaged in air and artillery strikes in FATA against a host of terrorist organizations, inflicting considerable civilian casualties. These actions provided impetus for groups there to adopt more violent tactics. Considering Pakistan’s experience, Bangladesh would be wise to maintain its present policy of engaging terrorist groups through the paradigm of police and intelligence action and avoid calls for a change in tactics following the mutiny of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR).

    Terrorism’s Parallel Paths in Bangladesh and Pakistan?

    Bangladesh’s “militant cycle” has lagged behind Pakistan’s and as such, Dhaka has the rare luxury of being able to avoid counter-terrorism pitfalls by observing Pakistan’s experience with the Lashkar-i- Jhangvi (LeJ). LeJ is a Pakistani terrorist group founded in 1996, which was initially very narrowly focused on the targeting of Shi’as in the country. However, not long after Pakistan mounted military operations in FATA, Pakistan witnessed the use of suicide bombings by LeJ, a tactic which the group had not previously been known to engage.

    Bangladesh’s experience with terrorist groups such as Jamaat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) and Harakat-ul-Jihad-i-Islami Bangladesh (HUJI-B) in some ways parallel that of Pakistan and their dealings with LeJ prior to the use of military operations in FATA. HUJI-B and JMB claim to be fighting against the fundamental secular tenants of the Bangladeshi state on the grounds that it is an apostate system inherited from the British. JMB has exceptional organizational skills which were demonstrated when the group carried out 463 bombings throughout Bangladesh in the space of one hour in 2005. JMB information operations and propaganda videos are beginning to emulate those produced by other international terrorist groups, suggesting that Bangladesh’s terrorist outfits are very much attuned to regional and global developments. This is something that must be taken seriously by Dhaka considering the evolution of terrorist strategies in Pakistan.

    Radicalization and the Adoption of Suicide Terrorism

    There is no single path to radicalization, it can however be argued that individuals and groups move toward further radicalization if they feel that they are victims of political oppression or have been on the receiving end of harsh government treatment. Pakistan’s adoption of a military-centric approach to tackling terrorism in FATA did exactly this. Conflicts in which the tactic of suicide terrorism is used are asymmetric in nature with the targeted opponent maintaining superior capabilities and resources. The implementation of suicide terrorism as a strategy is often a measure of last resort, with heavy handed military action and its accompanying collateral damage serving as a catalyst in generating the emotions of hate and vengeance which are required in suicide terrorism operations. Revenge is a strong factor in suicide terrorism as was demonstrated in one study which found that close to half of Palestinian suicide bombers committed their attacks shortly after having lost someone close to them. Subsequently governments should avoid engaging in actions which would increase the likelihood of vengeful acts.

    Suicide terrorist attacks are often aimed at democracies due to the fact that they are viewed as being more susceptible to such acts of coercion than other types of governments. Such a strategy is one of coercion used to pressure a change in policy of governments by signaling that there will be further attacks if their demands are not met. Therefore in the case of Bangladesh it is vital that the government recognizes the error of relying on large-scale military action which could facilitate a radical transformation of the country’s terrorist groups. At present, the threat of suicide terrorism in Bangladesh is low as Dhaka continues to view the issue through a law enforcement and intelligence paradigm. However, if the government was to alter its approach, the tempo of radicalization among terrorist groups in the country could increase.

    Learning Regional Lessons – Bangladesh

    While the BDR mutiny has sparked fears that Bangladesh’s terrorist groups are scaling up their terrorist campaigns, the government must not cave in to any future public pressure to engage in a military-led crackdown on their strongholds. So far Dhaka has been wise in viewing terrorism through a police/law-and-order paradigm as opposed to an erroneous military-centric one. Calls for military involvement could, if implemented, actually increase the support base of HUJI-B and JMB, alienate potential local allies, and cause an unnecessary escalation. Such a turn of events will lead to further radicalization in the country and may bring about even more violent tactics on the part of the terrorist groups. If Bangladesh is to turn the tide on terrorist groups and ensure that the problem remains manageable, Dhaka must maintain its present course of relying on police and intelligence action while avoiding the pitfalls of large-scale military operations.

    About the Authors

    Ryan Clarke and Clint Lorimore are Associate Research Fellows with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Terrorism Studies / South Asia

    Commentary

    The recent incident involving the mutiny and possible infiltration of the Bangladesh Rifles by a terrorist group has raised concerns among security experts that Dhaka may be considering changing its current approach to dealing with terrorist groups by adopting a military-led strategy instead of maintaining its current policy of engagement through police and intelligence action. This brings front and centre the classical debate over police versus military action in combating terrorism. Before adopting such an approach it would be wise for the Bangladeshi government to examine Pakistan’s counter-terrorism experience in its Federally Administered Tribal Areas in order to avoid unnecessary radicalization in the country.

    Use of Police Versus Military Action in Combating Terrorists

    Pakistan’s counter-terrorism experience in the country’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), where the government, while under tremendous American pressure, chose to rely on large scale military operations to pursue terrorist groups did more to exacerbate the issue of radicalization in the region than it did to solve the problem. In late 2003 and early 2004, Pakistan engaged in air and artillery strikes in FATA against a host of terrorist organizations, inflicting considerable civilian casualties. These actions provided impetus for groups there to adopt more violent tactics. Considering Pakistan’s experience, Bangladesh would be wise to maintain its present policy of engaging terrorist groups through the paradigm of police and intelligence action and avoid calls for a change in tactics following the mutiny of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR).

    Terrorism’s Parallel Paths in Bangladesh and Pakistan?

    Bangladesh’s “militant cycle” has lagged behind Pakistan’s and as such, Dhaka has the rare luxury of being able to avoid counter-terrorism pitfalls by observing Pakistan’s experience with the Lashkar-i- Jhangvi (LeJ). LeJ is a Pakistani terrorist group founded in 1996, which was initially very narrowly focused on the targeting of Shi’as in the country. However, not long after Pakistan mounted military operations in FATA, Pakistan witnessed the use of suicide bombings by LeJ, a tactic which the group had not previously been known to engage.

    Bangladesh’s experience with terrorist groups such as Jamaat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) and Harakat-ul-Jihad-i-Islami Bangladesh (HUJI-B) in some ways parallel that of Pakistan and their dealings with LeJ prior to the use of military operations in FATA. HUJI-B and JMB claim to be fighting against the fundamental secular tenants of the Bangladeshi state on the grounds that it is an apostate system inherited from the British. JMB has exceptional organizational skills which were demonstrated when the group carried out 463 bombings throughout Bangladesh in the space of one hour in 2005. JMB information operations and propaganda videos are beginning to emulate those produced by other international terrorist groups, suggesting that Bangladesh’s terrorist outfits are very much attuned to regional and global developments. This is something that must be taken seriously by Dhaka considering the evolution of terrorist strategies in Pakistan.

    Radicalization and the Adoption of Suicide Terrorism

    There is no single path to radicalization, it can however be argued that individuals and groups move toward further radicalization if they feel that they are victims of political oppression or have been on the receiving end of harsh government treatment. Pakistan’s adoption of a military-centric approach to tackling terrorism in FATA did exactly this. Conflicts in which the tactic of suicide terrorism is used are asymmetric in nature with the targeted opponent maintaining superior capabilities and resources. The implementation of suicide terrorism as a strategy is often a measure of last resort, with heavy handed military action and its accompanying collateral damage serving as a catalyst in generating the emotions of hate and vengeance which are required in suicide terrorism operations. Revenge is a strong factor in suicide terrorism as was demonstrated in one study which found that close to half of Palestinian suicide bombers committed their attacks shortly after having lost someone close to them. Subsequently governments should avoid engaging in actions which would increase the likelihood of vengeful acts.

    Suicide terrorist attacks are often aimed at democracies due to the fact that they are viewed as being more susceptible to such acts of coercion than other types of governments. Such a strategy is one of coercion used to pressure a change in policy of governments by signaling that there will be further attacks if their demands are not met. Therefore in the case of Bangladesh it is vital that the government recognizes the error of relying on large-scale military action which could facilitate a radical transformation of the country’s terrorist groups. At present, the threat of suicide terrorism in Bangladesh is low as Dhaka continues to view the issue through a law enforcement and intelligence paradigm. However, if the government was to alter its approach, the tempo of radicalization among terrorist groups in the country could increase.

    Learning Regional Lessons – Bangladesh

    While the BDR mutiny has sparked fears that Bangladesh’s terrorist groups are scaling up their terrorist campaigns, the government must not cave in to any future public pressure to engage in a military-led crackdown on their strongholds. So far Dhaka has been wise in viewing terrorism through a police/law-and-order paradigm as opposed to an erroneous military-centric one. Calls for military involvement could, if implemented, actually increase the support base of HUJI-B and JMB, alienate potential local allies, and cause an unnecessary escalation. Such a turn of events will lead to further radicalization in the country and may bring about even more violent tactics on the part of the terrorist groups. If Bangladesh is to turn the tide on terrorist groups and ensure that the problem remains manageable, Dhaka must maintain its present course of relying on police and intelligence action while avoiding the pitfalls of large-scale military operations.

    About the Authors

    Ryan Clarke and Clint Lorimore are Associate Research Fellows with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Terrorism Studies

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info