Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09044 | Weapons acquisition in the US: Streamlining the Process
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09044 | Weapons acquisition in the US: Streamlining the Process

    05 May 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    Past attempts to reform the US weapons acquisition process have largely met with failure. However, the combined impact of the economic recession and the US’ current woes in Iraq and Afghanistan may paradoxically give the Obama administration the opportunity to succeed where previous administrations have failed.

    TWO OF THE most critical and visible challenges that the Obama administration is currently grappling with are the ailing US economy and the ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. In comparison, the issue of defence spending has been lost to the public view. However, the Obama administration’s attempt to rein in defence spending underscores how inextricably tied defence spending is to the economic crisis and the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan. To be sure, attempting to cut defence spending, especially by killing off major systems programmes, is a considerable challenge, not least because it entails taking on powerful interests entrenched in the military-industrial complex. However, the combination of the US government’s deteriorating finances and the imperatives of Iraq and Afghanistan have made the task easier, though hardly plain-sailing.

    A Strategic Shift or a Budget-Cutting Exercise?

    Leading the drive to reorient the Pentagon’s budget from future weapons programmes to the immediate needs of the US’ two wars is Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates. Secretary Gates’ budget proposal would involve not only the cancellation of existing weapon systems programmes, but also the reallocation of billions of dollars from the development of future weapons programmes to the more pressing needs of the US’ two campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. At risk are major weapon systems such as the army’s Future Combat Systems and the navy’s next generation of aircraft carriers.

    Indeed, in campaigning for his overhaul of the Pentagon’s budget, Gates has emphasised meeting the current needs of the US military over future weapon systems. In addressing the Army War College, he said that there was a misperception that “Iraq and Afghanistan were exotic distractions that would be wrapped up relatively soon” and that the weapons and hardware needed there were “fielded ad hoc and on the fly”.

    While it is highly debatable whether this constitutes a genuine strategic shift, or a budget-cutting exercise merely disguised as one, what is significant is that Gates’ aggressive campaign to garner support from the military and defence companies to streamline the defence budget and overhaul the procurement process is in stark contrast to Donald Rumsfeld’s tenure as Defence Secretary. In the six years that he presided over ever-increasing wartime budgets, Rumsfeld never had to kill weapon systems programmes and therefore never had to sell the idea of budget cuts or reforms to stakeholders.

    The timing of this push to reform the weapons acquisition process is also significant: while past administrations have acknowledged the need for reforms, attempting to do so now amidst the sharp economic recession underscores how closely linked military power and economic power are. Paradoxically, the economic crisis could prove to be the very impetus to meaningful reforms of the defence procurement process as the issue of cost effectiveness gains increasing traction not only with policy makers but the general public.

    Unexpected Support from the Air Force

    The push to consolidate the Pentagon’s budget via the cancellation of existing weapons programmes has gained unexpected support from the US Air Force. In an opinion editorial published in the Washington Post on 13 April 2009, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley and Air Force Chief of Staff General Norton Schwartz endorsed Gates’ proposal to end production of the F-22 Raptor air superiority fighter, the most advanced and capable fighter in the US Air Force. This support is unprecedented, since historically the military has been deeply opposed to the cancellation of weapons programmes in which it has invested considerable resources, particularly weapon systems that are highly symbolic of its power.

    Secretary Donley and General Schwartz have acknowledged that, given budget constraints, procuring more F-22s necessarily means less money to acquire much needed capabilities in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, command and control, as well as capabilities to conduct irregular warfare. More importantly, they write that “based on warfighting experience over the past several years and judgments about future threats”, there is a need to re-evaluate the Air Force’s orders for F- 22s.

    Essentially, this is a tacit acknowledgement that the F-22 has not proved useful in Iraq. Designed with sophisticated radar and stealth characteristics, the F-22 is optimised for air-to-air combat with ground attack capability. However, the airspace over Iraq does not present threats where deployment of the F- 22 is warranted. In other words, as far as operations in Iraq are concerned, the F-22’s characteristics are an ‘over-kill’, and therefore ‘gold-plated’.

    This is a significant development because it undermines the existing ‘because we can do it, we must do it’ technological imperative that drives weapons acquisition. The rationale is to obtain the most sophisticated weapon system, without necessarily matching it to current and most likely threats and needs. Current economic difficulties, and the consequent constraints on defence budgets, may finally force defence planners and the military to acknowledge that the complex and advanced weapon systems that are either in use or in development may not only be an overkill for conventional military operations. Indeed, they may also be ill-suited to irregular warfare and such acquisitions should either be scaled back or cancelled altogether.

    Policy Implications

    Defence budget reforms is a perennial policy agenda item, not only in the US but in other countries. The economic crisis and the resultant constraints in defence budgets is forcing policy makers to streamline weapons acquisitions and to overhaul the procurement process. The need to maintain capabilities that are commensurate with the military’s objectives and missions while working within the budget has made cost effectiveness the key guiding principle. The gold-plated weapon system is a luxury that is ill-afforded in an economic crisis. With the world’s biggest military, with powerful embedded interests both in government and industry, conceding the need for drastic reforms amidst the economic crisis, defence policymakers will feel compelled to at least re-examine their rationale for weapons acquisition.

    About the Author

    Adrian W. J. Kuah is a doctoral candidate at the UK Defence Academy, Cranfield University and an Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He specialises in defence economics and is attached to the School’s Military Transformations Programme. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General / Americas

    Commentary

    Past attempts to reform the US weapons acquisition process have largely met with failure. However, the combined impact of the economic recession and the US’ current woes in Iraq and Afghanistan may paradoxically give the Obama administration the opportunity to succeed where previous administrations have failed.

    TWO OF THE most critical and visible challenges that the Obama administration is currently grappling with are the ailing US economy and the ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. In comparison, the issue of defence spending has been lost to the public view. However, the Obama administration’s attempt to rein in defence spending underscores how inextricably tied defence spending is to the economic crisis and the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan. To be sure, attempting to cut defence spending, especially by killing off major systems programmes, is a considerable challenge, not least because it entails taking on powerful interests entrenched in the military-industrial complex. However, the combination of the US government’s deteriorating finances and the imperatives of Iraq and Afghanistan have made the task easier, though hardly plain-sailing.

    A Strategic Shift or a Budget-Cutting Exercise?

    Leading the drive to reorient the Pentagon’s budget from future weapons programmes to the immediate needs of the US’ two wars is Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates. Secretary Gates’ budget proposal would involve not only the cancellation of existing weapon systems programmes, but also the reallocation of billions of dollars from the development of future weapons programmes to the more pressing needs of the US’ two campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. At risk are major weapon systems such as the army’s Future Combat Systems and the navy’s next generation of aircraft carriers.

    Indeed, in campaigning for his overhaul of the Pentagon’s budget, Gates has emphasised meeting the current needs of the US military over future weapon systems. In addressing the Army War College, he said that there was a misperception that “Iraq and Afghanistan were exotic distractions that would be wrapped up relatively soon” and that the weapons and hardware needed there were “fielded ad hoc and on the fly”.

    While it is highly debatable whether this constitutes a genuine strategic shift, or a budget-cutting exercise merely disguised as one, what is significant is that Gates’ aggressive campaign to garner support from the military and defence companies to streamline the defence budget and overhaul the procurement process is in stark contrast to Donald Rumsfeld’s tenure as Defence Secretary. In the six years that he presided over ever-increasing wartime budgets, Rumsfeld never had to kill weapon systems programmes and therefore never had to sell the idea of budget cuts or reforms to stakeholders.

    The timing of this push to reform the weapons acquisition process is also significant: while past administrations have acknowledged the need for reforms, attempting to do so now amidst the sharp economic recession underscores how closely linked military power and economic power are. Paradoxically, the economic crisis could prove to be the very impetus to meaningful reforms of the defence procurement process as the issue of cost effectiveness gains increasing traction not only with policy makers but the general public.

    Unexpected Support from the Air Force

    The push to consolidate the Pentagon’s budget via the cancellation of existing weapons programmes has gained unexpected support from the US Air Force. In an opinion editorial published in the Washington Post on 13 April 2009, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley and Air Force Chief of Staff General Norton Schwartz endorsed Gates’ proposal to end production of the F-22 Raptor air superiority fighter, the most advanced and capable fighter in the US Air Force. This support is unprecedented, since historically the military has been deeply opposed to the cancellation of weapons programmes in which it has invested considerable resources, particularly weapon systems that are highly symbolic of its power.

    Secretary Donley and General Schwartz have acknowledged that, given budget constraints, procuring more F-22s necessarily means less money to acquire much needed capabilities in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, command and control, as well as capabilities to conduct irregular warfare. More importantly, they write that “based on warfighting experience over the past several years and judgments about future threats”, there is a need to re-evaluate the Air Force’s orders for F- 22s.

    Essentially, this is a tacit acknowledgement that the F-22 has not proved useful in Iraq. Designed with sophisticated radar and stealth characteristics, the F-22 is optimised for air-to-air combat with ground attack capability. However, the airspace over Iraq does not present threats where deployment of the F- 22 is warranted. In other words, as far as operations in Iraq are concerned, the F-22’s characteristics are an ‘over-kill’, and therefore ‘gold-plated’.

    This is a significant development because it undermines the existing ‘because we can do it, we must do it’ technological imperative that drives weapons acquisition. The rationale is to obtain the most sophisticated weapon system, without necessarily matching it to current and most likely threats and needs. Current economic difficulties, and the consequent constraints on defence budgets, may finally force defence planners and the military to acknowledge that the complex and advanced weapon systems that are either in use or in development may not only be an overkill for conventional military operations. Indeed, they may also be ill-suited to irregular warfare and such acquisitions should either be scaled back or cancelled altogether.

    Policy Implications

    Defence budget reforms is a perennial policy agenda item, not only in the US but in other countries. The economic crisis and the resultant constraints in defence budgets is forcing policy makers to streamline weapons acquisitions and to overhaul the procurement process. The need to maintain capabilities that are commensurate with the military’s objectives and missions while working within the budget has made cost effectiveness the key guiding principle. The gold-plated weapon system is a luxury that is ill-afforded in an economic crisis. With the world’s biggest military, with powerful embedded interests both in government and industry, conceding the need for drastic reforms amidst the economic crisis, defence policymakers will feel compelled to at least re-examine their rationale for weapons acquisition.

    About the Author

    Adrian W. J. Kuah is a doctoral candidate at the UK Defence Academy, Cranfield University and an Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He specialises in defence economics and is attached to the School’s Military Transformations Programme. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info