Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09098 | Ketsana and its Aftermath: Lessons on Social Resilience
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09098 | Ketsana and its Aftermath: Lessons on Social Resilience
    Kevin Punzalan

    06 October 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    Typhoon Ketsana in the Philippines has exposed both the weaknesses of government-led disaster preparations and the strengths of civil society in responding to the crisis. Clearly planning for disaster is vital. There are also lessons from the outpouring of voluntarism in the aftermath.

    TYPHOON KETSANA has left much of Manila submerged in floodwaters. As of 2 October, approximately 300 people have died, and over 2.2 million people were directly affected by the resulting floods. While the country frequently experiences typhoons, Ketsana poured more rain than any in Philippine history, exceeding a record set over 40 years ago.

    Civil Society at the Forefront, Government at the Rear

    The response from Filipinos at home and abroad has been massive. Thousands of Filipinos have trooped to evacuation and relief centres to volunteer in processing and distributing food, supplies and equipment to victims of the disaster. Using social networking websites, mobile phones, and blogs, they have been able to pass vital information and on areas affected, the locations of people in need of rescue, and where to donate relief goods and cash. Volunteer efforts included the creation of a missing persons database using GoogleMaps software. The mobilisation of volunteers and donations has proceeded independently of government intervention, exceeding government efforts in collecting and distributing food and emergency goods packages.

    The government, in contrast, has been criticised for its poor response and its lack of preparation for the disaster. The weather bureau has blamed the disaster on climate change, saying that there was no way the government could have anticipated the rapid flooding. This was contradicted by reports that deforestation contributed to the floods. Defence Secretary Gilbert Teodoro, head of the National Disaster Coordination Council (NDCC), was criticised for having insufficient rubber boats and helicopters deployed at the onset of the Typhoon. Many people have been rescued not by the police or the army, but by volunteers creating makeshift boats out of whatever they could find. In anticipation of another typhoon, the President announced a preventive evacuation of affected areas, to avoid repeating earlier mistakes.

    As disaster relief proceeded apace, some politicians were reported to have capitalised on the disaster to boost their political capital. In one case, people who did not possess coupons bearing the visage of an ex-president were not allowed to claim relief goods. President Arroyo herself contributed to confusion by designating the presidential residence as an evacuation centre, cancelling that order, and reverting back to the original plan. Another policy which has hindered relief efforts is the official policy of taxing goods and aid sent from abroad, unless these are routed through the Department of Social Welfare and Development, the ministry designated to distribute aid.

    A Missing Partnership?

    While the spirit of voluntarism among Manileños has been impressive, insufficient efforts have been undertaken to coordinate the volunteers and the flow of donations to critical areas. The government has not attempted to coordinate its efforts with that of civil society, nor has it provided a system to allocate and guide volunteers to the worst affected areas. In some evacuation centres, there has been an excess of volunteers. In others, the lack of them has hampered the distribution of relief goods. The fact that the missing persons database mentioned earlier was created by a volunteer exemplified the ingenuity of private individuals. But it also revealed that the NDCC had yet to come up with a system of identifying and rescuing missing persons.

    It is clear that civil society has taken a leadership role that is normally filled by the government. However, the Philippine government should not abscond its responsibilities and instead engage civil society in an equal partnership. Given the massive support offered by the private sector, the government should create a comprehensive plan for coordinating its rescue and disaster relief efforts with civil society. By improving the situation map based on data collected by volunteers, the government can efficiently distribute its rescue efforts, and also mobilise volunteers in areas it cannot reach. It can also tap bloggers and social networking sites to disseminate information on flooded areas to avoid, shortages of key resources, and of the identities of rescued survivors. Finally, relief centres should have a system for processing volunteers for specific duties and areas of operations, to ensure that energy and manpower and not wasted.

    Alternative Form of Social Resilience

    The considerable efforts that volunteers have contributed should not be discounted. Many working professionals have taken unpaid leave to contribute to the distribution of emergency goods. Graphic artists have created awareness posters for free. Filipinos abroad have pooled donations for the aid agencies, and have tried to raise awareness about the disaster in their host countries. Despite the inadequate government response to the disaster, individuals have taken it upon themselves to aid victims of Typhoon Ketsana in any way they can.

    The Filipino term for this phenomenon, bayanihan (loosely translated as “mutual cooperation for the public good”) illustrates a social resilience that has ensured the survival of civic unity despite the depredations Manila has endured. Resilience is not determined solely by the level of disaster readiness a state maintains, but also by a people’s attitude towards adversity. Despite the Philippines’ weak political infrastructure, despite entrenched corruption and prevalent poverty; ordinary people have maintained a strong bayanihan spirit.

    The crisis has deeply affected millions of Filipinos, but it has also brought out the best in them through the spirit of voluntarism. The Philippine government should appreciate this resource and ensure that it is used intelligently by channeling it and allowing it complement its own efforts. Other countries with similar vulnerabilities should also examine this untapped resource and examine how its potential can be realised in the event of natural disasters. By doing so, they can ensure that their own social resilience is enhanced.

    About the Author

    Kevin Punzalan is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, where he serves at the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies. He is also a native of Manila.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Commentary

    Typhoon Ketsana in the Philippines has exposed both the weaknesses of government-led disaster preparations and the strengths of civil society in responding to the crisis. Clearly planning for disaster is vital. There are also lessons from the outpouring of voluntarism in the aftermath.

    TYPHOON KETSANA has left much of Manila submerged in floodwaters. As of 2 October, approximately 300 people have died, and over 2.2 million people were directly affected by the resulting floods. While the country frequently experiences typhoons, Ketsana poured more rain than any in Philippine history, exceeding a record set over 40 years ago.

    Civil Society at the Forefront, Government at the Rear

    The response from Filipinos at home and abroad has been massive. Thousands of Filipinos have trooped to evacuation and relief centres to volunteer in processing and distributing food, supplies and equipment to victims of the disaster. Using social networking websites, mobile phones, and blogs, they have been able to pass vital information and on areas affected, the locations of people in need of rescue, and where to donate relief goods and cash. Volunteer efforts included the creation of a missing persons database using GoogleMaps software. The mobilisation of volunteers and donations has proceeded independently of government intervention, exceeding government efforts in collecting and distributing food and emergency goods packages.

    The government, in contrast, has been criticised for its poor response and its lack of preparation for the disaster. The weather bureau has blamed the disaster on climate change, saying that there was no way the government could have anticipated the rapid flooding. This was contradicted by reports that deforestation contributed to the floods. Defence Secretary Gilbert Teodoro, head of the National Disaster Coordination Council (NDCC), was criticised for having insufficient rubber boats and helicopters deployed at the onset of the Typhoon. Many people have been rescued not by the police or the army, but by volunteers creating makeshift boats out of whatever they could find. In anticipation of another typhoon, the President announced a preventive evacuation of affected areas, to avoid repeating earlier mistakes.

    As disaster relief proceeded apace, some politicians were reported to have capitalised on the disaster to boost their political capital. In one case, people who did not possess coupons bearing the visage of an ex-president were not allowed to claim relief goods. President Arroyo herself contributed to confusion by designating the presidential residence as an evacuation centre, cancelling that order, and reverting back to the original plan. Another policy which has hindered relief efforts is the official policy of taxing goods and aid sent from abroad, unless these are routed through the Department of Social Welfare and Development, the ministry designated to distribute aid.

    A Missing Partnership?

    While the spirit of voluntarism among Manileños has been impressive, insufficient efforts have been undertaken to coordinate the volunteers and the flow of donations to critical areas. The government has not attempted to coordinate its efforts with that of civil society, nor has it provided a system to allocate and guide volunteers to the worst affected areas. In some evacuation centres, there has been an excess of volunteers. In others, the lack of them has hampered the distribution of relief goods. The fact that the missing persons database mentioned earlier was created by a volunteer exemplified the ingenuity of private individuals. But it also revealed that the NDCC had yet to come up with a system of identifying and rescuing missing persons.

    It is clear that civil society has taken a leadership role that is normally filled by the government. However, the Philippine government should not abscond its responsibilities and instead engage civil society in an equal partnership. Given the massive support offered by the private sector, the government should create a comprehensive plan for coordinating its rescue and disaster relief efforts with civil society. By improving the situation map based on data collected by volunteers, the government can efficiently distribute its rescue efforts, and also mobilise volunteers in areas it cannot reach. It can also tap bloggers and social networking sites to disseminate information on flooded areas to avoid, shortages of key resources, and of the identities of rescued survivors. Finally, relief centres should have a system for processing volunteers for specific duties and areas of operations, to ensure that energy and manpower and not wasted.

    Alternative Form of Social Resilience

    The considerable efforts that volunteers have contributed should not be discounted. Many working professionals have taken unpaid leave to contribute to the distribution of emergency goods. Graphic artists have created awareness posters for free. Filipinos abroad have pooled donations for the aid agencies, and have tried to raise awareness about the disaster in their host countries. Despite the inadequate government response to the disaster, individuals have taken it upon themselves to aid victims of Typhoon Ketsana in any way they can.

    The Filipino term for this phenomenon, bayanihan (loosely translated as “mutual cooperation for the public good”) illustrates a social resilience that has ensured the survival of civic unity despite the depredations Manila has endured. Resilience is not determined solely by the level of disaster readiness a state maintains, but also by a people’s attitude towards adversity. Despite the Philippines’ weak political infrastructure, despite entrenched corruption and prevalent poverty; ordinary people have maintained a strong bayanihan spirit.

    The crisis has deeply affected millions of Filipinos, but it has also brought out the best in them through the spirit of voluntarism. The Philippine government should appreciate this resource and ensure that it is used intelligently by channeling it and allowing it complement its own efforts. Other countries with similar vulnerabilities should also examine this untapped resource and examine how its potential can be realised in the event of natural disasters. By doing so, they can ensure that their own social resilience is enhanced.

    About the Author

    Kevin Punzalan is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, where he serves at the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies. He is also a native of Manila.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info