Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09111 | APEC at 20: Old Promises, New Challenges
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09111 | APEC at 20: Old Promises, New Challenges
    Barry Desker

    11 November 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    As APEC leaders convene for the Singapore summit this week, there is one question that needs to be asked: Can the consensual, inclusive norm that has propelled APEC be the driving force to bind regional groupings together?

    THIS WEEK’S APEC Leaders Meeting in Singapore marks the 20th anniversary of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. Critics of APEC have highlighted the lack of progress in promoting regional economic integration and the failure of its efforts at voluntary sectoral liberalisation. They doubt that its ambition of free trade across the APEC region will be achieved by 2020. The APEC summit is remembered by them more for the attire of the leaders than for the substantive pronouncements of the meeting. APEC is seen as a talk shop with few concrete benefits, unlike NAFTA or the European Union with their strong legal institutions and clearly defined rules.

    APEC’s Forgotten Role

    However, this negative assessment ignores the dynamic growth that has occurred in the East Asian region over the past 20 years. The rapid recovery of East Asia during the current global financial and economic crisis bears testimony to the emerging shift in global economic power from West to East. Trans-Pacific trade and investment is now far more significant than trade and investment across the Atlantic. The regular meetings of leaders at APEC have facilitated this global adjustment as well as created an informal web of relationships within East Asia and across the Pacific. Even if APEC’s developed members do not meet the Bogor 2010 goals next year, loosely structured cooperation through APEC has enabled East Asia to emerge as the fastest growing region in the world over the past two decades.

    APEC’s role in promoting trade liberalisation tends to be forgotten. China’s participation in APEC since 1991 provided the impetus for Chinese unilateral liberalisation. It was a valuable learning experience prior to China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). APEC served as a template for China’s ‘early harvest’ concessions to the ASEAN states during the China-ASEAN FTA negotiations. APEC also provided the leadership for the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996. The ITA facilitated the elimination of customs duties on computers, telecommunications products, semi-conductors, semi-conductor manufacturing equipment and scientific equipment. The significance of the electronics manufacturing sector for East Asia meant that the ITA had a greater trade liberalising impact than many of the bilateral FTAs that have been signed in recent years. APEC is now embarking on reducing non-tariff barriers to trade, which offers potentially the greatest gains to the trading community.

    APEC and Political Issues

    While APEC initiatives on multilateral trade liberalisation have stalled, recent summits have been marked by useful consultations on political issues. APEC discussed East Timor in 1999, terrorism since 2001 and is now involved in exchanges on “trade-related” security issues such as supply chain security, maritime security, energy and environmental wellbeing. Here APEC seems to be entering ground covered by the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It is time for rationalisation of the work covered by APEC and the ARF.

    It would be beneficial to hold back-to-back summits of APEC and the ARF when an ARF member hosts the APEC Leaders Meeting. Such a move is likely to win Chinese support. Back-to-back APEC/ARF summits would mean that APEC would focus on economic cooperation while the ARF would be the apex regional security institution. As Taiwan attends APEC meetings as ‘Chinese Taipei’, it would be included in regional economic institution building but excluded from major regional security dialogues.

    The vision which should underpin our efforts to re-think the relationship between APEC and the ARF is founded on a critical need. We need institutions that can bind the United States — the sole superpower — and rising powers such as China within a framework that allows representation and participation by medium powers and smaller states in the region. Such inclusive institutions can serve as the basis for the emergence of a growing sense of regional identity and increased contacts among decision-makers in the Asia-Pacific.

    Alternative View

    An alternative view is that regional economic and security affairs should be shaped by the more powerful states in the Asia-Pacific. A paper at a recent Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) conference in Singapore called for a G-10 comprising the Asia-Pacific members of the G-20 which would be at the apex of Asia-Pacific decision-making. Proponents of this grouping argue that effectiveness matters much more than broad representation. However, the turn to a concert of powers reminds me more of the 19th century than a 21st century response to the challenge of creating regional order.

    One of the strengths of APEC is that its practices have been shaped by the norms and values of the ASEAN states that played a critical role in establishing APEC and the ARF. The ASEAN approach emphasised consultation, consensus decision-making and an inclusive approach to regional institution- building.

    The opportunities for informal exchanges and consensual decision-making in APEC could help to ensure that the concerns of both Western as well as Asian states are reflected in the evolving regional order. We need to recognise that there are divergent norms and values present in international society and that those differences could lead to possible conflict. Inclusive institutions such as APEC could serve as harbingers of cooperation on a larger scale.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Commentary

    As APEC leaders convene for the Singapore summit this week, there is one question that needs to be asked: Can the consensual, inclusive norm that has propelled APEC be the driving force to bind regional groupings together?

    THIS WEEK’S APEC Leaders Meeting in Singapore marks the 20th anniversary of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. Critics of APEC have highlighted the lack of progress in promoting regional economic integration and the failure of its efforts at voluntary sectoral liberalisation. They doubt that its ambition of free trade across the APEC region will be achieved by 2020. The APEC summit is remembered by them more for the attire of the leaders than for the substantive pronouncements of the meeting. APEC is seen as a talk shop with few concrete benefits, unlike NAFTA or the European Union with their strong legal institutions and clearly defined rules.

    APEC’s Forgotten Role

    However, this negative assessment ignores the dynamic growth that has occurred in the East Asian region over the past 20 years. The rapid recovery of East Asia during the current global financial and economic crisis bears testimony to the emerging shift in global economic power from West to East. Trans-Pacific trade and investment is now far more significant than trade and investment across the Atlantic. The regular meetings of leaders at APEC have facilitated this global adjustment as well as created an informal web of relationships within East Asia and across the Pacific. Even if APEC’s developed members do not meet the Bogor 2010 goals next year, loosely structured cooperation through APEC has enabled East Asia to emerge as the fastest growing region in the world over the past two decades.

    APEC’s role in promoting trade liberalisation tends to be forgotten. China’s participation in APEC since 1991 provided the impetus for Chinese unilateral liberalisation. It was a valuable learning experience prior to China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). APEC served as a template for China’s ‘early harvest’ concessions to the ASEAN states during the China-ASEAN FTA negotiations. APEC also provided the leadership for the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996. The ITA facilitated the elimination of customs duties on computers, telecommunications products, semi-conductors, semi-conductor manufacturing equipment and scientific equipment. The significance of the electronics manufacturing sector for East Asia meant that the ITA had a greater trade liberalising impact than many of the bilateral FTAs that have been signed in recent years. APEC is now embarking on reducing non-tariff barriers to trade, which offers potentially the greatest gains to the trading community.

    APEC and Political Issues

    While APEC initiatives on multilateral trade liberalisation have stalled, recent summits have been marked by useful consultations on political issues. APEC discussed East Timor in 1999, terrorism since 2001 and is now involved in exchanges on “trade-related” security issues such as supply chain security, maritime security, energy and environmental wellbeing. Here APEC seems to be entering ground covered by the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It is time for rationalisation of the work covered by APEC and the ARF.

    It would be beneficial to hold back-to-back summits of APEC and the ARF when an ARF member hosts the APEC Leaders Meeting. Such a move is likely to win Chinese support. Back-to-back APEC/ARF summits would mean that APEC would focus on economic cooperation while the ARF would be the apex regional security institution. As Taiwan attends APEC meetings as ‘Chinese Taipei’, it would be included in regional economic institution building but excluded from major regional security dialogues.

    The vision which should underpin our efforts to re-think the relationship between APEC and the ARF is founded on a critical need. We need institutions that can bind the United States — the sole superpower — and rising powers such as China within a framework that allows representation and participation by medium powers and smaller states in the region. Such inclusive institutions can serve as the basis for the emergence of a growing sense of regional identity and increased contacts among decision-makers in the Asia-Pacific.

    Alternative View

    An alternative view is that regional economic and security affairs should be shaped by the more powerful states in the Asia-Pacific. A paper at a recent Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) conference in Singapore called for a G-10 comprising the Asia-Pacific members of the G-20 which would be at the apex of Asia-Pacific decision-making. Proponents of this grouping argue that effectiveness matters much more than broad representation. However, the turn to a concert of powers reminds me more of the 19th century than a 21st century response to the challenge of creating regional order.

    One of the strengths of APEC is that its practices have been shaped by the norms and values of the ASEAN states that played a critical role in establishing APEC and the ARF. The ASEAN approach emphasised consultation, consensus decision-making and an inclusive approach to regional institution- building.

    The opportunities for informal exchanges and consensual decision-making in APEC could help to ensure that the concerns of both Western as well as Asian states are reflected in the evolving regional order. We need to recognise that there are divergent norms and values present in international society and that those differences could lead to possible conflict. Inclusive institutions such as APEC could serve as harbingers of cooperation on a larger scale.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info