Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09114 | Counter Ideology: Role of Media Relations
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09114 | Counter Ideology: Role of Media Relations
    Muhammad Haniff Hassan, Nur Azlin Mohamed Yasin

    16 November 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    Muslim self-help groups doing counter ideological work play an important role. However, the work could be boosted with more support from the mainstream media. A group of journalists share their views on how self-help groups should relate to the media to forge greater cooperation in inoculating the public from extremist propaganda.

    Reaching out to the Media

    What makes news depends on the value of the news – does it have impact, and to what degree? The more drama and conflict are involved, especially casualties, the greater the value of the news. It is not surprising then that statements issued by extremists receive wide media coverage; so much so that media outlets are often blamed for being the conduit of extremists’ messages. This raises the question of how to counter the extremists’ unchallenged use of the media. To demand the media to stop covering extremists’ statements may not be practical. To complement them with counter-views though, would provide a balance that could neutralise the implications of the extremists’views.

    Counter-extremist practitioners must be as active as the extremists in courting the media. The media is not giving its space to the extremists, the extremists are proactively taking it, so must the counteracting side. This is especially important for self-help counter ideology groups. Self-help groups usually lack an understanding of strategic communications; they tend to be passive and wait for the media to approach them. Their weak distribution network does not enable them to create a “buzz” around their activities that would create media interest. These groups need to understand the media cycle, how to present their information in a compelling way, and how to proactively court the media.

    The best way to understand the media is to work with professionals with deep knowledge of the industry, and a commitment to understanding counter-ideology work. To gain some insights on how to address this critical issue, we spoke to seven journalists. They are: Azahar Mohamed, M. Noor, Chairul Fahmy, Syed Zakir Hussain, Zackaria Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Dhafeer and Mazlena Mazlan, all from Singapore Press Holding and Mediacorp. Unanimous on the need for a strong relationship between the two parties, they all stressed the importance of confidence building and the maintenance of relations that transcends ‘the immediate need’.

    Building Confidence

    Self-help groups involved in counter ideological work need to demonstrate their credibility to assist the media in accurately covering this issue in an objective way. According to Zackaria, some critical questions need to be addressed, such as “Whose ideology you’re countering? For what reason? Why is one ideology more “correct” than the other?” Once that is done, people will want to understand the likely impact of the effort. To this end, suggests Chairul Fahmy, sharing information about the efforts should not be restricted to stories about success or ‘positive stories’ only. Media reporting on failures, if done in a factual and responsible manner, would contribute to the public’s greater understanding of the tasks at hand. It will encourage greater understanding that “counter terrorism threats are no mean feat and that by sharing these failures, there will be people within the community who can share good advice or ideas, and suggestions”. This way, confidence in counter ideological work is developed both in the media and the public.

    One hindrance to good organisation-media relations is the stereotypical perception held by organisations that the media is always looking for “tabloid-type” stories only. In reality, the media is not just looking for gory and dramatic pictures, but is trying to understand what is happening so as to be able to inform its audience. Good open communication is critical. Chairul Fahmy commented: “It’s important to overcome this habit of questioning the integrity of the press men and try to avoid the cliché of saying, almost everything, ‘off-the-record’.” They are of the view that both parties should view each other as committed honest professionals.

    Sustaining Good Relations

    Building such a relationship with the media should not be a one-off programme but a continuous effort. Among other measures that could be taken, Zakir, Zackaria, M. Noor and Chairul Fahmy stress the need for self-help bodies to invite journalists to their events and have discussions so as to provide them with a better understanding of their work, position and views on various issues as well as share important findings from their research.

    The writers believe that good media relations would facilitate counter-extremist messages to the larger audience. For example, media requests for interviews should not be ignored. Accessibility for interview beyond the usual working hours also helps to accommodate the nature of media work. Unavailability for interviews must be courteously communicated; journalists understand that interviewees are busy, but being rude or ignoring requests creates unnecessary hostility and mistrust. To assist in managing media requests, having a trained corporate communications officer would be helpful. One interesting suggestion was offered by Azahar who suggested a media attachment programme for self-help groups so that they can understand the media cycle and how to work with it.

    Writing for the Media

    Fighting for media space depends not only on good media relations, but also on being relevant to the media’s focus. “Be proactive, but not excessive”, says Zackaria. One example of pro-activeness, the writers suggest, is to anticipate requests especially of significant incidents when the media would often seek comments from the ground. However, all the journalists agree that the content must be media- friendly. “Sending press releases without understanding what is really news will be a waste of time,” says Azahar, who argues for proper training.

    Empathy

    A structured ‘to-do list’ for self-help groups in their efforts to build media relations is only a small part. The main theme however is empathy. Like all other skills required in building individual or organisational relations, one has to be emphatic of the other to understand each other’s role. In this case, self-help groups have to ultimately perceive the media as people who are just trying to do their jobs. If both sides understand the strengths and weaknesses of each other then the substance of the relationship can be strengthened, resulting in a more effective outreach to the community in counter-ideological work.

    About the Authors

    Muhammad Haniff Hassan is Associate Research Fellow and Nur Azlin Mohamed Yasin is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Commentary

    Muslim self-help groups doing counter ideological work play an important role. However, the work could be boosted with more support from the mainstream media. A group of journalists share their views on how self-help groups should relate to the media to forge greater cooperation in inoculating the public from extremist propaganda.

    Reaching out to the Media

    What makes news depends on the value of the news – does it have impact, and to what degree? The more drama and conflict are involved, especially casualties, the greater the value of the news. It is not surprising then that statements issued by extremists receive wide media coverage; so much so that media outlets are often blamed for being the conduit of extremists’ messages. This raises the question of how to counter the extremists’ unchallenged use of the media. To demand the media to stop covering extremists’ statements may not be practical. To complement them with counter-views though, would provide a balance that could neutralise the implications of the extremists’views.

    Counter-extremist practitioners must be as active as the extremists in courting the media. The media is not giving its space to the extremists, the extremists are proactively taking it, so must the counteracting side. This is especially important for self-help counter ideology groups. Self-help groups usually lack an understanding of strategic communications; they tend to be passive and wait for the media to approach them. Their weak distribution network does not enable them to create a “buzz” around their activities that would create media interest. These groups need to understand the media cycle, how to present their information in a compelling way, and how to proactively court the media.

    The best way to understand the media is to work with professionals with deep knowledge of the industry, and a commitment to understanding counter-ideology work. To gain some insights on how to address this critical issue, we spoke to seven journalists. They are: Azahar Mohamed, M. Noor, Chairul Fahmy, Syed Zakir Hussain, Zackaria Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Dhafeer and Mazlena Mazlan, all from Singapore Press Holding and Mediacorp. Unanimous on the need for a strong relationship between the two parties, they all stressed the importance of confidence building and the maintenance of relations that transcends ‘the immediate need’.

    Building Confidence

    Self-help groups involved in counter ideological work need to demonstrate their credibility to assist the media in accurately covering this issue in an objective way. According to Zackaria, some critical questions need to be addressed, such as “Whose ideology you’re countering? For what reason? Why is one ideology more “correct” than the other?” Once that is done, people will want to understand the likely impact of the effort. To this end, suggests Chairul Fahmy, sharing information about the efforts should not be restricted to stories about success or ‘positive stories’ only. Media reporting on failures, if done in a factual and responsible manner, would contribute to the public’s greater understanding of the tasks at hand. It will encourage greater understanding that “counter terrorism threats are no mean feat and that by sharing these failures, there will be people within the community who can share good advice or ideas, and suggestions”. This way, confidence in counter ideological work is developed both in the media and the public.

    One hindrance to good organisation-media relations is the stereotypical perception held by organisations that the media is always looking for “tabloid-type” stories only. In reality, the media is not just looking for gory and dramatic pictures, but is trying to understand what is happening so as to be able to inform its audience. Good open communication is critical. Chairul Fahmy commented: “It’s important to overcome this habit of questioning the integrity of the press men and try to avoid the cliché of saying, almost everything, ‘off-the-record’.” They are of the view that both parties should view each other as committed honest professionals.

    Sustaining Good Relations

    Building such a relationship with the media should not be a one-off programme but a continuous effort. Among other measures that could be taken, Zakir, Zackaria, M. Noor and Chairul Fahmy stress the need for self-help bodies to invite journalists to their events and have discussions so as to provide them with a better understanding of their work, position and views on various issues as well as share important findings from their research.

    The writers believe that good media relations would facilitate counter-extremist messages to the larger audience. For example, media requests for interviews should not be ignored. Accessibility for interview beyond the usual working hours also helps to accommodate the nature of media work. Unavailability for interviews must be courteously communicated; journalists understand that interviewees are busy, but being rude or ignoring requests creates unnecessary hostility and mistrust. To assist in managing media requests, having a trained corporate communications officer would be helpful. One interesting suggestion was offered by Azahar who suggested a media attachment programme for self-help groups so that they can understand the media cycle and how to work with it.

    Writing for the Media

    Fighting for media space depends not only on good media relations, but also on being relevant to the media’s focus. “Be proactive, but not excessive”, says Zackaria. One example of pro-activeness, the writers suggest, is to anticipate requests especially of significant incidents when the media would often seek comments from the ground. However, all the journalists agree that the content must be media- friendly. “Sending press releases without understanding what is really news will be a waste of time,” says Azahar, who argues for proper training.

    Empathy

    A structured ‘to-do list’ for self-help groups in their efforts to build media relations is only a small part. The main theme however is empathy. Like all other skills required in building individual or organisational relations, one has to be emphatic of the other to understand each other’s role. In this case, self-help groups have to ultimately perceive the media as people who are just trying to do their jobs. If both sides understand the strengths and weaknesses of each other then the substance of the relationship can be strengthened, resulting in a more effective outreach to the community in counter-ideological work.

    About the Authors

    Muhammad Haniff Hassan is Associate Research Fellow and Nur Azlin Mohamed Yasin is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info