Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Public Education
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      Public EducationAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • CO09121 | South Korea: Time to Reconsider the Notion of ‘Ethnic Homogeneity’
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO09121 | South Korea: Time to Reconsider the Notion of ‘Ethnic Homogeneity’
Jenna Park

03 December 2009

download pdf

Commentary

In a globalising world in which multi-culturalism has become a by-product, South Korea has remained one of the few ethnically homogeneous countries. However, globalisation has also started an influx of foreigners and immigrants into South Korean society, which poses massive challenges to the state as well as the individual South Korean citizen.

The Curious Case of Bonojit Hussain

Bonojit Hussain is an Indian national who is working as a research professor at Sungkonghoe University in Seoul. On 10 July 2009, while on the bus with a female Korean friend, Hussain was verbally abused by one “Mr. Park”, who threw racial and sexist comments at him and his female friend. Fortunately, the bus driver complied with their request to be driven to the nearest police station, where Mr. Park was consequently apprehended. This incident caught the attention of not only the mainstream media, but more importantly, the South Korean prosecutors.

On 28 August, in the landmark development, the prosecutors indicted Mr. Park on a charge of criminal insult. Subsequently, Mr. Park was sentenced to a fine of 1 million Korean Won. More importantly, this case highlighted not only the age-old racial prejudices that permeates South Korean society, but also exposed the gaps in the legal infrastructure in dealing with racial offences.

Influx of Foreigners into South Korea

The influx of foreign labour into South Korea began in the wake of its remarkably rapid economic development since the 1960s. Having attained the status of one of the four ‘Asian Tigers’, South Koreans began to shun away from the so-called 3D (difficult, dirty, and dangerous) labour. Consequently, the South Korean government and businesses began to look outwards to fill the shortage of 3D labour and foreign workers started to arrive to fill this gap. Many of these workers hailed from the poorer parts of Asia and typically stayed for a few years on a contract basis.

However, an interesting and more permanent form of foreign immigration arrived in the form of foreign women. These women, who were usually Chinese and Vietnamese, became the foreign brides of South Korean men in the rural regions who found it increasingly difficult to find a local partner due to urban migration. A third and more modern type of foreign immigrant can be found in the increasing number of foreign professionals and students who typically work and reside in the urban centres.

Ethnic Homogeneity and Immigration in South Korea

South Korea – a nation of 49 million people – does not have a tradition of incorporating immigrants into society. Although foreign residents have increased to 1.2 million, this figure represents only 2 percent of the entire South Korean population. Given such demographics, it is easy to see why the establishment of laws and policies vis-a-vis foreigners has never been a priority. This point is amply illustrated by the fact that there is currently no specific law against racial discrimination in South Korea; the closest being that of criminal insult as in the case of Mr. Park.

The strength and homogeneity of Korean culture unfortunately translates to the lack of political imperative to enact rights and protection for non-Koreans. However, this status quo is increasingly being challenged due to the importance of foreigners to the Korean economy. As corporate giants such as Samsung and Hyundai compete in the globalised world economy, it has become increasingly recognised that the cheap influx of foreign labour is vital to keep the domestic economy running.

South Korea is a country that is not only ethnically homogenous, but also built upon an exceptionally strong sense of nationalism. This can be explained from a historical perspective, as a result of: i) enduring brutal Japanese colonisation from 1910 to 1945; and ii) the policies of president Park Jung- Hee in the immediate aftermath of the Korean War. President Park emphasised the importance of collective effort of South Koreans in reconstructing the country. It is notable that the reconstruction was largely carried out by the blood and sweat of the South Koreans without the input of foreign labour.

In retrospect, it is undeniable that this culture of strong collectivism enabled rapid economic and social development in South Korea. However, on the other hand, it has also cultivated a sense of xenophobia and insularity which resonates till today.

Implications for South Korean Immigration Policy

Immigration policy has been taken seriously only recently as most of the immigrants come for a short- term purpose, mainly providing labour, with plans to eventually return to their home country. For this reason, South Korean immigration policy has been short-term oriented. This explains the absence of a solid legal basis which addresses the issue of racial discrimination and lack of social infrastructure suited for foreigners. Nonetheless, the increasing influx of foreigners brought about by globalisation would lead to increase in persons wanting to reside on a long-term or permanent basis. In this connection, there have been reports of foreigners submitting applications to acquire South Korean citizenship.

If such a trend continues, it is likely that South Korean society would have to shed its insular fabric and the concept of ‘ethnic homogeneity’ would have to necessarily evolve. The recent measures introduced by the government seem to indicate a recognition of the need to accommodate and integrate foreigners into the society. For example, the Employment Permit System was implemented in 2004 to protect the rights of migrant workers. Additionally, Democratic Party representative Jun Byung-Hun expressed his intention to introduce a bill against racial discrimination in the National Assembly after Hussain’s case was reported.

Indeed, South Korea seems to have realised that maintaining ‘ethnic homogeneity’ is no longer feasible in a globalised world and – very much like Singapore – that it is crucial to assimilate its immigrants into the society in order to boost national competitiveness. However, while the government initiatives and efforts to integrate immigrants into the society are certainly laudable, the greater challenge lies in gradually eroding the prejudices of the average South Korean citizen, such as a certain “Mr. Park”.

About the Author

Jenna Park is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS) in S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. A native of Seoul, she graduated with a MSc degree in International Political Economy from RSIS. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / East Asia and Asia Pacific

Commentary

In a globalising world in which multi-culturalism has become a by-product, South Korea has remained one of the few ethnically homogeneous countries. However, globalisation has also started an influx of foreigners and immigrants into South Korean society, which poses massive challenges to the state as well as the individual South Korean citizen.

The Curious Case of Bonojit Hussain

Bonojit Hussain is an Indian national who is working as a research professor at Sungkonghoe University in Seoul. On 10 July 2009, while on the bus with a female Korean friend, Hussain was verbally abused by one “Mr. Park”, who threw racial and sexist comments at him and his female friend. Fortunately, the bus driver complied with their request to be driven to the nearest police station, where Mr. Park was consequently apprehended. This incident caught the attention of not only the mainstream media, but more importantly, the South Korean prosecutors.

On 28 August, in the landmark development, the prosecutors indicted Mr. Park on a charge of criminal insult. Subsequently, Mr. Park was sentenced to a fine of 1 million Korean Won. More importantly, this case highlighted not only the age-old racial prejudices that permeates South Korean society, but also exposed the gaps in the legal infrastructure in dealing with racial offences.

Influx of Foreigners into South Korea

The influx of foreign labour into South Korea began in the wake of its remarkably rapid economic development since the 1960s. Having attained the status of one of the four ‘Asian Tigers’, South Koreans began to shun away from the so-called 3D (difficult, dirty, and dangerous) labour. Consequently, the South Korean government and businesses began to look outwards to fill the shortage of 3D labour and foreign workers started to arrive to fill this gap. Many of these workers hailed from the poorer parts of Asia and typically stayed for a few years on a contract basis.

However, an interesting and more permanent form of foreign immigration arrived in the form of foreign women. These women, who were usually Chinese and Vietnamese, became the foreign brides of South Korean men in the rural regions who found it increasingly difficult to find a local partner due to urban migration. A third and more modern type of foreign immigrant can be found in the increasing number of foreign professionals and students who typically work and reside in the urban centres.

Ethnic Homogeneity and Immigration in South Korea

South Korea – a nation of 49 million people – does not have a tradition of incorporating immigrants into society. Although foreign residents have increased to 1.2 million, this figure represents only 2 percent of the entire South Korean population. Given such demographics, it is easy to see why the establishment of laws and policies vis-a-vis foreigners has never been a priority. This point is amply illustrated by the fact that there is currently no specific law against racial discrimination in South Korea; the closest being that of criminal insult as in the case of Mr. Park.

The strength and homogeneity of Korean culture unfortunately translates to the lack of political imperative to enact rights and protection for non-Koreans. However, this status quo is increasingly being challenged due to the importance of foreigners to the Korean economy. As corporate giants such as Samsung and Hyundai compete in the globalised world economy, it has become increasingly recognised that the cheap influx of foreign labour is vital to keep the domestic economy running.

South Korea is a country that is not only ethnically homogenous, but also built upon an exceptionally strong sense of nationalism. This can be explained from a historical perspective, as a result of: i) enduring brutal Japanese colonisation from 1910 to 1945; and ii) the policies of president Park Jung- Hee in the immediate aftermath of the Korean War. President Park emphasised the importance of collective effort of South Koreans in reconstructing the country. It is notable that the reconstruction was largely carried out by the blood and sweat of the South Koreans without the input of foreign labour.

In retrospect, it is undeniable that this culture of strong collectivism enabled rapid economic and social development in South Korea. However, on the other hand, it has also cultivated a sense of xenophobia and insularity which resonates till today.

Implications for South Korean Immigration Policy

Immigration policy has been taken seriously only recently as most of the immigrants come for a short- term purpose, mainly providing labour, with plans to eventually return to their home country. For this reason, South Korean immigration policy has been short-term oriented. This explains the absence of a solid legal basis which addresses the issue of racial discrimination and lack of social infrastructure suited for foreigners. Nonetheless, the increasing influx of foreigners brought about by globalisation would lead to increase in persons wanting to reside on a long-term or permanent basis. In this connection, there have been reports of foreigners submitting applications to acquire South Korean citizenship.

If such a trend continues, it is likely that South Korean society would have to shed its insular fabric and the concept of ‘ethnic homogeneity’ would have to necessarily evolve. The recent measures introduced by the government seem to indicate a recognition of the need to accommodate and integrate foreigners into the society. For example, the Employment Permit System was implemented in 2004 to protect the rights of migrant workers. Additionally, Democratic Party representative Jun Byung-Hun expressed his intention to introduce a bill against racial discrimination in the National Assembly after Hussain’s case was reported.

Indeed, South Korea seems to have realised that maintaining ‘ethnic homogeneity’ is no longer feasible in a globalised world and – very much like Singapore – that it is crucial to assimilate its immigrants into the society in order to boost national competitiveness. However, while the government initiatives and efforts to integrate immigrants into the society are certainly laudable, the greater challenge lies in gradually eroding the prejudices of the average South Korean citizen, such as a certain “Mr. Park”.

About the Author

Jenna Park is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS) in S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. A native of Seoul, she graduated with a MSc degree in International Political Economy from RSIS. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info