Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09125 | Relevance of the Singapore Armed Forces: A Journey into Singaporeaness
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO09125 | Relevance of the Singapore Armed Forces: A Journey into Singaporeaness
    Ong Wei Chong

    14 December 2009

    download pdf

    Commentary

    The continued relevance of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) to the nation-state guarantees its existence as a national institution. In addition to traditional security considerations, this must take into account an increasingly globalised Singaporean society.

    THE END OF the Cold War has led to a paradigm shift in the global security eco-system – not least the role of armed forces in their respective societies. A refrain from a popular military cadence of the 1980s went: ‘down by the river, took a little walk, ran into some communists, had a little talk’. A post- September 11 SAF Serviceman would be familiar with the tune – except that terrorists rather than communists are now the featured enemies of the state.

    Communist subversion and acts of terrorism are highly visible security concerns that justify the existence of the SAF. In short, since its inception more than 40 years ago, the SAF has always been the principal guarantor of Singapore’s security, strategic interests and sovereignty. Other than the defence of Singapore, the SAF plays another less swash-buckling but no less important role – moulding and holding the social fabric of Singaporean society. As a globalised city-state open to the world, Singapore is prone to rapid shifts in its societal make-up and notions of ‘Singaporeaness’. This in turn requires new approaches when justifying the relevance and existence of the SAF.

    A Relevant SAF for the Singaporean Generation Y

    Part of the Singapore Army’s vision statement acknowledges the fact that it has to be ‘Ready, Relevant and Decisive’. Like all things Singaporean, the SAF is not spared from the rigours of justifying its relevance. Military National Service (NS) plays the twin role of ensuring an operationally-ready SAF as well as nation-building. Thus NS and the attitudes towards military service is a microcosm of Singapore and Singaporeaness. A recent article in POINTER, the journal of the SAF, Generation Why – So What? highlighted the significant generational differences in attitudes and values between the Generation Y Singaporean servicemen (young adults who grew up in the 1990s/2000s) and their predecessors.

    As hinted in the article’s title, Generation Y servicemen are intuitively prone to asking why and seeking the rationale behind decisions. The intrepid article also noted that the idea of contractual obligation to the state in the form of long-term bonds is an anathema to many a Generation Y regular serviceman. What the article did not sufficiently address is – has the definition of traditional military core values such as honour, pride, duty and loyalty to country – and most importantly notions of Singaporeaness evolved into vastly different creatures for Generation Y servicemen? If so, should SAF policy in recruitment and career management reflect those changes in core values?

    The SAF must be able to convince its Generation Y servicemen — both professional and citizen — of the relevance of military service. In the market for talent, the SAF faces tough competition not only from the private sector but also prestigious overseas universities that offer bond-free scholarships. The guarantee of an ‘iron rice bowl’ is no longer sufficient to induce the best and brightest Singaporeans into a professional military career. The danger here is that to a Generation Y Singaporean with more flexible options for self-advancement, a SAF career might be dismissed as an ‘irrelevant’ consideration.

    A Reflection of Singaporean Identity

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau once asked: “How can they love it, if their native land means no more to them than it does to foreigners, and if what it does for them is only what cannot be refused to anyone?” Perceptions of ‘NS for Singaporeans, jobs for foreigners’ is a well-articulated concern of Generation Y Singaporeans on youtube, online blogs and social networking sites. Unlike their predecessors, many Generation Y Singaporeans have the ability to vote with their feet. Hence, the raison d’être of the SAF and NS cannot be taken for granted. Will young Singaporeans of today and beyond continue to perceive the SAF and NS as relevant national and social institutions?

    This question is further compounded by the dwindling pool of citizens fit for military service. Citizens currently account for 65% of Singapore’s resident population and the low replacement rate of its citizens (1.08 in 2008 – the third lowest in the world) is a strategic reality that will impact the make-up of the SAF. The conscription of female citizens alongside their male counterparts and the recruitment of non-citizens as career soldiers are issues that cannot be dismissed lightly in the near future.

    The United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, Spain and France are well-known examples of countries that actively recruit non-citizens as professional soldiers. Despite advances in military automation technologies, militaries do need a certain level of critical mass to sustain their operational readiness. This, coupled with the need to integrate recent immigrants into the fabric of Singaporean society, favours the consideration of embracing non-citizen career soldiers into the SAF’s ranks.

    Citizenship and Identity

    The attainment of citizenship is not the same as acquisition of an identity. The identification of recent citizens with their new domicile is very much a product of social interaction. At Singapore Day London 2009, the crew of the mrbrown show presented a comedy skit in which a mainland Chinese- accented NS recruit failed to grasp the local Singaporean lingo. The ‘us’ and ‘them’ perceptions are there, but bonds forged in a foxhole can transcend those differences. Thus, military service provides a platform from which the socialisation of recent citizens and building of national cohesion can take place.

    In order for the SAF to remain relevant and attract the very best, it must adopt a policy that appeals to the aspirations of its future leaders. Demographic and value shifts in Singaporean society are issues that cannot be ignored. That said, a nation’s security is a matter of national survival and soldiering is more than just a job. Of all the SAF’s seven core values, ‘loyalty to country’ must continue to be of sacrosanct resonance to servicemen all through the generations. The day that no longer rings true, the SAF would have ceased to be relevant.

    About the Author

    Ong Weichong is Associate Research Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is attached to the Military Transformations Programme at the school’s constituent unit, the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. He is also a Doctoral Candidate with the Centre for the Study of War, State and Society, University of Exeter, UK. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Commentary

    The continued relevance of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) to the nation-state guarantees its existence as a national institution. In addition to traditional security considerations, this must take into account an increasingly globalised Singaporean society.

    THE END OF the Cold War has led to a paradigm shift in the global security eco-system – not least the role of armed forces in their respective societies. A refrain from a popular military cadence of the 1980s went: ‘down by the river, took a little walk, ran into some communists, had a little talk’. A post- September 11 SAF Serviceman would be familiar with the tune – except that terrorists rather than communists are now the featured enemies of the state.

    Communist subversion and acts of terrorism are highly visible security concerns that justify the existence of the SAF. In short, since its inception more than 40 years ago, the SAF has always been the principal guarantor of Singapore’s security, strategic interests and sovereignty. Other than the defence of Singapore, the SAF plays another less swash-buckling but no less important role – moulding and holding the social fabric of Singaporean society. As a globalised city-state open to the world, Singapore is prone to rapid shifts in its societal make-up and notions of ‘Singaporeaness’. This in turn requires new approaches when justifying the relevance and existence of the SAF.

    A Relevant SAF for the Singaporean Generation Y

    Part of the Singapore Army’s vision statement acknowledges the fact that it has to be ‘Ready, Relevant and Decisive’. Like all things Singaporean, the SAF is not spared from the rigours of justifying its relevance. Military National Service (NS) plays the twin role of ensuring an operationally-ready SAF as well as nation-building. Thus NS and the attitudes towards military service is a microcosm of Singapore and Singaporeaness. A recent article in POINTER, the journal of the SAF, Generation Why – So What? highlighted the significant generational differences in attitudes and values between the Generation Y Singaporean servicemen (young adults who grew up in the 1990s/2000s) and their predecessors.

    As hinted in the article’s title, Generation Y servicemen are intuitively prone to asking why and seeking the rationale behind decisions. The intrepid article also noted that the idea of contractual obligation to the state in the form of long-term bonds is an anathema to many a Generation Y regular serviceman. What the article did not sufficiently address is – has the definition of traditional military core values such as honour, pride, duty and loyalty to country – and most importantly notions of Singaporeaness evolved into vastly different creatures for Generation Y servicemen? If so, should SAF policy in recruitment and career management reflect those changes in core values?

    The SAF must be able to convince its Generation Y servicemen — both professional and citizen — of the relevance of military service. In the market for talent, the SAF faces tough competition not only from the private sector but also prestigious overseas universities that offer bond-free scholarships. The guarantee of an ‘iron rice bowl’ is no longer sufficient to induce the best and brightest Singaporeans into a professional military career. The danger here is that to a Generation Y Singaporean with more flexible options for self-advancement, a SAF career might be dismissed as an ‘irrelevant’ consideration.

    A Reflection of Singaporean Identity

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau once asked: “How can they love it, if their native land means no more to them than it does to foreigners, and if what it does for them is only what cannot be refused to anyone?” Perceptions of ‘NS for Singaporeans, jobs for foreigners’ is a well-articulated concern of Generation Y Singaporeans on youtube, online blogs and social networking sites. Unlike their predecessors, many Generation Y Singaporeans have the ability to vote with their feet. Hence, the raison d’être of the SAF and NS cannot be taken for granted. Will young Singaporeans of today and beyond continue to perceive the SAF and NS as relevant national and social institutions?

    This question is further compounded by the dwindling pool of citizens fit for military service. Citizens currently account for 65% of Singapore’s resident population and the low replacement rate of its citizens (1.08 in 2008 – the third lowest in the world) is a strategic reality that will impact the make-up of the SAF. The conscription of female citizens alongside their male counterparts and the recruitment of non-citizens as career soldiers are issues that cannot be dismissed lightly in the near future.

    The United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, Spain and France are well-known examples of countries that actively recruit non-citizens as professional soldiers. Despite advances in military automation technologies, militaries do need a certain level of critical mass to sustain their operational readiness. This, coupled with the need to integrate recent immigrants into the fabric of Singaporean society, favours the consideration of embracing non-citizen career soldiers into the SAF’s ranks.

    Citizenship and Identity

    The attainment of citizenship is not the same as acquisition of an identity. The identification of recent citizens with their new domicile is very much a product of social interaction. At Singapore Day London 2009, the crew of the mrbrown show presented a comedy skit in which a mainland Chinese- accented NS recruit failed to grasp the local Singaporean lingo. The ‘us’ and ‘them’ perceptions are there, but bonds forged in a foxhole can transcend those differences. Thus, military service provides a platform from which the socialisation of recent citizens and building of national cohesion can take place.

    In order for the SAF to remain relevant and attract the very best, it must adopt a policy that appeals to the aspirations of its future leaders. Demographic and value shifts in Singaporean society are issues that cannot be ignored. That said, a nation’s security is a matter of national survival and soldiering is more than just a job. Of all the SAF’s seven core values, ‘loyalty to country’ must continue to be of sacrosanct resonance to servicemen all through the generations. The day that no longer rings true, the SAF would have ceased to be relevant.

    About the Author

    Ong Weichong is Associate Research Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is attached to the Military Transformations Programme at the school’s constituent unit, the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. He is also a Doctoral Candidate with the Centre for the Study of War, State and Society, University of Exeter, UK. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info