Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO10106 | How NSmen could be Rewarded
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO10106 | How NSmen could be Rewarded
    Ho Shu Huang

    03 September 2010

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    The National Service Recognition Award (NSRA) was recently launched to recognise National Servicemen (NSmen) for their contributions to Singapore’s security. Although well-intentioned, the NSRA runs the risk of being only appreciated for its cash value. The government might therefore consider establishing a coherent philosophy of appreciating NSmen that goes beyond the simple principle that they should be recognised.

    Commentary

    THE NATIONAL Service Recognition Award (NSRA) was recently launched to thank National Servicemen (NSmen) for their contributions to Singapore’s security. NSmen eligible for the award will receive at least $9000 in three equal tranches. It is the largest monetary award for NSmen thus far, and will cost the government millions of dollars each year to disburse.

    Although well-intentioned, the NSRA runs the risk of being only appreciated for its cash value. As an award and not a subsidy, effort must be invested in ensuring Singaporeans understand what it symbolises. To that end, the Singapore government might consider establishing a coherent philosophy of appreciating NSmen that goes beyond the simple principle that they should be recognised.

    Developing a Coherent Philosophy

    The government’s decision to introduce the NSRA is the latest of a series of initiatives consistently introduced to thank NSmen for their contributions to Singapore’s security. The government has from the very start deeply appreciated the sacrifices NSmen. Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, often acknowledged this, and the topic has been regularly discussed in parliamentary sessions. For the past two decades, Recognising the Contributions of Operationally Ready National Servicemen to Total Defence (RECORD) committees have brainstormed and suggested ways to better appreciate Singapore’s NSmen. Many of their suggestions have been adopted.

    Unfortunately, the good intentions behind the NSRA have been overshadowed by debates, especially in cyber- space, surrounding the monetary value of the award. While the vast majority of NSmen appreciate the government’s gesture, some debate whether the $9000 quantum is sufficient. Others bemoan the amount goes straight into their Post Secondary Education Account (PSEA) and Central Provident Fund Account, limiting the award’s use. A cynical few wonder if they can pay the government a larger sum to avoid National Service altogether. These murmurings suggest that for some, the forest has already been missed for the trees.

    These reactions are not unexpected. Monetary incentives invariably invite scrutiny. Yet, as Mr. Michael Palmer, Chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee – Defence and Foreign Affairs (GPC-DFA), pointed out, the “best awards are probably monetary incentives”. Monetary incentives are tangible, transparent, equitable, and are comparatively easy to administer, important characteristics of any good government policy. Furthermore, Singaporeans are largely pragmatic and look at the practical utility of any benefit received. Attaching a cash value to the NSRA packages it in a way that Singaporeans understand.

    Giving More Visibility

    The disadvantage of disbursing monetary incentives is the symbolic value of such awards is typically under- emphasised. Instead, its “usability,” or monetary benefit, is invariably highlighted by the recipient. The government has taken great pains to emphasise the NSRA is not compensation for an NSman’s sacrifice, but a token of appreciation. Yet, with “$9000” associated with the award, it is now hard to look beyond that figure.

    One reason for this difficulty is the lack of coherence in the various initiatives which recognise NSmen. There currently is no umbrella movement that overtly, regularly and clearly thanks NSmen for their contributions. While the RECORD committee does an admirable job, its visibility to the general public is limited, often to only when it releases its recommendations. Furthermore, its stated primary goal is functional (to suggest specific ways how NSmen can be supported and recognised,) not philosophical (to guide and inform such initiatives.) Each initiative to recognise NSmen is generally announced independently without any overarching framework beyond one that simply acknowledges NSmen should be appreciated for their sacrifices. Consequently, each award is analysed by NSmen on its own practical terms, and not within the rubric of something larger.

    A Singaporean “Military Covenant”?

    Recognising NSmen must go beyond repeating the self-evident fact that they make sacrifices by doing National Service. As the award is meant to recognise military professionals, even if they are citizen soldiers, the disbursement of any award must be done within a philosophy that emphasises the martial values of community, comradeship and respectful reciprocity between the Nation and the Soldier grounded in honour and sacrifice.

    One example of such a philosophy is the British Army’s “Military Covenant” which was formalised in 2000. It is explained as “the mutual obligation between the Nation, the Army and each individual soldier; an unbreakable common bond of identity, loyalty and responsibility … Soldiers will be called upon to make personal sacrifices in the service of the Nation. In putting the needs of the Nation and the Army before their own, they forego some of the rights enjoyed by those outside the Armed Forces. In return, British soldiers must always be able to expect fair treatment, to be valued and respected as individuals, and that they … will be sustained and rewarded by commensurate terms and conditions of service.“

    The value of such a social contract lies less in the specific benefits servicemen receive in recognition for their service, but the promise that “the Nation” will take care of them. The government need not set up Veterans’ hospitals as is the case in the United Kingdom (though it might be useful to examine such ideas) but it could publicly adopt a similar philosophy to guide its recognition of NSmen. Rather than have several large one-off monetary incentives, or adjusting NSmen allowances upwards, which are typically forgotten soon after, the government could also introduce smaller measures which demonstrate that it is continuously fulfilling its side of its “mutual obligation” to care for NSmen. These might include subsidised healthcare and public transport concessions for all NSmen.

    Constant reminder

    The point is not the actual value of such awards, but that such discounts will be omnipresent privileges which only NSmen are entitled to, and thereby serve as a constant reminder that the government, and Singaporeans writ large, care about them. A Singaporean “Military Covenant” could be an example of “creative thinking” which Ms. Li Xueying, in an earlier Straits Times op-ed, called for “which might make people feel good about being citizens”. “The money,” she highlighted, “is not the point.” That Singapore fundamentally appreciates its NSmen, is. Having a coherent, overarching structure to guide NSmen recognition will certainly drive this home and make that an integral part of Singapore’s social consciousness.

    About the Author

    Ho Shu Huang is an Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is with the Military Transformations Programme at the school’s constituent unit, the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Synopsis

    The National Service Recognition Award (NSRA) was recently launched to recognise National Servicemen (NSmen) for their contributions to Singapore’s security. Although well-intentioned, the NSRA runs the risk of being only appreciated for its cash value. The government might therefore consider establishing a coherent philosophy of appreciating NSmen that goes beyond the simple principle that they should be recognised.

    Commentary

    THE NATIONAL Service Recognition Award (NSRA) was recently launched to thank National Servicemen (NSmen) for their contributions to Singapore’s security. NSmen eligible for the award will receive at least $9000 in three equal tranches. It is the largest monetary award for NSmen thus far, and will cost the government millions of dollars each year to disburse.

    Although well-intentioned, the NSRA runs the risk of being only appreciated for its cash value. As an award and not a subsidy, effort must be invested in ensuring Singaporeans understand what it symbolises. To that end, the Singapore government might consider establishing a coherent philosophy of appreciating NSmen that goes beyond the simple principle that they should be recognised.

    Developing a Coherent Philosophy

    The government’s decision to introduce the NSRA is the latest of a series of initiatives consistently introduced to thank NSmen for their contributions to Singapore’s security. The government has from the very start deeply appreciated the sacrifices NSmen. Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, often acknowledged this, and the topic has been regularly discussed in parliamentary sessions. For the past two decades, Recognising the Contributions of Operationally Ready National Servicemen to Total Defence (RECORD) committees have brainstormed and suggested ways to better appreciate Singapore’s NSmen. Many of their suggestions have been adopted.

    Unfortunately, the good intentions behind the NSRA have been overshadowed by debates, especially in cyber- space, surrounding the monetary value of the award. While the vast majority of NSmen appreciate the government’s gesture, some debate whether the $9000 quantum is sufficient. Others bemoan the amount goes straight into their Post Secondary Education Account (PSEA) and Central Provident Fund Account, limiting the award’s use. A cynical few wonder if they can pay the government a larger sum to avoid National Service altogether. These murmurings suggest that for some, the forest has already been missed for the trees.

    These reactions are not unexpected. Monetary incentives invariably invite scrutiny. Yet, as Mr. Michael Palmer, Chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee – Defence and Foreign Affairs (GPC-DFA), pointed out, the “best awards are probably monetary incentives”. Monetary incentives are tangible, transparent, equitable, and are comparatively easy to administer, important characteristics of any good government policy. Furthermore, Singaporeans are largely pragmatic and look at the practical utility of any benefit received. Attaching a cash value to the NSRA packages it in a way that Singaporeans understand.

    Giving More Visibility

    The disadvantage of disbursing monetary incentives is the symbolic value of such awards is typically under- emphasised. Instead, its “usability,” or monetary benefit, is invariably highlighted by the recipient. The government has taken great pains to emphasise the NSRA is not compensation for an NSman’s sacrifice, but a token of appreciation. Yet, with “$9000” associated with the award, it is now hard to look beyond that figure.

    One reason for this difficulty is the lack of coherence in the various initiatives which recognise NSmen. There currently is no umbrella movement that overtly, regularly and clearly thanks NSmen for their contributions. While the RECORD committee does an admirable job, its visibility to the general public is limited, often to only when it releases its recommendations. Furthermore, its stated primary goal is functional (to suggest specific ways how NSmen can be supported and recognised,) not philosophical (to guide and inform such initiatives.) Each initiative to recognise NSmen is generally announced independently without any overarching framework beyond one that simply acknowledges NSmen should be appreciated for their sacrifices. Consequently, each award is analysed by NSmen on its own practical terms, and not within the rubric of something larger.

    A Singaporean “Military Covenant”?

    Recognising NSmen must go beyond repeating the self-evident fact that they make sacrifices by doing National Service. As the award is meant to recognise military professionals, even if they are citizen soldiers, the disbursement of any award must be done within a philosophy that emphasises the martial values of community, comradeship and respectful reciprocity between the Nation and the Soldier grounded in honour and sacrifice.

    One example of such a philosophy is the British Army’s “Military Covenant” which was formalised in 2000. It is explained as “the mutual obligation between the Nation, the Army and each individual soldier; an unbreakable common bond of identity, loyalty and responsibility … Soldiers will be called upon to make personal sacrifices in the service of the Nation. In putting the needs of the Nation and the Army before their own, they forego some of the rights enjoyed by those outside the Armed Forces. In return, British soldiers must always be able to expect fair treatment, to be valued and respected as individuals, and that they … will be sustained and rewarded by commensurate terms and conditions of service.“

    The value of such a social contract lies less in the specific benefits servicemen receive in recognition for their service, but the promise that “the Nation” will take care of them. The government need not set up Veterans’ hospitals as is the case in the United Kingdom (though it might be useful to examine such ideas) but it could publicly adopt a similar philosophy to guide its recognition of NSmen. Rather than have several large one-off monetary incentives, or adjusting NSmen allowances upwards, which are typically forgotten soon after, the government could also introduce smaller measures which demonstrate that it is continuously fulfilling its side of its “mutual obligation” to care for NSmen. These might include subsidised healthcare and public transport concessions for all NSmen.

    Constant reminder

    The point is not the actual value of such awards, but that such discounts will be omnipresent privileges which only NSmen are entitled to, and thereby serve as a constant reminder that the government, and Singaporeans writ large, care about them. A Singaporean “Military Covenant” could be an example of “creative thinking” which Ms. Li Xueying, in an earlier Straits Times op-ed, called for “which might make people feel good about being citizens”. “The money,” she highlighted, “is not the point.” That Singapore fundamentally appreciates its NSmen, is. Having a coherent, overarching structure to guide NSmen recognition will certainly drive this home and make that an integral part of Singapore’s social consciousness.

    About the Author

    Ho Shu Huang is an Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is with the Military Transformations Programme at the school’s constituent unit, the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info