Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
PUBLIC EDUCATION
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      PUBLIC EDUCATIONAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • CO11044 | Social Media’s Role in Revolt: A Technological or Social Phenomenon
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO11044 | Social Media’s Role in Revolt: A Technological or Social Phenomenon
Ng Sue Chia

18 March 2011

download pdf

Synopsis

The civil unrest in the Middle East underscores the unprecedented role that social media plays in facilitating mass revolts. Social media-facilitated uprisings have to be understood as both a technology-backed as well as a social phenomenon.

Commentary

THE ONGOING civil unrest in the Middle East underscores the much discussed role of social media as an agent of social and political change. Social media clearly can evoke mass reactions and mobilise collective protest against a regime that has lost popular support. The latest revolt that has caught the attention of netizens or Web-communities from the Middle East is the one in Libya. As a consequence, regimes in the region have attempted to circumscribe Internet access. Beyond the Middle East, countries like Myanmar and China have also tried to prevent their citizens from being influenced by and taking part in supposedly anti-establishment rallies online by barring access to websites or Internet Service Providers (ISPs). However, social media’s influence on society and politics goes beyond the technological. The latest rounds of social media-facilitated civil rebellions might just well be the tip of the iceberg of a wider change in social communication habits. This is evident in the use of social media to express discontent and gain public support for political change.

What is Social Media?

This is not the first time that social media has been blamed for the widest range of security breaches. For instance, the photographs posted on Facebook by the wife of the UK’s chief of the Secret Intelligence Service MI6, followed by the exposé of key state secrets on wikileaks, had security analysts discussing the danger of information leaks on national security. Of late and as current events have shown, the power of the Internet seems to have reached new heights, especially in its ability to unite as well as divide societies in the shortest possible time ever.

The Middle East revolts also mark a change in the way information is communicated and used to mobilise people. Chat rooms, discussion forums and electronic mail (e-mail), for instance, used to be the only few avenues for the exchange of thoughts online. Web-users generally do not and could not alter information found online. That is not the case anymore. Web-users are not only able to post their comments on news sites but also write and publish their own thoughts while participating in real-time discussions online. In fact, as web- communication applications are so readily available and embedded in a wide range of consumer products (such as Mobile Phones and Portable Music Players), anyone can access the Web and shape public opinion at anytime.

The term Social Media therefore entails more than just technological innovation. Beyond the appliances and applications that support web-based communication, it is also a social movement fuelled by a growing appetite for self-created news — led by the people.

Technological or Social Phenomenon?

From a simple Twitter journal entry on the next movie to watch to a criticism of substandard services experienced at a local administrative office, each speaks volumes for the majority whose opinions could now attract a following of likeminded individuals. Essentially, they are expressions that tug the common heartstrings, and that have been amplified for a worldwide audience by technology. Enter the golden age of online diary writing or Blogging and online social networking or Facebooking. This is when people write what they want to read, or publicly debate who they want to support and form their own alliances.

This is perhaps also a reason why despite the many and repeated attempts by some countries to impose Internet usage restrictions, people will find ways to circumvent regulations to broadcast and garner support for their views. They want to hear and be heard for themselves. Protesters from the Saffron Revolution of 2007 in Myanmar, for instance, managed to avoid state detection and slip personal information on the monks-led anti- government movements to a worldwide audience by either encrypting their email content or connecting to foreign ISPs. Likewise, Chinese netizens have over the last decade tested state tolerance towards citizenry reporting by collectively exposing corrupt local officials through blogging and tweeting.

Social Discontent

The current wave of revolts in the Middle East is probably no different from any previous cases of civil uprising before the advent of web-based communication technology. However, it sends a strong message of the mutual influences that technology and social communication have on one another. Web-based interaction might have started out as a technological innovation but its functions have been adapted and altered in the last decade to support wider societal developments.

Therefore, efforts to prevent social media-facilitated revolts by raising barriers to Web access are not only going to be near impossible; they also miss out on the social nuances, grievances and greater sociological change in human-to-human relations. There is also no stopping the march of technology and the way individuals innovatively use social media to create and claim information ownership. Social media-facilitated revolts similar to those experienced in the Middle East are very likely not going to be the last we will witness. Afterall, how does one put a lid over a brewing pot of social discontent?

About the Author

Ng Sue Chia is Associate Research Fellow with the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS) at the S. Rajaratnam School Of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Global

Synopsis

The civil unrest in the Middle East underscores the unprecedented role that social media plays in facilitating mass revolts. Social media-facilitated uprisings have to be understood as both a technology-backed as well as a social phenomenon.

Commentary

THE ONGOING civil unrest in the Middle East underscores the much discussed role of social media as an agent of social and political change. Social media clearly can evoke mass reactions and mobilise collective protest against a regime that has lost popular support. The latest revolt that has caught the attention of netizens or Web-communities from the Middle East is the one in Libya. As a consequence, regimes in the region have attempted to circumscribe Internet access. Beyond the Middle East, countries like Myanmar and China have also tried to prevent their citizens from being influenced by and taking part in supposedly anti-establishment rallies online by barring access to websites or Internet Service Providers (ISPs). However, social media’s influence on society and politics goes beyond the technological. The latest rounds of social media-facilitated civil rebellions might just well be the tip of the iceberg of a wider change in social communication habits. This is evident in the use of social media to express discontent and gain public support for political change.

What is Social Media?

This is not the first time that social media has been blamed for the widest range of security breaches. For instance, the photographs posted on Facebook by the wife of the UK’s chief of the Secret Intelligence Service MI6, followed by the exposé of key state secrets on wikileaks, had security analysts discussing the danger of information leaks on national security. Of late and as current events have shown, the power of the Internet seems to have reached new heights, especially in its ability to unite as well as divide societies in the shortest possible time ever.

The Middle East revolts also mark a change in the way information is communicated and used to mobilise people. Chat rooms, discussion forums and electronic mail (e-mail), for instance, used to be the only few avenues for the exchange of thoughts online. Web-users generally do not and could not alter information found online. That is not the case anymore. Web-users are not only able to post their comments on news sites but also write and publish their own thoughts while participating in real-time discussions online. In fact, as web- communication applications are so readily available and embedded in a wide range of consumer products (such as Mobile Phones and Portable Music Players), anyone can access the Web and shape public opinion at anytime.

The term Social Media therefore entails more than just technological innovation. Beyond the appliances and applications that support web-based communication, it is also a social movement fuelled by a growing appetite for self-created news — led by the people.

Technological or Social Phenomenon?

From a simple Twitter journal entry on the next movie to watch to a criticism of substandard services experienced at a local administrative office, each speaks volumes for the majority whose opinions could now attract a following of likeminded individuals. Essentially, they are expressions that tug the common heartstrings, and that have been amplified for a worldwide audience by technology. Enter the golden age of online diary writing or Blogging and online social networking or Facebooking. This is when people write what they want to read, or publicly debate who they want to support and form their own alliances.

This is perhaps also a reason why despite the many and repeated attempts by some countries to impose Internet usage restrictions, people will find ways to circumvent regulations to broadcast and garner support for their views. They want to hear and be heard for themselves. Protesters from the Saffron Revolution of 2007 in Myanmar, for instance, managed to avoid state detection and slip personal information on the monks-led anti- government movements to a worldwide audience by either encrypting their email content or connecting to foreign ISPs. Likewise, Chinese netizens have over the last decade tested state tolerance towards citizenry reporting by collectively exposing corrupt local officials through blogging and tweeting.

Social Discontent

The current wave of revolts in the Middle East is probably no different from any previous cases of civil uprising before the advent of web-based communication technology. However, it sends a strong message of the mutual influences that technology and social communication have on one another. Web-based interaction might have started out as a technological innovation but its functions have been adapted and altered in the last decade to support wider societal developments.

Therefore, efforts to prevent social media-facilitated revolts by raising barriers to Web access are not only going to be near impossible; they also miss out on the social nuances, grievances and greater sociological change in human-to-human relations. There is also no stopping the march of technology and the way individuals innovatively use social media to create and claim information ownership. Social media-facilitated revolts similar to those experienced in the Middle East are very likely not going to be the last we will witness. Afterall, how does one put a lid over a brewing pot of social discontent?

About the Author

Ng Sue Chia is Associate Research Fellow with the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS) at the S. Rajaratnam School Of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info