Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO12216 | Defusing Tensions in the South China Sea
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO12216 | Defusing Tensions in the South China Sea
    Barry Desker

    03 December 2012

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    As East Asia and Southeast Asia enter a more unpredictable period arising from growing territorial disputes, there is a critical need for mutual restraint on the part of all disputing parties lest the tensions get out of hand. At the same time, there are lessons to be learnt.

    Commentary

    CONFLICTING MARITIME territorial claims in East Asia will be a key source of tensions in the region in the decade ahead. While most of China’s land boundary disputes have been settled on terms favourable to China’s neighbours, except for its continuing disputes with India and Bhutan, its maritime boundaries in the East China and South China Seas are contested.

    China has traditionally been a continental power focused on its landward Eurasian border. However, a resurgent China in the 21st century will pay increasing attention to its maritime space as its gaze turns eastwards towards the United States, the dominant power of the 20th century, and Japan, which it has overtaken economically but with whom China has had a difficult relationship bedevilled by memories of Japan’s role as a colonial power and the trauma of its experiences during World War Two. The Sino-Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands will be the most intractable maritime issue in East Asia because of this historical baggage.

    Beijing’s vague position unhelpful

    In response to a submission by Vietnam and Malaysia informing the United Nations of the demarcation of their continental shelf boundary, China reiterated its territorial claims and submitted a map with ‘nine dash lines’ enclosing most of the South China Sea. This was the first time the map was circulated as a UN document although it was based on a 1947 Kuomintang Government map. The Chinese move unsettled several ASEAN states, especially the Philippines and Vietnam but also Malaysia and Brunei, which all have competing claims.

    As this map is widely circulated in China, appears prominently in many government buildings and is now reproduced in Chinese passports, the Chinese public believes that the entire area falls within China’s territorial waters, if the highly charged comments on the Internet are indicative of wider opinion. The failure by knowledgeable Chinese international lawyers and foreign policy makers to publicly clarify its position on the South China Sea has increased apprehensions.

    China’s public assertion of historical rights is not sustainable under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), although the claim to sovereignty over the rocks and islands within the line could be consistent with UNCLOS. Chinese naval and fishery protection vessels have mounted patrols in waters within the EEZ of claimant states while China has offered leases on petroleum exploration blocks within Vietnam’s EEZ, even though China could not claim an EEZ overlapping with these areas extending from islands represented by its map.

    Impact on China-ASEAN relations

    Because of these developments, ASEAN meetings continue to be distracted by the South China Sea issue. At the close of the summit of ASEAN leaders in Phnom Penh on 18 November, the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen said that there was an agreement not to internationalise the issue. Left unchallenged, such an agreement would reflect the Chinese position on the issue. However, the Philippines and Vietnam, as well as Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, submitted letters formally disagreeing with this view and the chairman’s final statement did not contain such a reference.

    If the Cambodian delegation had insisted on its version, the likely outcome would have been a repeat of the ASEAN ministerial meeting in July this year which failed for the first time in ASEAN’s 45-year history to issue a joint communique. Cambodia had objected to inclusion of a reference to the South China Sea disputes as it argued that ASEAN did not discuss bilateral issues.

    Ironically, Cambodia had raised its own bilateral border dispute with Thailand over land surrounding the Preah Vihear temple the previous year and had obtained a standalone ASEAN foreign ministers’ statement on the issue and a reference in the Chairman’s statement of the 19th ASEAN summit.

    As a major power, China’s preference is for bilateral negotiations where it exercises greater leverage. While China enjoys excellent ties with ASEAN, it has referred to ASEAN/China and ASEAN Plus Three (China, Japan, South Korea) as 10+1 and 10+3 meetings, highlighting China’s approach of dealing with ASEAN members bilaterally. Attempts to nudge China in the direction of the adjudication of maritime boundary disputes by the International Court of Justice or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea will not succeed. In ratifying the UN Law of the Sea Convention, China opted out of compulsory binding dispute settlement. Instead, ASEAN and China have focused on developing norms, building mutual confidence and promoting cooperative behaviour, as seen in the 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.

    The approach has been to avoid addressing the territorial claims at the ASEAN level, which will be taken up bilaterally by the parties directly concerned. ASEAN attention is now on engaging with China on a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea which will focus on issues such as the prevention of incidents at sea, crisis management, confidence building measures and encouraging joint development. But progress is likely to be slow.

    Need for mutual restraint

    While a grand package should be envisaged, it would be timely to move first on the implementation of confidence building measures such as increasing exchanges and discussions at a non-official level aimed at reducing misperceptions and encouraging mutual confidence, establishing a hot line at the operational level between navies and coast guard units of regional states, agreeing on prior notification of military exercises in the South China Sea and facilitating the rescue at sea of people and vessels in distress.

    Provocative gestures such as China’s decision to include its nine dash lines’ map in its new passports should be avoided. All claimant states are also guilty of occupying uninhabited islands and land features. They should agree to refrain from doing so. The aim should be to strengthen crisis management capabilities and to lay the groundwork for agreement on rules and procedures aimed at defusing tensions.

    Despite the challenges posed by the conflicting claims in the South China Sea, it should be recognised that China is now a major engine of growth for the ASEAN region. The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area is the world’s largest free trade area in terms of population and the third largest in terms of nominal GDP. At the East Asia Summit on 20 November 2012, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao also acknowledged China’s willingness to increase dialogue and enhance cooperation with ASEAN members in the security and strategic fields.

    From a Chinese perspective, the management of China’s relationship with ASEAN is critical. As a resurgent power with an increasingly global presence, many states will be watching how China deals with its neighbours. Lessons will be drawn on the impact for them of a rising China.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. An earlier version appeared in The Straits Times.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Synopsis

    As East Asia and Southeast Asia enter a more unpredictable period arising from growing territorial disputes, there is a critical need for mutual restraint on the part of all disputing parties lest the tensions get out of hand. At the same time, there are lessons to be learnt.

    Commentary

    CONFLICTING MARITIME territorial claims in East Asia will be a key source of tensions in the region in the decade ahead. While most of China’s land boundary disputes have been settled on terms favourable to China’s neighbours, except for its continuing disputes with India and Bhutan, its maritime boundaries in the East China and South China Seas are contested.

    China has traditionally been a continental power focused on its landward Eurasian border. However, a resurgent China in the 21st century will pay increasing attention to its maritime space as its gaze turns eastwards towards the United States, the dominant power of the 20th century, and Japan, which it has overtaken economically but with whom China has had a difficult relationship bedevilled by memories of Japan’s role as a colonial power and the trauma of its experiences during World War Two. The Sino-Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands will be the most intractable maritime issue in East Asia because of this historical baggage.

    Beijing’s vague position unhelpful

    In response to a submission by Vietnam and Malaysia informing the United Nations of the demarcation of their continental shelf boundary, China reiterated its territorial claims and submitted a map with ‘nine dash lines’ enclosing most of the South China Sea. This was the first time the map was circulated as a UN document although it was based on a 1947 Kuomintang Government map. The Chinese move unsettled several ASEAN states, especially the Philippines and Vietnam but also Malaysia and Brunei, which all have competing claims.

    As this map is widely circulated in China, appears prominently in many government buildings and is now reproduced in Chinese passports, the Chinese public believes that the entire area falls within China’s territorial waters, if the highly charged comments on the Internet are indicative of wider opinion. The failure by knowledgeable Chinese international lawyers and foreign policy makers to publicly clarify its position on the South China Sea has increased apprehensions.

    China’s public assertion of historical rights is not sustainable under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), although the claim to sovereignty over the rocks and islands within the line could be consistent with UNCLOS. Chinese naval and fishery protection vessels have mounted patrols in waters within the EEZ of claimant states while China has offered leases on petroleum exploration blocks within Vietnam’s EEZ, even though China could not claim an EEZ overlapping with these areas extending from islands represented by its map.

    Impact on China-ASEAN relations

    Because of these developments, ASEAN meetings continue to be distracted by the South China Sea issue. At the close of the summit of ASEAN leaders in Phnom Penh on 18 November, the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen said that there was an agreement not to internationalise the issue. Left unchallenged, such an agreement would reflect the Chinese position on the issue. However, the Philippines and Vietnam, as well as Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, submitted letters formally disagreeing with this view and the chairman’s final statement did not contain such a reference.

    If the Cambodian delegation had insisted on its version, the likely outcome would have been a repeat of the ASEAN ministerial meeting in July this year which failed for the first time in ASEAN’s 45-year history to issue a joint communique. Cambodia had objected to inclusion of a reference to the South China Sea disputes as it argued that ASEAN did not discuss bilateral issues.

    Ironically, Cambodia had raised its own bilateral border dispute with Thailand over land surrounding the Preah Vihear temple the previous year and had obtained a standalone ASEAN foreign ministers’ statement on the issue and a reference in the Chairman’s statement of the 19th ASEAN summit.

    As a major power, China’s preference is for bilateral negotiations where it exercises greater leverage. While China enjoys excellent ties with ASEAN, it has referred to ASEAN/China and ASEAN Plus Three (China, Japan, South Korea) as 10+1 and 10+3 meetings, highlighting China’s approach of dealing with ASEAN members bilaterally. Attempts to nudge China in the direction of the adjudication of maritime boundary disputes by the International Court of Justice or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea will not succeed. In ratifying the UN Law of the Sea Convention, China opted out of compulsory binding dispute settlement. Instead, ASEAN and China have focused on developing norms, building mutual confidence and promoting cooperative behaviour, as seen in the 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.

    The approach has been to avoid addressing the territorial claims at the ASEAN level, which will be taken up bilaterally by the parties directly concerned. ASEAN attention is now on engaging with China on a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea which will focus on issues such as the prevention of incidents at sea, crisis management, confidence building measures and encouraging joint development. But progress is likely to be slow.

    Need for mutual restraint

    While a grand package should be envisaged, it would be timely to move first on the implementation of confidence building measures such as increasing exchanges and discussions at a non-official level aimed at reducing misperceptions and encouraging mutual confidence, establishing a hot line at the operational level between navies and coast guard units of regional states, agreeing on prior notification of military exercises in the South China Sea and facilitating the rescue at sea of people and vessels in distress.

    Provocative gestures such as China’s decision to include its nine dash lines’ map in its new passports should be avoided. All claimant states are also guilty of occupying uninhabited islands and land features. They should agree to refrain from doing so. The aim should be to strengthen crisis management capabilities and to lay the groundwork for agreement on rules and procedures aimed at defusing tensions.

    Despite the challenges posed by the conflicting claims in the South China Sea, it should be recognised that China is now a major engine of growth for the ASEAN region. The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area is the world’s largest free trade area in terms of population and the third largest in terms of nominal GDP. At the East Asia Summit on 20 November 2012, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao also acknowledged China’s willingness to increase dialogue and enhance cooperation with ASEAN members in the security and strategic fields.

    From a Chinese perspective, the management of China’s relationship with ASEAN is critical. As a resurgent power with an increasingly global presence, many states will be watching how China deals with its neighbours. Lessons will be drawn on the impact for them of a rising China.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. An earlier version appeared in The Straits Times.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info