Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13071 | BN-PR Manifesto War: Different Platforms, Same School
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO13071 | BN-PR Manifesto War: Different Platforms, Same School
    Shamsul A.B.

    22 April 2013

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    The ruling Barisan Nasional coalition and the opposition Pakatan Rakyat have been engaged in a war of manifestos. While each side claims to offer better programmes and plans than the other, their leaders, Najib Razak and Anwar Ibrahim, come from the same school – the ‘BN Political Academy’- and are essentially cut from the same cloth.

    Commentary

    OBSERVING MALAYSIAN politics is like watching Nicol David, the Malaysian who is seven times World Champion in Women’s Squash, contesting the strategic ‘T position’ in the centre of court. The squash contest is usually focused, fast, furious and exciting.

    In Malaysian politics, the contest for the T-position – is for dominance of ‘the perception space’. This contest is generally slow and often unpredictable. But as in squash, it is also highly exciting; it involves the ruling coalition and its supporters, the opposition and its supporters, those sitting on the fence, as well as civil society and extremist groups.

    BN ‘Political Academy’

    If we include the bloggers, we suddenly have a crowded T-position. Observing the antics and intrigues of those in the T-position in contemporary Malaysian politics is never boring because, since the last general election in 2008, everyone has an opinion and everyone is an analyst.

    It also poses the question: in the end, to what extent does this excitement about Malaysian politics in general represent the momentous political struggle between two former UMNO Youth leaders – Anwar Ibrahim and Najib Tun Razak? Despite their rivalry, both share many things in common. Most importantly, both are alumni of the one and only Malaysian ‘school of politics,’ namely, the ‘Barisan Nasional (BN) Political Academy.’ Because they come from the same school, their opposing manifestos even look very similar – to the point of triggering mutual accusations of intellectual borrowing, or plagiarism.

    Take, for example, the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) manifesto. Its supporters claim that the PR manifesto is original and fresh. If we compare it closely against previous manifestos of the Alliance or BN, it looks like a rehash of those old manifestos. What PR does is to promise to revamp or end those policies that it has criticised to be flawed.

    For instance, the National Automotive Policy (NAP) introduced by BN in 2006 has many shortcomings, so PR intends to correct the NAP should it capture Putrajaya. The feel-good promise for the middle class is that PR intends to reduce car prices if it wins this general election. It does not need a politics graduate from Oxford to come up with such an ‘innovative’ promise. One with a ‘sekolah malam’ (night school) qualification could suggest even better ideas based on his/her life experience.

    On the other hand, if we look at BN’s manifesto closely, it is basically a summary of the report card of the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that Prime Minister Najib presented on 19 March 2013. Some are indeed very general, such as on macro-economic matters relating to investment and finance. But some are very specific, such as on the proposed increase in quantum of the government hand-out Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M).

    About three-quarters of BN’s promises are actually a continuation of what the ruling coalition has already implemented. Only one-quarter listed in the manifesto comprises new projects, such as the proposed Kuala Lumpur-Singapore high-speed train.

    In short, if we are to stick this list of BN promises on our wall till the next general election in 2018, we can literally tick YES and/or NO and evaluate whether BN has indeed fulfilled its promises made in this general election. This assessment can easily influence how voters should vote in the next general election five years from now.

    Populist politics and policies

    What is significant but unspoken in both manifestos is the fact that voters are still guided by populist politics and policies – in the way ideas and pronouncements are made about the state of Malaysia’s progress and development. As voters have needs, wants and desires, the government has, since 1957, been doing everything it possibly could  to fulfill all the basic needs – food, clothing and shelter – while increasing the level of income and reducing poverty.

    Malaysia has now reduced the incidence of poverty from 50% to 5% in the last five decades. This is a remarkable achievement by any standard. In the new millennium there is a shift from simply fulfilling needs to achieving what the people want and what they desire.

    The introduction of the concept of the ‘bottom 40%’ is about recognising simultaneously the social positions of the poor and the low-income group and addressing their soci-economic challenges. For this bottom 40%, the government’s main task is to fulfil their needs and wants at the same time.

    There is also the ‘noisy, consumerist and self-centred’ middle class, not to mention the wealthy who are comfortably enjoying all the subsidies while complaining that they are being taxed too much. Their wants and desires have to be fulfilled too.

    Which is better?

    Absent all the rhetoric and gutter politics, both the BN and PR manifestos fundamentally articulate the entrenched triangular nexus of needs-wants-desires that both Anwar and Najib are trying to address. In doing so, they try very hard to differentiate themselves. But they have not been successful because both have been schooled for decades in the same ‘BN Political Academy.’

    Even their political language and idioms are hard to separate, just like Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola. The real difference perhaps is the state of their respective coalitions or alliances. While the various ethnic parties that make up the components of BN are together in an arranged marriage, PR remains in a de facto marriage.

    It will be up to the Malaysian voters in this crucial general election to distinguish between the two political groupings and decide which will be the preferred coalition to represent their aspirations for a better future.

    About the Author

    Shamsul A.B. is Distinguished Professor and Director, Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), National University of Malaysia (UKM). He contributed this specially to RSIS Commentaries.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Synopsis

    The ruling Barisan Nasional coalition and the opposition Pakatan Rakyat have been engaged in a war of manifestos. While each side claims to offer better programmes and plans than the other, their leaders, Najib Razak and Anwar Ibrahim, come from the same school – the ‘BN Political Academy’- and are essentially cut from the same cloth.

    Commentary

    OBSERVING MALAYSIAN politics is like watching Nicol David, the Malaysian who is seven times World Champion in Women’s Squash, contesting the strategic ‘T position’ in the centre of court. The squash contest is usually focused, fast, furious and exciting.

    In Malaysian politics, the contest for the T-position – is for dominance of ‘the perception space’. This contest is generally slow and often unpredictable. But as in squash, it is also highly exciting; it involves the ruling coalition and its supporters, the opposition and its supporters, those sitting on the fence, as well as civil society and extremist groups.

    BN ‘Political Academy’

    If we include the bloggers, we suddenly have a crowded T-position. Observing the antics and intrigues of those in the T-position in contemporary Malaysian politics is never boring because, since the last general election in 2008, everyone has an opinion and everyone is an analyst.

    It also poses the question: in the end, to what extent does this excitement about Malaysian politics in general represent the momentous political struggle between two former UMNO Youth leaders – Anwar Ibrahim and Najib Tun Razak? Despite their rivalry, both share many things in common. Most importantly, both are alumni of the one and only Malaysian ‘school of politics,’ namely, the ‘Barisan Nasional (BN) Political Academy.’ Because they come from the same school, their opposing manifestos even look very similar – to the point of triggering mutual accusations of intellectual borrowing, or plagiarism.

    Take, for example, the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) manifesto. Its supporters claim that the PR manifesto is original and fresh. If we compare it closely against previous manifestos of the Alliance or BN, it looks like a rehash of those old manifestos. What PR does is to promise to revamp or end those policies that it has criticised to be flawed.

    For instance, the National Automotive Policy (NAP) introduced by BN in 2006 has many shortcomings, so PR intends to correct the NAP should it capture Putrajaya. The feel-good promise for the middle class is that PR intends to reduce car prices if it wins this general election. It does not need a politics graduate from Oxford to come up with such an ‘innovative’ promise. One with a ‘sekolah malam’ (night school) qualification could suggest even better ideas based on his/her life experience.

    On the other hand, if we look at BN’s manifesto closely, it is basically a summary of the report card of the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that Prime Minister Najib presented on 19 March 2013. Some are indeed very general, such as on macro-economic matters relating to investment and finance. But some are very specific, such as on the proposed increase in quantum of the government hand-out Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M).

    About three-quarters of BN’s promises are actually a continuation of what the ruling coalition has already implemented. Only one-quarter listed in the manifesto comprises new projects, such as the proposed Kuala Lumpur-Singapore high-speed train.

    In short, if we are to stick this list of BN promises on our wall till the next general election in 2018, we can literally tick YES and/or NO and evaluate whether BN has indeed fulfilled its promises made in this general election. This assessment can easily influence how voters should vote in the next general election five years from now.

    Populist politics and policies

    What is significant but unspoken in both manifestos is the fact that voters are still guided by populist politics and policies – in the way ideas and pronouncements are made about the state of Malaysia’s progress and development. As voters have needs, wants and desires, the government has, since 1957, been doing everything it possibly could  to fulfill all the basic needs – food, clothing and shelter – while increasing the level of income and reducing poverty.

    Malaysia has now reduced the incidence of poverty from 50% to 5% in the last five decades. This is a remarkable achievement by any standard. In the new millennium there is a shift from simply fulfilling needs to achieving what the people want and what they desire.

    The introduction of the concept of the ‘bottom 40%’ is about recognising simultaneously the social positions of the poor and the low-income group and addressing their soci-economic challenges. For this bottom 40%, the government’s main task is to fulfil their needs and wants at the same time.

    There is also the ‘noisy, consumerist and self-centred’ middle class, not to mention the wealthy who are comfortably enjoying all the subsidies while complaining that they are being taxed too much. Their wants and desires have to be fulfilled too.

    Which is better?

    Absent all the rhetoric and gutter politics, both the BN and PR manifestos fundamentally articulate the entrenched triangular nexus of needs-wants-desires that both Anwar and Najib are trying to address. In doing so, they try very hard to differentiate themselves. But they have not been successful because both have been schooled for decades in the same ‘BN Political Academy.’

    Even their political language and idioms are hard to separate, just like Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola. The real difference perhaps is the state of their respective coalitions or alliances. While the various ethnic parties that make up the components of BN are together in an arranged marriage, PR remains in a de facto marriage.

    It will be up to the Malaysian voters in this crucial general election to distinguish between the two political groupings and decide which will be the preferred coalition to represent their aspirations for a better future.

    About the Author

    Shamsul A.B. is Distinguished Professor and Director, Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), National University of Malaysia (UKM). He contributed this specially to RSIS Commentaries.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info