Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13077 | India and Southeast Asia: Building LEP momentum
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO13077 | India and Southeast Asia: Building LEP momentum
    Mahesh Shankar

    26 April 2013

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    The changing strategic context in Southeast Asia has rapidly elevated India to a highly sought after partner in the region. New Delhi must take care, however, that domestic dynamics do not squander its rising stock.

    Commentary

    INDIA’S LOOK EAST Policy (LEP) appeared to be in danger of collapsing in the 1990s, when simply put, countries in Southeast Asia did not seem to care enough. They were either busy riding, along with China, the ‘tiger’ of rapid economic growth and prosperity, or contending with the effects of the disastrous financial meltdown in 1997-98. By the early 2000s, however, the situation had begun to improve progressively, with the establishment of a summit level dialogue between India and ASEAN in 2002, and then India’s membership of the East Asia Summit (EAS) in 2005. Even then, at least some ASEAN members continued to remain sceptical of, or indifferent to, the utility and role of India in their region.

    India’s Rising Stock

    Reassuringly for New Delhi, ASEAN perspectives of India have changed for the better in recent times. There is a growing sense in Southeast Asia about India’s importance to the region, and a concomitant desire for New Delhi to play a greater role. This is evidenced in repeated calls from leaders in ASEAN for India to become a more active diplomatic and military player in their region; increasing urgency towards the conclusion of agreements on free trade in goods, investment and services; and growing emphasis on infrastructural connectivity between India and Southeast Asia. The agreement of ASEAN states to upgrade ties with India to a ‘strategic partnership’ in December 2012 of course gave concrete expression to these trends.

    It is hardly surprising that ASEAN states would view India so favourably, especially in the context of recent Chinese assertiveness. Key to this is the geographical proximity of India to Southeast Asia. In the economic realm, this proximity – including the possibility of multiple channels of connectivity – offers ASEAN countries a massive Indian domestic market as a natural remedy to the ‘asymmetric interdependence’ that now characterises their economic ties with China. This is an ‘asymmetric interdependence,’ of course, that Beijing has shown a willingness to exploit in recent times as a leverage in dealing with maritime disagreements in the South China Sea.

    Crucially, for multiple reasons, this proximity also allows India to be seen – and to ‘sell’ itself – as a natural and indispensable security partner in the region. For one, proximity fosters recognition in the region that the security problems and concerns the ASEAN countries are likely to face in the coming years will be shared by India as well. This applies most obviously to challenges related to Chinese territorial ambitions and assertiveness, but also to other maritime and environment related security concerns.

    Relatedly, proximity means that India is less prone to the kind of credibility problems which now accompany American policy and commitments in Southeast Asia. ASEAN leaders are less likely to view India as having the same kind of leeway which they fear affords the US an ‘exit’ option, due to domestic political, personality, and/or fiscal constraints. This dynamic makes India appear a potentially more credible or reliable partner in the region.

    Finally, the very fact that India is strong enough to influence the regional security architecture, without being potent enough to dominate it, is appealing to ASEAN sensibilities. In contrast to the US, and China, both of which can individually, or in concert, overwhelm and undermine regional structures, India poses no such challenges to the idea of ASEAN centrality to the management of their region.

    Challenges to Indian credibility

    These strong, positive portents notwithstanding, one of the major challenges to Indian credibility – and having ASEAN states continue to take India seriously – would appear to lie not in the realm of Indian capabilities, but rather in Indian state capacity.

    Transforming India from a still peripheral – even in economic terms, where India-ASEAN trade is a fraction of China-ASEAN trade – to a meaningful actor will require, in part, strategic thinking, as well as massive efforts on the ground from New Delhi. The big question, however, is whether the Indian state, constrained by coalition politics, a labouring bureaucracy, and crippled by rampant inefficiencies and corruption, truly has the capacity to act in a concerted manner in pushing its LEP towards fruition in Southeast Asia? In ASEAN states, it is likely to be this factor, more than anything else, which might temper the sense of credibility that India otherwise carries as a strategic partner in their region.

    From New Delhi’s perspective therefore, it is crucial that any such impressions are swiftly addressed and corrected, lest Indian credibility in Southeast Asia is lost at the altar of state (in)capacity. This will require, of course, greater clarity from India – without necessarily putting forth an overly ambitious agenda or commitment – about where strategic thinking in New Delhi currently stands. Some of this is no doubt happening through multiple consultative mechanisms that now exist between both sides.

    More importantly, however, the Indian administration will need to more urgently demonstrate that despite its domestic constraints, it can act effectively and efficiently in fulfilling commitments already made. The most obvious arenas in which to begin doing so are the economic and infrastructural ones, where Indian efficiency can heighten credibility without putting New Delhi in a strategic tight spot vis-à-vis China.

    In particular, India could do its part towards the timely implementation of already planned connectivity projects, such as the trilateral highway connecting India with Myanmar and Thailand, the Mekong-India Economic Corridor (MIEC), the Kaladan Multimodal Transport Project, and an open skies agreement with the ASEAN countries. At this infrastructural connectivity level, India’s record of implementation has been far from exemplary, especially in comparison to that of China. Ensuring that this is no longer the case, will go a long way in demonstrating Indian commitment to its LEP, and reassuring Southeast Asian states that the potential they attribute to India is truly deliverable.

    About the Author

    Mahesh Shankar is a Visiting Fellow with the South Asia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Synopsis

    The changing strategic context in Southeast Asia has rapidly elevated India to a highly sought after partner in the region. New Delhi must take care, however, that domestic dynamics do not squander its rising stock.

    Commentary

    INDIA’S LOOK EAST Policy (LEP) appeared to be in danger of collapsing in the 1990s, when simply put, countries in Southeast Asia did not seem to care enough. They were either busy riding, along with China, the ‘tiger’ of rapid economic growth and prosperity, or contending with the effects of the disastrous financial meltdown in 1997-98. By the early 2000s, however, the situation had begun to improve progressively, with the establishment of a summit level dialogue between India and ASEAN in 2002, and then India’s membership of the East Asia Summit (EAS) in 2005. Even then, at least some ASEAN members continued to remain sceptical of, or indifferent to, the utility and role of India in their region.

    India’s Rising Stock

    Reassuringly for New Delhi, ASEAN perspectives of India have changed for the better in recent times. There is a growing sense in Southeast Asia about India’s importance to the region, and a concomitant desire for New Delhi to play a greater role. This is evidenced in repeated calls from leaders in ASEAN for India to become a more active diplomatic and military player in their region; increasing urgency towards the conclusion of agreements on free trade in goods, investment and services; and growing emphasis on infrastructural connectivity between India and Southeast Asia. The agreement of ASEAN states to upgrade ties with India to a ‘strategic partnership’ in December 2012 of course gave concrete expression to these trends.

    It is hardly surprising that ASEAN states would view India so favourably, especially in the context of recent Chinese assertiveness. Key to this is the geographical proximity of India to Southeast Asia. In the economic realm, this proximity – including the possibility of multiple channels of connectivity – offers ASEAN countries a massive Indian domestic market as a natural remedy to the ‘asymmetric interdependence’ that now characterises their economic ties with China. This is an ‘asymmetric interdependence,’ of course, that Beijing has shown a willingness to exploit in recent times as a leverage in dealing with maritime disagreements in the South China Sea.

    Crucially, for multiple reasons, this proximity also allows India to be seen – and to ‘sell’ itself – as a natural and indispensable security partner in the region. For one, proximity fosters recognition in the region that the security problems and concerns the ASEAN countries are likely to face in the coming years will be shared by India as well. This applies most obviously to challenges related to Chinese territorial ambitions and assertiveness, but also to other maritime and environment related security concerns.

    Relatedly, proximity means that India is less prone to the kind of credibility problems which now accompany American policy and commitments in Southeast Asia. ASEAN leaders are less likely to view India as having the same kind of leeway which they fear affords the US an ‘exit’ option, due to domestic political, personality, and/or fiscal constraints. This dynamic makes India appear a potentially more credible or reliable partner in the region.

    Finally, the very fact that India is strong enough to influence the regional security architecture, without being potent enough to dominate it, is appealing to ASEAN sensibilities. In contrast to the US, and China, both of which can individually, or in concert, overwhelm and undermine regional structures, India poses no such challenges to the idea of ASEAN centrality to the management of their region.

    Challenges to Indian credibility

    These strong, positive portents notwithstanding, one of the major challenges to Indian credibility – and having ASEAN states continue to take India seriously – would appear to lie not in the realm of Indian capabilities, but rather in Indian state capacity.

    Transforming India from a still peripheral – even in economic terms, where India-ASEAN trade is a fraction of China-ASEAN trade – to a meaningful actor will require, in part, strategic thinking, as well as massive efforts on the ground from New Delhi. The big question, however, is whether the Indian state, constrained by coalition politics, a labouring bureaucracy, and crippled by rampant inefficiencies and corruption, truly has the capacity to act in a concerted manner in pushing its LEP towards fruition in Southeast Asia? In ASEAN states, it is likely to be this factor, more than anything else, which might temper the sense of credibility that India otherwise carries as a strategic partner in their region.

    From New Delhi’s perspective therefore, it is crucial that any such impressions are swiftly addressed and corrected, lest Indian credibility in Southeast Asia is lost at the altar of state (in)capacity. This will require, of course, greater clarity from India – without necessarily putting forth an overly ambitious agenda or commitment – about where strategic thinking in New Delhi currently stands. Some of this is no doubt happening through multiple consultative mechanisms that now exist between both sides.

    More importantly, however, the Indian administration will need to more urgently demonstrate that despite its domestic constraints, it can act effectively and efficiently in fulfilling commitments already made. The most obvious arenas in which to begin doing so are the economic and infrastructural ones, where Indian efficiency can heighten credibility without putting New Delhi in a strategic tight spot vis-à-vis China.

    In particular, India could do its part towards the timely implementation of already planned connectivity projects, such as the trilateral highway connecting India with Myanmar and Thailand, the Mekong-India Economic Corridor (MIEC), the Kaladan Multimodal Transport Project, and an open skies agreement with the ASEAN countries. At this infrastructural connectivity level, India’s record of implementation has been far from exemplary, especially in comparison to that of China. Ensuring that this is no longer the case, will go a long way in demonstrating Indian commitment to its LEP, and reassuring Southeast Asian states that the potential they attribute to India is truly deliverable.

    About the Author

    Mahesh Shankar is a Visiting Fellow with the South Asia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info