Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13096 | Pan-ASEAN Maritime Security Cooperation: Prospects for Pooling Resources
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO13096 | Pan-ASEAN Maritime Security Cooperation: Prospects for Pooling Resources
    Collin Koh Swee Lean

    17 May 2013

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    To effectively cope with transnational maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia, ASEAN should consider institutionalising intra-regional maritime security cooperation such as those operating in Europe. Existing national and bilateral surveillance capabilities could be connected in a new ASEAN maritime security framework.

    Commentary

    ASEAN LEADERS at their summit in Brunei last month pledged to realise the ASEAN Community by 2015. The ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) component envisages regional cooperation in the area of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. In this regard, maritime security carries overlapping potential for ASEAN-wide cooperation.

    In view of the recent armed seaborne incursion into eastern Sabah and the refugee boat issues affecting Indonesia, Thailand and Australia, it is clear that existing, largely bilateral maritime security cooperation arrangements in the region have limited effectiveness against an array of non-traditional security challenges. These may come in the form of human trafficking, illegal fishing, sea robbery and piracy, as well as maritime terrorism – all of which carry potential trans-boundary security ramifications.

    New challenges, new needs

    Since 2011, ASEAN has begun to embrace intra-regional multilateral maritime security cooperation. For example, in 2012, the ASEAN Information-Sharing Portal for member states’ navies was inaugurated, along with the first ASEAN Maritime Security Information Sharing Exercise. In collaboration with extra-regional partners, ASEAN is slated to conduct the first ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus Expert Working Group Maritime Security Field Training Exercise this September.

    Clearly, more can be done to put flesh on the bones of these exploratory efforts. Sovereignty remains one of the key obstacles, as are disparities in national capacities. As a result, ASEAN is stuck at capacity-building at the national level.

    International examples may offer useful insights into how national sovereignty concerns can be tackled alongside pragmatic cooperation, and show that the creation of institutionalised mechanisms for stronger ASEAN maritime security cooperation can go hand in hand with national capacity-building efforts.

    The first is the multilateral Sea Surveillance Cooperation Baltic Sea (SUCBAS), which is an enhancement of an originally bilateral framework – Surveillance Cooperation Finland-Sweden – in 2009. SUCBAS comprises graduated levels of information-sharing amongst national authorities – both military and civilian – such that facilitating an institutionalised mechanism of maritime security information-sharing in the Baltic Sea does not prejudice member states’ national sovereignty over data which can be deemed too sensitive for sharing.

    Beyond information exchange and sharing, ASEAN member states should seriously consider embarking on joint maritime security operations. An example of such comprehensive, institutionalised maritime security cooperation can be found in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, or FRONTEX. Since its inception in 2004, FRONTEX has conducted regular joint maritime border control and surveillance operations in European, Atlantic and Mediterranean waters.

    The cornerstone of FRONTEX is a three-phased, pan-European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) first promulgated by the European Commission in 2008. The first phase fosters national-level capacity-building, thereby melding national surveillance assets within the EUROSUR Network. National authorities may retain control over what data is being shared and with whom and when. The second phase establishes a round-the-clock, pan-European maritime situational awareness picture available to all users. Finally, EUROSUR envisages a common information-sharing platform in diverse maritime security dimensions such as fishery control and environmental protection.

    SUCBAS and FRONTEX demonstrate that bold yet incremental approaches could be adopted to promote pragmatic regional cooperation, rectifying national capacity shortfalls by efficiently pooling and utilising scarce resources to effectively tackle trans-boundary maritime security challenges on the one hand while preserving national sovereignty on the other. In this respect, these examples are worth ASEAN consideration.

    Institutionalising ASEAN maritime security cooperation

    ASEAN may utilise and expand upon existing maritime security cooperation arrangements before involving extra-regional partners. The Malacca Strait Patrols (MSP), established in 2004 by Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (Thailand joined later) to counter piracy and sea robbery, may be a useful platform. MSP possesses several features found in SUCBAS and FRONTEX, though on a smaller scale, including coordinated surface patrols, later augmented by an aerial surveillance component dubbed “Eyes in the Sky” and intelligence exchange.

    MSP could be broadened into an ASEAN-wide maritime security institution akin to FRONTEX, dealing with a wide range of trans-boundary maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia’s littoral expanse. In July 2010, non-members – Brunei, Philippines and Vietnam – were invited as observers, thus highlighting its potential.

    A new FRONTEX-like institutional ASEAN maritime security framework would connect existing national and bilateral surveillance capabilities (for instance, the Indonesia-Singapore Surface Picture or SURPIC I and II created in 2005 and 2009 respectively) with the eventual goal of establishing a pan-ASEAN maritime situational awareness network. Information exchange and sharing in this regard can be a scaled-up enhancement of the ASEAN Information-Sharing Portal. Existing coordinated patrols could be broadened in scope and elevated to “joint” status, with reciprocal rights of hot pursuit permitted for patrol forces of member states under established procedures.

    Singapore’s role

    Where does Singapore feature in this endeavour? Long regarded as a strong regional security cooperation advocate and, in recent times, having called for a review of ASEAN’s processes and institutions, Singapore can play a key role. Notably, the Changi Command and Control (C2) Centre has also already facilitated regional maritime security cooperation since 2009. Its multi-national staffed Information Fusion Centre may serve as the data fusion node for a round-the-clock pan-ASEAN maritime situational awareness network. The Changi C2 Centre’s Multinational Exercise and Operations Centre could coordinate ASEAN multilateral joint maritime surveillance operations.

    Sufficient political will amongst ASEAN governments is needed to propel this institutional effort. Yet, to cope with the complex maritime security challenges that carry trans-boundary ramifications, ASEAN needs to move beyond existing arrangements to embark on institutionalised cooperation. In the long run, the strategic benefits are enormous. This not only helps facilitate ASEAN’s community-building goals but also cements its centrality in the regional security architecture. Efficient pooling and utilisation of scarce national resources may result in more effective policing of Southeast Asian waters against trans-boundary maritime security threats that impede socioeconomic developments in the region.

    As one of the better-equipped and endowed ASEAN members, Singapore could help play a facilitation role and contribute in niche capabilities. To succeed, however, maritime Southeast Asia must be prepared to pool its collective weight.

    About the Author

    Koh Swee Lean Collin is associate research fellow and doctoral candidate at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. His research specialises in naval modernisation and maritime security cooperation in Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Maritime Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Synopsis

    To effectively cope with transnational maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia, ASEAN should consider institutionalising intra-regional maritime security cooperation such as those operating in Europe. Existing national and bilateral surveillance capabilities could be connected in a new ASEAN maritime security framework.

    Commentary

    ASEAN LEADERS at their summit in Brunei last month pledged to realise the ASEAN Community by 2015. The ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) component envisages regional cooperation in the area of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. In this regard, maritime security carries overlapping potential for ASEAN-wide cooperation.

    In view of the recent armed seaborne incursion into eastern Sabah and the refugee boat issues affecting Indonesia, Thailand and Australia, it is clear that existing, largely bilateral maritime security cooperation arrangements in the region have limited effectiveness against an array of non-traditional security challenges. These may come in the form of human trafficking, illegal fishing, sea robbery and piracy, as well as maritime terrorism – all of which carry potential trans-boundary security ramifications.

    New challenges, new needs

    Since 2011, ASEAN has begun to embrace intra-regional multilateral maritime security cooperation. For example, in 2012, the ASEAN Information-Sharing Portal for member states’ navies was inaugurated, along with the first ASEAN Maritime Security Information Sharing Exercise. In collaboration with extra-regional partners, ASEAN is slated to conduct the first ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus Expert Working Group Maritime Security Field Training Exercise this September.

    Clearly, more can be done to put flesh on the bones of these exploratory efforts. Sovereignty remains one of the key obstacles, as are disparities in national capacities. As a result, ASEAN is stuck at capacity-building at the national level.

    International examples may offer useful insights into how national sovereignty concerns can be tackled alongside pragmatic cooperation, and show that the creation of institutionalised mechanisms for stronger ASEAN maritime security cooperation can go hand in hand with national capacity-building efforts.

    The first is the multilateral Sea Surveillance Cooperation Baltic Sea (SUCBAS), which is an enhancement of an originally bilateral framework – Surveillance Cooperation Finland-Sweden – in 2009. SUCBAS comprises graduated levels of information-sharing amongst national authorities – both military and civilian – such that facilitating an institutionalised mechanism of maritime security information-sharing in the Baltic Sea does not prejudice member states’ national sovereignty over data which can be deemed too sensitive for sharing.

    Beyond information exchange and sharing, ASEAN member states should seriously consider embarking on joint maritime security operations. An example of such comprehensive, institutionalised maritime security cooperation can be found in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, or FRONTEX. Since its inception in 2004, FRONTEX has conducted regular joint maritime border control and surveillance operations in European, Atlantic and Mediterranean waters.

    The cornerstone of FRONTEX is a three-phased, pan-European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) first promulgated by the European Commission in 2008. The first phase fosters national-level capacity-building, thereby melding national surveillance assets within the EUROSUR Network. National authorities may retain control over what data is being shared and with whom and when. The second phase establishes a round-the-clock, pan-European maritime situational awareness picture available to all users. Finally, EUROSUR envisages a common information-sharing platform in diverse maritime security dimensions such as fishery control and environmental protection.

    SUCBAS and FRONTEX demonstrate that bold yet incremental approaches could be adopted to promote pragmatic regional cooperation, rectifying national capacity shortfalls by efficiently pooling and utilising scarce resources to effectively tackle trans-boundary maritime security challenges on the one hand while preserving national sovereignty on the other. In this respect, these examples are worth ASEAN consideration.

    Institutionalising ASEAN maritime security cooperation

    ASEAN may utilise and expand upon existing maritime security cooperation arrangements before involving extra-regional partners. The Malacca Strait Patrols (MSP), established in 2004 by Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (Thailand joined later) to counter piracy and sea robbery, may be a useful platform. MSP possesses several features found in SUCBAS and FRONTEX, though on a smaller scale, including coordinated surface patrols, later augmented by an aerial surveillance component dubbed “Eyes in the Sky” and intelligence exchange.

    MSP could be broadened into an ASEAN-wide maritime security institution akin to FRONTEX, dealing with a wide range of trans-boundary maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia’s littoral expanse. In July 2010, non-members – Brunei, Philippines and Vietnam – were invited as observers, thus highlighting its potential.

    A new FRONTEX-like institutional ASEAN maritime security framework would connect existing national and bilateral surveillance capabilities (for instance, the Indonesia-Singapore Surface Picture or SURPIC I and II created in 2005 and 2009 respectively) with the eventual goal of establishing a pan-ASEAN maritime situational awareness network. Information exchange and sharing in this regard can be a scaled-up enhancement of the ASEAN Information-Sharing Portal. Existing coordinated patrols could be broadened in scope and elevated to “joint” status, with reciprocal rights of hot pursuit permitted for patrol forces of member states under established procedures.

    Singapore’s role

    Where does Singapore feature in this endeavour? Long regarded as a strong regional security cooperation advocate and, in recent times, having called for a review of ASEAN’s processes and institutions, Singapore can play a key role. Notably, the Changi Command and Control (C2) Centre has also already facilitated regional maritime security cooperation since 2009. Its multi-national staffed Information Fusion Centre may serve as the data fusion node for a round-the-clock pan-ASEAN maritime situational awareness network. The Changi C2 Centre’s Multinational Exercise and Operations Centre could coordinate ASEAN multilateral joint maritime surveillance operations.

    Sufficient political will amongst ASEAN governments is needed to propel this institutional effort. Yet, to cope with the complex maritime security challenges that carry trans-boundary ramifications, ASEAN needs to move beyond existing arrangements to embark on institutionalised cooperation. In the long run, the strategic benefits are enormous. This not only helps facilitate ASEAN’s community-building goals but also cements its centrality in the regional security architecture. Efficient pooling and utilisation of scarce national resources may result in more effective policing of Southeast Asian waters against trans-boundary maritime security threats that impede socioeconomic developments in the region.

    As one of the better-equipped and endowed ASEAN members, Singapore could help play a facilitation role and contribute in niche capabilities. To succeed, however, maritime Southeast Asia must be prepared to pool its collective weight.

    About the Author

    Koh Swee Lean Collin is associate research fellow and doctoral candidate at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. His research specialises in naval modernisation and maritime security cooperation in Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Maritime Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info