Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Public Education
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      Public EducationAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • CO13112 | Prospects for President Park’s Trustpolitik
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO13112 | Prospects for President Park’s Trustpolitik
Sukjoon Yoon

19 June 2013

download pdf

Synopsis

After 100 days in power, public approval of South Korean President Park Geun-hyae’s foreign policy is at an unprecedented high of 60%. Despite North Korea’s military provocations and unrelenting rhetoric, most people seem ready to give her signature trustpolitik the benefit of the doubt.

Commentary

SOUTH KOREANS feel safe – at least for the time being – making light of North Korea’s continuing rhetorical and military threats. Following President Park Geun-hyae’s recent successful visit to Washington, and ahead of her trip to Beijing later this month, some commentators have painted the future of the ROK-US alliance in glowing terms. It is seen as an everlasting military-security alliance structure capable of surviving even the sudden unification of the Korean peninsula.

In reality, however, the sole purpose of the alliance, which has a single command and control system and is therefore binational rather than bilateral, is to deter North Korea from initiating another Korean War.

China’s perspective

Park, who is scheduled to travel to Beijing on 27 June for summit talks with President Xi Jinping, is thought to enjoy a close personal rapport with the new leader. So what is China putting on the table?

Beijing may accept the South Korean proposal for a “strategic cooperative partnership concerning North Korean issues”, relinquishing the primary responsibility for restarting inter-Korean dialogue. This implies much warmer relations between Seoul and Beijing, perhaps, in the longer term, becoming more like those between Seoul and Washington.

Beijing’s relations with Pyongyang are clearly at a crossroads, though it remains unclear whether there will be any lasting changes. But there are signals that China wants to move toward a more comprehensive regional and global perspective. For example, the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) were allowed to visit the operations centre of China’s North Sea Fleet earlier this month.

China seems ready to join the “Trilateral Strategic Dialogue between China, US and South Korea” to deal with North Korean emergencies. In March this year, the South Korean and US militaries agreed a plan to deter conventional military provocations by North Korea, so any sudden turmoil on the Korean Peninsula may occasion more US military involvement.

And the mutual friendship treaty signed between Beijing and Pyongyang in 1951 allows China to intervene directly if North Korea comes under external attack. So the knock-on consequences of continued saber-rattling by the North are unpredictable – would China ditch its long-time ally? Fortuitously the US and China are stepping up consultations on these issues.

China is coming closer to the US in its ideas about the future of the Korean Peninsula, as the joint statement from the US-China summit on 6-7 June made clear. China now acknowledges North Korea as a source of instability in Northeast Asia, chastising Pyongyang for their nuclear blackmail and their conventional threats against South Korea. The US and China are currently reappraising their strategic relations, which they hope will lead to more cooperation between the two great powers. If they can agree on how to manage North Korea, then South Korea will surely tag along.

Park’s agenda for China visit

Park needs to address three key objectives on her visit to Beijing. Firstly, she should identify the grand strategy behind China’s rise: how do the Chinese view the future of the region, and how will they share power with the US? South Korea can cooperate with China on Beijing’s regional strategy, especially regarding North Korea, to develop a relationship as broad and deep as the ROK-US strategic alliance.

Secondly, she could invite the Chinese to buy-in to a “One Korea Policy” based on President Park’s trustpolitik in which North Korea is given social and economic support en route to a peaceful unification. Just as Deng Xiaoping successfully managed tensions with Taiwan and Hong Kong through his “One China Policy”, the current Chinese leadership would allow Park to initiate a process to unify the two Koreas within a rules-based framework.

Thirdly, she must clarify the details of her trustpolitik, for example: that South Korea should take the lead in managing North Korea, and therefore in maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula. Also, the North would not be asked to immediately abandon its existing nuclear weapons, but only to refrain from expanding its arsenal, since, as matters stand, it seems impossible for Pyongyang to discard its only strategic leverage.

Unlike previous policies toward North Korea, Park’s trustpolitik is rethinking this paradigm as a series of incremental steps. Rather than having to choose between stability and denuclearisation, the goal is to provide stability through a structured process including gradual denuclearisation. And this approach should suit China, which has always valued stability much more than denuclearisation.

Can Park prevail?

Park’s trustpolitik offers social-economic development, sponsored by the South, in exchange for peace and partnership; but will this policy fare any better than the earlier approaches? North Korea, because of its economic weakness and to preserve its regime, is unlikely to start another Korean War. But it can still make considerable local trouble for South Korea. The possibility of some sort of attack should not be neglected, especially after Park’s visit to Washington in March prompted much hyperbolic rhetoric, though Pyongyang routinely takes offence at any demonstration of the strength of the ROK-US alliance.

Park must not drop the ball in the interval before her visit to Beijing. She must press on with trustpolitik, despite the possibility of a Beijing visit by Kim Jung-un, as implied by the recent mission there of a North Korean special envoy, Lt. General Choe Younghae. This is despite the distraction of Presidents Xi and Obama discussing North Korea at their recent California summit. General Choe’s visit seems to be a rear-guard action to persuade Beijing to keep its distance from Seoul and to express a willingness to take Chinese advice in making changes.

Park needs to find a way to cut the Gordian Knot on the Korean peninsula by moving closer to China without slighting the US, and her trustpolitik offers a gradualist strategy with space for creative ambiguity. Now that China’s power and influence begin to rival that of the US, South Korea’s policy toward the North must move beyond simple military containment to encompass preventive diplomacy.

Park must take every opportunity for dialogue, and as nothing is more essential than that Beijing should change its attitude towards Pyongyang, Park must work tirelessly for such a breakthrough.

About the Author 

Captain (Ret.) Sukjoon Yoon is a Senior Research Fellow at the Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy (KIMS) and Visiting Professor of the Department of Defence System Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul. A former director of maritime strategy studies at the Naval War College, he contributed this specially to RSIS Commentaries.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

Synopsis

After 100 days in power, public approval of South Korean President Park Geun-hyae’s foreign policy is at an unprecedented high of 60%. Despite North Korea’s military provocations and unrelenting rhetoric, most people seem ready to give her signature trustpolitik the benefit of the doubt.

Commentary

SOUTH KOREANS feel safe – at least for the time being – making light of North Korea’s continuing rhetorical and military threats. Following President Park Geun-hyae’s recent successful visit to Washington, and ahead of her trip to Beijing later this month, some commentators have painted the future of the ROK-US alliance in glowing terms. It is seen as an everlasting military-security alliance structure capable of surviving even the sudden unification of the Korean peninsula.

In reality, however, the sole purpose of the alliance, which has a single command and control system and is therefore binational rather than bilateral, is to deter North Korea from initiating another Korean War.

China’s perspective

Park, who is scheduled to travel to Beijing on 27 June for summit talks with President Xi Jinping, is thought to enjoy a close personal rapport with the new leader. So what is China putting on the table?

Beijing may accept the South Korean proposal for a “strategic cooperative partnership concerning North Korean issues”, relinquishing the primary responsibility for restarting inter-Korean dialogue. This implies much warmer relations between Seoul and Beijing, perhaps, in the longer term, becoming more like those between Seoul and Washington.

Beijing’s relations with Pyongyang are clearly at a crossroads, though it remains unclear whether there will be any lasting changes. But there are signals that China wants to move toward a more comprehensive regional and global perspective. For example, the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) were allowed to visit the operations centre of China’s North Sea Fleet earlier this month.

China seems ready to join the “Trilateral Strategic Dialogue between China, US and South Korea” to deal with North Korean emergencies. In March this year, the South Korean and US militaries agreed a plan to deter conventional military provocations by North Korea, so any sudden turmoil on the Korean Peninsula may occasion more US military involvement.

And the mutual friendship treaty signed between Beijing and Pyongyang in 1951 allows China to intervene directly if North Korea comes under external attack. So the knock-on consequences of continued saber-rattling by the North are unpredictable – would China ditch its long-time ally? Fortuitously the US and China are stepping up consultations on these issues.

China is coming closer to the US in its ideas about the future of the Korean Peninsula, as the joint statement from the US-China summit on 6-7 June made clear. China now acknowledges North Korea as a source of instability in Northeast Asia, chastising Pyongyang for their nuclear blackmail and their conventional threats against South Korea. The US and China are currently reappraising their strategic relations, which they hope will lead to more cooperation between the two great powers. If they can agree on how to manage North Korea, then South Korea will surely tag along.

Park’s agenda for China visit

Park needs to address three key objectives on her visit to Beijing. Firstly, she should identify the grand strategy behind China’s rise: how do the Chinese view the future of the region, and how will they share power with the US? South Korea can cooperate with China on Beijing’s regional strategy, especially regarding North Korea, to develop a relationship as broad and deep as the ROK-US strategic alliance.

Secondly, she could invite the Chinese to buy-in to a “One Korea Policy” based on President Park’s trustpolitik in which North Korea is given social and economic support en route to a peaceful unification. Just as Deng Xiaoping successfully managed tensions with Taiwan and Hong Kong through his “One China Policy”, the current Chinese leadership would allow Park to initiate a process to unify the two Koreas within a rules-based framework.

Thirdly, she must clarify the details of her trustpolitik, for example: that South Korea should take the lead in managing North Korea, and therefore in maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula. Also, the North would not be asked to immediately abandon its existing nuclear weapons, but only to refrain from expanding its arsenal, since, as matters stand, it seems impossible for Pyongyang to discard its only strategic leverage.

Unlike previous policies toward North Korea, Park’s trustpolitik is rethinking this paradigm as a series of incremental steps. Rather than having to choose between stability and denuclearisation, the goal is to provide stability through a structured process including gradual denuclearisation. And this approach should suit China, which has always valued stability much more than denuclearisation.

Can Park prevail?

Park’s trustpolitik offers social-economic development, sponsored by the South, in exchange for peace and partnership; but will this policy fare any better than the earlier approaches? North Korea, because of its economic weakness and to preserve its regime, is unlikely to start another Korean War. But it can still make considerable local trouble for South Korea. The possibility of some sort of attack should not be neglected, especially after Park’s visit to Washington in March prompted much hyperbolic rhetoric, though Pyongyang routinely takes offence at any demonstration of the strength of the ROK-US alliance.

Park must not drop the ball in the interval before her visit to Beijing. She must press on with trustpolitik, despite the possibility of a Beijing visit by Kim Jung-un, as implied by the recent mission there of a North Korean special envoy, Lt. General Choe Younghae. This is despite the distraction of Presidents Xi and Obama discussing North Korea at their recent California summit. General Choe’s visit seems to be a rear-guard action to persuade Beijing to keep its distance from Seoul and to express a willingness to take Chinese advice in making changes.

Park needs to find a way to cut the Gordian Knot on the Korean peninsula by moving closer to China without slighting the US, and her trustpolitik offers a gradualist strategy with space for creative ambiguity. Now that China’s power and influence begin to rival that of the US, South Korea’s policy toward the North must move beyond simple military containment to encompass preventive diplomacy.

Park must take every opportunity for dialogue, and as nothing is more essential than that Beijing should change its attitude towards Pyongyang, Park must work tirelessly for such a breakthrough.

About the Author 

Captain (Ret.) Sukjoon Yoon is a Senior Research Fellow at the Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy (KIMS) and Visiting Professor of the Department of Defence System Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul. A former director of maritime strategy studies at the Naval War College, he contributed this specially to RSIS Commentaries.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info