Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13160 | Religious Harmony in Indonesia: Need for New Approaches
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO13160 | Religious Harmony in Indonesia: Need for New Approaches
    Jennifer Yang Hui

    27 August 2013

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    Religious intolerance continues to bedevil Indonesia. Although the Indonesian constitution is committed to protecting religious freedom, there are certain laws and official actions that do not. Policymakers need to be proactive to build education, political and law enforcement capabilities to deal with religious intolerance.

    Commentary

    INDONESIAN PRESIDENT Susilo Bambang Yudyohono’s invocation of religious tolerance in his Independence Day Speech on 17 August 2013 was poignant in the light of the recent bombing of the Ekayana Buddhist Center in Jakarta two weeks earlier. While the media speculated about the possible terrorist motive of the bombing, the bigger concern for policy makers ought to be the persistence of religious intolerance in the country.

    The Indonesian authorities echoed this fear. Following the bombing incident, the Chief of Police, General Timur Pradopo asked the people to remain calm and not be provoked by SARA – the local acronym referring to the four sensitive issues of ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup feelings.

    Minorities face intolerance and opposition

    While in general the Indonesian constitution and most laws and policies are committed to protecting religious freedom, there are certain laws and official actions that do not. For instance, in 2008, a decree banned proselytising activities by the Ahmadiyah believers while preventing vigilante acts against the group. In addition, the decree did not prohibit the conduct of worship or other practices within the Ahmadiyah community itself. However opposition from some factions continued. For example in 2011, the West Java Governor Ahmad Heryawan passed an order that banned all activities conducted by the Ahmadiyah community.

    Meanwhile some Christian churches also faced opposition from the majority Muslim community and local leaders due to the 2006 regulation that apparently made it difficult for minority church groups to build places of worship. The regulation required the signatures of at least 90 members of the group in addition to 60 individuals of different religious groups in the community in support of the construction, besides the approval of the local religious affairs office.

    The Taman Yasmin church in Bogor for example, had been battling a decision from the mayor denying the legality of their building permit and had been closed since 2011. In addition, fundamentalist Islamic groups have jumped into the fray in some of these situations while police stood by.

    For example, on January 2012, members of the Indonesian Muslim Communication Forum (Forkami) and the Islamic Reform Movement (Garis), harassed Taman Yasmin members who were conducting a church service at a member’s house. In another instance in March 2013, the Batak Protestant Church (HKBP) Taman Sari church in Bekasi was demolished following opposition from the Taman Sari Islamic People’s Forum (FUIT).

    Furthermore, results from surveys confirm the rising discomfort that Indonesians have towards those of different religious backgrounds. A January 2013 study by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) noted that 68 percent of its respondents disagreed to having a place of worship for other faiths in their neighbourhood. In 2012, a study by the reputable Indonesian Survey Circle (LSI) found that 15 percent of its respondents are wary of people of different religious backgrounds, an increase from eight percent in its 2005 study.

    As an illustration, on 19 August 2013, some residents of Lenteng Agung subdistrict in South Jakarta petitioned for the removal of the newly installed subdistrict head owing to the fact that she is not Muslim.

    Need to build proactive and reactive capacities

    It is easy to see that the current worrying state of creeping religious intolerance can under certain conditions lead to violence. Thus there is a need for policymakers to build what Singaporean geographer Lily Kong describes as “proactive and reactive capacities” when addressing the problems of religious intolerance in Indonesia.

    There is need to anticipate religious adversities and harness religion for social well-being. Policymakers should also think about the ways to limit the damage from religious adversity. The building of proactive and reactive capacities in the Indonesian religious context requires other initiatives:

    First, reform in the area of religious education in schools: Education officials already recognise the possible linkage between violence across the archipelago and shortcomings in the Indonesian education system. To address this issue, curriculum reform was implemented in June 2013 that removed the teaching of Science, English and Information Technology in order to dedicate more time to religious studies.

    However, the new curriculum needs to incorporate interfaith teaching of religion. It should also expose students to the fact that the religious landscape in Indonesia, and all over Southeast Asia, is largely characterised by religious diversity. Such reforms in the religious education system are more likely to improve inter-religious understanding and tolerance in the long-run.

    Political will to enforce guarantee

    Second, there is a need for political will. Indonesian leaders should enforce the constitutional guarantee for religious freedom in the country. This is especially so in the regions, where the central government in Jakarta has been unable to interfere with, given the authority of regional officials as outlined in the 2004 Regional Administration Law. This is best illustrated in the case of Taman Yasmin church, whereby the Bogor Mayor refused to obey 2010 ruling by the Supreme Court to allow the congregation to hold services at the church.

    Finally, there is a need for training. Law enforcement authorities need to improve training in view of their increasing involvement in situations involving inter-religious conflicts. Training academies should consider incorporating teachings on interfaith religious studies in their curriculum as well as practical knowledge on preparing officers for deployment to situations of religious conflicts or violence.

    About the Author

    Jennifer Yang Hui is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Religion in Contemporary Society / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Synopsis

    Religious intolerance continues to bedevil Indonesia. Although the Indonesian constitution is committed to protecting religious freedom, there are certain laws and official actions that do not. Policymakers need to be proactive to build education, political and law enforcement capabilities to deal with religious intolerance.

    Commentary

    INDONESIAN PRESIDENT Susilo Bambang Yudyohono’s invocation of religious tolerance in his Independence Day Speech on 17 August 2013 was poignant in the light of the recent bombing of the Ekayana Buddhist Center in Jakarta two weeks earlier. While the media speculated about the possible terrorist motive of the bombing, the bigger concern for policy makers ought to be the persistence of religious intolerance in the country.

    The Indonesian authorities echoed this fear. Following the bombing incident, the Chief of Police, General Timur Pradopo asked the people to remain calm and not be provoked by SARA – the local acronym referring to the four sensitive issues of ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup feelings.

    Minorities face intolerance and opposition

    While in general the Indonesian constitution and most laws and policies are committed to protecting religious freedom, there are certain laws and official actions that do not. For instance, in 2008, a decree banned proselytising activities by the Ahmadiyah believers while preventing vigilante acts against the group. In addition, the decree did not prohibit the conduct of worship or other practices within the Ahmadiyah community itself. However opposition from some factions continued. For example in 2011, the West Java Governor Ahmad Heryawan passed an order that banned all activities conducted by the Ahmadiyah community.

    Meanwhile some Christian churches also faced opposition from the majority Muslim community and local leaders due to the 2006 regulation that apparently made it difficult for minority church groups to build places of worship. The regulation required the signatures of at least 90 members of the group in addition to 60 individuals of different religious groups in the community in support of the construction, besides the approval of the local religious affairs office.

    The Taman Yasmin church in Bogor for example, had been battling a decision from the mayor denying the legality of their building permit and had been closed since 2011. In addition, fundamentalist Islamic groups have jumped into the fray in some of these situations while police stood by.

    For example, on January 2012, members of the Indonesian Muslim Communication Forum (Forkami) and the Islamic Reform Movement (Garis), harassed Taman Yasmin members who were conducting a church service at a member’s house. In another instance in March 2013, the Batak Protestant Church (HKBP) Taman Sari church in Bekasi was demolished following opposition from the Taman Sari Islamic People’s Forum (FUIT).

    Furthermore, results from surveys confirm the rising discomfort that Indonesians have towards those of different religious backgrounds. A January 2013 study by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) noted that 68 percent of its respondents disagreed to having a place of worship for other faiths in their neighbourhood. In 2012, a study by the reputable Indonesian Survey Circle (LSI) found that 15 percent of its respondents are wary of people of different religious backgrounds, an increase from eight percent in its 2005 study.

    As an illustration, on 19 August 2013, some residents of Lenteng Agung subdistrict in South Jakarta petitioned for the removal of the newly installed subdistrict head owing to the fact that she is not Muslim.

    Need to build proactive and reactive capacities

    It is easy to see that the current worrying state of creeping religious intolerance can under certain conditions lead to violence. Thus there is a need for policymakers to build what Singaporean geographer Lily Kong describes as “proactive and reactive capacities” when addressing the problems of religious intolerance in Indonesia.

    There is need to anticipate religious adversities and harness religion for social well-being. Policymakers should also think about the ways to limit the damage from religious adversity. The building of proactive and reactive capacities in the Indonesian religious context requires other initiatives:

    First, reform in the area of religious education in schools: Education officials already recognise the possible linkage between violence across the archipelago and shortcomings in the Indonesian education system. To address this issue, curriculum reform was implemented in June 2013 that removed the teaching of Science, English and Information Technology in order to dedicate more time to religious studies.

    However, the new curriculum needs to incorporate interfaith teaching of religion. It should also expose students to the fact that the religious landscape in Indonesia, and all over Southeast Asia, is largely characterised by religious diversity. Such reforms in the religious education system are more likely to improve inter-religious understanding and tolerance in the long-run.

    Political will to enforce guarantee

    Second, there is a need for political will. Indonesian leaders should enforce the constitutional guarantee for religious freedom in the country. This is especially so in the regions, where the central government in Jakarta has been unable to interfere with, given the authority of regional officials as outlined in the 2004 Regional Administration Law. This is best illustrated in the case of Taman Yasmin church, whereby the Bogor Mayor refused to obey 2010 ruling by the Supreme Court to allow the congregation to hold services at the church.

    Finally, there is a need for training. Law enforcement authorities need to improve training in view of their increasing involvement in situations involving inter-religious conflicts. Training academies should consider incorporating teachings on interfaith religious studies in their curriculum as well as practical knowledge on preparing officers for deployment to situations of religious conflicts or violence.

    About the Author

    Jennifer Yang Hui is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info