Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13177 | Enhancing Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: The Role of Private Citizens
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO13177 | Enhancing Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: The Role of Private Citizens
    Caitrίona Helena Heinl

    27 September 2013

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    Cybersecurity is increasingly being enhanced worldwide. At the same time, it is equally necessary to be mindful of civil liberties and data privacy protections. Initiatives which co-opt citizens can be effective in achieving these goals.

    Commentary

    AS GOVERNMENTS and public authorities develop and implement cybersecurity measures, it is essential that civil liberties such as data privacy and data protection be respected. Where possible, both security and data privacy principles should be incorporated from the outset in such measures – in other words by design.

    Consequently, novel initiatives which strengthen cybersecurity and data privacy as well as increase public awareness of their importance should be encouraged since citizens’ buy-in, loyalty and cooperation are essential for effective cybersecurity strategies. Furthermore, while the end-user is often identified as the weakest link in terms of cybersecurity, he can also be the most valuable link if novel strategies are applied.

    Co-ownership of responsibility for cybersecurity

    There are five key considerations underlying initiatives which co-opt citizens for enhancing cybersecurity. First, for much-needed cybersecurity measures to be effective when implemented they must respect fundamental rights and protect civil liberties such as data privacy and data protection. Deviation from these principles will only undermine the credibility of authorities and impede the effectiveness of the measures.

    Second, awareness-raising initiatives and constructive debate are essential to ensure citizens are fully informed and aware about the issues and risks they encounter on a daily basis in their use of ICT as well as their own role in ensuring cybersecurity.

    Third, citizens should be made aware that they have a shared responsibility for cybersecurity and data privacy. As end-users, individual citizens must be made to realise that they too play a crucial role and that there is a shared responsibility for cybersecurity and data privacy between public authorities, the private sector and individuals as the end-user.

    Fourth, recent initiatives to stimulate the creation of innovative and useful tools can assist public authorities and companies identify much-needed talent. Lastly, most initiatives are easily transferable and may therefore be adopted or tweaked at local, national or international level.

    A toolbox of initiatives

    Several examples of recent initiatives and developments support these principles. They include outreach campaigns to promote public awareness through education, cybersecurity months, transparency reports such as the release for the first time on 27 August 2013 of Facebook’s Global Government Requests Report, and hackathons like this year’s “EUhackathon 2013”.

    The Facebook report details, for purposes of increased transparency and trust, which countries requested information about Facebook users, the number of requests and number of user accounts specified in those requests, and the percentage of requests in which the company was legally obliged to disclose some data.

    EUhackathon 2013, themed “hACK4YOUrRIGhTS”, was a 24-hour coding session held in September 2013 in Google’s Brussels offices. It focused on raising awareness of government requests to companies for user information and the “empower[ing] of citizens to stand up for their fundamental rights” through the creation of tools to be made freely available online by citizens for citizens to know when and why governments demand access to their information.

    Selected teams of coders, developers and hackers were challenged to create applications on the state of government surveillance by using data sets from network analysis, corporate transparency reports, government reports, and Freedom of Information Requests.

    While such initiatives are significant and should be further encouraged, there is still, however, an urgent need for more of these kinds of initiatives which should be broader in their scope.

    Solving complex cybersecurity dilemmas

    Open innovation challenges allow public authorities, corporations or even civil society groups to tailor a cost-effective challenge for citizens by placing a specific question on online innovation forums. A challenge may be limited to national applicants or it may be opened to the wider global community and should therefore be considered as a possible solution for finding new policy or theoretical concepts and novel technological tools.

    For instance, the online community could be asked in an open cybersecurity challenge, “how can big data be best leveraged to enhance cybersecurity while ensuring data privacy?” The parameters may be set so that solutions must incorporate principles of security and data privacy by design. For example, open innovation challenges were launched earlier this year on pre-existing innovation forums by USAID and the Humanity United Foundation to find a mechanism for secure communications during a crisis. In July 2013 the US Department of State launched the 2013 Innovation in Arms Control Challenge for a prize of US$10,000 to find out “what information technology tools and concepts can support future arms control inspections”.

    Results can often be quite surprising, as can the sources of submissions – winners of one challenge included a student, a scientist, and a defence industry consultant. It is therefore worth considering the feasibility of open innovation challenges for enhancing cybersecurity and civil liberties protections since they are solutions-based in nature, stimulate innovation, are relatively cost-effective, and enhance awareness of the issues.

    Furthermore, co-ownership of responsibility is encouraged since citizens are engaged to co-produce exciting and novel solutions for burning policy and technological questions. In short, an open cybersecurity challenge could quite easily provide a valuable and simple opportunity for solving some of the most complex cybersecurity and related data privacy problems.

    About the Author

    Caitríona H. Heinl is a Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Global

    Synopsis

    Cybersecurity is increasingly being enhanced worldwide. At the same time, it is equally necessary to be mindful of civil liberties and data privacy protections. Initiatives which co-opt citizens can be effective in achieving these goals.

    Commentary

    AS GOVERNMENTS and public authorities develop and implement cybersecurity measures, it is essential that civil liberties such as data privacy and data protection be respected. Where possible, both security and data privacy principles should be incorporated from the outset in such measures – in other words by design.

    Consequently, novel initiatives which strengthen cybersecurity and data privacy as well as increase public awareness of their importance should be encouraged since citizens’ buy-in, loyalty and cooperation are essential for effective cybersecurity strategies. Furthermore, while the end-user is often identified as the weakest link in terms of cybersecurity, he can also be the most valuable link if novel strategies are applied.

    Co-ownership of responsibility for cybersecurity

    There are five key considerations underlying initiatives which co-opt citizens for enhancing cybersecurity. First, for much-needed cybersecurity measures to be effective when implemented they must respect fundamental rights and protect civil liberties such as data privacy and data protection. Deviation from these principles will only undermine the credibility of authorities and impede the effectiveness of the measures.

    Second, awareness-raising initiatives and constructive debate are essential to ensure citizens are fully informed and aware about the issues and risks they encounter on a daily basis in their use of ICT as well as their own role in ensuring cybersecurity.

    Third, citizens should be made aware that they have a shared responsibility for cybersecurity and data privacy. As end-users, individual citizens must be made to realise that they too play a crucial role and that there is a shared responsibility for cybersecurity and data privacy between public authorities, the private sector and individuals as the end-user.

    Fourth, recent initiatives to stimulate the creation of innovative and useful tools can assist public authorities and companies identify much-needed talent. Lastly, most initiatives are easily transferable and may therefore be adopted or tweaked at local, national or international level.

    A toolbox of initiatives

    Several examples of recent initiatives and developments support these principles. They include outreach campaigns to promote public awareness through education, cybersecurity months, transparency reports such as the release for the first time on 27 August 2013 of Facebook’s Global Government Requests Report, and hackathons like this year’s “EUhackathon 2013”.

    The Facebook report details, for purposes of increased transparency and trust, which countries requested information about Facebook users, the number of requests and number of user accounts specified in those requests, and the percentage of requests in which the company was legally obliged to disclose some data.

    EUhackathon 2013, themed “hACK4YOUrRIGhTS”, was a 24-hour coding session held in September 2013 in Google’s Brussels offices. It focused on raising awareness of government requests to companies for user information and the “empower[ing] of citizens to stand up for their fundamental rights” through the creation of tools to be made freely available online by citizens for citizens to know when and why governments demand access to their information.

    Selected teams of coders, developers and hackers were challenged to create applications on the state of government surveillance by using data sets from network analysis, corporate transparency reports, government reports, and Freedom of Information Requests.

    While such initiatives are significant and should be further encouraged, there is still, however, an urgent need for more of these kinds of initiatives which should be broader in their scope.

    Solving complex cybersecurity dilemmas

    Open innovation challenges allow public authorities, corporations or even civil society groups to tailor a cost-effective challenge for citizens by placing a specific question on online innovation forums. A challenge may be limited to national applicants or it may be opened to the wider global community and should therefore be considered as a possible solution for finding new policy or theoretical concepts and novel technological tools.

    For instance, the online community could be asked in an open cybersecurity challenge, “how can big data be best leveraged to enhance cybersecurity while ensuring data privacy?” The parameters may be set so that solutions must incorporate principles of security and data privacy by design. For example, open innovation challenges were launched earlier this year on pre-existing innovation forums by USAID and the Humanity United Foundation to find a mechanism for secure communications during a crisis. In July 2013 the US Department of State launched the 2013 Innovation in Arms Control Challenge for a prize of US$10,000 to find out “what information technology tools and concepts can support future arms control inspections”.

    Results can often be quite surprising, as can the sources of submissions – winners of one challenge included a student, a scientist, and a defence industry consultant. It is therefore worth considering the feasibility of open innovation challenges for enhancing cybersecurity and civil liberties protections since they are solutions-based in nature, stimulate innovation, are relatively cost-effective, and enhance awareness of the issues.

    Furthermore, co-ownership of responsibility is encouraged since citizens are engaged to co-produce exciting and novel solutions for burning policy and technological questions. In short, an open cybersecurity challenge could quite easily provide a valuable and simple opportunity for solving some of the most complex cybersecurity and related data privacy problems.

    About the Author

    Caitríona H. Heinl is a Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info