Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
PUBLIC EDUCATION
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      PUBLIC EDUCATIONAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • CO13223 | The Evolution of National Service in the Singapore Story
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO13223 | The Evolution of National Service in the Singapore Story
Ong Wei Chong

05 December 2013

download pdf

Synopsis

The narrative of NS continues to evolve, so does its relevance to national security.

Commentary

MINDEF’S RECENT decision to ban certain offensive lyrics in a popular marching song ‘Purple Light’ has reignited much discussion in social media and alternative media circles on perceptions of National Service (NS) in Singapore. Much of the focus has been on gender relations in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), but bloggers have used the opportunity to widen the scope of discussion. In one such commentary in Yahoo! News, ‘Is it time to reconsider National Service?’, Kirsten Han asserted that:

“NS … is a thorn in the side of Singaporean men … Men often play the NS card when it comes to discussions of gender equality, telling women that until they have been conscripted they have no right to speak out on sexism. This tactic is also adopted when conversations on immigration arise; foreigners’ rights should always be secondary to ours because they have served in our military… Since we can accept that NS is problematic and unfair, it makes sense for us to begin to question conscription and its place in Singapore.”

Shaky asssertions

Ms Han’s assertions do not stand up to critical scrutiny for the following reasons:

> Her claim that the “NS is a thorn in the side of Singaporean men” does not square with recent empirical evidence nor does she provide any to support her claim. On the contrary, a recent independent survey carried out by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) showed that 98% of respondents agreed that NS is “Necessary for the defence of Singapore”;

> Her comment on men playing up the NS card when it comes to discussions on gender equality and immigration does not paint an accurate picture of the larger ongoing debate on NS. The government-led conversation to strengthen NS precisely seeks to mitigate the negative effects of playing up the NS card on the above issues;

> However, the most worrying of Ms Han’s assertion is that “Since we can accept that NS is problematic, it makes sense for us to begin to question conscription and its place in Singapore”. In this case, Ms Han does not provide the evidence to substantiate her claim that “NS is problematic and unfair”. Utilising such unsubstantiated assertions as a rationale to question the place of conscription has no place in serious policy debate – much less as a basis for sound defence policy making.

In the Singapore context, NS adds rather than subtracts from the country’s military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy capabilities. More importantly, NS has ensured that Singapore continues to have a military that remains connected to the society that it protects. To maintain that connection, it is crucial to have places and spaces for rigorous debate on the role of NS in Singapore – be it through government-led or civil society-driven initiatives.

However, in the largely ‘unpoliceable’ space of alternative media, assertions that lack rigour can easily be misinterpreted as informed opinions – particularly when written by prominent figures in the blogosphere.

Why NS and a strong SAF still matter

Historian Victor Davis Hanson reminds us that “Even with changing technology and ideologies … conflict will remain the familiar father of us all”. Having said that, it is easy to quantify how much food a dollar can buy, but how much security can a dollar spent on defence buy?  Admittedly, this seemingly simple question is a difficult one for even defence experts and policymakers. An excerpt from a November 2013 SIPRI report on defence macroeconomics highlights this conundrum:

“To even begin to calculate…one would need to know…the prevailing and known threats and their associated costs and the likelihood of unknown threats and their probable costs. One would need an assessment of the mitigation measures available, and the costs and effectiveness of each response…one would need to estimate probabilities of threats materialising, and the probabilities of security measures succeeding in mitigating those threats…many of these threats are unknown or intangible, and the costs of losses are immeasurable.”

In short, like life insurance and medical insurance, defence spending protects individuals against the probabilities of life-threatening threats and losses – some of which may be unknown, intangible or immeasurable. The fact that these threats and losses may not always materialise immediately does not mean that they are not real. In the case of Singapore, NS is not only part of the ‘insurance premium’ paid by citizens for that protection, but a key component of that umbrella of protection – as instruments of military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy.

Citizen soldiers

When you see an infantryman patrolling Changi Airport with his Hometeam brethren-in-arms, chances are he will be a citizen soldier providing deterrence against security threats. When you hear of a World War Two era bomb being safely disposed off in a residential area, chances are several members of that disposal team will be citizen soldiers from the Combat Engineers keeping Singapore homes safe. When you read of the SAF’s personnel, ships, aircraft and other assets assisting in humanitarian efforts in the aftermath of regional natural disasters, chances are a significant portion of the personnel will be citizen soldiers, sailors and airmen extending the reach of Singapore’s defence diplomacy.

The core capabilities that allow the SAF to carry out the above missions and tasks are painstakingly built over years and sometimes decades – upon the shoulders of NSmen. Many of these core capabilities in military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy are not scalable like Lego blocks. Simply put, like humpty-dumpty once broken, they can never be put back again.

About the Author

Ong Weichong is Assistant Professor with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is currently a visiting faculty at the Ecole Navale, France.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

Synopsis

The narrative of NS continues to evolve, so does its relevance to national security.

Commentary

MINDEF’S RECENT decision to ban certain offensive lyrics in a popular marching song ‘Purple Light’ has reignited much discussion in social media and alternative media circles on perceptions of National Service (NS) in Singapore. Much of the focus has been on gender relations in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), but bloggers have used the opportunity to widen the scope of discussion. In one such commentary in Yahoo! News, ‘Is it time to reconsider National Service?’, Kirsten Han asserted that:

“NS … is a thorn in the side of Singaporean men … Men often play the NS card when it comes to discussions of gender equality, telling women that until they have been conscripted they have no right to speak out on sexism. This tactic is also adopted when conversations on immigration arise; foreigners’ rights should always be secondary to ours because they have served in our military… Since we can accept that NS is problematic and unfair, it makes sense for us to begin to question conscription and its place in Singapore.”

Shaky asssertions

Ms Han’s assertions do not stand up to critical scrutiny for the following reasons:

> Her claim that the “NS is a thorn in the side of Singaporean men” does not square with recent empirical evidence nor does she provide any to support her claim. On the contrary, a recent independent survey carried out by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) showed that 98% of respondents agreed that NS is “Necessary for the defence of Singapore”;

> Her comment on men playing up the NS card when it comes to discussions on gender equality and immigration does not paint an accurate picture of the larger ongoing debate on NS. The government-led conversation to strengthen NS precisely seeks to mitigate the negative effects of playing up the NS card on the above issues;

> However, the most worrying of Ms Han’s assertion is that “Since we can accept that NS is problematic, it makes sense for us to begin to question conscription and its place in Singapore”. In this case, Ms Han does not provide the evidence to substantiate her claim that “NS is problematic and unfair”. Utilising such unsubstantiated assertions as a rationale to question the place of conscription has no place in serious policy debate – much less as a basis for sound defence policy making.

In the Singapore context, NS adds rather than subtracts from the country’s military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy capabilities. More importantly, NS has ensured that Singapore continues to have a military that remains connected to the society that it protects. To maintain that connection, it is crucial to have places and spaces for rigorous debate on the role of NS in Singapore – be it through government-led or civil society-driven initiatives.

However, in the largely ‘unpoliceable’ space of alternative media, assertions that lack rigour can easily be misinterpreted as informed opinions – particularly when written by prominent figures in the blogosphere.

Why NS and a strong SAF still matter

Historian Victor Davis Hanson reminds us that “Even with changing technology and ideologies … conflict will remain the familiar father of us all”. Having said that, it is easy to quantify how much food a dollar can buy, but how much security can a dollar spent on defence buy?  Admittedly, this seemingly simple question is a difficult one for even defence experts and policymakers. An excerpt from a November 2013 SIPRI report on defence macroeconomics highlights this conundrum:

“To even begin to calculate…one would need to know…the prevailing and known threats and their associated costs and the likelihood of unknown threats and their probable costs. One would need an assessment of the mitigation measures available, and the costs and effectiveness of each response…one would need to estimate probabilities of threats materialising, and the probabilities of security measures succeeding in mitigating those threats…many of these threats are unknown or intangible, and the costs of losses are immeasurable.”

In short, like life insurance and medical insurance, defence spending protects individuals against the probabilities of life-threatening threats and losses – some of which may be unknown, intangible or immeasurable. The fact that these threats and losses may not always materialise immediately does not mean that they are not real. In the case of Singapore, NS is not only part of the ‘insurance premium’ paid by citizens for that protection, but a key component of that umbrella of protection – as instruments of military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy.

Citizen soldiers

When you see an infantryman patrolling Changi Airport with his Hometeam brethren-in-arms, chances are he will be a citizen soldier providing deterrence against security threats. When you hear of a World War Two era bomb being safely disposed off in a residential area, chances are several members of that disposal team will be citizen soldiers from the Combat Engineers keeping Singapore homes safe. When you read of the SAF’s personnel, ships, aircraft and other assets assisting in humanitarian efforts in the aftermath of regional natural disasters, chances are a significant portion of the personnel will be citizen soldiers, sailors and airmen extending the reach of Singapore’s defence diplomacy.

The core capabilities that allow the SAF to carry out the above missions and tasks are painstakingly built over years and sometimes decades – upon the shoulders of NSmen. Many of these core capabilities in military deterrence, homeland defence and defence diplomacy are not scalable like Lego blocks. Simply put, like humpty-dumpty once broken, they can never be put back again.

About the Author

Ong Weichong is Assistant Professor with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is currently a visiting faculty at the Ecole Navale, France.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info