Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO14047 | India-Pakistan Peace Process: The Role of Intra-Kashmir Trade
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO14047 | India-Pakistan Peace Process: The Role of Intra-Kashmir Trade
    Sumona DasGupta

    10 March 2014

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    The complete closure of trade across the “Line of Control” in Kashmir over a single instance of narcotics smuggling in early 2014 indicates the fragility of this front as a confidence building measure. It also shows the reluctance of the Indian and Pakistani authorities to allow the peace process to be driven by Kashmiri stakeholders of both sides.

    Commentary

    EFFORTS BY India and Pakistan to build trust and confidence between them through trade across the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir came to a halt last January over a truckload of narcotics. The closely guarded and partially fenced LoC separates Indian and Pakistan administered Kashmir and serves as a de facto border between the two nuclear-armed states.

    A limited and highly controlled intra-Kashmir trade was opened from two points in October 2008, for the first time since the 1949 ceasefire line (now the LoC) divided families and communities in Kashmir.

    Stuck on both sides

    On 17 January 2014, a truck from Pakistan which had crossed over to Uri on the Indian side was found to be carrying a narcotic commonly known as brown sugar worth an estimated US$ 18million. The truck was seized and the driver arrested and sent to jail in Srinagar (capital of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir). Pakistani authorities promptly detained 27 Indian trucks which had crossed over to their side that day. They also closed the gates, which meant that 48 Pakistani trucks and drivers on the Indian side could not return either.

    The trucks and drivers remained stranded on each side as Pakistan insisted that the arrested driver be released or be tried in Pakistan. India maintained that since the contraband was seized on Indian territory, this case had to be tried under Indian law. The stand-off continued for more than three weeks till protests by the families of the stranded truck drivers forced a diplomatic dialogue. The drivers and their trucks were finally allowed to cross over to their respective sides on 12 February. However the arrested driver and his impounded truck remained in Indian territory and trade resumed only on 26 February.

    Not the first time

    That this single incident snowballed into an extended diplomatic crisis and halted a whole process of trade hailed as a key confidence building measure (CBM) may appear surprising. But this is not the first time that this initiative has ground to a halt. In 2012 and 2013, trade was twice suspended owing to tensions between Indian and Pakistani troops, across the LoC.

    The manner in which  trade is repeatedly suspended and resumed, apart from causing economic losses to the business communities on both sides, raised larger questions about the scope, nature and intent of this initiative. Hailed as a major confidence building exercise between the two parts of divided Kashmir, a “blind” duty free barter trade – without any exchange of currency, no banking back up and no direct line of communication between buyers and sellers – was initiated in October 2008.

    Over the years the people involved in the process from both sides have tried to drive the initiative by forming joint chambers of commerce and traders’ associations; they have urged the governments of India and Pakistan to make this trade not just a token “emotional connecter” between divided communities and families, but an economically sustainable enterprise, So far, however, the governments have shown a reluctance to move beyond the limited “blind” barter mode, citing security reasons. The discovery of contraband in one truck has made the task of persuading the governments to ease restrictions on trade more difficult.

    The larger peace process

    In the recent stalemate, the Kashmir Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) suggested that teams from both sides of Kashmir play a role in resolving the conflict. As the KCCI president pointed out, cross-LoC trade is not just about selling and buying commodities, but something that constitutes a critical CBM for Kashmiris.

    The sequence of events in the crisis and the fact that the stalemate could be overcome only when the highest echelons of the Indian and Pakistan foreign offices intervened indicates a reluctance to allow the people of Kashmir, including members of registered chambers of commerce, to play a more proactive role in moving this CBM from its current symbolic status to a more substantive and meaningful one. Yet it is precisely the involvement of Kashmiris that is crucial in building a long-term Indo-Pakistani peace process.

    The significance of LoC-related initiatives that create opportunities for people-to-people contact cannot be understated, for they have the potential to end the conflict in the long run. Traders and businessmen involved in cross-LoC trade have repeatedly pointed out that this CBM has broad political implications because it has dispelled many misgivings about the “other side”. Beyond the quantum of trade and the number of people involved in it, the issue  is  about how  such LoC-based initiatives can feed into a larger process of making “borders” in Kashmir “irrelevant” – a goal which both sides have publicly committed to.

    Indian and Pakistani policy makers need to consult the direct stakeholders – the traders and business community of Kashmir in this case – who have an understanding of the ground realities involved in the cross-LoC trading process. Local ownership of the CBM can be created by allowing the Kashmiri leaders and business community to decide on the items to be traded, the banking and communication facilities that can be introduced given the security constraints, and the facilities required at trade facilitation centres.

    The Jammu and Kashmir Joint Chamber of Commerce – the first cross-LoC NGO – can be given a formal role in crisis management and trade-related dispute resolution and consulted on evolving policy on LoC trade, including the possibility of transit trade and increasing the number of crossing points beyond the existing two. A process of mutual economic gain involving Kashmiris will generate common interests and a stronger sense of cross-LoC community.

    As India and Pakistan seek a dialogic engagement, they must realise that the road to peace cannot side-step the aspirations of Kashmiris seeking to build ties across cartographic lines that have kept them apart.

    About the Author

    Sumona DasGupta is a Visiting Fellow with the South Asia Programme at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Synopsis

    The complete closure of trade across the “Line of Control” in Kashmir over a single instance of narcotics smuggling in early 2014 indicates the fragility of this front as a confidence building measure. It also shows the reluctance of the Indian and Pakistani authorities to allow the peace process to be driven by Kashmiri stakeholders of both sides.

    Commentary

    EFFORTS BY India and Pakistan to build trust and confidence between them through trade across the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir came to a halt last January over a truckload of narcotics. The closely guarded and partially fenced LoC separates Indian and Pakistan administered Kashmir and serves as a de facto border between the two nuclear-armed states.

    A limited and highly controlled intra-Kashmir trade was opened from two points in October 2008, for the first time since the 1949 ceasefire line (now the LoC) divided families and communities in Kashmir.

    Stuck on both sides

    On 17 January 2014, a truck from Pakistan which had crossed over to Uri on the Indian side was found to be carrying a narcotic commonly known as brown sugar worth an estimated US$ 18million. The truck was seized and the driver arrested and sent to jail in Srinagar (capital of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir). Pakistani authorities promptly detained 27 Indian trucks which had crossed over to their side that day. They also closed the gates, which meant that 48 Pakistani trucks and drivers on the Indian side could not return either.

    The trucks and drivers remained stranded on each side as Pakistan insisted that the arrested driver be released or be tried in Pakistan. India maintained that since the contraband was seized on Indian territory, this case had to be tried under Indian law. The stand-off continued for more than three weeks till protests by the families of the stranded truck drivers forced a diplomatic dialogue. The drivers and their trucks were finally allowed to cross over to their respective sides on 12 February. However the arrested driver and his impounded truck remained in Indian territory and trade resumed only on 26 February.

    Not the first time

    That this single incident snowballed into an extended diplomatic crisis and halted a whole process of trade hailed as a key confidence building measure (CBM) may appear surprising. But this is not the first time that this initiative has ground to a halt. In 2012 and 2013, trade was twice suspended owing to tensions between Indian and Pakistani troops, across the LoC.

    The manner in which  trade is repeatedly suspended and resumed, apart from causing economic losses to the business communities on both sides, raised larger questions about the scope, nature and intent of this initiative. Hailed as a major confidence building exercise between the two parts of divided Kashmir, a “blind” duty free barter trade – without any exchange of currency, no banking back up and no direct line of communication between buyers and sellers – was initiated in October 2008.

    Over the years the people involved in the process from both sides have tried to drive the initiative by forming joint chambers of commerce and traders’ associations; they have urged the governments of India and Pakistan to make this trade not just a token “emotional connecter” between divided communities and families, but an economically sustainable enterprise, So far, however, the governments have shown a reluctance to move beyond the limited “blind” barter mode, citing security reasons. The discovery of contraband in one truck has made the task of persuading the governments to ease restrictions on trade more difficult.

    The larger peace process

    In the recent stalemate, the Kashmir Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) suggested that teams from both sides of Kashmir play a role in resolving the conflict. As the KCCI president pointed out, cross-LoC trade is not just about selling and buying commodities, but something that constitutes a critical CBM for Kashmiris.

    The sequence of events in the crisis and the fact that the stalemate could be overcome only when the highest echelons of the Indian and Pakistan foreign offices intervened indicates a reluctance to allow the people of Kashmir, including members of registered chambers of commerce, to play a more proactive role in moving this CBM from its current symbolic status to a more substantive and meaningful one. Yet it is precisely the involvement of Kashmiris that is crucial in building a long-term Indo-Pakistani peace process.

    The significance of LoC-related initiatives that create opportunities for people-to-people contact cannot be understated, for they have the potential to end the conflict in the long run. Traders and businessmen involved in cross-LoC trade have repeatedly pointed out that this CBM has broad political implications because it has dispelled many misgivings about the “other side”. Beyond the quantum of trade and the number of people involved in it, the issue  is  about how  such LoC-based initiatives can feed into a larger process of making “borders” in Kashmir “irrelevant” – a goal which both sides have publicly committed to.

    Indian and Pakistani policy makers need to consult the direct stakeholders – the traders and business community of Kashmir in this case – who have an understanding of the ground realities involved in the cross-LoC trading process. Local ownership of the CBM can be created by allowing the Kashmiri leaders and business community to decide on the items to be traded, the banking and communication facilities that can be introduced given the security constraints, and the facilities required at trade facilitation centres.

    The Jammu and Kashmir Joint Chamber of Commerce – the first cross-LoC NGO – can be given a formal role in crisis management and trade-related dispute resolution and consulted on evolving policy on LoC trade, including the possibility of transit trade and increasing the number of crossing points beyond the existing two. A process of mutual economic gain involving Kashmiris will generate common interests and a stronger sense of cross-LoC community.

    As India and Pakistan seek a dialogic engagement, they must realise that the road to peace cannot side-step the aspirations of Kashmiris seeking to build ties across cartographic lines that have kept them apart.

    About the Author

    Sumona DasGupta is a Visiting Fellow with the South Asia Programme at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info