Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO14076 | Networked Resilience: Moving the Asia-Pacific Forward
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO14076 | Networked Resilience: Moving the Asia-Pacific Forward
    , Alistair D. B. Cook

    22 April 2014

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    As the United Nations moves towards cementing a Post-2015 agenda with the Sustainable Development Goals, how can Asia-Pacific states best achieve these? It is time to recognise our resources from across society to build stronger communities and more resilient states.

    Commentary

    SINCE MARCH 2013, the United Nations has worked on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an agenda to replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which expire in 2015. At the UN General Assembly in March, the UN working group released a list of existing goals and targets like poverty eradication; preventing pandemics, child and maternal deaths; universal education; access to clean water and sanitation; sustainable cities and human settlements; responding to climate change; fighting corruption; promoting basic freedoms and participatory decision-making.

    These are challenges faced across the Asia-Pacific and most pronounced after natural disasters and in the wake of armed conflicts. However, building resilience with the adequate political, social, technical and financial commitment are imperative for many developing countries in the region that may lose gains achieved with the MDGs if communities lose the capacity to contribute to their own development.

    Community resilience: The missing link?

    Recently, community resilience has entered the policy arena to link empowerment and accountability. It has visibly become the driver for disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation efforts. Community resilience dovetails with human security to focus on preparedness as a way to make sustainable, inclusive and innovative policy responses to the major challenges we face today. Yet there remain several challenges to turning these policy words into action.

    A significant challenge and at the same time, a critical element of community resilience, is information and communication. Increasing awareness and communicating risk has become more technologically advanced and complex for people particularly in urban areas that are growing rapidly in the Asia–Pacific. Identifying the proper mechanisms for information dissemination and risk communication are necessary to effectively raise awareness in times of natural disasters and conflict. This is where open data programs like Google Earth, OpenStreetMaps and collaborative projects such as GeoNode, InaSAFE and the Open Cities Project powered by smartphones and GPS systems come in.

    Maps generated through these participatory mapping programmes were widely used in response to Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines and urban flooding in Indonesia as much as they were used for urban planning in Nepal and Sri Lanka. Many of these open data initiatives are being funded through the World Bank’s Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)’s Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI).

    Such information needs to be triangulated through dependable media platforms factoring in internet penetration rates – a significant hurdle in the region due to the wide variation in internet access. In some cases the mapping technology has had limited effect like after the 2008 Pakistan earthquake because not enough people were online to generate the necessary amount of data.

    Indeed, knowing when a disaster will strike or where the greatest need is, is important. Yet this does not amount to effective resilience. Communities at risk may be located in areas vulnerable to earthquakes or typhoons, and recognising this is important to determine whether relocation is necessary or desirable. Empowering a community to propose their own solutions with government support anchors local knowledge and spurs creativity to generate long-term solutions. Ultimately, deciding to relocate an entire community highlights the need to balance what a community wants with the need to protect it from natural hazards and violence.

    Towards responsible and resilient communities

    The concept of community resilience focuses on responsibility and empowerment and leads some to argue it detracts away from the impact and importance of national governments. Rather community resilience seeks to redress the balance of responsibility away from government dependence and recognises what many communities are already doing. Indeed recognising the importance of the multiple stakeholders involved illustrates a complex web of decision-makers. It is decision-making at the most appropriate level which determines how resilient a state and its society is.

    Decisions made by leveraging on a mix of community, local government, NGO and national government inputs will create more sustainable solutions. Building resilience through this networked approach ensures a holistic response, whether it be to an earthquake or volcanic eruption.

    With a large number of natural disasters and conflicts across the Asia-Pacific, there are many crucial lessons and best practices for community resilience already on display. However expanding these lessons and replicating best practices into concrete policies and action still present challenges for resilience-building initiatives. Public-private partnerships are often promoted as a viable solution but in reality they are no panacea for the complex challenges  after natural disasters or in conflicts. Indeed, the contribution of the informal sector bridges the gap where the public and the private sectors are unable to meet the immediate needs of communities at risk.

    Furthermore, in the face of adversity, communities are already their own first responders administering first aid after an earthquake or distributing food to those in need. Ultimately though, government coordination and support, whether technical or political, is still paramount to successful implementation of an action plan that draws on different sectors and actors. Recasting resilience as networked resilience helps ensure that we recognise the roles and responsibilities of all those needed in better responding to disasters and building stronger communities for sustainable development.

    About the Authors

    Gianna Gayle Amul is Senior Analyst and Alistair D. B. Cook is Research Fellow with the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Synopsis

    As the United Nations moves towards cementing a Post-2015 agenda with the Sustainable Development Goals, how can Asia-Pacific states best achieve these? It is time to recognise our resources from across society to build stronger communities and more resilient states.

    Commentary

    SINCE MARCH 2013, the United Nations has worked on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an agenda to replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which expire in 2015. At the UN General Assembly in March, the UN working group released a list of existing goals and targets like poverty eradication; preventing pandemics, child and maternal deaths; universal education; access to clean water and sanitation; sustainable cities and human settlements; responding to climate change; fighting corruption; promoting basic freedoms and participatory decision-making.

    These are challenges faced across the Asia-Pacific and most pronounced after natural disasters and in the wake of armed conflicts. However, building resilience with the adequate political, social, technical and financial commitment are imperative for many developing countries in the region that may lose gains achieved with the MDGs if communities lose the capacity to contribute to their own development.

    Community resilience: The missing link?

    Recently, community resilience has entered the policy arena to link empowerment and accountability. It has visibly become the driver for disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation efforts. Community resilience dovetails with human security to focus on preparedness as a way to make sustainable, inclusive and innovative policy responses to the major challenges we face today. Yet there remain several challenges to turning these policy words into action.

    A significant challenge and at the same time, a critical element of community resilience, is information and communication. Increasing awareness and communicating risk has become more technologically advanced and complex for people particularly in urban areas that are growing rapidly in the Asia–Pacific. Identifying the proper mechanisms for information dissemination and risk communication are necessary to effectively raise awareness in times of natural disasters and conflict. This is where open data programs like Google Earth, OpenStreetMaps and collaborative projects such as GeoNode, InaSAFE and the Open Cities Project powered by smartphones and GPS systems come in.

    Maps generated through these participatory mapping programmes were widely used in response to Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines and urban flooding in Indonesia as much as they were used for urban planning in Nepal and Sri Lanka. Many of these open data initiatives are being funded through the World Bank’s Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)’s Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI).

    Such information needs to be triangulated through dependable media platforms factoring in internet penetration rates – a significant hurdle in the region due to the wide variation in internet access. In some cases the mapping technology has had limited effect like after the 2008 Pakistan earthquake because not enough people were online to generate the necessary amount of data.

    Indeed, knowing when a disaster will strike or where the greatest need is, is important. Yet this does not amount to effective resilience. Communities at risk may be located in areas vulnerable to earthquakes or typhoons, and recognising this is important to determine whether relocation is necessary or desirable. Empowering a community to propose their own solutions with government support anchors local knowledge and spurs creativity to generate long-term solutions. Ultimately, deciding to relocate an entire community highlights the need to balance what a community wants with the need to protect it from natural hazards and violence.

    Towards responsible and resilient communities

    The concept of community resilience focuses on responsibility and empowerment and leads some to argue it detracts away from the impact and importance of national governments. Rather community resilience seeks to redress the balance of responsibility away from government dependence and recognises what many communities are already doing. Indeed recognising the importance of the multiple stakeholders involved illustrates a complex web of decision-makers. It is decision-making at the most appropriate level which determines how resilient a state and its society is.

    Decisions made by leveraging on a mix of community, local government, NGO and national government inputs will create more sustainable solutions. Building resilience through this networked approach ensures a holistic response, whether it be to an earthquake or volcanic eruption.

    With a large number of natural disasters and conflicts across the Asia-Pacific, there are many crucial lessons and best practices for community resilience already on display. However expanding these lessons and replicating best practices into concrete policies and action still present challenges for resilience-building initiatives. Public-private partnerships are often promoted as a viable solution but in reality they are no panacea for the complex challenges  after natural disasters or in conflicts. Indeed, the contribution of the informal sector bridges the gap where the public and the private sectors are unable to meet the immediate needs of communities at risk.

    Furthermore, in the face of adversity, communities are already their own first responders administering first aid after an earthquake or distributing food to those in need. Ultimately though, government coordination and support, whether technical or political, is still paramount to successful implementation of an action plan that draws on different sectors and actors. Recasting resilience as networked resilience helps ensure that we recognise the roles and responsibilities of all those needed in better responding to disasters and building stronger communities for sustainable development.

    About the Authors

    Gianna Gayle Amul is Senior Analyst and Alistair D. B. Cook is Research Fellow with the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info