Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO03028 | Homeland Security Strategies: The United States Approach
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO03028 | Homeland Security Strategies: The United States Approach
    Bernard Loo Fook Weng

    24 July 2003

    download pdf

    Commentary

    On 24 November 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Homeland Security Bill, creating a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It brought together under one new roof almost 170 000 personnel from twenty-two existing agencies and government departments including the Coast Guard, Customs, and the Secret Service. This is generally regarded as the most significant reorganisation of the United States (US) federal government since the creation of the Department of Defence after World War II.

    Structure and Functions

    The DHS is tasked with seven missions, of which the key are the prevention of and reduction of vulnerability of the USA to terrorist attacks, the minimisation of damage and assistance in recovery from terrorist attacks that do occur, and the monitoring of connections between illegal drug trafficking and terrorism.

    The Department is headed by the Secretary for Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, who is assisted by a Deputy Secretary and four Under Secretaries, in charge of the following functions: Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection, Science and Technology in Support of Homeland Security, Border and Transportation Security, and Emergency Preparedness and Response.

    The DHS is, in the words of President Bush, the “front line of protecting America.” The impetus behind its creation was the perception amongst decision-makers that the defence of the USA against future terrorist threats required a “unified, effective response.” The obvious implication was that government counter-terrorist mechanisms before 11 September 2001 were unable to effectively prevent the perpetration of terrorism against the USA. The reasons for this failure ultimately derive from one major flaw, namely the lack of coordination between numerous government branches and agencies that have some role in this counter-terrorism function. The creation of the DHS was therefore seen as the logical solution to this problem of the lack of inter-agency coordination.

    As mentioned, the DHS coordinates the tasks and functions of a vast array of existing government branches and agencies that have some relation to the objective of protecting the USA from terrorist activities. It will have to coordinate and collate the intelligence information of such disparate federal agencies as the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as well as the National Security Agency (NSA). Other existing agencies and organisations that will fall under its purview include the US Coast Guard, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Transportation Security Agency, the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institute of Health. Coordinating such disparate organisations and agencies will be a difficult task. In addition the DHS will also have to coordinate the local, state and private sector organisations that have functions relating to the protection of the USA against terrorist activities.

    Evaluation

    The consolidation of existing agencies concerned with security is a good idea, particularly having one organisation for the agencies critical for homeland security. Consolidating these agencies into a single bureaucracy, will enhance intelligence processing of terrorist threats to the USA, and enable the relevant government authorities to act on such intelligence with greater rapidity and flexibility.

    The key concern, however, is that the creation of the DHS preceded the formulation of a coherent homeland security strategy. There was a fairly clear identification of the missions of the DHS, but “missions do not add up to a coherent, integrated strategy.” Strategy determines the missions that need to be accomplished, not the other way around. It was the selection of a maritime strategy, for instance, that made the US Navy’s interdiction of Japanese sea lines of communication during World War II an important mission. Of course, the ability to complete particular missions is an important element in the selection of strategy.

    Lacking a coherent homeland security strategy, a number of potential clashes of inter-agency interests may be inevitable, especially as the DHS has to supervise and coordinate the very disparate activities of many pre-existing governmental agencies. Conflicts are inevitable as established government agencies (with long-standing organisational cultures and interests) struggle to cope with the possibly competing organisational cultures and interests of hitherto separate and distinct agencies that have been brought under one roof suddenly. This is more so for previously separate agencies with overlapping functions – for instance, the consolidation of the US Coast Guard and INS, both of which have not entirely similar but overlapping missions and functions. There is the danger of wastage of resources through the needless duplication of services, and more important, reduced effectiveness of either agency as a result of this intra-department conflict.

    Lessons

    At one level, it might appear that the US experience holds little relevance for Singapore. Unlike the US, Singapore has adopted a network approach to homeland security coordination. A number of inter- ministerial agencies coordinate various aspects of intelligence and operations. They include the National Security Task Force and the Homefront Security Centre, both situated in the Ministry of Home Affairs. The latter centre oversees joint exercises as well as counter-terrorist operations. It works closely with the Ministry of Defence, which has established a National Security Secretariat to coordinate strategic information and policy for counter-terrorism. There is also a Joint Counter Terrorism Centre, which coordinates intelligence on terrorists. They all report to the Security Policy Review Committee chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister in charge of defence and security, Dr Tony Tan, and comprises the Ministers of Defence, Home Affairs and Foreign Affairs. The new security architecture is designed to improve regional and international cooperation in counter-terrorism, particularly in the sharing of intelligence, greater inter-ministerial coordination, and enhance joint operations between the civil and military forces in countering terrorism.

    The Singapore approach would seem to be less likely to produce clashes of interests and cultures of the kind experienced by the merging of different organisations and agencies in the US. However the potential for problems cannot be ruled out, given the traditional separation of functions and roles between the SAF and SPF and the leading role played by the Internal Security Department in countering all forms of security threats to Singapore, including terrorism. It is not clear that their roles have been rationalised within the coordinating network, or even that a clear homeland security strategy has been formulated. It would seem that the missions for the various agencies have been identified before such an integrated strategy has been developed.

    This assessment is highly tentative, given the lack of open information about the security network of Singapore. However one should guard against the possibility of separate government agencies tending to duplicate each other’s functions, or have a clash of interests, which could undermine the efforts of the Singapore Government to prepare a coherent counter-terrorist platform with which to protect the vital interests and resources of the state.

    About the Author

    Dr Bernard Loo is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / Terrorism Studies / Americas / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Commentary

    On 24 November 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Homeland Security Bill, creating a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It brought together under one new roof almost 170 000 personnel from twenty-two existing agencies and government departments including the Coast Guard, Customs, and the Secret Service. This is generally regarded as the most significant reorganisation of the United States (US) federal government since the creation of the Department of Defence after World War II.

    Structure and Functions

    The DHS is tasked with seven missions, of which the key are the prevention of and reduction of vulnerability of the USA to terrorist attacks, the minimisation of damage and assistance in recovery from terrorist attacks that do occur, and the monitoring of connections between illegal drug trafficking and terrorism.

    The Department is headed by the Secretary for Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, who is assisted by a Deputy Secretary and four Under Secretaries, in charge of the following functions: Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection, Science and Technology in Support of Homeland Security, Border and Transportation Security, and Emergency Preparedness and Response.

    The DHS is, in the words of President Bush, the “front line of protecting America.” The impetus behind its creation was the perception amongst decision-makers that the defence of the USA against future terrorist threats required a “unified, effective response.” The obvious implication was that government counter-terrorist mechanisms before 11 September 2001 were unable to effectively prevent the perpetration of terrorism against the USA. The reasons for this failure ultimately derive from one major flaw, namely the lack of coordination between numerous government branches and agencies that have some role in this counter-terrorism function. The creation of the DHS was therefore seen as the logical solution to this problem of the lack of inter-agency coordination.

    As mentioned, the DHS coordinates the tasks and functions of a vast array of existing government branches and agencies that have some relation to the objective of protecting the USA from terrorist activities. It will have to coordinate and collate the intelligence information of such disparate federal agencies as the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as well as the National Security Agency (NSA). Other existing agencies and organisations that will fall under its purview include the US Coast Guard, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Transportation Security Agency, the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institute of Health. Coordinating such disparate organisations and agencies will be a difficult task. In addition the DHS will also have to coordinate the local, state and private sector organisations that have functions relating to the protection of the USA against terrorist activities.

    Evaluation

    The consolidation of existing agencies concerned with security is a good idea, particularly having one organisation for the agencies critical for homeland security. Consolidating these agencies into a single bureaucracy, will enhance intelligence processing of terrorist threats to the USA, and enable the relevant government authorities to act on such intelligence with greater rapidity and flexibility.

    The key concern, however, is that the creation of the DHS preceded the formulation of a coherent homeland security strategy. There was a fairly clear identification of the missions of the DHS, but “missions do not add up to a coherent, integrated strategy.” Strategy determines the missions that need to be accomplished, not the other way around. It was the selection of a maritime strategy, for instance, that made the US Navy’s interdiction of Japanese sea lines of communication during World War II an important mission. Of course, the ability to complete particular missions is an important element in the selection of strategy.

    Lacking a coherent homeland security strategy, a number of potential clashes of inter-agency interests may be inevitable, especially as the DHS has to supervise and coordinate the very disparate activities of many pre-existing governmental agencies. Conflicts are inevitable as established government agencies (with long-standing organisational cultures and interests) struggle to cope with the possibly competing organisational cultures and interests of hitherto separate and distinct agencies that have been brought under one roof suddenly. This is more so for previously separate agencies with overlapping functions – for instance, the consolidation of the US Coast Guard and INS, both of which have not entirely similar but overlapping missions and functions. There is the danger of wastage of resources through the needless duplication of services, and more important, reduced effectiveness of either agency as a result of this intra-department conflict.

    Lessons

    At one level, it might appear that the US experience holds little relevance for Singapore. Unlike the US, Singapore has adopted a network approach to homeland security coordination. A number of inter- ministerial agencies coordinate various aspects of intelligence and operations. They include the National Security Task Force and the Homefront Security Centre, both situated in the Ministry of Home Affairs. The latter centre oversees joint exercises as well as counter-terrorist operations. It works closely with the Ministry of Defence, which has established a National Security Secretariat to coordinate strategic information and policy for counter-terrorism. There is also a Joint Counter Terrorism Centre, which coordinates intelligence on terrorists. They all report to the Security Policy Review Committee chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister in charge of defence and security, Dr Tony Tan, and comprises the Ministers of Defence, Home Affairs and Foreign Affairs. The new security architecture is designed to improve regional and international cooperation in counter-terrorism, particularly in the sharing of intelligence, greater inter-ministerial coordination, and enhance joint operations between the civil and military forces in countering terrorism.

    The Singapore approach would seem to be less likely to produce clashes of interests and cultures of the kind experienced by the merging of different organisations and agencies in the US. However the potential for problems cannot be ruled out, given the traditional separation of functions and roles between the SAF and SPF and the leading role played by the Internal Security Department in countering all forms of security threats to Singapore, including terrorism. It is not clear that their roles have been rationalised within the coordinating network, or even that a clear homeland security strategy has been formulated. It would seem that the missions for the various agencies have been identified before such an integrated strategy has been developed.

    This assessment is highly tentative, given the lack of open information about the security network of Singapore. However one should guard against the possibility of separate government agencies tending to duplicate each other’s functions, or have a clash of interests, which could undermine the efforts of the Singapore Government to prepare a coherent counter-terrorist platform with which to protect the vital interests and resources of the state.

    About the Author

    Dr Bernard Loo is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security / Terrorism Studies

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info