Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO04045 | Jakarta Bombing 2004: Why Target Australia?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO04045 | Jakarta Bombing 2004: Why Target Australia?
    Michelle Teo

    22 September 2004

    download pdf

    Commentary

    The latest terrorist attack in Jakarta, on 9 September, hit the Australian embassy. Soon after the blast, Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer was quoted saying that it was “directed at Australia”. The first Australian news reports were quick to point out that there were no Australian casualties. Nine Indonesians were killed. It was later found that a five- year-old girl with Australian citizenship was among the 158 injured.

    Indonesian and Australian authorities blamed the regional terrorist network, Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), which claimed responsibility in a statement posted on an Islamist website. JI said it chose Australia as it “didn’t respond positively” to messages “regarding its participation in the war against our brothers in Iraq”, and was therefore to be “punished”. JI also called on Canberra to withdraw forces from Iraq, threatening more attacks. Prime Minister John Howard rejected the warning and reiterated Australia’s commitment to Iraq.

    Are Australians being specifically targeted in Indonesia? Why?

    Target Australia

    Canberra has constantly reminded its citizens, at home and abroad, not to take security for granted. To date, no major attack has been carried out in Australia, and the most significant Australian casualties from a terrorist attack have been the 88 killed in the Bali nightclub bombings. But Australia has been on the terrorists’ radar screen for some time.

    In December 2001, Singaporean authorities foiled a JI plot to bomb western interests, and targets included the Australian High Commission. Similarly, in June 2003, Thai police uncovered another JI plot to attack the Australian embassy in Bangkok, along with the U.S. and British missions. In March this year, a lone attacker threw a small explosive device made of “firecracker material” at the High Commission in Kuala Lumpur.

    This last attack caused insignificant damage, and speculations of it being a terrorist attack were dismissed. In Australia itself, deported Frenchman Willie Brigitte was apparently involved in plans with Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba, to attack critical infrastructure in Sydney.

    Why Australia?

    One can fathom a number of reasons why Australia has, post-9/11, become a direct terrorist target. Australia’s White Paper on transnational terrorism discussed a ‘clash of cultures’, noting that it is a target because terrorists are “threatened” by its “example as a conspicuously successful modern society”. But, as many experts and scholars have noted, it is more probable that terrorists target a country and its nationals for the government’s policies.

    Some analysts and opposition politicians suggest that Mr Howard’s staunch support for the Bush administration and its ‘war on terror’ policies have made Australia a target. Canberra was amongst the first to respond to Washington’s call for allies – first into Afghanistan in 2001, and then Iraq in 2003. This was noted by Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who issued a statement in mid-November 2001on the Afghanistan conflict, saying, “…what do Japan or Australia or Germany have to do with this war? They just support the infidels and the Crusaders.” Other commentators have noted that Australia’s involvement in the separation of East Timor from Indonesia, and Canberra’s perceived anti-Muslim immigration policies have fuelled resentment against Australia.

    The fact that the attack took place just a month before Australia goes to the polls, in which Mr Howard is seeking re-election, drew comparisons with the Madrid bombings affecting the outcome of Spain’s elections, with significant implications on its domestic and foreign policies in March this year.

    One explanation could be Australia’s call in August for the extradition of the Bali bombers from Indonesia to Australia. Charges against an Indonesian, who admitted to involvement in the Bali blasts, were dropped following an Indonesian Constitutional Court ruling that anti- terrorism laws could not be applied retroactively. Mr Downer said that if the Bali bombers avoided justice in Indonesia, Australia might have to take its own action – extraditing the culprits to Australia to face charges. Indonesia later cautioned Canberra against diplomatic pressure on Jakarta, especially since it risked a backlash by Islamic fundamentalists in Indonesia.

    Going Ahead

    In its White Paper, Canberra recognised that the extremist interpretation of Islam is behind the terrorist threat today. But it noted, “the notion of ‘root causes’ is misleading”, saying that the terrorists are “opportunistic in invoking popular concerns to rally people to their cause”. Despite this, it commits itself to tackling the economic, social and political factors that give rise to extremism.

    Australia is proactive in regional counter-terrorism efforts. Its strategy is to combat terrorism through operational-level cooperation, helping other countries develop and strengthen capabilities, and building political will among governments to respond to the long-term threat. It dedicated significant funding to help Indonesia build up its counter-terrorism capacity, for the Jakarta Centre for Law Enforcement Cooperation in Semarang, inaugurated in July this year.

    However, Australia might need to re-examine its policies, and see that ‘root causes’ play a real role in the terrorism equation. Beyond operational measures and sheer power, it is also important to be sensitive to the issues of the day, and the contexts.

    In dealing with an unconventional threat such as terrorism, it is important not to aggravate existing tensions or animosities. Indeed, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia’s largest Muslim organization, called on countries that are targets to exercise “introspection”, with regards to their global policies.

    Policymakers have already acknowledged that terrorism today is an ideological threat. Against this, security measures and force have limited effectiveness. Going towards a comprehensive approach, utilising one’s ‘soft power’ – attracting and persuading others to adopt your goals – might be appropriate. Already, several authorities have advocated winning ‘hearts and minds’, and veterans from the security forces recall that such a campaign was used successfully against the communist insurgency in this region.

    Perhaps it is time for a change in mindset and policy, oriented towards engaging the populace and therein drying up support for the terrorists. JI continues to be a threat in the region, and military might has shown to have limited, short-term results. Since the attack, Australia is now allowed to build a high bomb-proof wall around its embassy compound in Jakarta. But will it be enough?

    About the Author

    Michelle Teo is a Research Analyst with the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at the Institute of Defence and Srategic Studies.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Commentary

    The latest terrorist attack in Jakarta, on 9 September, hit the Australian embassy. Soon after the blast, Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer was quoted saying that it was “directed at Australia”. The first Australian news reports were quick to point out that there were no Australian casualties. Nine Indonesians were killed. It was later found that a five- year-old girl with Australian citizenship was among the 158 injured.

    Indonesian and Australian authorities blamed the regional terrorist network, Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), which claimed responsibility in a statement posted on an Islamist website. JI said it chose Australia as it “didn’t respond positively” to messages “regarding its participation in the war against our brothers in Iraq”, and was therefore to be “punished”. JI also called on Canberra to withdraw forces from Iraq, threatening more attacks. Prime Minister John Howard rejected the warning and reiterated Australia’s commitment to Iraq.

    Are Australians being specifically targeted in Indonesia? Why?

    Target Australia

    Canberra has constantly reminded its citizens, at home and abroad, not to take security for granted. To date, no major attack has been carried out in Australia, and the most significant Australian casualties from a terrorist attack have been the 88 killed in the Bali nightclub bombings. But Australia has been on the terrorists’ radar screen for some time.

    In December 2001, Singaporean authorities foiled a JI plot to bomb western interests, and targets included the Australian High Commission. Similarly, in June 2003, Thai police uncovered another JI plot to attack the Australian embassy in Bangkok, along with the U.S. and British missions. In March this year, a lone attacker threw a small explosive device made of “firecracker material” at the High Commission in Kuala Lumpur.

    This last attack caused insignificant damage, and speculations of it being a terrorist attack were dismissed. In Australia itself, deported Frenchman Willie Brigitte was apparently involved in plans with Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba, to attack critical infrastructure in Sydney.

    Why Australia?

    One can fathom a number of reasons why Australia has, post-9/11, become a direct terrorist target. Australia’s White Paper on transnational terrorism discussed a ‘clash of cultures’, noting that it is a target because terrorists are “threatened” by its “example as a conspicuously successful modern society”. But, as many experts and scholars have noted, it is more probable that terrorists target a country and its nationals for the government’s policies.

    Some analysts and opposition politicians suggest that Mr Howard’s staunch support for the Bush administration and its ‘war on terror’ policies have made Australia a target. Canberra was amongst the first to respond to Washington’s call for allies – first into Afghanistan in 2001, and then Iraq in 2003. This was noted by Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who issued a statement in mid-November 2001on the Afghanistan conflict, saying, “…what do Japan or Australia or Germany have to do with this war? They just support the infidels and the Crusaders.” Other commentators have noted that Australia’s involvement in the separation of East Timor from Indonesia, and Canberra’s perceived anti-Muslim immigration policies have fuelled resentment against Australia.

    The fact that the attack took place just a month before Australia goes to the polls, in which Mr Howard is seeking re-election, drew comparisons with the Madrid bombings affecting the outcome of Spain’s elections, with significant implications on its domestic and foreign policies in March this year.

    One explanation could be Australia’s call in August for the extradition of the Bali bombers from Indonesia to Australia. Charges against an Indonesian, who admitted to involvement in the Bali blasts, were dropped following an Indonesian Constitutional Court ruling that anti- terrorism laws could not be applied retroactively. Mr Downer said that if the Bali bombers avoided justice in Indonesia, Australia might have to take its own action – extraditing the culprits to Australia to face charges. Indonesia later cautioned Canberra against diplomatic pressure on Jakarta, especially since it risked a backlash by Islamic fundamentalists in Indonesia.

    Going Ahead

    In its White Paper, Canberra recognised that the extremist interpretation of Islam is behind the terrorist threat today. But it noted, “the notion of ‘root causes’ is misleading”, saying that the terrorists are “opportunistic in invoking popular concerns to rally people to their cause”. Despite this, it commits itself to tackling the economic, social and political factors that give rise to extremism.

    Australia is proactive in regional counter-terrorism efforts. Its strategy is to combat terrorism through operational-level cooperation, helping other countries develop and strengthen capabilities, and building political will among governments to respond to the long-term threat. It dedicated significant funding to help Indonesia build up its counter-terrorism capacity, for the Jakarta Centre for Law Enforcement Cooperation in Semarang, inaugurated in July this year.

    However, Australia might need to re-examine its policies, and see that ‘root causes’ play a real role in the terrorism equation. Beyond operational measures and sheer power, it is also important to be sensitive to the issues of the day, and the contexts.

    In dealing with an unconventional threat such as terrorism, it is important not to aggravate existing tensions or animosities. Indeed, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia’s largest Muslim organization, called on countries that are targets to exercise “introspection”, with regards to their global policies.

    Policymakers have already acknowledged that terrorism today is an ideological threat. Against this, security measures and force have limited effectiveness. Going towards a comprehensive approach, utilising one’s ‘soft power’ – attracting and persuading others to adopt your goals – might be appropriate. Already, several authorities have advocated winning ‘hearts and minds’, and veterans from the security forces recall that such a campaign was used successfully against the communist insurgency in this region.

    Perhaps it is time for a change in mindset and policy, oriented towards engaging the populace and therein drying up support for the terrorists. JI continues to be a threat in the region, and military might has shown to have limited, short-term results. Since the attack, Australia is now allowed to build a high bomb-proof wall around its embassy compound in Jakarta. But will it be enough?

    About the Author

    Michelle Teo is a Research Analyst with the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at the Institute of Defence and Srategic Studies.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info