Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06083 | Influenza Pandemic: How Operationally Ready Are We?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO06083 | Influenza Pandemic: How Operationally Ready Are We?
    Beverley Loke

    16 August 2006

    download pdf

    Commentary

    In a world where international terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and other forms of hard security challenges tend to dominate the contemporary global security agenda, seemingly less urgent or soft security threats are often neglected. However, it could be argued that continuing in such a fashion may expose countries to soft security threats whose impact could be as devastating as those posed by more traditional security concerns.

    An example of such a threat is an influenza pandemic. The impact of such a pandemic should not be underestimated. As a reference point, an estimated 40 million were killed in the 1918- 19 “Spanish influenza” pandemic, five times more than the deaths caused by World War I. Given the current rising death toll of human avian influenza victims, an influenza pandemic should be viewed as a genuine threat. Moreover, for it to be overcome, it is a threat requiring not just a competent response from government agencies but it also demands the general public at large to play a key role.

    Not “If” but “When”

    Whilst the international community is not currently confronted with an influenza pandemic, we are only one step away from a catastrophic occurrence where the virus develops the ability to engage in efficient and sustained human-to-human transmission.

    In this regard, with the prospect of the virus mutating into one of pandemic potential, the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza is an ominous threat to security. Two escalating trends are indicative of such a possibility.

    First, since emerging in 1997 and resurfacing in 2003, avian influenza has infected hundreds of millions of poultry and wild birds. This year alone has seen it spread from 11 to over 40 counties, with the virus making inroads into Africa and Europe. The virus is also finding host in a larger number of species not previously susceptible to any type of the influenza A virus.

    Second, at the point of writing, there have been 238 cases of avian influenza human infection since 2003. The death of the latest victim in Indonesia on 8 August 2006 has brought the global death toll to 139. This represents a 58.4 percent case fatality rate, more than five times of that caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus. More significantly, we have seen a steady increase of deaths over the 2004-6 period, with 32 deaths in 2004, 41 in 2005 and already 62 in only the first half of 2006.

    Given these trends, the onslaught of an influenza pandemic may be a case of “when” rather than “if”. Globalisation means that a H5N1 influenza pandemic outbreak in any one country will spread worldwide in a matter of months. Unlike SARS, the influenza virus is infectious even before symptoms present themselves. Modest estimates by the WHO project global deaths in the range of 2 to 7.4 million. The question then remains: how equipped are we?

    The Singapore Initiative- Exercise Sparrowhawk II

    From a national security perspective, an influenza pandemic will have a significant economic, psychological and social impact on Singapore. Singapore’s small state status, its significant dependence on trade and its geographical proximity to countries identified as hotspots for avian influenza human deaths mean that Singapore must have an effective defence strategy against an influenza pandemic.

    Due to Singapore’s vulnerability, the country conducted its first ever exercise to assess its operational preparedness for such an event. Codenamed Sparrowhawk II, the two day drill on 21-22 July 2006 comprised a series of simulated orange and red alert scenario-based exercises. It involved over 10,000 government personnel, public health officers and volunteers from the population. The objective was to test the current reactive capacities and capabilities in the event of an influenza pandemic so as to fine tune the Ministry of Health’s Influenza Pandemic Readiness and Response Plan.

    The significance of Sparrowhawk II is two-fold. First, it recognises the potential threat of a world-wide influenza pandemic. Second, by adopting an integrated defence against influenza pandemic, the exercise represents a step towards positioning health security at the forefront of Singapore’s national security agenda.

    However, whilst the Sparrowhawk II exercise was certainly valuable in demonstrating detection and rapid response measures, relevant government agencies and the wider community must engage in a continuous process of evaluation, refinement and improvement. It may be argued that one important aspect to emphasise during this process of refinement and improvement would be the role civil society.

    The Public as Stakeholders

    It should not be assumed that public action will support government initiated response efforts to an influenza pandemic. The US National Governors Association’s Preparing for a Pandemic Influenza: A Primer for Governors and Senior State Officials report states that past experiences have shown that such support “is neither likely nor realistic”. The public may believe that they are unaffected, they may be too fearful to take required actions, or they may simply be unaware of what they should do. The report further states that as the personal threat level heightens, the public will be more likely to turn away from central authority towards leadership which they are familiar with.

    In such scenarios, defending against an influenza pandemic from a civil society perspective takes utmost importance. Civil society can educate the wider community, inculcate a greater sense of civic mindedness to ensure effective social mobilisation as well as assist in alleviating the panic and psychological impact.

    Ultimately, for an effective influenza pandemic defence plan to be successful, it must consist not only of a networked government but also a networked community approach. Only through such a multilevel approach can we be vigilant and build social resilience in what is an unsettling security environment.

    About the Author

    Beverley Loke is a Research Analyst at the Center of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a Research Unit of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Commentary

    In a world where international terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and other forms of hard security challenges tend to dominate the contemporary global security agenda, seemingly less urgent or soft security threats are often neglected. However, it could be argued that continuing in such a fashion may expose countries to soft security threats whose impact could be as devastating as those posed by more traditional security concerns.

    An example of such a threat is an influenza pandemic. The impact of such a pandemic should not be underestimated. As a reference point, an estimated 40 million were killed in the 1918- 19 “Spanish influenza” pandemic, five times more than the deaths caused by World War I. Given the current rising death toll of human avian influenza victims, an influenza pandemic should be viewed as a genuine threat. Moreover, for it to be overcome, it is a threat requiring not just a competent response from government agencies but it also demands the general public at large to play a key role.

    Not “If” but “When”

    Whilst the international community is not currently confronted with an influenza pandemic, we are only one step away from a catastrophic occurrence where the virus develops the ability to engage in efficient and sustained human-to-human transmission.

    In this regard, with the prospect of the virus mutating into one of pandemic potential, the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza is an ominous threat to security. Two escalating trends are indicative of such a possibility.

    First, since emerging in 1997 and resurfacing in 2003, avian influenza has infected hundreds of millions of poultry and wild birds. This year alone has seen it spread from 11 to over 40 counties, with the virus making inroads into Africa and Europe. The virus is also finding host in a larger number of species not previously susceptible to any type of the influenza A virus.

    Second, at the point of writing, there have been 238 cases of avian influenza human infection since 2003. The death of the latest victim in Indonesia on 8 August 2006 has brought the global death toll to 139. This represents a 58.4 percent case fatality rate, more than five times of that caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus. More significantly, we have seen a steady increase of deaths over the 2004-6 period, with 32 deaths in 2004, 41 in 2005 and already 62 in only the first half of 2006.

    Given these trends, the onslaught of an influenza pandemic may be a case of “when” rather than “if”. Globalisation means that a H5N1 influenza pandemic outbreak in any one country will spread worldwide in a matter of months. Unlike SARS, the influenza virus is infectious even before symptoms present themselves. Modest estimates by the WHO project global deaths in the range of 2 to 7.4 million. The question then remains: how equipped are we?

    The Singapore Initiative- Exercise Sparrowhawk II

    From a national security perspective, an influenza pandemic will have a significant economic, psychological and social impact on Singapore. Singapore’s small state status, its significant dependence on trade and its geographical proximity to countries identified as hotspots for avian influenza human deaths mean that Singapore must have an effective defence strategy against an influenza pandemic.

    Due to Singapore’s vulnerability, the country conducted its first ever exercise to assess its operational preparedness for such an event. Codenamed Sparrowhawk II, the two day drill on 21-22 July 2006 comprised a series of simulated orange and red alert scenario-based exercises. It involved over 10,000 government personnel, public health officers and volunteers from the population. The objective was to test the current reactive capacities and capabilities in the event of an influenza pandemic so as to fine tune the Ministry of Health’s Influenza Pandemic Readiness and Response Plan.

    The significance of Sparrowhawk II is two-fold. First, it recognises the potential threat of a world-wide influenza pandemic. Second, by adopting an integrated defence against influenza pandemic, the exercise represents a step towards positioning health security at the forefront of Singapore’s national security agenda.

    However, whilst the Sparrowhawk II exercise was certainly valuable in demonstrating detection and rapid response measures, relevant government agencies and the wider community must engage in a continuous process of evaluation, refinement and improvement. It may be argued that one important aspect to emphasise during this process of refinement and improvement would be the role civil society.

    The Public as Stakeholders

    It should not be assumed that public action will support government initiated response efforts to an influenza pandemic. The US National Governors Association’s Preparing for a Pandemic Influenza: A Primer for Governors and Senior State Officials report states that past experiences have shown that such support “is neither likely nor realistic”. The public may believe that they are unaffected, they may be too fearful to take required actions, or they may simply be unaware of what they should do. The report further states that as the personal threat level heightens, the public will be more likely to turn away from central authority towards leadership which they are familiar with.

    In such scenarios, defending against an influenza pandemic from a civil society perspective takes utmost importance. Civil society can educate the wider community, inculcate a greater sense of civic mindedness to ensure effective social mobilisation as well as assist in alleviating the panic and psychological impact.

    Ultimately, for an effective influenza pandemic defence plan to be successful, it must consist not only of a networked government but also a networked community approach. Only through such a multilevel approach can we be vigilant and build social resilience in what is an unsettling security environment.

    About the Author

    Beverley Loke is a Research Analyst at the Center of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a Research Unit of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info