Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06122 | Networked Cooperation and Diversity for the Future
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO06122 | Networked Cooperation and Diversity for the Future
    Tom Quiggin

    30 November 2006

    download pdf

    Commentary

    SEVERAL national security issues have become clearer in the five years since 9/11. Singapore, and other small or medium-sized developed states, face a complex and uncertain international environment. Most of the new and emerging threats to the state are now asymmetric in nature. Knowledge, not raw power, is the only weapon that can prevail in the face of an asymmetric threat. It is also clear that it will be impossible to predict the future with respect to discrete events and leaders will have to deal with uncertainty on a regular basis.

    Tackling an Uncertain Future

    Is Singapore well-positioned to tackle this uncertain future? Both positive and negative signals exist, while some questions remain unanswered. Novel methods of collaboration have been found and new government bodies such as the National Security Coordination Secretariat are functioning. The population at large appears to be well informed about potential threats without being unduly alarmed or fearful. National security issues need to be in the public eye, and not buried away out of view.

    Greater networking between government agencies is a necessity to build the knowledge needed to prevail in an uncertain threat environment. An ever-increasing need exists to integrate intelligence and operational information as close to the frontlines of government as possible. Without this frontline process in place, the “fine grains” of intelligence that are needed for pattern detection and success are frequently missed. On the positive side again, it can be seen that Singapore is fortunate as networking is almost a natural skill for most Singaporeans. There is a relatively small and young civil service which is linked to the local and global private sector. It is also a cosmopolitan state with global connections. As such, as the necessity increases for greater networking, less resistance will be felt in Singapore than in other states.

    Singapore also has great diversity. In order to understand a complex environment and respond effectively, any government will need multiple individuals who have a “big picture” view of the world. The more diverse the individuals working on the problems, the more likely it is that actionable intelligence will be available for national security decision makers. Singapore’s natural diversity leaves it poised to capitalize on this new reality.

    Education for the future remains a question mark. Future leaders and decision makers need to be able to work in the realm of uncertainty. This means more people in government who can deal with abstraction. It also means having generalists who can integrate information across a wide range of knowledge boundaries. One of the unfortunate side-effects of a highly specialized education system is that artificial knowledge boundaries are built between the specialties, complicating the transfer and growth of knowledge. At the same time, specialists tend to be reductionists as well. They frequently believe that problems can be broken down into their component parts, and that each part can be dealt with separately. In manufacturing, this might work, but with a complex field such as international relations, the “pieces” of the problem are all interrelated and cannot be broken down without losing the essence of the problem at hand. Specialization will be a handicap, not an advantage, for those who have to deal with abstract and uncertain problems in the future.

    The Downside

    On the negative side, many forces in government seem to be pre-occupied with seeking out greater “efficiencies” in government and they appear to have been infected with the “business model” method. Government is not a business, and it should not try to emulate the latest methodology that falls out of the business world. Businesses, it should be noted, regularly go out of business despite their supposed efficiencies. Citizens, who might be considered the “shareholders” of the government, cannot afford to have their governments collapse under pressure the ways businesses do on a regular basis. It should be remembered that an “efficient” system is one in which the redundancies have been removed and no excess capability exists. This “business model” might be of value in a production line type of business which operates in a stable business environment where the variables are constant. Unfortunately, government does not operate in such an environment and should not try to convince itself that it does. The “key performance indicator” for a government is how well it survives a crisis or sudden turn of events. Government should not set itself up to have key success indicators which measure successes against stated missions and goals that bear little resemblance to the real world of crisis and change.

    Overall, Singapore is in a positive position compared to many other small and medium- sized developed states. Singapore is used to change and does it well, but the challenges are mounting as the speed of change required increases. At the same time, it is clear that economic prosperity is tied to national security, but business models cannot be allowed to infringe on effective government.

    About the Author

    Tom Quiggin is a Senior Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Non-Traditional Security / Global

    Commentary

    SEVERAL national security issues have become clearer in the five years since 9/11. Singapore, and other small or medium-sized developed states, face a complex and uncertain international environment. Most of the new and emerging threats to the state are now asymmetric in nature. Knowledge, not raw power, is the only weapon that can prevail in the face of an asymmetric threat. It is also clear that it will be impossible to predict the future with respect to discrete events and leaders will have to deal with uncertainty on a regular basis.

    Tackling an Uncertain Future

    Is Singapore well-positioned to tackle this uncertain future? Both positive and negative signals exist, while some questions remain unanswered. Novel methods of collaboration have been found and new government bodies such as the National Security Coordination Secretariat are functioning. The population at large appears to be well informed about potential threats without being unduly alarmed or fearful. National security issues need to be in the public eye, and not buried away out of view.

    Greater networking between government agencies is a necessity to build the knowledge needed to prevail in an uncertain threat environment. An ever-increasing need exists to integrate intelligence and operational information as close to the frontlines of government as possible. Without this frontline process in place, the “fine grains” of intelligence that are needed for pattern detection and success are frequently missed. On the positive side again, it can be seen that Singapore is fortunate as networking is almost a natural skill for most Singaporeans. There is a relatively small and young civil service which is linked to the local and global private sector. It is also a cosmopolitan state with global connections. As such, as the necessity increases for greater networking, less resistance will be felt in Singapore than in other states.

    Singapore also has great diversity. In order to understand a complex environment and respond effectively, any government will need multiple individuals who have a “big picture” view of the world. The more diverse the individuals working on the problems, the more likely it is that actionable intelligence will be available for national security decision makers. Singapore’s natural diversity leaves it poised to capitalize on this new reality.

    Education for the future remains a question mark. Future leaders and decision makers need to be able to work in the realm of uncertainty. This means more people in government who can deal with abstraction. It also means having generalists who can integrate information across a wide range of knowledge boundaries. One of the unfortunate side-effects of a highly specialized education system is that artificial knowledge boundaries are built between the specialties, complicating the transfer and growth of knowledge. At the same time, specialists tend to be reductionists as well. They frequently believe that problems can be broken down into their component parts, and that each part can be dealt with separately. In manufacturing, this might work, but with a complex field such as international relations, the “pieces” of the problem are all interrelated and cannot be broken down without losing the essence of the problem at hand. Specialization will be a handicap, not an advantage, for those who have to deal with abstract and uncertain problems in the future.

    The Downside

    On the negative side, many forces in government seem to be pre-occupied with seeking out greater “efficiencies” in government and they appear to have been infected with the “business model” method. Government is not a business, and it should not try to emulate the latest methodology that falls out of the business world. Businesses, it should be noted, regularly go out of business despite their supposed efficiencies. Citizens, who might be considered the “shareholders” of the government, cannot afford to have their governments collapse under pressure the ways businesses do on a regular basis. It should be remembered that an “efficient” system is one in which the redundancies have been removed and no excess capability exists. This “business model” might be of value in a production line type of business which operates in a stable business environment where the variables are constant. Unfortunately, government does not operate in such an environment and should not try to convince itself that it does. The “key performance indicator” for a government is how well it survives a crisis or sudden turn of events. Government should not set itself up to have key success indicators which measure successes against stated missions and goals that bear little resemblance to the real world of crisis and change.

    Overall, Singapore is in a positive position compared to many other small and medium- sized developed states. Singapore is used to change and does it well, but the challenges are mounting as the speed of change required increases. At the same time, it is clear that economic prosperity is tied to national security, but business models cannot be allowed to infringe on effective government.

    About the Author

    Tom Quiggin is a Senior Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info