Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
PUBLIC EDUCATION
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      PUBLIC EDUCATIONAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • America Takes a Leaf Out of China’s International Relations Playbook
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO25124 | America Takes a Leaf Out of China’s International Relations Playbook
Benjamin Ho

05 June 2025

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

In their competition for geopolitical supremacy, Trump and Xi are overcompensating for years of US-China engagement in which their predecessors made concessions compromising their domestic fronts. Trump is now taking a leaf out of Xi’s international relations playbook.

Source: Canva
Source: Canva

COMMENTARY

During the Shangri-La Dialogue over the weekend, United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth alluded to America’s war-fighting capabilities and characterised its foreign policy under Trump 2.0 as one of “peace through strength”.

This proclamation of strength is consistent with US President Donald Trump’s approach to political relations since he took office. Soft power has been eschewed in place of a more muscular and transactional foreign policy.

Interests – not ideology or values – would be the lens through which the US sees its relations with others. As Mr Hegseth himself put it, “We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology … We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align.”

Portraying a Strong America

Indeed, we should not be surprised at this show of strength. During the US election campaigning last year, one of the key criticisms Mr Trump and the Republican Party had towards the Democrats was the weakness of then President Joe Biden’s team. Mr Trump promised that under his watch, this would all change.

Seen this way, the Trump administration’s geopolitical manoeuvring stems from the belief that leaders of superpower states cannot afford to look weak – not least in front of their own people.

Mr Trump’s first show of might was to order a blanket tariff across American trading partners, using this as a tool to get other countries to acquiesce to US demands. His bet was that the US domestic market is too important to ignore and that countries worldwide would rather absorb the tariffs than risk losing access to American consumers.

What is happening to US-China competition today is basically this: Both countries are overcompensating for years of engagement in which international cooperation have led to both having to make compromises domestically.

From Washington’s perspective, countries have gotten a free ride on its provision of public goods while Americans have not benefitted from US-led globalisation. As one foreign diplomat told me in a conversation during the SLD, the days of “happy globalisation” is over. International relations have repercussions at home and domestic politics now frequently spill into foreign policy.

According to the Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, states are constantly engaged in a domestic-international interplay in their relations with each other whereby leaders must fulfil both international and domestic agendas. Ironically, Mr Trump has taken a leaf from the Chinese government playbook and its chief exponent of strongman politics – President Xi Jinping himself.

Xi’s Pursuit of National Security

Beijing’s priorities are strengthening national security and more importantly, ensuring the stability of the Chinese Communist Party.

Since 2012, Mr Xi has gone on the offensive in his pursuit of domestic security while significantly limiting the ability of foreign forces to influence China. From political purges to corruption witch-hunts, censorship of information deemed unfavourable to Beijing and wolf warrior diplomacy, Mr Xi hopes to project the face of a strong and uncompromising Chinese state.

This is not unexpected given the perception that party discipline was lax under the policies of his predecessor Hu Jintao and those in power were mostly interested in individual pursuit of wealth and power without a broader commitment to the country’s well-being.

As described by journalist Wong Chun Han in his book Party Of One, Mr Xi is motivated primarily by “historical grievances and a sense of civilisational destiny” and that his China is “brash but brittle, intrepid yet insecure … a would-be superpower in a hurry, eager to take on the world while wary of what may come”.

This was mostly acutely seen in China’s response to the Trump tariffs. Beijing refused to concede an inch when slapped with a 125 per cent “reciprocal” tariff, and in turn raised levies on US imports and placed restrictions on American movies.

Beijing’s bet was American companies and industries could not stomach the short-term pain of financial losses as a result of restricted access to Chinese markets.

Both countries were proven right: The temperature was eventually dialled down as both Washington and Beijing rolled back their tariff policies.

However, it seems that the Trump administration is now opening a new front in its battle with China in the field of education, as seen by its ban on visas given to Chinese students. It remains to be seen how Beijing will respond.

The Road Forward

While the possibility of a grand deal between Washington and Beijing looks even more remote than ever, this hostile climate may not be lasting. As folks in international relations would say, “There are no permanent friends, only permanent interests”.

Both Mr Trump and Mr Xi are overcompensating for what they view as years of benign neglect by their predecessors on the domestic front. At some point, their policies would hurt their countries’ bottom lines.

For instance, the Trump administration’s visa curbs on institutions of higher educations will compromise American ability to attract talent from all over the world. Meanwhile, China would find it increasingly more challenging to gain trust abroad – even among those who are non-allied with the US.

Given that both Mr Trump and Mr Xi cannot afford to look weak in front of their people, strongman politics will likely define the contours of US-China relations in the next few years.

About the Author

Benjamin Ho is an Assistant Professor in the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He specialises in the study of Chinese politics, US-China relations and cross-strait relations. This commentary was published in Channel News Asia on 3 June 2025. It is republished here with permission.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
comments powered by Disqus

SYNOPSIS

In their competition for geopolitical supremacy, Trump and Xi are overcompensating for years of US-China engagement in which their predecessors made concessions compromising their domestic fronts. Trump is now taking a leaf out of Xi’s international relations playbook.

Source: Canva
Source: Canva

COMMENTARY

During the Shangri-La Dialogue over the weekend, United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth alluded to America’s war-fighting capabilities and characterised its foreign policy under Trump 2.0 as one of “peace through strength”.

This proclamation of strength is consistent with US President Donald Trump’s approach to political relations since he took office. Soft power has been eschewed in place of a more muscular and transactional foreign policy.

Interests – not ideology or values – would be the lens through which the US sees its relations with others. As Mr Hegseth himself put it, “We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology … We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align.”

Portraying a Strong America

Indeed, we should not be surprised at this show of strength. During the US election campaigning last year, one of the key criticisms Mr Trump and the Republican Party had towards the Democrats was the weakness of then President Joe Biden’s team. Mr Trump promised that under his watch, this would all change.

Seen this way, the Trump administration’s geopolitical manoeuvring stems from the belief that leaders of superpower states cannot afford to look weak – not least in front of their own people.

Mr Trump’s first show of might was to order a blanket tariff across American trading partners, using this as a tool to get other countries to acquiesce to US demands. His bet was that the US domestic market is too important to ignore and that countries worldwide would rather absorb the tariffs than risk losing access to American consumers.

What is happening to US-China competition today is basically this: Both countries are overcompensating for years of engagement in which international cooperation have led to both having to make compromises domestically.

From Washington’s perspective, countries have gotten a free ride on its provision of public goods while Americans have not benefitted from US-led globalisation. As one foreign diplomat told me in a conversation during the SLD, the days of “happy globalisation” is over. International relations have repercussions at home and domestic politics now frequently spill into foreign policy.

According to the Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, states are constantly engaged in a domestic-international interplay in their relations with each other whereby leaders must fulfil both international and domestic agendas. Ironically, Mr Trump has taken a leaf from the Chinese government playbook and its chief exponent of strongman politics – President Xi Jinping himself.

Xi’s Pursuit of National Security

Beijing’s priorities are strengthening national security and more importantly, ensuring the stability of the Chinese Communist Party.

Since 2012, Mr Xi has gone on the offensive in his pursuit of domestic security while significantly limiting the ability of foreign forces to influence China. From political purges to corruption witch-hunts, censorship of information deemed unfavourable to Beijing and wolf warrior diplomacy, Mr Xi hopes to project the face of a strong and uncompromising Chinese state.

This is not unexpected given the perception that party discipline was lax under the policies of his predecessor Hu Jintao and those in power were mostly interested in individual pursuit of wealth and power without a broader commitment to the country’s well-being.

As described by journalist Wong Chun Han in his book Party Of One, Mr Xi is motivated primarily by “historical grievances and a sense of civilisational destiny” and that his China is “brash but brittle, intrepid yet insecure … a would-be superpower in a hurry, eager to take on the world while wary of what may come”.

This was mostly acutely seen in China’s response to the Trump tariffs. Beijing refused to concede an inch when slapped with a 125 per cent “reciprocal” tariff, and in turn raised levies on US imports and placed restrictions on American movies.

Beijing’s bet was American companies and industries could not stomach the short-term pain of financial losses as a result of restricted access to Chinese markets.

Both countries were proven right: The temperature was eventually dialled down as both Washington and Beijing rolled back their tariff policies.

However, it seems that the Trump administration is now opening a new front in its battle with China in the field of education, as seen by its ban on visas given to Chinese students. It remains to be seen how Beijing will respond.

The Road Forward

While the possibility of a grand deal between Washington and Beijing looks even more remote than ever, this hostile climate may not be lasting. As folks in international relations would say, “There are no permanent friends, only permanent interests”.

Both Mr Trump and Mr Xi are overcompensating for what they view as years of benign neglect by their predecessors on the domestic front. At some point, their policies would hurt their countries’ bottom lines.

For instance, the Trump administration’s visa curbs on institutions of higher educations will compromise American ability to attract talent from all over the world. Meanwhile, China would find it increasingly more challenging to gain trust abroad – even among those who are non-allied with the US.

Given that both Mr Trump and Mr Xi cannot afford to look weak in front of their people, strongman politics will likely define the contours of US-China relations in the next few years.

About the Author

Benjamin Ho is an Assistant Professor in the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He specialises in the study of Chinese politics, US-China relations and cross-strait relations. This commentary was published in Channel News Asia on 3 June 2025. It is republished here with permission.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info