Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Arrest of 53 Activists: Hong Kong’s Tightening Grip
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO21004 | Arrest of 53 Activists: Hong Kong’s Tightening Grip
    Dylan MH Loh

    07 January 2021

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    On 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for alleged subversion under Hong Kong’s national security law. What does this portend for the pro-democracy camp?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    SIX DAYS into the new year, on 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for allegedly violating the national security laws as they were involved in an unofficial ‘primary election’ in Hong Kong in 2020. This was viewed as potential subversion by the authorities.

    The incoming United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, condemned the arrests as “an assault on those bravely advocating for universal rights”. Nevertheless, Washington seems to have exhausted its options on Hong Kong and cannot offer any good response with serious bite. What is the significance of the arrests of the 53 political activists?

    Primaries in 2020: ‘35+ Strategy’

    Unofficial primaries were held in Hong Kong in July 2020 with the goal of selecting the most viable pro-democracy candidates for the Legislative Council elections – to realise the so-called ‘35+ strategy’. The strategy’s purpose, largely the brainchild of Benny Tai, the Hong Kong legal scholar and democracy activist, was to maximise the chances for an outright majority of democratic lawmakers in Hong Kong’s 70-member legislative council.

    It is worth bearing in mind that half of these seats are reserved for ‘functional constituencies’ representing special interest groups such as ‘financial services’ and ‘tourism’. Significantly, these tend to be filled by largely pro-establishment representatives and as such only 35 seats are directly contestable through elections.

    Conducting the unofficial primaries has a couple of distinct advantages for the pro-democratic camp. First, it prevents a cannibalisation of votes as candidates are bound by a gentlemen’s agreement not to contest in the Legislative Council, if they were not the winning candidates. Second, the primaries demonstrated that, despite their ideological differences, different pro-democratic candidates were willing to work together to achieve broader political goals.

    The turnout for the primaries was relatively high, with over 600,000 Hong Kong residents voting, accounting for around 13% of the total registered voters. In response, Chinese state media – the Global Times – warned that the conduct of the primaries is likely to fall afoul of Hong Kong’s national security law.

    “10 Steps to Mutual Destruction”

    There are at least four pertinent reasons for the arrests. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, Benny Tai’s ‘35+ strategy’ secures an agreement from the candidates to leverage their majoritarian position to veto Hong Kong’s budget. This gets to the heart of the arrests because the Legislative Council is tasked with passing the budget.

    In the event that the Legislative Council does not pass the budget, the Chief Executive must resign. That is the end-goal of the ’35+ strategy’ – to take down Carrie Lam.

    Under the national security laws, however, this falls under the ‘subverting the state power’ category and in the eyes of the authorities, seems to fulfil the criteria of “seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions” of the Hong Kong and Central governments.

    Secondly, and perhaps more incendiary from the Hong Kong and Chinese governments’ perspective, is the ’10 steps to mutual destruction’ plan. In this proposal, Benny Tai outlined a progressive series of escalatory steps for political activists to take up to ensure the removal of the current government.

    The proposed steps culminate in a large street protest “leading Hong Kong society to a standstill” and eventually, in the tenth step, causing world powers to enact economic and political sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party.

    Upcoming Sept 2021 Legislative Elections

    The other key motivating factor is the upcoming 2021 September Legislative Elections. By arresting and potentially disbarring these candidates in the upcoming elections, the authorities can essentially eviscerate the pro-democratic movement and their electoral chances in one fell swoop as every candidate that ran in the 2020 primaries were arrested.

    It is also apt to note that the security laws carry a maximum of life imprisonment for ‘principal’ offenders.

    Thirdly, the opportunity is ripe because the United States have almost exhausted all their possible foreign policy options over Hong Kong. The US has already sanctioned Chinese and Hong Kong officials – resulting in Carrie Lam’s inability to use credit cards – over purported human rights abuses in Hong Kong and there is not much more they can do in that regard.

    In that way, beyond verbal opprobrium, there is little else the US and other Western countries can or are willing to do.

    Finally, the arrests and the series of arrests leading up to 6 January send a strong domestic signal that the Central government is firmly in charge. It would not have escaped observers that President Xi Jinping’s annual new year greetings struck an almost triumphalist tone.

    This is understandable given China’s relative success in containing COVID-19 as compared to its western counterparts. Nevertheless, the political leadership in Beijing is delivering on its promise to bring stability and security to Hong Kong through these highly visible securitising activities which demonstrate effective control over the island.

    What Next?

    The legislative election due in Hong Kong is months away but this was originally scheduled to be held in September 2020. It was postponed by the Hong Kong government when it invoked emergency laws due to the worsening coronavirus situation.

    In any event, the latest arrests coupled with an increasingly propensity to wield the powerful national security laws will deal a heavy a blow to the electoral chances of the pro-democrats.

    There are two other developments that bear watching.

    The first is the normalisation of the national security law and the seemingly frequent exercise of the powers therein. Normally, such laws in other jurisdictions are only invoked in exceptional cases. Regularly wielding these powers may have the effect of wearing down resistance, turning it into quiet acceptance.

    The second is how the pro-democratic camp reacts to this. Will this stifle the movement that was already under heavy pressure or will this galvanise them to adopt more extreme measures? In any event, the latest arrests portend a period of stronger, more visible and indeed more decisive control from the Central authorities in Hong Kong’s political and social spheres.

    About the Author

    Dylan MH Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was formerly with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) at NTU.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    On 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for alleged subversion under Hong Kong’s national security law. What does this portend for the pro-democracy camp?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    SIX DAYS into the new year, on 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for allegedly violating the national security laws as they were involved in an unofficial ‘primary election’ in Hong Kong in 2020. This was viewed as potential subversion by the authorities.

    The incoming United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, condemned the arrests as “an assault on those bravely advocating for universal rights”. Nevertheless, Washington seems to have exhausted its options on Hong Kong and cannot offer any good response with serious bite. What is the significance of the arrests of the 53 political activists?

    Primaries in 2020: ‘35+ Strategy’

    Unofficial primaries were held in Hong Kong in July 2020 with the goal of selecting the most viable pro-democracy candidates for the Legislative Council elections – to realise the so-called ‘35+ strategy’. The strategy’s purpose, largely the brainchild of Benny Tai, the Hong Kong legal scholar and democracy activist, was to maximise the chances for an outright majority of democratic lawmakers in Hong Kong’s 70-member legislative council.

    It is worth bearing in mind that half of these seats are reserved for ‘functional constituencies’ representing special interest groups such as ‘financial services’ and ‘tourism’. Significantly, these tend to be filled by largely pro-establishment representatives and as such only 35 seats are directly contestable through elections.

    Conducting the unofficial primaries has a couple of distinct advantages for the pro-democratic camp. First, it prevents a cannibalisation of votes as candidates are bound by a gentlemen’s agreement not to contest in the Legislative Council, if they were not the winning candidates. Second, the primaries demonstrated that, despite their ideological differences, different pro-democratic candidates were willing to work together to achieve broader political goals.

    The turnout for the primaries was relatively high, with over 600,000 Hong Kong residents voting, accounting for around 13% of the total registered voters. In response, Chinese state media – the Global Times – warned that the conduct of the primaries is likely to fall afoul of Hong Kong’s national security law.

    “10 Steps to Mutual Destruction”

    There are at least four pertinent reasons for the arrests. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, Benny Tai’s ‘35+ strategy’ secures an agreement from the candidates to leverage their majoritarian position to veto Hong Kong’s budget. This gets to the heart of the arrests because the Legislative Council is tasked with passing the budget.

    In the event that the Legislative Council does not pass the budget, the Chief Executive must resign. That is the end-goal of the ’35+ strategy’ – to take down Carrie Lam.

    Under the national security laws, however, this falls under the ‘subverting the state power’ category and in the eyes of the authorities, seems to fulfil the criteria of “seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions” of the Hong Kong and Central governments.

    Secondly, and perhaps more incendiary from the Hong Kong and Chinese governments’ perspective, is the ’10 steps to mutual destruction’ plan. In this proposal, Benny Tai outlined a progressive series of escalatory steps for political activists to take up to ensure the removal of the current government.

    The proposed steps culminate in a large street protest “leading Hong Kong society to a standstill” and eventually, in the tenth step, causing world powers to enact economic and political sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party.

    Upcoming Sept 2021 Legislative Elections

    The other key motivating factor is the upcoming 2021 September Legislative Elections. By arresting and potentially disbarring these candidates in the upcoming elections, the authorities can essentially eviscerate the pro-democratic movement and their electoral chances in one fell swoop as every candidate that ran in the 2020 primaries were arrested.

    It is also apt to note that the security laws carry a maximum of life imprisonment for ‘principal’ offenders.

    Thirdly, the opportunity is ripe because the United States have almost exhausted all their possible foreign policy options over Hong Kong. The US has already sanctioned Chinese and Hong Kong officials – resulting in Carrie Lam’s inability to use credit cards – over purported human rights abuses in Hong Kong and there is not much more they can do in that regard.

    In that way, beyond verbal opprobrium, there is little else the US and other Western countries can or are willing to do.

    Finally, the arrests and the series of arrests leading up to 6 January send a strong domestic signal that the Central government is firmly in charge. It would not have escaped observers that President Xi Jinping’s annual new year greetings struck an almost triumphalist tone.

    This is understandable given China’s relative success in containing COVID-19 as compared to its western counterparts. Nevertheless, the political leadership in Beijing is delivering on its promise to bring stability and security to Hong Kong through these highly visible securitising activities which demonstrate effective control over the island.

    What Next?

    The legislative election due in Hong Kong is months away but this was originally scheduled to be held in September 2020. It was postponed by the Hong Kong government when it invoked emergency laws due to the worsening coronavirus situation.

    In any event, the latest arrests coupled with an increasingly propensity to wield the powerful national security laws will deal a heavy a blow to the electoral chances of the pro-democrats.

    There are two other developments that bear watching.

    The first is the normalisation of the national security law and the seemingly frequent exercise of the powers therein. Normally, such laws in other jurisdictions are only invoked in exceptional cases. Regularly wielding these powers may have the effect of wearing down resistance, turning it into quiet acceptance.

    The second is how the pro-democratic camp reacts to this. Will this stifle the movement that was already under heavy pressure or will this galvanise them to adopt more extreme measures? In any event, the latest arrests portend a period of stronger, more visible and indeed more decisive control from the Central authorities in Hong Kong’s political and social spheres.

    About the Author

    Dylan MH Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was formerly with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) at NTU.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info