Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • ASEAN Economies and a Post-COVID Era
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO21106 | ASEAN Economies and a Post-COVID Era
    Jikon Lai

    09 July 2021

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent election of President Biden and the on-going roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines should embolden policymakers to look ahead to a post-crises era. For the ASEAN economies, three inter-related issues will be important, especially the China-US geopolitical rivalry.

    Source: Designed by Freepik

    COMMENTARY

    THE GLOBAL economy has been through turbulence in recent years. First, the administration of President Trump disrupted the liberal international economy as we knew it with its ‘America first’ approach to foreign economic policies. Then came the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

    It is too early to claim that the end of the tunnel is getting near; but the recent election of President Biden and the on-going roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines should embolden policymakers to look ahead to a post-crises era. For the ASEAN economies, three inter-related issues will be important in this context: international economic cooperation; economic resilience and security; and the geopolitical rivalry between China and the US.

    Weakening of International Economic Cooperation

    Almost all ASEAN economies have historically relied on integration with the global economy to develop their economies, lift their standards of living and, for some, also legitimise their domestic political order.

    ‘Export-led growth’ necessarily requires an international environment that is relatively stable and operates to a great extent on commonly accepted rules and practices, all of which require the active support and cooperation of international economic partners. These conditions have come under significant strain in recent years.

    On the one hand, the existing rules have not kept up with the evolution of the global economy. New areas such as the emergence and rapid growth of the digital economy have posed challenges to existing rules which were developed in an earlier analogue-dominant era. The intersection between contemporary ‘national security’ concerns and international trade is also poorly addressed by existing agreements.

    Then, there are established rules that are no longer effective in achieving their intended goals because of ‘slippages’ in enforcement or changes on the ground.

    On the other hand, certain key actors have chosen to turn their back against international cooperation and established rules. The predilection of the Trump administration to adopt unilateral measures to address concerns over trade balance and national security has antagonised trade partners and led them to question US’ commitment to the liberal international economic order. Elsewhere, there is a growing chorus against China’s use of ‘economic coercion’ to advance its economic and political interests.

    Geopolitics & ASEAN’s ‘Wicked Problem’

    The liberal international economic order has also come under pressure from the recent re-emergence of geopolitical rivalry. For almost 30 years, the global economy experienced what in hindsight might be called the ‘golden era’ of globalisation that took off when the Cold War ended in 1991.

    While this period had not been without conflict, most of these were addressed within established and agreed multilateral frameworks. That idyll came increasingly under threat as China’s economy grew and its geopolitical ambitions became clearer.

    Nevertheless, it was not until Trump became president that the idyll was loudly shattered and replaced at the very front and centre with the economic and political rivalry between China and the US.

    This has presented ASEAN economies with a ‘wicked problem’. They are deeply entangled economically with both China and the US through complex production chains, albeit with variations in their individual intensities. Both great powers are major sources of investment, technology and export income. For a handful of ASEAN economies, the US is also a key security ally. ASEAN economies would prefer to contain the China-US rivalry and not have to choose sides.

    Nevertheless, it is probably true that “it is unlikely that the non-alignment playbook can be conveniently revived” by members of ASEAN. Consequently, the economic fortunes of ASEAN economies would likely change should this geopolitical rivalry continue to escalate, and they are forced to stake a position.

    While one or two might benefit from unexpected opportunities that might emerge, all would almost certainly be economically worse off in the longer term compared with a situation where there might be greater harmony between the two major powers.

    Economic Resilience and Security

    The COVID-19 pandemic and the China-US geopolitical rivalry have raise two issues that threaten to further weaken the international liberal economic order: economic resilience and economic security. These have arguably evolved from the earlier notion of ‘decoupling’ that became popular when Trump first launched his ‘trade-war’.

    Many soon realised that global production systems were far too complex, integrated and geographically dispersed to be decoupled completely, an observation that was reinforced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Furthermore, while decoupling from the Chinese economy might suit the US, it does not necessarily suit the bottomline of many American, and other, firms.

    The focus on ‘decoupling’ thus shifted to risk management and the ability to withstand uncertain and unexpected shocks. Although it is tempting, it would be mistaken to believe that an inward-looking approach to economic policy would help address national concerns over economic resilience and security.

    With one or two exceptions, most countries do not have the ability or capacity to be self-sufficient without incurring significant costs. Identifying all vulnerable areas and all sources of vulnerability are also mammoth tasks.

    In practice, economic resilience and security are best achieved through partnership with others, and therein lies the tension: concerns over economic resilience and security first arose out of inefficiencies and dysfunctionality in the liberal international economic order; yet the former cannot really be addressed without recourse to some form of international cooperation.

    How Should ASEAN Build a Post-Crises Economy?

    ASEAN’s economic interests would be best served with a rejuvenated open international economic order. This could be achieved by engaging (major) economic partners to re-commit to international cooperation, uphold international rules and norms, work on updating existing rules, and develop new rules and new approaches to meet current needs and new challenges.

    These efforts, while necessary, would however be limited if the China-US geopolitical rivalry, which is increasingly the main obstacle to greater global economic prosperity, is not addressed. While ASEAN economies’ ability to influence this relationship is admittedly limited, their interests are nevertheless probably best served by taking active measures to facilitate and encourage détente or even rapprochement between the two major powers.

    Standing back and watching this geopolitical rivalry from the sidelines will probably not serve ASEAN economies’ interests well. Without some resolution to this rivalry, it is increasingly likely that we will enter another period of crisis rather than move into a post-crises economic era.

    About the Author

    Jikon Lai is Assistant Professor in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Non-Traditional Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent election of President Biden and the on-going roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines should embolden policymakers to look ahead to a post-crises era. For the ASEAN economies, three inter-related issues will be important, especially the China-US geopolitical rivalry.

    Source: Designed by Freepik

    COMMENTARY

    THE GLOBAL economy has been through turbulence in recent years. First, the administration of President Trump disrupted the liberal international economy as we knew it with its ‘America first’ approach to foreign economic policies. Then came the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

    It is too early to claim that the end of the tunnel is getting near; but the recent election of President Biden and the on-going roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines should embolden policymakers to look ahead to a post-crises era. For the ASEAN economies, three inter-related issues will be important in this context: international economic cooperation; economic resilience and security; and the geopolitical rivalry between China and the US.

    Weakening of International Economic Cooperation

    Almost all ASEAN economies have historically relied on integration with the global economy to develop their economies, lift their standards of living and, for some, also legitimise their domestic political order.

    ‘Export-led growth’ necessarily requires an international environment that is relatively stable and operates to a great extent on commonly accepted rules and practices, all of which require the active support and cooperation of international economic partners. These conditions have come under significant strain in recent years.

    On the one hand, the existing rules have not kept up with the evolution of the global economy. New areas such as the emergence and rapid growth of the digital economy have posed challenges to existing rules which were developed in an earlier analogue-dominant era. The intersection between contemporary ‘national security’ concerns and international trade is also poorly addressed by existing agreements.

    Then, there are established rules that are no longer effective in achieving their intended goals because of ‘slippages’ in enforcement or changes on the ground.

    On the other hand, certain key actors have chosen to turn their back against international cooperation and established rules. The predilection of the Trump administration to adopt unilateral measures to address concerns over trade balance and national security has antagonised trade partners and led them to question US’ commitment to the liberal international economic order. Elsewhere, there is a growing chorus against China’s use of ‘economic coercion’ to advance its economic and political interests.

    Geopolitics & ASEAN’s ‘Wicked Problem’

    The liberal international economic order has also come under pressure from the recent re-emergence of geopolitical rivalry. For almost 30 years, the global economy experienced what in hindsight might be called the ‘golden era’ of globalisation that took off when the Cold War ended in 1991.

    While this period had not been without conflict, most of these were addressed within established and agreed multilateral frameworks. That idyll came increasingly under threat as China’s economy grew and its geopolitical ambitions became clearer.

    Nevertheless, it was not until Trump became president that the idyll was loudly shattered and replaced at the very front and centre with the economic and political rivalry between China and the US.

    This has presented ASEAN economies with a ‘wicked problem’. They are deeply entangled economically with both China and the US through complex production chains, albeit with variations in their individual intensities. Both great powers are major sources of investment, technology and export income. For a handful of ASEAN economies, the US is also a key security ally. ASEAN economies would prefer to contain the China-US rivalry and not have to choose sides.

    Nevertheless, it is probably true that “it is unlikely that the non-alignment playbook can be conveniently revived” by members of ASEAN. Consequently, the economic fortunes of ASEAN economies would likely change should this geopolitical rivalry continue to escalate, and they are forced to stake a position.

    While one or two might benefit from unexpected opportunities that might emerge, all would almost certainly be economically worse off in the longer term compared with a situation where there might be greater harmony between the two major powers.

    Economic Resilience and Security

    The COVID-19 pandemic and the China-US geopolitical rivalry have raise two issues that threaten to further weaken the international liberal economic order: economic resilience and economic security. These have arguably evolved from the earlier notion of ‘decoupling’ that became popular when Trump first launched his ‘trade-war’.

    Many soon realised that global production systems were far too complex, integrated and geographically dispersed to be decoupled completely, an observation that was reinforced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Furthermore, while decoupling from the Chinese economy might suit the US, it does not necessarily suit the bottomline of many American, and other, firms.

    The focus on ‘decoupling’ thus shifted to risk management and the ability to withstand uncertain and unexpected shocks. Although it is tempting, it would be mistaken to believe that an inward-looking approach to economic policy would help address national concerns over economic resilience and security.

    With one or two exceptions, most countries do not have the ability or capacity to be self-sufficient without incurring significant costs. Identifying all vulnerable areas and all sources of vulnerability are also mammoth tasks.

    In practice, economic resilience and security are best achieved through partnership with others, and therein lies the tension: concerns over economic resilience and security first arose out of inefficiencies and dysfunctionality in the liberal international economic order; yet the former cannot really be addressed without recourse to some form of international cooperation.

    How Should ASEAN Build a Post-Crises Economy?

    ASEAN’s economic interests would be best served with a rejuvenated open international economic order. This could be achieved by engaging (major) economic partners to re-commit to international cooperation, uphold international rules and norms, work on updating existing rules, and develop new rules and new approaches to meet current needs and new challenges.

    These efforts, while necessary, would however be limited if the China-US geopolitical rivalry, which is increasingly the main obstacle to greater global economic prosperity, is not addressed. While ASEAN economies’ ability to influence this relationship is admittedly limited, their interests are nevertheless probably best served by taking active measures to facilitate and encourage détente or even rapprochement between the two major powers.

    Standing back and watching this geopolitical rivalry from the sidelines will probably not serve ASEAN economies’ interests well. Without some resolution to this rivalry, it is increasingly likely that we will enter another period of crisis rather than move into a post-crises economic era.

    About the Author

    Jikon Lai is Assistant Professor in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Non-Traditional Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info