Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Being a Middle Power
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO24136 | Being a Middle Power
    Marty Natalegawa

    17 September 2024

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    There are different ways to understand what a “middle power” is in international politics and relations. Coming from a particular state acknowledged or described by others as a middle power or declaring oneself to be one has varied implications for the prevailing world order and considerable impact on the state concerned.

    240918 Being a Middle Power
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    What to make of the often-cited notion of “middle power”?

    Significantly, the usage of the term has varied.

    In some instances, it suggests a country’s coming to prominence moment; an “elevated” status in the rank of international power, an occasion to be celebrated. In others, it refers to a country’s – or a group of countries’ – foreign policy orientation, being in the “middle” or equidistant in the deepening and widening geopolitical divide between the “major” or “great” powers. Such usage is sometime associated with other terms that refer to groups of countries such as “the Global South” and “emerging powers”, though without much regard to the fact that this risk oversimplifying the complex dynamics that exist between countries with varying interests and concerns. It is also sometimes juxtaposed with “neutrality”, or a foreign policy orientation described as “hedging”.

    The notion of middle power deserves a more critical analysis.

    Perhaps one of its most egregious features is that it is inherently inconsistent with one of the most fundamental principles of interstate relations, as enshrined in Article 2.1 of the United Nations Charter, namely that of “sovereign equality” of states. One of the bedrock principles in multilateral cooperation with emphasis on cooperative partnership between states, and of mutual respect and mutual benefit. It took decades of efforts – including by countries emerging from colonial occupation – to ensure that this sacrosanct principle of international relations is not dismissed as mere legal formality unfounded by realpolitik.

    However, the usage of term such as “middle power” and the concurrent notion of large, major or great powers risk creating self-fulfilling dynamic, that of a stratified international order. That some powers – solidified most vividly and formally by the existence of permanent, non-elected members of the United Nations Security Council – shoulder special responsibilities and possesses special rights. That outside these powers, the great majority of states, should merely await – brace themselves even – the results of the big powers’ deliberations. Middle powers are to be seated around the proverbial international decision-making table only at the invitation of the big powers; and is expected be grateful for the opportunity afforded.

    In emphasising the notion of middle powers, are we thus not simply codifying and giving credence to the idea of big powers? That might make right? And, indeed, should countries, like Indonesia, by no means insignificant in terms of traditional indices of power, such as geographic size, its population and economy, cap its future potential as being “middle” power?

    Closely related, the notion of middle power seems an anathema when linked to the reality that power – understood here as a state’s capacity to effect change – is not static and constant. It is dynamic, ever-changing and most often issue-dependent and situation-specific. Rather than seeing states in the world as being ranked from the most powerful to the least powerful – with the so-called “middle powers” presumably occupying the middle cluster in this list – it seems important to recognise that each international issue brings with it its own power “dynamics” and constellation. A country may well be a significant and minor “player” all at the same time dependent on the issues at hand: political-security, the economy, socio-culture, and global common issues such as climate crisis and the environment, public health and technology.

    Further still, the applicable currencies for power and influence are determined by the issues faced. That most obvious indices for power – a country’s military might and size of the economy – may not matter much in enabling countries to influence outcome when, for instance, the most vital ingredient is “trust” and, to borrow ASEAN’s parlance, “comfort level”. Thus, ASEAN’s past capacity to effect change and outcome – its “centrality” so to speak, was not necessarily derived from its Member States’ “power” in the quantifiable sense, rather from the trust and confidence it enjoys from its interlocutors to initiate and manage the wider region’s architecture.

    What of middle power as foreign policy orientation? Clearly for some countries it may be a fitting description if it chooses to remain simply in the “middle” – equidistant – in the face of ever deepening geopolitical competition. Here, middle power foreign policy orientation can perhaps be equated with neutrality. A preference not to be forced to choose between contending geopolitical foes; to be left alone. It certainly does not fit the description of countries such as Indonesia whose “bebas dan aktif” or independent and active foreign policy orientation eschews passive neutrality. Instead, here “independent” refers to a capacity for independent and sovereign decision-making, specific to the issue at hand. “Active” suggests a readiness to weigh in on various issues and contrasts to a passive stance which neutrality suggest.

    Being described as a middle power deserves more greater scrutiny.

    About the Author

    Dr Marty Natalegawa is a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was the Foreign Minister of Indonesia (2009-14) and the author of “Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within” (ISEAS, 2018).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Country and Region Studies / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    There are different ways to understand what a “middle power” is in international politics and relations. Coming from a particular state acknowledged or described by others as a middle power or declaring oneself to be one has varied implications for the prevailing world order and considerable impact on the state concerned.

    240918 Being a Middle Power
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    What to make of the often-cited notion of “middle power”?

    Significantly, the usage of the term has varied.

    In some instances, it suggests a country’s coming to prominence moment; an “elevated” status in the rank of international power, an occasion to be celebrated. In others, it refers to a country’s – or a group of countries’ – foreign policy orientation, being in the “middle” or equidistant in the deepening and widening geopolitical divide between the “major” or “great” powers. Such usage is sometime associated with other terms that refer to groups of countries such as “the Global South” and “emerging powers”, though without much regard to the fact that this risk oversimplifying the complex dynamics that exist between countries with varying interests and concerns. It is also sometimes juxtaposed with “neutrality”, or a foreign policy orientation described as “hedging”.

    The notion of middle power deserves a more critical analysis.

    Perhaps one of its most egregious features is that it is inherently inconsistent with one of the most fundamental principles of interstate relations, as enshrined in Article 2.1 of the United Nations Charter, namely that of “sovereign equality” of states. One of the bedrock principles in multilateral cooperation with emphasis on cooperative partnership between states, and of mutual respect and mutual benefit. It took decades of efforts – including by countries emerging from colonial occupation – to ensure that this sacrosanct principle of international relations is not dismissed as mere legal formality unfounded by realpolitik.

    However, the usage of term such as “middle power” and the concurrent notion of large, major or great powers risk creating self-fulfilling dynamic, that of a stratified international order. That some powers – solidified most vividly and formally by the existence of permanent, non-elected members of the United Nations Security Council – shoulder special responsibilities and possesses special rights. That outside these powers, the great majority of states, should merely await – brace themselves even – the results of the big powers’ deliberations. Middle powers are to be seated around the proverbial international decision-making table only at the invitation of the big powers; and is expected be grateful for the opportunity afforded.

    In emphasising the notion of middle powers, are we thus not simply codifying and giving credence to the idea of big powers? That might make right? And, indeed, should countries, like Indonesia, by no means insignificant in terms of traditional indices of power, such as geographic size, its population and economy, cap its future potential as being “middle” power?

    Closely related, the notion of middle power seems an anathema when linked to the reality that power – understood here as a state’s capacity to effect change – is not static and constant. It is dynamic, ever-changing and most often issue-dependent and situation-specific. Rather than seeing states in the world as being ranked from the most powerful to the least powerful – with the so-called “middle powers” presumably occupying the middle cluster in this list – it seems important to recognise that each international issue brings with it its own power “dynamics” and constellation. A country may well be a significant and minor “player” all at the same time dependent on the issues at hand: political-security, the economy, socio-culture, and global common issues such as climate crisis and the environment, public health and technology.

    Further still, the applicable currencies for power and influence are determined by the issues faced. That most obvious indices for power – a country’s military might and size of the economy – may not matter much in enabling countries to influence outcome when, for instance, the most vital ingredient is “trust” and, to borrow ASEAN’s parlance, “comfort level”. Thus, ASEAN’s past capacity to effect change and outcome – its “centrality” so to speak, was not necessarily derived from its Member States’ “power” in the quantifiable sense, rather from the trust and confidence it enjoys from its interlocutors to initiate and manage the wider region’s architecture.

    What of middle power as foreign policy orientation? Clearly for some countries it may be a fitting description if it chooses to remain simply in the “middle” – equidistant – in the face of ever deepening geopolitical competition. Here, middle power foreign policy orientation can perhaps be equated with neutrality. A preference not to be forced to choose between contending geopolitical foes; to be left alone. It certainly does not fit the description of countries such as Indonesia whose “bebas dan aktif” or independent and active foreign policy orientation eschews passive neutrality. Instead, here “independent” refers to a capacity for independent and sovereign decision-making, specific to the issue at hand. “Active” suggests a readiness to weigh in on various issues and contrasts to a passive stance which neutrality suggest.

    Being described as a middle power deserves more greater scrutiny.

    About the Author

    Dr Marty Natalegawa is a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was the Foreign Minister of Indonesia (2009-14) and the author of “Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within” (ISEAS, 2018).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Country and Region Studies

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info