Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO14095 | Electing Indonesia’s Next President: King or Kingmaker?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO14095 | Electing Indonesia’s Next President: King or Kingmaker?
    Yang Razali Kassim

    22 May 2014

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    Indonesia’s fifth presidential election post-Suharto is taking place under the shadow of Sukarno. Whether it will be Jokowi or Prabowo as president, the kingmaker behind the throne has to be reckoned with. Will there be a new post of prime minister?

    Commentary

    INDONESIA’S BIG contest to elect its next president has begun, with 185 million registered to vote in the third direct presidential election in post-Suharto Indonesia this 9 July. It is now a straight fight between two new political players – Jakarta governor Joko Widodo (“Jokowi”), and former special forces general Prabowo Subianto. The real winner, though, is already apparent – the enduring legacy of Sukarno, Indonesia’s first president. This in itself suggests a certain direction that the country may take over the next five years.

    Jokowi is the candidate of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), the winner of the 9 April parliamentary elections, the successor of Sukarno’s nationalist PNI, and whose leader is Sukarno’s daughter, Megawati Sukarnoputri. Jokowi himself lately until little known outside his Central Java hometown, is an enigma of a man. His sweeping popularity, due to his common touch rather than fiery oratory, is probably not seen since Sukarno. Strangely, the image and proletarian philosophy of Sukarno is more asserted by Jokowi’s rival: in a highly symbolic show, Prabowo declared his candidacy in Sukarno’s former house in East Jakarta.

    Race to be ‘king’ of the hill

    Attempts to field  a third candidate in the form of Aburizal Bakrie, one of Indonesia’s richest men, fizzled out at the eleventh hour, paving the way for the Jokowi-Prabowo head-to-head fight. Had there been a three-cornered contest, the wildly popular Jokowi’s road to the Istana as Indonesia’s seventh president would not be a shoo-in. In the worst-case scenario, Jokowi might have even lost in a second-round election.

    While this is now academic, it will not be plain-sailing for Jokowi, whose popularity gives him the edge as voters get to elect their preferred leader directly. His rival has amassed quite a formidable coalition of six parties, with a combined strength of 49 percent of the popular votes. In contrast, Jokowi’s coalition has a smaller combined power of four parties with 40 percent of the popular vote. The player who tipped the balance in Prabowo’s favour is Bakrie who, in a surprise move, declared his support just before nomination closed on 20 May 2014. Earlier expectations had been for him to lean towards becoming Jokowi’s vice-presidential running mate.

    How did the race come to this? The 9 April parliamentary elections threw up three leading parties in a new pecking order – Megawati’s PDIP, Bakrie’s Golkar and Prabowo’s Gerindra. But none of them could compete in the presidential election on their own as they failed to meet the threshold, forcing them to form coalitions to be eligible. Opinion polls suggested that the top two electable candidates would be Jokowi and Prabowo.

    Although Golkar came in second in the parliamentary polls, its leader Bakrie was not deemed popular enough because of some business controversies. In the end, two contesting pairs emerged: Jokowi and Jusuf Kalla, a former vice-president and ex-Golkar chairman; versus Prabowo and Hatta Rajasa, a former economic coordinating minister.

    Jokowi clearly held the upper hand as he easily met the threshold of 25 percent of the popular vote when his PDIP secured the backing of three other parties to form a coalition. This forced Prabowo to scramble for support from the remaining parties to add to his 12 percent. He eventually secured the backing of Golkar and four Muslim-based parties – PAN, PPP, PKS and PBB. PAN’s leader, Hatta Rajasa, emerged as Prabowo’s vice-presidential running mate, leaving no room for Bakrie.

    Bakrie as prime minister in a Prabowo cabinet?

    Bakrie was initially resigned to staying out of the contest, especially given Golkar’s factionalism. However Golkar eventually closed ranks, endorsed Bakrie as its sole candidate, and gave him a wide mandate to play the role of a king-maker – which Bakrie did with some agility, though a tad too late.

    When Jokowi stuck with Jusuf Kalla as his running mate, Bakrie gave up his own bid to be president or vice-president and threw his support behind Prabowo. This unexpected manouevre split Golkar. While retaining Hatta as running mate, Prabowo promised Bakrie an unprecedented role – as Menteri Utama – in a Prabowo cabinet. There is some debate over what this meant. Gerindra said it could be like a coordinating minister or even a senior minister ala Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore. Bakrie, however, interpreted it as equivalent to prime minister in a trisula or triumvirate leadership. “Overseas it is known as prime minister. Over here, the name is menteri utama,” Bakrie told the media.

    Should he win, Prabowo would have to restructure the cabinet to create such a position – although some questioned whether this is possible in Indonesia’s presidential system. But then again, when Sukarno was president, he had a series of prime ministers, in addition to his vice-president Mohammad Hatta.

    The king-makers behind the scenes

    Prabowo justified such a position as befitting Bakrie’s role as a “king-maker”. Indeed, while either Jokowi or Prabowo could be king, this presidential election is as much about the king-makers behind the scenes. Apart from Bakrie, there are two others: Megawati and President Yudhoyono.

    Megawati, the PDIP chair, is the de facto power behind Jokowi should he win the presidency. Megawati relishes this role, though she was initially disappointed to have to give up her ambition to be PDIP’s presidential candidate owing to her lack of popularity. Opinion polls had not been in her favour, pointing to her as belonging to the past. But Megawati had an eye on the future – to advance the legacy of Sukarno beyond family through the PDIP as a ruling party. Interestingly, she even bypassed her own daughter, Puan Maharani, as a possible running mate for Jokowi.

    The third king-maker is President Yudhoyono. Despite his Democrat Party’s suffering a steep drop in popularity due to corruption scandals, it still won a respectable 10 percent of the popular vote, making it the fourth largest party in parliament. Yudhoyono is shrewd enough to know that his PD still has some clout in the new political terrain.

    While choosing to be neutral now, he leaves the option open to throw his weight eventually behind Prabowo whose vice-presidential running mate, Hatta, is father-in-law of Yudhoyono’s son. The outgoing president may also end up in the opposition, playing the role of check-and-balancer.

    In this new power-game, it is significant that the ones who will determine the future course of Indonesia are two new players in the political landscape – Jokowi and Prabowo. Whoever it will be, the next president of Indonesia will carry the legacy of Sukarno’s nationalism. How will this influence the rise of Southeast Asia’s largest economy and its external relations?

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. This also appeared in The Straits Times.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Synopsis

    Indonesia’s fifth presidential election post-Suharto is taking place under the shadow of Sukarno. Whether it will be Jokowi or Prabowo as president, the kingmaker behind the throne has to be reckoned with. Will there be a new post of prime minister?

    Commentary

    INDONESIA’S BIG contest to elect its next president has begun, with 185 million registered to vote in the third direct presidential election in post-Suharto Indonesia this 9 July. It is now a straight fight between two new political players – Jakarta governor Joko Widodo (“Jokowi”), and former special forces general Prabowo Subianto. The real winner, though, is already apparent – the enduring legacy of Sukarno, Indonesia’s first president. This in itself suggests a certain direction that the country may take over the next five years.

    Jokowi is the candidate of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), the winner of the 9 April parliamentary elections, the successor of Sukarno’s nationalist PNI, and whose leader is Sukarno’s daughter, Megawati Sukarnoputri. Jokowi himself lately until little known outside his Central Java hometown, is an enigma of a man. His sweeping popularity, due to his common touch rather than fiery oratory, is probably not seen since Sukarno. Strangely, the image and proletarian philosophy of Sukarno is more asserted by Jokowi’s rival: in a highly symbolic show, Prabowo declared his candidacy in Sukarno’s former house in East Jakarta.

    Race to be ‘king’ of the hill

    Attempts to field  a third candidate in the form of Aburizal Bakrie, one of Indonesia’s richest men, fizzled out at the eleventh hour, paving the way for the Jokowi-Prabowo head-to-head fight. Had there been a three-cornered contest, the wildly popular Jokowi’s road to the Istana as Indonesia’s seventh president would not be a shoo-in. In the worst-case scenario, Jokowi might have even lost in a second-round election.

    While this is now academic, it will not be plain-sailing for Jokowi, whose popularity gives him the edge as voters get to elect their preferred leader directly. His rival has amassed quite a formidable coalition of six parties, with a combined strength of 49 percent of the popular votes. In contrast, Jokowi’s coalition has a smaller combined power of four parties with 40 percent of the popular vote. The player who tipped the balance in Prabowo’s favour is Bakrie who, in a surprise move, declared his support just before nomination closed on 20 May 2014. Earlier expectations had been for him to lean towards becoming Jokowi’s vice-presidential running mate.

    How did the race come to this? The 9 April parliamentary elections threw up three leading parties in a new pecking order – Megawati’s PDIP, Bakrie’s Golkar and Prabowo’s Gerindra. But none of them could compete in the presidential election on their own as they failed to meet the threshold, forcing them to form coalitions to be eligible. Opinion polls suggested that the top two electable candidates would be Jokowi and Prabowo.

    Although Golkar came in second in the parliamentary polls, its leader Bakrie was not deemed popular enough because of some business controversies. In the end, two contesting pairs emerged: Jokowi and Jusuf Kalla, a former vice-president and ex-Golkar chairman; versus Prabowo and Hatta Rajasa, a former economic coordinating minister.

    Jokowi clearly held the upper hand as he easily met the threshold of 25 percent of the popular vote when his PDIP secured the backing of three other parties to form a coalition. This forced Prabowo to scramble for support from the remaining parties to add to his 12 percent. He eventually secured the backing of Golkar and four Muslim-based parties – PAN, PPP, PKS and PBB. PAN’s leader, Hatta Rajasa, emerged as Prabowo’s vice-presidential running mate, leaving no room for Bakrie.

    Bakrie as prime minister in a Prabowo cabinet?

    Bakrie was initially resigned to staying out of the contest, especially given Golkar’s factionalism. However Golkar eventually closed ranks, endorsed Bakrie as its sole candidate, and gave him a wide mandate to play the role of a king-maker – which Bakrie did with some agility, though a tad too late.

    When Jokowi stuck with Jusuf Kalla as his running mate, Bakrie gave up his own bid to be president or vice-president and threw his support behind Prabowo. This unexpected manouevre split Golkar. While retaining Hatta as running mate, Prabowo promised Bakrie an unprecedented role – as Menteri Utama – in a Prabowo cabinet. There is some debate over what this meant. Gerindra said it could be like a coordinating minister or even a senior minister ala Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore. Bakrie, however, interpreted it as equivalent to prime minister in a trisula or triumvirate leadership. “Overseas it is known as prime minister. Over here, the name is menteri utama,” Bakrie told the media.

    Should he win, Prabowo would have to restructure the cabinet to create such a position – although some questioned whether this is possible in Indonesia’s presidential system. But then again, when Sukarno was president, he had a series of prime ministers, in addition to his vice-president Mohammad Hatta.

    The king-makers behind the scenes

    Prabowo justified such a position as befitting Bakrie’s role as a “king-maker”. Indeed, while either Jokowi or Prabowo could be king, this presidential election is as much about the king-makers behind the scenes. Apart from Bakrie, there are two others: Megawati and President Yudhoyono.

    Megawati, the PDIP chair, is the de facto power behind Jokowi should he win the presidency. Megawati relishes this role, though she was initially disappointed to have to give up her ambition to be PDIP’s presidential candidate owing to her lack of popularity. Opinion polls had not been in her favour, pointing to her as belonging to the past. But Megawati had an eye on the future – to advance the legacy of Sukarno beyond family through the PDIP as a ruling party. Interestingly, she even bypassed her own daughter, Puan Maharani, as a possible running mate for Jokowi.

    The third king-maker is President Yudhoyono. Despite his Democrat Party’s suffering a steep drop in popularity due to corruption scandals, it still won a respectable 10 percent of the popular vote, making it the fourth largest party in parliament. Yudhoyono is shrewd enough to know that his PD still has some clout in the new political terrain.

    While choosing to be neutral now, he leaves the option open to throw his weight eventually behind Prabowo whose vice-presidential running mate, Hatta, is father-in-law of Yudhoyono’s son. The outgoing president may also end up in the opposition, playing the role of check-and-balancer.

    In this new power-game, it is significant that the ones who will determine the future course of Indonesia are two new players in the political landscape – Jokowi and Prabowo. Whoever it will be, the next president of Indonesia will carry the legacy of Sukarno’s nationalism. How will this influence the rise of Southeast Asia’s largest economy and its external relations?

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. This also appeared in The Straits Times.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info