Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO18135 | Indo-Pacific: The Next Growth Engine?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO18135 | Indo-Pacific: The Next Growth Engine?
    Christopher H. Lim, Tan Ming Hui

    10 August 2018

    download pdf

    Synopsis

    There is more to gain by turning the Indo-Pacific into the next global growth engine.

    Commentary

    LINKING THE Indian and Pacific Oceans into a single geographical space, most scholars and analysts have discussed the vaguely defined Indo-Pacific concept within a geostrategic or geopolitical frame. The flurry of analytical articles over the past year often contain common themes: containment, militarisation, and rebalancing vis-à-vis China’s rise and assertiveness.

    Yet, there is more to gain from a geo-economic perspective. Further, from a non-traditional security dimension, enhanced Indo-Pacific cooperation will yield significant benefits.

    Make Peace, Not War

    The idea of further militarisation understandably brings wariness to many in this region. Peace is an extremely precious commodity here – the price is beyond silver and gold, and had been paid by lives of millions.

    The past century saw countries in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly in East Asia, plagued by numerous wars and civil conflicts; the Second World War, the Chinese Civil War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and so on.

    For the people still living in the shadows and memories of these traditional wars, they also increasingly have to deal with non-traditional battles on a daily basis, including the fight against climate change, global warming and natural disasters, on top of the fight against global epidemics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) outbreaks.

    At the same time, much of Southeast Asia and South Asia, especially the rural areas, still face challenges in attaining safe, clean, and secure water and sanitation, accessible and reliable healthcare, as well as adequate public infrastructure.

    On top of these, countries in the region are facing the escalating trade war between the United States and China, and bracing themselves for the potential fallout.

    Towards A Cooperative Concept

    For the Indo-Pacific concept to gain traction in the region, it has to move away from the rhetoric of military competition and a zero sum game. Rather, it should move towards a more constructive, cooperative, and inclusive framework. As a geo-economic entity, there is boundless potential in the Indo-Pacific.

    Linking the two oceans into one cooperative geographical space is not inconceivable especially because it is not a new concept in this region. ASEAN has long led the way with its multilateral and inclusive platforms of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) since 1994 and East Asia Summit (EAS) since 2005. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), even though it is still undergoing negotiations, is another key effort to deepen economic partnership and integration among countries that fall within the scope of an Indo-Pacific region.

    The US-China trade war is a great destabiliser and disrupter globally. Amid this atmosphere of uncertainty and fear, cooperation and hope are needed more than ever. A development-driven cooperative framework can bring more optimism and stability to the region.

    Southeast Asia as Starting Point

    Southeast Asia provides a good starting point for a cooperative and development-driven Indo-Pacific strategy to take shape. ASEAN members are committed to neutrality, and ASEAN processes and architecture have allowed more than 630 million people to live together in peace. ASEAN neutrality can help bridge the gap of mistrust between the Quad countries  ̶  the US, Australia, Japan and India  ̶  and China.

    All major powers within the Indo-Pacific could make a difference by contributing to the development of Southeast Asia, and can continue to make a positive contribution.

    Japan’s quality control methods in manufacturing and product safety is well known globally. Given its declining domestic workforce, Japan could join forces with the growing ASEAN’s young population to expand Japan’s manufacturing strength in ASEAN. Together, they could potentially create the next manufacturing miracle – guaranteeing Japanese quality and workmanship at competitive ASEAN price.

    Food and agriculture are fundamental to human survival. The emerging challenges in climate change and water shortage would further exacerbate the needs of food production in highly populated ASEAN. Australia’s agricultural R&D capability ranks among the best in the world, meaning that Australia could share its agricultural expertise and help ASEAN become a “food bowl” for the rest of the world.

    Tourism is increasingly a critical industry in ASEAN. With the increase in tourist volume in Southeast Asia, the natural environment is under considerable strain and rapid degradation. Again, ASEAN can tap on the Australian expertise in environmental protection. Similar to Australia, the region’s coral reefs are also facing grave threats. Australia could offer its research and knowledge on the protection and restoration of the Great Barrier Reef.

    Digitisation and Infrastructure

    ASEAN has collectively identified digitisation is one of the key developmental initiatives. The region is experiencing upward trends in internet penetration and mobile connectivity, and e-commerce is becoming increasingly important. India has long been identified as the global leader and hub in software development.

    India could extend its strength in the digital industry to ASEAN, particularly amongst the ASEAN youths, and help propel ASEAN to compete in the e-commerce globally. Such initiatives by India could help to enhance ASEAN’s global competitiveness.

    ASEAN economies will need to spend more than US$60 billion annually for their infrastructure needs, especially in the energy and transport sectors. Given that the Japan-backed ADB (Asian Development Bank) and the China-backed AIIB (Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank) already have the experience of co-financing four infrastructure projects in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Georgia and India, the next step is for ADB and AIIB to join forces again to address and develop the infrastructure needs in ASEAN.

    Turning away from containment and militarisation, the Indo-Pacific can collectively leverage on a positive, constructive and cooperative concept as outlined above. This collaborative strategy can be extended eastward to all the countries and islands in the Pacific Ocean, even covering South America, and westward to those islands and countries in the Indian Ocean and the African Continent.

    Escaping the Vicious Cycle of Containment

    All the major and smaller players in the region have a stake in the stability, growth, and success of the Indo-Pacific region, and it does not make economic sense to prefer containment over cooperation.

    Furthermore, the perception of whether a country is a partner and whether a country is a competitor is not static, and can change over time. The US-Japan alliance has been relatively stable and strong since the end of World War II. Nevertheless, when Japan was at its economic peak in the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was talk in the US over whether it should be contained. In fact, Japan’s economic expansion was described as “uncontrolled and unbalanced”, and hurting American interests. Fast forward 20 years later, China is now perceived as the competitor.

    Twenty years from now or even earlier, India could be the next rising power with its economic growth potential. By then, does it mean that it will become the next competitor to contain? Certainly not. Otherwise, the region will be in a perpetual cycle of containment.

    About the Authors

    Christopher H. Lim is Senior Fellow and Tan Ming Hui is Associate Research Fellow in the Office of the Executive Deputy Chairman at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    Synopsis

    There is more to gain by turning the Indo-Pacific into the next global growth engine.

    Commentary

    LINKING THE Indian and Pacific Oceans into a single geographical space, most scholars and analysts have discussed the vaguely defined Indo-Pacific concept within a geostrategic or geopolitical frame. The flurry of analytical articles over the past year often contain common themes: containment, militarisation, and rebalancing vis-à-vis China’s rise and assertiveness.

    Yet, there is more to gain from a geo-economic perspective. Further, from a non-traditional security dimension, enhanced Indo-Pacific cooperation will yield significant benefits.

    Make Peace, Not War

    The idea of further militarisation understandably brings wariness to many in this region. Peace is an extremely precious commodity here – the price is beyond silver and gold, and had been paid by lives of millions.

    The past century saw countries in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly in East Asia, plagued by numerous wars and civil conflicts; the Second World War, the Chinese Civil War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and so on.

    For the people still living in the shadows and memories of these traditional wars, they also increasingly have to deal with non-traditional battles on a daily basis, including the fight against climate change, global warming and natural disasters, on top of the fight against global epidemics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) outbreaks.

    At the same time, much of Southeast Asia and South Asia, especially the rural areas, still face challenges in attaining safe, clean, and secure water and sanitation, accessible and reliable healthcare, as well as adequate public infrastructure.

    On top of these, countries in the region are facing the escalating trade war between the United States and China, and bracing themselves for the potential fallout.

    Towards A Cooperative Concept

    For the Indo-Pacific concept to gain traction in the region, it has to move away from the rhetoric of military competition and a zero sum game. Rather, it should move towards a more constructive, cooperative, and inclusive framework. As a geo-economic entity, there is boundless potential in the Indo-Pacific.

    Linking the two oceans into one cooperative geographical space is not inconceivable especially because it is not a new concept in this region. ASEAN has long led the way with its multilateral and inclusive platforms of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) since 1994 and East Asia Summit (EAS) since 2005. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), even though it is still undergoing negotiations, is another key effort to deepen economic partnership and integration among countries that fall within the scope of an Indo-Pacific region.

    The US-China trade war is a great destabiliser and disrupter globally. Amid this atmosphere of uncertainty and fear, cooperation and hope are needed more than ever. A development-driven cooperative framework can bring more optimism and stability to the region.

    Southeast Asia as Starting Point

    Southeast Asia provides a good starting point for a cooperative and development-driven Indo-Pacific strategy to take shape. ASEAN members are committed to neutrality, and ASEAN processes and architecture have allowed more than 630 million people to live together in peace. ASEAN neutrality can help bridge the gap of mistrust between the Quad countries  ̶  the US, Australia, Japan and India  ̶  and China.

    All major powers within the Indo-Pacific could make a difference by contributing to the development of Southeast Asia, and can continue to make a positive contribution.

    Japan’s quality control methods in manufacturing and product safety is well known globally. Given its declining domestic workforce, Japan could join forces with the growing ASEAN’s young population to expand Japan’s manufacturing strength in ASEAN. Together, they could potentially create the next manufacturing miracle – guaranteeing Japanese quality and workmanship at competitive ASEAN price.

    Food and agriculture are fundamental to human survival. The emerging challenges in climate change and water shortage would further exacerbate the needs of food production in highly populated ASEAN. Australia’s agricultural R&D capability ranks among the best in the world, meaning that Australia could share its agricultural expertise and help ASEAN become a “food bowl” for the rest of the world.

    Tourism is increasingly a critical industry in ASEAN. With the increase in tourist volume in Southeast Asia, the natural environment is under considerable strain and rapid degradation. Again, ASEAN can tap on the Australian expertise in environmental protection. Similar to Australia, the region’s coral reefs are also facing grave threats. Australia could offer its research and knowledge on the protection and restoration of the Great Barrier Reef.

    Digitisation and Infrastructure

    ASEAN has collectively identified digitisation is one of the key developmental initiatives. The region is experiencing upward trends in internet penetration and mobile connectivity, and e-commerce is becoming increasingly important. India has long been identified as the global leader and hub in software development.

    India could extend its strength in the digital industry to ASEAN, particularly amongst the ASEAN youths, and help propel ASEAN to compete in the e-commerce globally. Such initiatives by India could help to enhance ASEAN’s global competitiveness.

    ASEAN economies will need to spend more than US$60 billion annually for their infrastructure needs, especially in the energy and transport sectors. Given that the Japan-backed ADB (Asian Development Bank) and the China-backed AIIB (Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank) already have the experience of co-financing four infrastructure projects in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Georgia and India, the next step is for ADB and AIIB to join forces again to address and develop the infrastructure needs in ASEAN.

    Turning away from containment and militarisation, the Indo-Pacific can collectively leverage on a positive, constructive and cooperative concept as outlined above. This collaborative strategy can be extended eastward to all the countries and islands in the Pacific Ocean, even covering South America, and westward to those islands and countries in the Indian Ocean and the African Continent.

    Escaping the Vicious Cycle of Containment

    All the major and smaller players in the region have a stake in the stability, growth, and success of the Indo-Pacific region, and it does not make economic sense to prefer containment over cooperation.

    Furthermore, the perception of whether a country is a partner and whether a country is a competitor is not static, and can change over time. The US-Japan alliance has been relatively stable and strong since the end of World War II. Nevertheless, when Japan was at its economic peak in the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was talk in the US over whether it should be contained. In fact, Japan’s economic expansion was described as “uncontrolled and unbalanced”, and hurting American interests. Fast forward 20 years later, China is now perceived as the competitor.

    Twenty years from now or even earlier, India could be the next rising power with its economic growth potential. By then, does it mean that it will become the next competitor to contain? Certainly not. Otherwise, the region will be in a perpetual cycle of containment.

    About the Authors

    Christopher H. Lim is Senior Fellow and Tan Ming Hui is Associate Research Fellow in the Office of the Executive Deputy Chairman at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info