Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Demography-Religion Nexus: Tipping Point for Societal Norms
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22060 | Demography-Religion Nexus: Tipping Point for Societal Norms
    Mohammad Alami Musa

    03 June 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent debate about repealing Section 377A that criminalises sex between men assumes a high signature because it may lead to a social change in Singapore. It can potentially bring a largely conservative Singaporean society to a tipping point where many of its traditional pro-family norms may be undermined, even replaced with secular-liberal norms, leading to a decline in religion. This is not a conjecture. Some countries in the West have crossed such a tipping point.

     

    A happy Asian family
    A happy family — Religion fortifies family values. WEF picture.

    COMMENTARY

    DEMOGRAPHICALLY THE Census of Population 2020 showed that Singapore’s population still grew – from 3.23 million in 2010 to 3.52 million in 2020. This population growth is the outcome of efforts to get society to embrace pro-family norms. These norms are believed to be mainly associated with religious traditions.

    Religious institutions encouraged their flocks to preserve pro-family norms like upholding the institutions of marriage (between man and woman) as well as of family; having babies; and promoting women’s role to pro-create and discouraging behaviour that does not result in reproduction. Traditional pro-family norms and lifestyles are still strong in Singapore. Emphasising pro-family norms has the natural effect of preserving the importance of religion. Hence, for as long as Singapore preserves traditional pro-family norms, the decline of religion is unlikely to be significant or even to occur.

    Counter-Trends: Less Conservative, Less Pro-Family Society

    Nevertheless, there are counter-trends. Census 2020 also found the number of married Singaporeans to have slightly dipped by 0.6%; the number divorced or separated increased slightly by 1.0% and a larger group of married women (40-49 years) have never given birth.

    These counter-trends show that more Singaporeans are exercising their individual choices (i) not to get married; (ii) that if they do get married, not to have children; and (iii) to end their marriages through divorce or separation. The embrace of such individual choice norms is showing an uptrend.

    Besides the continued rise of the above counter-trends, Singaporean society has also embraced for a long time other individual choice norms like accepting abortion as an option and use of contraception as well as forms of sexual behaviour not linked to reproduction.

    In addition, figures from an IPS 2019 survey also show Singaporeans are more open to homosexuality. These all point to the uptrend of individual choice norms in Singapore which, according to the late American political scientist Ronald Inglehart, may have the effect of weakening traditional pro-family norms and consequently leading to a decline of religion.

    Has Singapore Crossed the Tipping Point?

    Some decline of religion, though insignificant, is already showing up in the Census 2020 data. More residents (aged 15 years and above, across most types of educational qualifications as well as age groups) have no religious affiliation. Their number has increased from 15% in 2000 to 17% in 2010 and finally to 20% in 2020.

    This decline in the number of people with religion may be insignificant when compared to the larger declines seen in many other developed countries. The question is whether such decline is due to a waning of pro-family norms and a strengthening of individual choice norms, as advocated by Inglehart?

    Has there been a fundamental shift that transforms Singaporean society from one that preserves pro-family norms to one that has started to significantly embrace individual choice norms? In other words, has Singapore crossed the tipping point?

    The answer is found in the findings of the World Values Survey that Ronald Inglehart conducted over two time periods from 1980 to 2007 and again from 2007 to 2020. The survey involved 112 countries which covered 90% of the world’s population. Singapore was one of the countries Inglehart studied.

    His study found that Singapore was just above the line dividing the countries that showed rising support for individual choice norms and those that showed falling support. This means that Singapore experienced a weak shift over the two time periods and this indicates that Singaporean society does show a little more accommodation for individual choice norms, but the change is not transformational. Singapore has not crossed the tipping point.

    Therefore, Singapore essentially retains its traditional pro-family norms character and this accounts for the continued emphasis on religion. Religion has remained strong in Singapore, notwithstanding the Census 2020 results that show the falling number of people with religion.

    Will Singapore Cross the Tipping Point over 377A?

    Singapore has neither reached nor crossed the tipping point from pro-family to individual choice norms, even though there has been a slight shift, as the Inglehart study and the Census data showed.

    Ronald Inglehart’s study found that countries will cross the tipping point when their societies accept same sex marriage and same sex relationships as these are deemed as critical markers to indicate the dominance of individual choice norms. Singapore has not reached this stage. Once it does, many pro-family norms will weaken or disappear and religion will lose its social significance, as observed in many developed countries.

    Therefore, the debate about Section 377A of the Penal Code which criminalises sex between consenting male adults is not merely to determine a position but more importantly the nature of Singaporean society. The anxiety that exists is the fear that repealing the law may imply the opening of the flood gate. It will mean Singapore may go down the path trodden by the Nordic and other Western countries that had reached the tipping point and crossed it.

    As a religious society, Singaporeans by and large try their best to resist the movement towards the tipping point, to safeguard pro-family norms and to protect the significance of religion in the country. In short, repealing Section 377A may be the much-dreaded tipping point that may transform Singapore.

    Inglehart’s massive work unearthing an abundance of data from the World Value Survey conducted from 1980 to 2020 shows that a lever like 377A may trigger a social transformation of sorts. Singaporeans therefore need to decide on the kind of society they desire.

    About the Author

    Mohammad Alami Musa is Head of Studies in Interreligious Relations in Plural Societies Programme (SRP), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent debate about repealing Section 377A that criminalises sex between men assumes a high signature because it may lead to a social change in Singapore. It can potentially bring a largely conservative Singaporean society to a tipping point where many of its traditional pro-family norms may be undermined, even replaced with secular-liberal norms, leading to a decline in religion. This is not a conjecture. Some countries in the West have crossed such a tipping point.

     

    A happy Asian family
    A happy family — Religion fortifies family values. WEF picture.

    COMMENTARY

    DEMOGRAPHICALLY THE Census of Population 2020 showed that Singapore’s population still grew – from 3.23 million in 2010 to 3.52 million in 2020. This population growth is the outcome of efforts to get society to embrace pro-family norms. These norms are believed to be mainly associated with religious traditions.

    Religious institutions encouraged their flocks to preserve pro-family norms like upholding the institutions of marriage (between man and woman) as well as of family; having babies; and promoting women’s role to pro-create and discouraging behaviour that does not result in reproduction. Traditional pro-family norms and lifestyles are still strong in Singapore. Emphasising pro-family norms has the natural effect of preserving the importance of religion. Hence, for as long as Singapore preserves traditional pro-family norms, the decline of religion is unlikely to be significant or even to occur.

    Counter-Trends: Less Conservative, Less Pro-Family Society

    Nevertheless, there are counter-trends. Census 2020 also found the number of married Singaporeans to have slightly dipped by 0.6%; the number divorced or separated increased slightly by 1.0% and a larger group of married women (40-49 years) have never given birth.

    These counter-trends show that more Singaporeans are exercising their individual choices (i) not to get married; (ii) that if they do get married, not to have children; and (iii) to end their marriages through divorce or separation. The embrace of such individual choice norms is showing an uptrend.

    Besides the continued rise of the above counter-trends, Singaporean society has also embraced for a long time other individual choice norms like accepting abortion as an option and use of contraception as well as forms of sexual behaviour not linked to reproduction.

    In addition, figures from an IPS 2019 survey also show Singaporeans are more open to homosexuality. These all point to the uptrend of individual choice norms in Singapore which, according to the late American political scientist Ronald Inglehart, may have the effect of weakening traditional pro-family norms and consequently leading to a decline of religion.

    Has Singapore Crossed the Tipping Point?

    Some decline of religion, though insignificant, is already showing up in the Census 2020 data. More residents (aged 15 years and above, across most types of educational qualifications as well as age groups) have no religious affiliation. Their number has increased from 15% in 2000 to 17% in 2010 and finally to 20% in 2020.

    This decline in the number of people with religion may be insignificant when compared to the larger declines seen in many other developed countries. The question is whether such decline is due to a waning of pro-family norms and a strengthening of individual choice norms, as advocated by Inglehart?

    Has there been a fundamental shift that transforms Singaporean society from one that preserves pro-family norms to one that has started to significantly embrace individual choice norms? In other words, has Singapore crossed the tipping point?

    The answer is found in the findings of the World Values Survey that Ronald Inglehart conducted over two time periods from 1980 to 2007 and again from 2007 to 2020. The survey involved 112 countries which covered 90% of the world’s population. Singapore was one of the countries Inglehart studied.

    His study found that Singapore was just above the line dividing the countries that showed rising support for individual choice norms and those that showed falling support. This means that Singapore experienced a weak shift over the two time periods and this indicates that Singaporean society does show a little more accommodation for individual choice norms, but the change is not transformational. Singapore has not crossed the tipping point.

    Therefore, Singapore essentially retains its traditional pro-family norms character and this accounts for the continued emphasis on religion. Religion has remained strong in Singapore, notwithstanding the Census 2020 results that show the falling number of people with religion.

    Will Singapore Cross the Tipping Point over 377A?

    Singapore has neither reached nor crossed the tipping point from pro-family to individual choice norms, even though there has been a slight shift, as the Inglehart study and the Census data showed.

    Ronald Inglehart’s study found that countries will cross the tipping point when their societies accept same sex marriage and same sex relationships as these are deemed as critical markers to indicate the dominance of individual choice norms. Singapore has not reached this stage. Once it does, many pro-family norms will weaken or disappear and religion will lose its social significance, as observed in many developed countries.

    Therefore, the debate about Section 377A of the Penal Code which criminalises sex between consenting male adults is not merely to determine a position but more importantly the nature of Singaporean society. The anxiety that exists is the fear that repealing the law may imply the opening of the flood gate. It will mean Singapore may go down the path trodden by the Nordic and other Western countries that had reached the tipping point and crossed it.

    As a religious society, Singaporeans by and large try their best to resist the movement towards the tipping point, to safeguard pro-family norms and to protect the significance of religion in the country. In short, repealing Section 377A may be the much-dreaded tipping point that may transform Singapore.

    Inglehart’s massive work unearthing an abundance of data from the World Value Survey conducted from 1980 to 2020 shows that a lever like 377A may trigger a social transformation of sorts. Singaporeans therefore need to decide on the kind of society they desire.

    About the Author

    Mohammad Alami Musa is Head of Studies in Interreligious Relations in Plural Societies Programme (SRP), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info