Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • “Every religion is a way to God”: Did the Pope Depart from Catholic Teaching?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO24141 | “Every religion is a way to God”: Did the Pope Depart from Catholic Teaching?
    Paul Hedges

    24 September 2024

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Some have felt that the Pope’s statement that “all religions are paths to God” is a pluralist heresy that departs from Catholic teaching. However, the Catholic Church teaches that both other religions and non-religious beliefs, may be ways that people are seeking and finding God. His words were daring, but seen in the context of previous Popes, Councils, and theologians, entirely orthodox.

    Photo: CNA/YouTube

    COMMENTARY

    Amidst the great joy amongst Catholics and non-Catholics who attended the Pope’s visit to Singapore and the wider region, considerable controversy has been stoked by some words uttered by Francis at his final engagement, an interreligious dialogue with youth at Catholic Junior College, Singapore.

    Some see the Pope’s words as departing from Catholic teaching, while others see them as being in accord with the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and other official pronouncements. Some context and framing are necessary to see that the Pope offered no major theological departure from his predecessors, nor the official Catholic teaching.

    The Theology of Religions

    Some technical terms from the theology of religions – the area of systematic theology that explores how Christians understand religious diversity – will be helpful. A typical typology divides Christian approaches to other religions into three types: exclusivist, inclusivist, and pluralist. In recent decades, a new postmodern approach, termed particularist, has also arisen amongst some theologians, but heavily critiqued, it has fallen from favour but still surfaces in debates.

    The three terms are quite descriptive, and while there are various nuances, we can gloss them briefly: exclusivists believe that only Christianity is true, while other religions actively take people away from God with false teachings; inclusivists believe that while they have the whole truth, other religions have some partial truth that leads people towards God; and pluralists assert that there are many equal paths towards God.

    Catholic and Biblical Teaching

    Since the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s, the Catholic Church has been inclusivist, with this stance endorsed in the important documents Nostra Aetate and Lumen Gentium. Before this, an official church teaching that nobody outside the church can be saved was exclusivist, though most significant theologians and church teachers were inclusivists. Both these approaches can be read in various parts of the Bible, with St Paul’s teaching seemingly inclusivist and parts of the Hebrew text seemingly exclusivist.

    Pluralism, as a distinct approach, arose in Christianity in the late Twentieth Century but has echoes in church history and the Bible. Many, for instance, would be surprised to discover that the Bible describes a Zoroastrian monarch as (the/a) Christ, using the same title applied to Jesus. It has, however, not been mainstream, and figures such as Cardinal Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI, issued condemnations against pluralism. However, what was condemned was relativism which says every religion is the same, which no serious pluralist theologian endorses anyway. This is different from what Francis said.

    The ground is complicated because, for almost all of Church history, it has been an acceptable belief that everyone will be saved. One early teacher of this was St Gregory of Nyssa, one of the greatest teachers of the Christian tradition. More recently, the conservative Twentieth Century Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar (a favourite of Benedict XVI) has also taught this.

    What the Pope Said in Context

    The Pope’s phrase that we should not describe any religion as false but all as true has, perhaps, been the most quoted and debated. In his words: “all religions are paths to God”. He also compared all religions to languages talking about God and said that every one of them provides a way to God.

    Some have seen the Pope as a pluralist and departing from Catholic teaching by saying this. However, a few points are in order. In line with universalist teaching, Francis may be stressing that every path humans take may be a pathway to God. Benedict XVI actually said that agnostics may be closer to God than many within the Church because they seriously ask questions of faith and God’s existence rather than taking it as routine.

    The former Pope, now Saint, John Paul II, also said there should be “mutual respect”, seemingly downplaying doctrinal differences, when meeting Buddhists and Christians in dialogue. He famously held the first Assisi Day of Prayer in 1986, bringing members of many religions together to pray for peace. Then Cardinal Ratzinger stayed away from this event, seen as a sign of disapproval, but as Benedict XVI, he assembled and led a second Assisi Day of Prayer in 2002 and invited an atheist speaker as part of the line-up of leaders.

    Francis’ words, especially as he is more of a pastoral leader than a theological speculator, seem very much in accord with the words and actions of his predecessors. Moreover, by stressing that everyone was on a path to God, mentioning one God, not many, may well indicate that he, in line with Catholic teaching, sees everyone as converging, if they come in goodwill, towards Jesus and God.

    In Catholic tradition, the important Twentieth Century theologian Karl Rahner, whose work has often been seen as defining the meaning of the Second Vatican Council, used the phrase “anonymous Christians” to mean that anyone within their own religion (or with Benedict, including non-religion) is seeking God in their heart when they act rightly. This accords with the inclusivist teachings of St Paul and the early Christian Father Justin Martyr in the Second Century, who saw Jesus as the Word (Logos) in “Pagans” when they spoke well.

    Pluralist or Inclusivist? The Courage to Speak

    Any competent theologian should be clear that while daring – and in that same speech, Francis urged courage to engage in dialogue – nothing Francis said went against Catholic teaching. Of course, one could quote particular phrases from Church documents or theologians and say that word for word, Francis’ words appear to be out of sync. For instance, the document Domine Iesus describes non-Christian religions as “gravely deficient”. Francis may also, as a Jesuit theologian, be using language that attracts people to the Church’s message, even if it may not seem to match traditional language. Yet, it may fully accord with traditional teaching if understood correctly.

    Neither theology nor Christian faith has ever been about spouting particular dogmas or verbal formulas to make one close to God (although, at times, Christians have regrettably acted and behaved as if this were true). As Benedict said, somebody within the Church can be far from God, and somebody not technically within the Church may be near God, even if they do not even fully profess God’s existence.

    Some may use Francis’ words as a way to attack the Pope, to attack Catholics, or to attack the practice of interreligious dialogue. I suggest, however, that people of goodwill, those seeking the common good of all, as Francis continually urges, should focus upon his call for courage in this same speech. People may twist your words or seek to attack your motives.

    However, interreligious dialogue and mutual coexistence across boundaries of religion and non-religion are, arguably, too important to be discouraged by critical naysayers. Jesus said that many would call his name, but he would not know them. Likewise, people who demand certain doctrinal words, or claim the name of Jesus or other religious leaders to attack others, are not the only voices of religion. Therefore, take courage and remember that the vocation of dialogue is, for Catholics and many others, an important and holy work.

    About the Author

    Dr Paul Hedges is Professor of Interreligious Studies in the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and a Life Member of Clare Hall, University of Cambridge, U.K.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Some have felt that the Pope’s statement that “all religions are paths to God” is a pluralist heresy that departs from Catholic teaching. However, the Catholic Church teaches that both other religions and non-religious beliefs, may be ways that people are seeking and finding God. His words were daring, but seen in the context of previous Popes, Councils, and theologians, entirely orthodox.

    Photo: CNA/YouTube

    COMMENTARY

    Amidst the great joy amongst Catholics and non-Catholics who attended the Pope’s visit to Singapore and the wider region, considerable controversy has been stoked by some words uttered by Francis at his final engagement, an interreligious dialogue with youth at Catholic Junior College, Singapore.

    Some see the Pope’s words as departing from Catholic teaching, while others see them as being in accord with the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and other official pronouncements. Some context and framing are necessary to see that the Pope offered no major theological departure from his predecessors, nor the official Catholic teaching.

    The Theology of Religions

    Some technical terms from the theology of religions – the area of systematic theology that explores how Christians understand religious diversity – will be helpful. A typical typology divides Christian approaches to other religions into three types: exclusivist, inclusivist, and pluralist. In recent decades, a new postmodern approach, termed particularist, has also arisen amongst some theologians, but heavily critiqued, it has fallen from favour but still surfaces in debates.

    The three terms are quite descriptive, and while there are various nuances, we can gloss them briefly: exclusivists believe that only Christianity is true, while other religions actively take people away from God with false teachings; inclusivists believe that while they have the whole truth, other religions have some partial truth that leads people towards God; and pluralists assert that there are many equal paths towards God.

    Catholic and Biblical Teaching

    Since the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s, the Catholic Church has been inclusivist, with this stance endorsed in the important documents Nostra Aetate and Lumen Gentium. Before this, an official church teaching that nobody outside the church can be saved was exclusivist, though most significant theologians and church teachers were inclusivists. Both these approaches can be read in various parts of the Bible, with St Paul’s teaching seemingly inclusivist and parts of the Hebrew text seemingly exclusivist.

    Pluralism, as a distinct approach, arose in Christianity in the late Twentieth Century but has echoes in church history and the Bible. Many, for instance, would be surprised to discover that the Bible describes a Zoroastrian monarch as (the/a) Christ, using the same title applied to Jesus. It has, however, not been mainstream, and figures such as Cardinal Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI, issued condemnations against pluralism. However, what was condemned was relativism which says every religion is the same, which no serious pluralist theologian endorses anyway. This is different from what Francis said.

    The ground is complicated because, for almost all of Church history, it has been an acceptable belief that everyone will be saved. One early teacher of this was St Gregory of Nyssa, one of the greatest teachers of the Christian tradition. More recently, the conservative Twentieth Century Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar (a favourite of Benedict XVI) has also taught this.

    What the Pope Said in Context

    The Pope’s phrase that we should not describe any religion as false but all as true has, perhaps, been the most quoted and debated. In his words: “all religions are paths to God”. He also compared all religions to languages talking about God and said that every one of them provides a way to God.

    Some have seen the Pope as a pluralist and departing from Catholic teaching by saying this. However, a few points are in order. In line with universalist teaching, Francis may be stressing that every path humans take may be a pathway to God. Benedict XVI actually said that agnostics may be closer to God than many within the Church because they seriously ask questions of faith and God’s existence rather than taking it as routine.

    The former Pope, now Saint, John Paul II, also said there should be “mutual respect”, seemingly downplaying doctrinal differences, when meeting Buddhists and Christians in dialogue. He famously held the first Assisi Day of Prayer in 1986, bringing members of many religions together to pray for peace. Then Cardinal Ratzinger stayed away from this event, seen as a sign of disapproval, but as Benedict XVI, he assembled and led a second Assisi Day of Prayer in 2002 and invited an atheist speaker as part of the line-up of leaders.

    Francis’ words, especially as he is more of a pastoral leader than a theological speculator, seem very much in accord with the words and actions of his predecessors. Moreover, by stressing that everyone was on a path to God, mentioning one God, not many, may well indicate that he, in line with Catholic teaching, sees everyone as converging, if they come in goodwill, towards Jesus and God.

    In Catholic tradition, the important Twentieth Century theologian Karl Rahner, whose work has often been seen as defining the meaning of the Second Vatican Council, used the phrase “anonymous Christians” to mean that anyone within their own religion (or with Benedict, including non-religion) is seeking God in their heart when they act rightly. This accords with the inclusivist teachings of St Paul and the early Christian Father Justin Martyr in the Second Century, who saw Jesus as the Word (Logos) in “Pagans” when they spoke well.

    Pluralist or Inclusivist? The Courage to Speak

    Any competent theologian should be clear that while daring – and in that same speech, Francis urged courage to engage in dialogue – nothing Francis said went against Catholic teaching. Of course, one could quote particular phrases from Church documents or theologians and say that word for word, Francis’ words appear to be out of sync. For instance, the document Domine Iesus describes non-Christian religions as “gravely deficient”. Francis may also, as a Jesuit theologian, be using language that attracts people to the Church’s message, even if it may not seem to match traditional language. Yet, it may fully accord with traditional teaching if understood correctly.

    Neither theology nor Christian faith has ever been about spouting particular dogmas or verbal formulas to make one close to God (although, at times, Christians have regrettably acted and behaved as if this were true). As Benedict said, somebody within the Church can be far from God, and somebody not technically within the Church may be near God, even if they do not even fully profess God’s existence.

    Some may use Francis’ words as a way to attack the Pope, to attack Catholics, or to attack the practice of interreligious dialogue. I suggest, however, that people of goodwill, those seeking the common good of all, as Francis continually urges, should focus upon his call for courage in this same speech. People may twist your words or seek to attack your motives.

    However, interreligious dialogue and mutual coexistence across boundaries of religion and non-religion are, arguably, too important to be discouraged by critical naysayers. Jesus said that many would call his name, but he would not know them. Likewise, people who demand certain doctrinal words, or claim the name of Jesus or other religious leaders to attack others, are not the only voices of religion. Therefore, take courage and remember that the vocation of dialogue is, for Catholics and many others, an important and holy work.

    About the Author

    Dr Paul Hedges is Professor of Interreligious Studies in the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and a Life Member of Clare Hall, University of Cambridge, U.K.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Singapore and Homeland Security / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info