Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
PUBLIC EDUCATION
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      PUBLIC EDUCATIONAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO21085 | History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It
Ong Wei Chong

25 May 2021

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

History matters for the military professional. The overemphasis on pragmatism may however erode the fundamental value of inspiring the military professional as a lifelong learner.

COMMENTARY

IN 1961, the late Sir Michael Howard delivered a RUSI lecture on “The Use and Abuse of Military History”. The context of his lecture was important as it specifically addressed academic concerns of military history being used as a tool of ‘myth-making’.

Like Plato, Howard believed that myths play a useful social function in preparing young soldiers for the realities of war. The creation of a romanticised image of the past in ‘myth-making’ to inspire and sustain action is not an abuse of history, but a different function from the critical examination of military history by an academic historian or strategic thinker.

History as Stories that Connect

In the case of Singapore, its Second World War history is perceived as a usable past that can be used to draw out stories and analogies that connect with the present. Singapore’s Second World War past, the battle and fall of Singapore to be precise, is an example where colonial war memory and remembrance co-exists alongside commemoration and nation-building lessons for an emergent nation-state.

Central to this approach are the stories of wartime resistance and sacrifice that seek to connect the military values of Singapore’s colonial past to a present generation of military leaders that have not experienced war.

Walking past the honour roll of SAFTI Military Institute, home of Singapore’s Officer Corps, an observer will be quick to spot a distinct difference from that of other military academies and colleges ─ an absence of names on the honour roll. The honour roll at SAFTI mirrors the Singapore Story of an ‘accidental nation’ that had to find its feet when independence was thrust on its shoulders in 1965.

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was created out of strategic necessity rather than a revolutionary warfighting past. It is perhaps understandable why Singapore’s Second World past remains a focal point for ‘war stories’ to inspire in the training of officer cadets and junior officers.

This narrow focus that relies on stories of wartime heroism and in certain cases romanticism as inspiration however is different from using military history to develop what military historian Elliot Cohen describes as the ‘historical mind’ ─ ‘a way of thinking that uses history as a mode of inquiry and a framework for thinking about problems’. The ‘historical mind’ approach to military history is a utilitarian one that looks to the history of war and warfare as a guide to decision making.

History Guiding Decision-making

Rather than look to the past for myths that connect, the ‘historical mind’ is employed to educate strategic thinkers in the SAF at the mid-career level. An example is how the Malayan Campaign and the Battle of Singapore is taught at the Goh Keng Swee Command and Staff College (GKS CSC).

Instead of learning stories of wartime heroism from Singapore’s WWII past, students of strategic studies at GKS CSC approach the usable past as an exercise in contextual decision-making that puts them in the shoes of key decision-makers who are required to examine the critical ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions.

Dr Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, is well remembered for his intellectual curiosity. His reading on defence matters spanned from military journals to the classics of strategy ─ Sun Tze, Clausewitz and Liddell Hart. Dr Goh would go so far as to send Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew ‘books and articles, sidelined and flagged, insisting that [the prime minister] must know enough to decide what [he] had to approve’.

This approach lies at the heart of the Clausewitzian approach to military history. To use history as a guide to judgement. One that enables the military leader to refight campaigns and battles in all their ambiguity, contingency, danger and complexity. when students and makers of strategy look to historical examples to illuminate current predicaments, this is where the ‘historical mind’ meets the ‘strategic mind’. It offers the student strategist the prospects of ‘wisdom without tears’, insights without the costly sacrifice that a battlefield education might require.

Looking to military history for a usable past to enhance strategic judgement is essential for the military professional. Its utility however can be limited when historical examples are misused. On the potential to use and abuse military history, Clausewitz warned:

“Historical examples clarify everything and also provide the best kind of proof in the empirical sciences. This is particularly true of the art of war…Historical examples are, however, seldom used to such good effect…To teach the art of war entirely by historical examples…would be an achievement of the utmost value; but it would be more than the work of lifetime.”

History in Lifelong Learning

Before lifelong learning became a buzzword, Clausewitz was living it in the 19th Century. Just as the interpretation of Singapore’s military history is an ongoing process, it is crucial that Singapore’s military professionals embrace Clausewitz’s exhortation of lifelong learning in honing the ‘historical’ and ‘strategic mind’. It is a rigorous lifetime journey, not meant for the intellectual lazy, but the reward of clarifying the complexity of war far outweighs the effort.

There is however one fundamental roadblock in this journey ─ career path demands and curriculum loading that reduces lifelong learning to an exhortation embraced by a selected few. This challenge is not particularly unique to Professional Military Education (PME) in Singapore.

In the last decade, PME administrators and faculty have sought to find the right symbiotic balance between education, training, career-enhancement, curriculum load and rigour.

The question of why history matters for the military profession stems from a central intellectual tradition of using history as a framework for problem solving and inquiry. How this common intellectual tradition manifests itself, however, is influenced and shaped by different norms and values. In the Singapore context, the Singaporean norm of pragmatism hangs heavily. That and the penchant for curriculum loading may impede the very creativity and curiosity that sustains lifelong learning.

Singapore’s founding fathers such as Goh Keng Swee were intellectual giants and lifelong learners who were able to strike that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration in their decision-making.

The overemphasis on pragmatism as a value in PME may have the detrimental effect of eroding the other fundamental value of PME ─ to inspire the military professional as a lifelong learner. Rather than look to Singapore’s colonial past, it may be more useful to rediscover examples in Singapore’s recent history of how its founding fathers created that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration.

About the Author

Ong Wei Chong is an Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He has taught at the command and staff college, advanced school and officer cadet school levels at SAFTI Military Institute, Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
comments powered by Disqus
"History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It" by Ong Wei Chong
In this podcast, Ong Wei Chong, Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at RSIS, shares why history matters for the military professional.

SYNOPSIS

History matters for the military professional. The overemphasis on pragmatism may however erode the fundamental value of inspiring the military professional as a lifelong learner.

COMMENTARY

IN 1961, the late Sir Michael Howard delivered a RUSI lecture on “The Use and Abuse of Military History”. The context of his lecture was important as it specifically addressed academic concerns of military history being used as a tool of ‘myth-making’.

Like Plato, Howard believed that myths play a useful social function in preparing young soldiers for the realities of war. The creation of a romanticised image of the past in ‘myth-making’ to inspire and sustain action is not an abuse of history, but a different function from the critical examination of military history by an academic historian or strategic thinker.

History as Stories that Connect

In the case of Singapore, its Second World War history is perceived as a usable past that can be used to draw out stories and analogies that connect with the present. Singapore’s Second World War past, the battle and fall of Singapore to be precise, is an example where colonial war memory and remembrance co-exists alongside commemoration and nation-building lessons for an emergent nation-state.

Central to this approach are the stories of wartime resistance and sacrifice that seek to connect the military values of Singapore’s colonial past to a present generation of military leaders that have not experienced war.

Walking past the honour roll of SAFTI Military Institute, home of Singapore’s Officer Corps, an observer will be quick to spot a distinct difference from that of other military academies and colleges ─ an absence of names on the honour roll. The honour roll at SAFTI mirrors the Singapore Story of an ‘accidental nation’ that had to find its feet when independence was thrust on its shoulders in 1965.

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was created out of strategic necessity rather than a revolutionary warfighting past. It is perhaps understandable why Singapore’s Second World past remains a focal point for ‘war stories’ to inspire in the training of officer cadets and junior officers.

This narrow focus that relies on stories of wartime heroism and in certain cases romanticism as inspiration however is different from using military history to develop what military historian Elliot Cohen describes as the ‘historical mind’ ─ ‘a way of thinking that uses history as a mode of inquiry and a framework for thinking about problems’. The ‘historical mind’ approach to military history is a utilitarian one that looks to the history of war and warfare as a guide to decision making.

History Guiding Decision-making

Rather than look to the past for myths that connect, the ‘historical mind’ is employed to educate strategic thinkers in the SAF at the mid-career level. An example is how the Malayan Campaign and the Battle of Singapore is taught at the Goh Keng Swee Command and Staff College (GKS CSC).

Instead of learning stories of wartime heroism from Singapore’s WWII past, students of strategic studies at GKS CSC approach the usable past as an exercise in contextual decision-making that puts them in the shoes of key decision-makers who are required to examine the critical ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions.

Dr Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, is well remembered for his intellectual curiosity. His reading on defence matters spanned from military journals to the classics of strategy ─ Sun Tze, Clausewitz and Liddell Hart. Dr Goh would go so far as to send Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew ‘books and articles, sidelined and flagged, insisting that [the prime minister] must know enough to decide what [he] had to approve’.

This approach lies at the heart of the Clausewitzian approach to military history. To use history as a guide to judgement. One that enables the military leader to refight campaigns and battles in all their ambiguity, contingency, danger and complexity. when students and makers of strategy look to historical examples to illuminate current predicaments, this is where the ‘historical mind’ meets the ‘strategic mind’. It offers the student strategist the prospects of ‘wisdom without tears’, insights without the costly sacrifice that a battlefield education might require.

Looking to military history for a usable past to enhance strategic judgement is essential for the military professional. Its utility however can be limited when historical examples are misused. On the potential to use and abuse military history, Clausewitz warned:

“Historical examples clarify everything and also provide the best kind of proof in the empirical sciences. This is particularly true of the art of war…Historical examples are, however, seldom used to such good effect…To teach the art of war entirely by historical examples…would be an achievement of the utmost value; but it would be more than the work of lifetime.”

History in Lifelong Learning

Before lifelong learning became a buzzword, Clausewitz was living it in the 19th Century. Just as the interpretation of Singapore’s military history is an ongoing process, it is crucial that Singapore’s military professionals embrace Clausewitz’s exhortation of lifelong learning in honing the ‘historical’ and ‘strategic mind’. It is a rigorous lifetime journey, not meant for the intellectual lazy, but the reward of clarifying the complexity of war far outweighs the effort.

There is however one fundamental roadblock in this journey ─ career path demands and curriculum loading that reduces lifelong learning to an exhortation embraced by a selected few. This challenge is not particularly unique to Professional Military Education (PME) in Singapore.

In the last decade, PME administrators and faculty have sought to find the right symbiotic balance between education, training, career-enhancement, curriculum load and rigour.

The question of why history matters for the military profession stems from a central intellectual tradition of using history as a framework for problem solving and inquiry. How this common intellectual tradition manifests itself, however, is influenced and shaped by different norms and values. In the Singapore context, the Singaporean norm of pragmatism hangs heavily. That and the penchant for curriculum loading may impede the very creativity and curiosity that sustains lifelong learning.

Singapore’s founding fathers such as Goh Keng Swee were intellectual giants and lifelong learners who were able to strike that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration in their decision-making.

The overemphasis on pragmatism as a value in PME may have the detrimental effect of eroding the other fundamental value of PME ─ to inspire the military professional as a lifelong learner. Rather than look to Singapore’s colonial past, it may be more useful to rediscover examples in Singapore’s recent history of how its founding fathers created that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration.

About the Author

Ong Wei Chong is an Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He has taught at the command and staff college, advanced school and officer cadet school levels at SAFTI Military Institute, Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info