Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Humanitarian Aid as a Weapon: The Militarisation of Relief in Gaza
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO25120 | Humanitarian Aid as a Weapon: The Militarisation of Relief in Gaza
    Hanan Samoud

    03 June 2025

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Israel has turned humanitarian aid in Gaza into a weapon of war – using food, medicine, and so-called “safe corridors” not to save lives, but to control, punish, and displace. Since October 7, 2023, relief has come with strings attached: biometric surveillance, forced movement, and loyalty tests. Aid is no longer delivered by neutral actors but by private firms like the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, run by ex-military and security figures. What was once a symbol of compassion now enforces submission, exposing the harsh truth: in Gaza, humanitarianism has been militarised, and neutrality is a myth.

    COMMENTARY

    The provision of humanitarian aid in Gaza is often framed as a neutral, life-saving intervention – an ethical obligation amid devastation. Yet in reality, it has become a central instrument of Israel’s military strategy, serving not just as a disaster relief operation but as a mechanism of control, domination, and social engineering. Far from being an impartial lifeline, aid in Gaza operates within a framework of coercion, surveillance, and political manipulation, exposing the darker dimensions of an Israeli war campaign which former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert recently described as “war crimes”.

    Israel’s use of humanitarian aid as a strategic tool is not new. Between 2016 and 2018, it employed such aid in Syria to cultivate alliances and exert soft influence. However, in Gaza, particularly since October 7, 2023, the approach has shifted dramatically.

    The Israeli military has turned humanitarian aid distribution into a security operation, designed to sever the bonds between civilians and Hamas, enforce behavioural compliance, and ultimately reshape Gaza’s social fabric. Food and medicine are not distributed freely but are tightly regulated, contingent upon biometric checks and security screenings. This transforms humanitarian assistance from a basic right into a conditional privilege – one that can be granted or withheld to manipulate civilian movement, loyalty, and survival.

    The goal of all humanitarian actions is to help people in need during armed conflicts, natural disasters and other emergencies. The fundamental principles include humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity, and universality. The so-called “humanitarian corridors” serve a dual purpose: framed as safe routes for civilians, they in reality enable forced displacement, pushing Palestinians further south or out of Gaza. After Israel broke the ceasefire in March 2025, it replaced traditional UN-led aid with a militarised system run by private security firms and profit-driven intermediaries. The result is a humanitarian apparatus driven not by neutrality, but by the logic of occupation and control.

    New Kind of Aid and Aid Workers

    One of the most alarming developments in the assault on Gaza is the emergence of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US-backed entity reportedly owned by former IDF members, Israeli businesspeople, and American security agents, registered in both Switzerland and Delaware, USA. Though newly formed, GHF is now in charge of aid distribution through armed contractors of Israeli and US origins. GHF epitomises the merger of humanitarian aid and military strategy, with unofficial backing from well-connected members of the Donald Trump administration.

    Under this system, Palestinians receive a single meal costing US$1.30 once or twice a month, but only after submitting to intrusive biometric surveillance. The GHF’s distribution centres, concentrated in southern Gaza, are not run by impartial aid workers but by Israeli and American security personnel, retired soldiers and former intelligence operatives.

    Unsurprisingly, the UN has denounced this model as a “fig leaf for forced displacement”, with UN aid coordinator Tom Fletcher accusing Israel of weaponising famine for political leverage. GHF director Jake Wood openly acknowledged that the current framework is the only one “acceptable to Israel” – a stark admission that the goal is not to save lives, but to enforce submission. Wood’s recent resignation came amid mounting criticism from the UN and international aid organisations, which argued that the GHF had become incapable of upholding even the most basic humanitarian principles.

    Theoretical Frameworks: Understanding Aid as a Weapon

    To fully grasp Israel’s strategy, we can turn to Game Theory, which examines how actors in conflict adjust their behaviour based on incentives. In Gaza, aid is not a passive resource but an active lever – denied to punish, granted to coerce, and manipulated to fracture civilian solidarity. By controlling who eats and who starves, Israel seeks to dismantle resistance networks and cultivate dependence.

    From a sociological perspective, modern warfare is no longer just about brute force; it also involves soft domination – using aid, healthcare, and infrastructure to reshape power dynamics. When an occupying army distributes food, it reframes itself not as an oppressor but as a provider, while reducing civilians from political agents to dependent recipients. This is not humanitarianism; it is pacification through rationing.

    Conclusion: The Moral Crisis of Militarised Aid

    Humanitarian aid in Gaza has been stripped of its ethical pretences. It is no longer about alleviating suffering but about managing populations, dividing communities into “compliant” versus “criminalised” categories, and restructuring society under the guise of charity. Just as financial debt is weaponised to discipline nations, humanitarian aid in Gaza is deployed to discipline a people – rewarding obedience and punishing defiance.

    This demands a fundamental reassessment of humanitarian principles in conflict zones. When aid becomes a tool of domination, the international community must confront an uncomfortable truth: neutrality is a myth in the face of systemic oppression. The militarisation of relief in Gaza is not an anomaly – it is a blueprint for how power disguises control as compassion. And unless challenged, it will redefine humanitarianism as just another frontier of war.

    The question now is not whether aid will reach Gaza, but who gets to control it – and to what end?

    About the Author

    Hanan Sahmoud is a Palestinian legal researcher and human rights advocate based in Australia, with expertise in Middle Eastern affairs, colonialism, and international law. She is a graduate of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Central Asia / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Middle East and North Africa (MENA) / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Israel has turned humanitarian aid in Gaza into a weapon of war – using food, medicine, and so-called “safe corridors” not to save lives, but to control, punish, and displace. Since October 7, 2023, relief has come with strings attached: biometric surveillance, forced movement, and loyalty tests. Aid is no longer delivered by neutral actors but by private firms like the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, run by ex-military and security figures. What was once a symbol of compassion now enforces submission, exposing the harsh truth: in Gaza, humanitarianism has been militarised, and neutrality is a myth.

    COMMENTARY

    The provision of humanitarian aid in Gaza is often framed as a neutral, life-saving intervention – an ethical obligation amid devastation. Yet in reality, it has become a central instrument of Israel’s military strategy, serving not just as a disaster relief operation but as a mechanism of control, domination, and social engineering. Far from being an impartial lifeline, aid in Gaza operates within a framework of coercion, surveillance, and political manipulation, exposing the darker dimensions of an Israeli war campaign which former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert recently described as “war crimes”.

    Israel’s use of humanitarian aid as a strategic tool is not new. Between 2016 and 2018, it employed such aid in Syria to cultivate alliances and exert soft influence. However, in Gaza, particularly since October 7, 2023, the approach has shifted dramatically.

    The Israeli military has turned humanitarian aid distribution into a security operation, designed to sever the bonds between civilians and Hamas, enforce behavioural compliance, and ultimately reshape Gaza’s social fabric. Food and medicine are not distributed freely but are tightly regulated, contingent upon biometric checks and security screenings. This transforms humanitarian assistance from a basic right into a conditional privilege – one that can be granted or withheld to manipulate civilian movement, loyalty, and survival.

    The goal of all humanitarian actions is to help people in need during armed conflicts, natural disasters and other emergencies. The fundamental principles include humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity, and universality. The so-called “humanitarian corridors” serve a dual purpose: framed as safe routes for civilians, they in reality enable forced displacement, pushing Palestinians further south or out of Gaza. After Israel broke the ceasefire in March 2025, it replaced traditional UN-led aid with a militarised system run by private security firms and profit-driven intermediaries. The result is a humanitarian apparatus driven not by neutrality, but by the logic of occupation and control.

    New Kind of Aid and Aid Workers

    One of the most alarming developments in the assault on Gaza is the emergence of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US-backed entity reportedly owned by former IDF members, Israeli businesspeople, and American security agents, registered in both Switzerland and Delaware, USA. Though newly formed, GHF is now in charge of aid distribution through armed contractors of Israeli and US origins. GHF epitomises the merger of humanitarian aid and military strategy, with unofficial backing from well-connected members of the Donald Trump administration.

    Under this system, Palestinians receive a single meal costing US$1.30 once or twice a month, but only after submitting to intrusive biometric surveillance. The GHF’s distribution centres, concentrated in southern Gaza, are not run by impartial aid workers but by Israeli and American security personnel, retired soldiers and former intelligence operatives.

    Unsurprisingly, the UN has denounced this model as a “fig leaf for forced displacement”, with UN aid coordinator Tom Fletcher accusing Israel of weaponising famine for political leverage. GHF director Jake Wood openly acknowledged that the current framework is the only one “acceptable to Israel” – a stark admission that the goal is not to save lives, but to enforce submission. Wood’s recent resignation came amid mounting criticism from the UN and international aid organisations, which argued that the GHF had become incapable of upholding even the most basic humanitarian principles.

    Theoretical Frameworks: Understanding Aid as a Weapon

    To fully grasp Israel’s strategy, we can turn to Game Theory, which examines how actors in conflict adjust their behaviour based on incentives. In Gaza, aid is not a passive resource but an active lever – denied to punish, granted to coerce, and manipulated to fracture civilian solidarity. By controlling who eats and who starves, Israel seeks to dismantle resistance networks and cultivate dependence.

    From a sociological perspective, modern warfare is no longer just about brute force; it also involves soft domination – using aid, healthcare, and infrastructure to reshape power dynamics. When an occupying army distributes food, it reframes itself not as an oppressor but as a provider, while reducing civilians from political agents to dependent recipients. This is not humanitarianism; it is pacification through rationing.

    Conclusion: The Moral Crisis of Militarised Aid

    Humanitarian aid in Gaza has been stripped of its ethical pretences. It is no longer about alleviating suffering but about managing populations, dividing communities into “compliant” versus “criminalised” categories, and restructuring society under the guise of charity. Just as financial debt is weaponised to discipline nations, humanitarian aid in Gaza is deployed to discipline a people – rewarding obedience and punishing defiance.

    This demands a fundamental reassessment of humanitarian principles in conflict zones. When aid becomes a tool of domination, the international community must confront an uncomfortable truth: neutrality is a myth in the face of systemic oppression. The militarisation of relief in Gaza is not an anomaly – it is a blueprint for how power disguises control as compassion. And unless challenged, it will redefine humanitarianism as just another frontier of war.

    The question now is not whether aid will reach Gaza, but who gets to control it – and to what end?

    About the Author

    Hanan Sahmoud is a Palestinian legal researcher and human rights advocate based in Australia, with expertise in Middle Eastern affairs, colonialism, and international law. She is a graduate of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info