Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Public Education
About Public Education
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      Public EducationAbout Public Education
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • Indonesia’s Growing Halal Market: Impact on the Economy
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO18199 | Indonesia’s Growing Halal Market: Impact on the Economy
Syafiq Hasyim

28 November 2018

download pdf

Synopsis

Indonesia remains the largest Muslim country in the world in terms of population. In 2019, Indonesia will officially implement a law on Halal Product Assurance. This legal framework will potentially turn Indonesia into the largest halal market in the world. What are its implications?

Commentary

HALAL, OR what is permissible in Islam, has clearly become a contested discourse in the Indonesian public sphere since the 1990s. The awareness of consuming halal products has been obligatory for Indonesian Muslims for a very long time. “Halalness” became an issue in Indonesia’s public and legal spheres since traces of pork-enzyme use were discovered in the milk products of a certain brand called DANCOW in East Java.

The Muslim consumers protested the company because their drink was discovered through the research of Brawijaya University, Malang, to be contaminated with impurity (najis). The Suharto government instructed the Indonesia Ulama Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI) to intervene and help find a solution. The issue was affecting economic stability in East Java especially for milk farmers who were not able to sell their products to the company.

Genesis of the Halal Institution

MUI came with a new idea to establish an institution that would have the responsibility and task to investigate, determine and watch the lawfulness of such products and goods available for sale in the public domain. In 1989, MUI established the Research Institute on Food, Medicine and Cosmetics, better known by its Indonesian acronym LPPOM (Lembaga Pengkajian Pangan, Obat-Obatan dan Kosmetika) with a mandate to become a halal institution.

Although LPPOM-MUI was established with the full support of the Suharto administration, this institution was not given the power to compel producers and vendors to halal-certify their products. As a non-state organisation (MUI), the LPPOM-MUI could only flex its cultural and religious influence and project its moral standing on the Indonesian Muslim community in general, and vendors and producers of goods (food, drink, medicines and cosmetics) in particular, about the importance of the “halalness” of goods.

Despite its limited authority and capacity, after three decades, the LPPOM-MUI has claimed success in cultivating the halal lifestyle not only among Indonesian consumers but also the general market players. This is evident from the number of vendors and producers who seek halal certificates for their products from LPPOM-MUI.

The LPPOM-MUI not only operates at the national level, but also internationally. Many international certifiers from European countries, Australia, America, Turkey and Muslim countries come to seek permission from LPPOM-MUI to become international halal certifiers on behalf of LPPOM-MUI.

The latest accomplishment of MUI was its ability to convince the lawmakers of Indonesia to legislate State Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance.

Regulating Halal

Indonesia is relatively late in regulating halal products through state policy in comparison to Malaysia, Turkey, and other Muslim countries. Since independence, Indonesian Muslims, as the primary stakeholders of “halalness” in the country, never had an issue with what they consumed and produced. There was therefore no consciousness of a need to draft such a national ruling guiding them on what is halal and non-halal (lawful and unlawful).

“Halalness” or otherwise was considered a private matter that Indonesian Muslim consumers could determine through self-control, without the need for state intervention. Proposing a state law on halal can also be seen as elevating a sharia matter – about halal and non-halal — into public law.

However, following the development of the halal market, on the one hand, and the growing piety of Muslims, in general, the lawmakers of Indonesia felt the importance of having a state law on halal issues. State Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance was officially legislated in 2014; in 2019 this law will be fully enacted.

This law stipulates that having a halal certificate is an obligation and mandatory for all actors that produce goods. For those who disagree with marking their products with the halal label, their choice is to merely declare their products and goods as non-halal (haram, unlawful) products.

It means there are only two categories of commodities and products in Indonesia: halal (lawful) and non-halal or haram (unlawful). Although the non-halal label does not necessarily indicate the unlawfulness of such products, in reality such a labelling can create a negative image in the market. The public and consumers will judge them by not buying and consuming non-halal commodities and products.

Expansion of Halal Space: Market and Islamic Piety

The consequence of the new law on halal is the expansion of the halal space. This expansion covers two issues; the creation of a new market and the significant rise of sharia-based piety in Muslim consumption. On the creation of market, when the new law was officially declared, the response from the business community was not quite positive.

Businessmen and entrepreneurs do not want to be forced by law to spend extra for getting halal certificates, in relation to their potential profit from the halal market. However, they are aware of the halal market potential because 86% of the Indonesian population is Muslim and this is the largest Muslim market in Asia.

On the rise of sharia-based piety, the enactment of this law is potentially understood and is acknowledged as a manifestation of the growing Islamic consciousness in Indonesia. Halal is not only about extending market space for Muslim people to eat, drink, and consume goods, but also about extending the obligatory practice of sharia.

This assumption is realistic, considering that the enactment of this law is going together with the rise of Islamic piety and Islamic identity politics in the last decade in the Indonesian public sphere.

What Should be Anticipated?

There are two things that can be anticipated. First, State Law No. 33/2014 on halal does not provide negotiable room for those who disagree with this law. It is true that the content of the law is very sharia, but this law also provides a battlefield not only for Muslims, but also for others.

The market is not about things Islamic and un-Islamic, but the market is also about how to produce commodities that attract people to buy and consume. This is the commercial side of the law on halal.

Second, the economic implication of the halal policy is that there will be an increase and escalation of Muslim entrepreneurship in the economic field in Indonesia. The number of SME actors in Indonesia is around 3.6 million and the majority of them are Muslim entrepreneurs and businessmen.

The state law on halal assurance states that the state will subsidise the cost of halal certificates for SMEs. It means that the consequence of this state law is the possible mushrooming of Muslim entrepreneurship and businesses due to state support.

This potential increase in the space of Muslim business will have an impact on the shifting economic structure, from a concentration on high capital business to small and middle enterprises in the future.

About the Author

Syafiq Hasyim is a Visiting Fellow at the Indonesia Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Country and Region Studies / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific
comments powered by Disqus

Synopsis

Indonesia remains the largest Muslim country in the world in terms of population. In 2019, Indonesia will officially implement a law on Halal Product Assurance. This legal framework will potentially turn Indonesia into the largest halal market in the world. What are its implications?

Commentary

HALAL, OR what is permissible in Islam, has clearly become a contested discourse in the Indonesian public sphere since the 1990s. The awareness of consuming halal products has been obligatory for Indonesian Muslims for a very long time. “Halalness” became an issue in Indonesia’s public and legal spheres since traces of pork-enzyme use were discovered in the milk products of a certain brand called DANCOW in East Java.

The Muslim consumers protested the company because their drink was discovered through the research of Brawijaya University, Malang, to be contaminated with impurity (najis). The Suharto government instructed the Indonesia Ulama Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI) to intervene and help find a solution. The issue was affecting economic stability in East Java especially for milk farmers who were not able to sell their products to the company.

Genesis of the Halal Institution

MUI came with a new idea to establish an institution that would have the responsibility and task to investigate, determine and watch the lawfulness of such products and goods available for sale in the public domain. In 1989, MUI established the Research Institute on Food, Medicine and Cosmetics, better known by its Indonesian acronym LPPOM (Lembaga Pengkajian Pangan, Obat-Obatan dan Kosmetika) with a mandate to become a halal institution.

Although LPPOM-MUI was established with the full support of the Suharto administration, this institution was not given the power to compel producers and vendors to halal-certify their products. As a non-state organisation (MUI), the LPPOM-MUI could only flex its cultural and religious influence and project its moral standing on the Indonesian Muslim community in general, and vendors and producers of goods (food, drink, medicines and cosmetics) in particular, about the importance of the “halalness” of goods.

Despite its limited authority and capacity, after three decades, the LPPOM-MUI has claimed success in cultivating the halal lifestyle not only among Indonesian consumers but also the general market players. This is evident from the number of vendors and producers who seek halal certificates for their products from LPPOM-MUI.

The LPPOM-MUI not only operates at the national level, but also internationally. Many international certifiers from European countries, Australia, America, Turkey and Muslim countries come to seek permission from LPPOM-MUI to become international halal certifiers on behalf of LPPOM-MUI.

The latest accomplishment of MUI was its ability to convince the lawmakers of Indonesia to legislate State Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance.

Regulating Halal

Indonesia is relatively late in regulating halal products through state policy in comparison to Malaysia, Turkey, and other Muslim countries. Since independence, Indonesian Muslims, as the primary stakeholders of “halalness” in the country, never had an issue with what they consumed and produced. There was therefore no consciousness of a need to draft such a national ruling guiding them on what is halal and non-halal (lawful and unlawful).

“Halalness” or otherwise was considered a private matter that Indonesian Muslim consumers could determine through self-control, without the need for state intervention. Proposing a state law on halal can also be seen as elevating a sharia matter – about halal and non-halal — into public law.

However, following the development of the halal market, on the one hand, and the growing piety of Muslims, in general, the lawmakers of Indonesia felt the importance of having a state law on halal issues. State Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance was officially legislated in 2014; in 2019 this law will be fully enacted.

This law stipulates that having a halal certificate is an obligation and mandatory for all actors that produce goods. For those who disagree with marking their products with the halal label, their choice is to merely declare their products and goods as non-halal (haram, unlawful) products.

It means there are only two categories of commodities and products in Indonesia: halal (lawful) and non-halal or haram (unlawful). Although the non-halal label does not necessarily indicate the unlawfulness of such products, in reality such a labelling can create a negative image in the market. The public and consumers will judge them by not buying and consuming non-halal commodities and products.

Expansion of Halal Space: Market and Islamic Piety

The consequence of the new law on halal is the expansion of the halal space. This expansion covers two issues; the creation of a new market and the significant rise of sharia-based piety in Muslim consumption. On the creation of market, when the new law was officially declared, the response from the business community was not quite positive.

Businessmen and entrepreneurs do not want to be forced by law to spend extra for getting halal certificates, in relation to their potential profit from the halal market. However, they are aware of the halal market potential because 86% of the Indonesian population is Muslim and this is the largest Muslim market in Asia.

On the rise of sharia-based piety, the enactment of this law is potentially understood and is acknowledged as a manifestation of the growing Islamic consciousness in Indonesia. Halal is not only about extending market space for Muslim people to eat, drink, and consume goods, but also about extending the obligatory practice of sharia.

This assumption is realistic, considering that the enactment of this law is going together with the rise of Islamic piety and Islamic identity politics in the last decade in the Indonesian public sphere.

What Should be Anticipated?

There are two things that can be anticipated. First, State Law No. 33/2014 on halal does not provide negotiable room for those who disagree with this law. It is true that the content of the law is very sharia, but this law also provides a battlefield not only for Muslims, but also for others.

The market is not about things Islamic and un-Islamic, but the market is also about how to produce commodities that attract people to buy and consume. This is the commercial side of the law on halal.

Second, the economic implication of the halal policy is that there will be an increase and escalation of Muslim entrepreneurship in the economic field in Indonesia. The number of SME actors in Indonesia is around 3.6 million and the majority of them are Muslim entrepreneurs and businessmen.

The state law on halal assurance states that the state will subsidise the cost of halal certificates for SMEs. It means that the consequence of this state law is the possible mushrooming of Muslim entrepreneurship and businesses due to state support.

This potential increase in the space of Muslim business will have an impact on the shifting economic structure, from a concentration on high capital business to small and middle enterprises in the future.

About the Author

Syafiq Hasyim is a Visiting Fellow at the Indonesia Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Country and Region Studies

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info