Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • Internet Governance: Priority Issues for ASEAN
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO24019 | Internet Governance: Priority Issues for ASEAN
Tan E Guang Eugene, Helena Yixin Huang

09 February 2024

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

Effective Internet governance is vital in ensuring a secure, interconnected, and digitally inclusive system that fosters economic growth and regional integration. This commentary discusses how ASEAN can play a bigger role in developing the rules, especially with its focus on speeding up digital development and transformation in the region.

thomas jensen h3vT1Kp0FxA unsplash
Source: Unsplash

COMMENTARY

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines Internet governance as the “complementary development and application by governments, the private sector, civil society and the technical community, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and activities that shape the evolution and use of the Internet”. This covers many of the daily legal, economic, and social issues that states grapple with.

Internet governance is also the term now used to discuss issues such as domain names and Internet Protocol addresses, technical standards, cybersecurity, data privacy, digital rights, access and inclusion, and content regulation.

Since the advent of the Internet in the 1990s, states have tried to find ways to govern issues such as who should assign domain names, how information found on the Internet is to be regulated or controlled, what constitutes a cybercrime, the Internet’s role in development, etc. However, there are Internet libertarians who believe that the Internet should remain as free of government intervention as possible, and not be a space to be governed.

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a good example of how complex the issue has become. Currently in its 18th iteration, the debates over various issues and differences on how Internet governance should take place have become more complicated and nuanced as technology progresses and matures.

We are presently no closer to bridging the tension that exists between the free, open, multi-stakeholder model championed by the West and the multilateral model preferred by states that are more paternal or authoritarian.

Due to the extensive impact of the Internet, the issues that Internet governance needs to resolve have become global and can affect every user and being on this planet. Internet governance is now not a choice, but a collective and strategic necessity that all states and stakeholders need to undertake in a collaborative effort.

This is especially important now at a time when more states are thinking about undertaking digital transformation. There is a need to ensure that the requirements and rights of all states are protected. Singapore and the ASEAN member states (AMS) are not exceptions to this.

Internet Governance in ASEAN

ASEAN’s digital economy and digital society ambitions are detailed in the ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025 (ADM2025). The regional grouping has made notable headway in addressing certain Internet governance issues, especially in areas linked to digital transformation and the development of the digital ecosystem.

ASEAN has, in fact, been taking steps on Internet governance from as early as 2016. For example, at the 2016 Asian Telecommunications and Information Technology Ministers Meeting, the Framework on Personal Data Protection was adopted to “strengthen the protection of personal data in ASEAN…with a view to contribute to the promotion and growth of regional and global trade and the flow of information”.

ASEAN has also changed how it deals with Internet governance, choosing to address it as a digital and digitisation issue rather than just a matter involving info-communication technologies. To enable this, ASEAN expanded the scope of its ASEAN Telecommunications and Information Technology Ministers Meeting (TELMIN) to become the ASEAN Digital Ministers Meeting (ADGMIN) in October 2019. This was not a cosmetic name change as ASEAN was actively seeking to govern the Internet better.

In 2021, as the digital economy continued to expand in the region, the ADGMIN adopted the ASEAN Data Management Framework to establish common frameworks and appropriate data protection measures. Besides this, it has also considered developing regional guidelines beyond the scope of Internet governance, such as those for AI governance and ethics.

Next Steps for ASEAN

It is uncommon for a diverse group of states with different levels of digital maturity to be interested in, and to play an active role in Internet governance. To strike while the iron is hot, ASEAN should and can do more to tackle the challenges of digital transformation and to enact more efficient Internet governance measures in the region, and in turn, share its experience globally.

In our opinion, the top three Internet governance issues that ASEAN should give priority to in 2024 are access and inclusion, cybersecurity cooperation, and content regulation.

Access and Inclusion

Firstly, there is an urgent need for the AMS to invest in infrastructure to improve connectivity, particularly in rural areas. The ASEAN Secretariat publication, ASEAN Rapid Assessment: The Impact of COVID-19 on Livelihoods Across ASEAN (2020), observed that “only 53% of rural children and adolescents have an internet connection” and “while mobile penetration is high in most ASEAN countries, many still do not have access to unlimited internet on their mobile devices”.

AMS also needs to explore domestic policies for Internet access to be made more affordable, while at the same time promoting digital literacy and skills development to ensure that their populations are ready for technological advancements that will occur in the near future.

Cybersecurity Cooperation

Secondly, ASEAN needs to continue strengthening its work in cybersecurity cooperation to cope with digitalisation in the region. ASEAN has developed the ASEAN Cybersecurity Cooperation Strategy to enhance cybersecurity cooperation among its member states.

In addition, the ASEAN-Singapore Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence (ASCCE) and the ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity Capacity Building Centre (AJCCBC) were set up to support cybersecurity cooperation and collaboration in the region.

Cybersecurity cooperation mostly takes on the form of information sharing, capacity building, and cooperation in research and development. For ASEAN to progress as an entity, more collaboration and harmonisation, and knowledge sharing are needed.

Content Regulation

Finally, ASEAN needs to pay attention to the challenges of content regulation as member states increase their connectivity. Content regulation is a delicate task requiring a multi-stakeholder approach that involves governments, civil society, think tanks, and tech companies in the policy discussion and development process.

ASEAN has already published the ASEAN Guideline on Management of Government Information in Combating Fake News and Disinformation in the Media (2023) to provide  guidelines for AMS. However, we should note that this only addresses fake news and disinformation and does not include the control of harmful online content, which may conflict with freedom of expression issues.

ASEAN could consider involving more stakeholders to leverage different expertise and resources for Internet governance and safer and more effective use of the Internet.

Conclusion

These three Internet governance issues are areas that ASEAN has already started work on and can provide global leadership for. Successfully resolved, they could form a development blueprint for developing states desiring to avoid tensions in cyberspace and bring ASEAN closer to what it hopes to achieve through ADM2025.

About the Authors

Eugene E. G. Tan is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Helena Yixin Huang is an Associate Research Fellow in the Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office at RSIS.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Technology and Future Issues / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
comments powered by Disqus

SYNOPSIS

Effective Internet governance is vital in ensuring a secure, interconnected, and digitally inclusive system that fosters economic growth and regional integration. This commentary discusses how ASEAN can play a bigger role in developing the rules, especially with its focus on speeding up digital development and transformation in the region.

thomas jensen h3vT1Kp0FxA unsplash
Source: Unsplash

COMMENTARY

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines Internet governance as the “complementary development and application by governments, the private sector, civil society and the technical community, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and activities that shape the evolution and use of the Internet”. This covers many of the daily legal, economic, and social issues that states grapple with.

Internet governance is also the term now used to discuss issues such as domain names and Internet Protocol addresses, technical standards, cybersecurity, data privacy, digital rights, access and inclusion, and content regulation.

Since the advent of the Internet in the 1990s, states have tried to find ways to govern issues such as who should assign domain names, how information found on the Internet is to be regulated or controlled, what constitutes a cybercrime, the Internet’s role in development, etc. However, there are Internet libertarians who believe that the Internet should remain as free of government intervention as possible, and not be a space to be governed.

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a good example of how complex the issue has become. Currently in its 18th iteration, the debates over various issues and differences on how Internet governance should take place have become more complicated and nuanced as technology progresses and matures.

We are presently no closer to bridging the tension that exists between the free, open, multi-stakeholder model championed by the West and the multilateral model preferred by states that are more paternal or authoritarian.

Due to the extensive impact of the Internet, the issues that Internet governance needs to resolve have become global and can affect every user and being on this planet. Internet governance is now not a choice, but a collective and strategic necessity that all states and stakeholders need to undertake in a collaborative effort.

This is especially important now at a time when more states are thinking about undertaking digital transformation. There is a need to ensure that the requirements and rights of all states are protected. Singapore and the ASEAN member states (AMS) are not exceptions to this.

Internet Governance in ASEAN

ASEAN’s digital economy and digital society ambitions are detailed in the ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025 (ADM2025). The regional grouping has made notable headway in addressing certain Internet governance issues, especially in areas linked to digital transformation and the development of the digital ecosystem.

ASEAN has, in fact, been taking steps on Internet governance from as early as 2016. For example, at the 2016 Asian Telecommunications and Information Technology Ministers Meeting, the Framework on Personal Data Protection was adopted to “strengthen the protection of personal data in ASEAN…with a view to contribute to the promotion and growth of regional and global trade and the flow of information”.

ASEAN has also changed how it deals with Internet governance, choosing to address it as a digital and digitisation issue rather than just a matter involving info-communication technologies. To enable this, ASEAN expanded the scope of its ASEAN Telecommunications and Information Technology Ministers Meeting (TELMIN) to become the ASEAN Digital Ministers Meeting (ADGMIN) in October 2019. This was not a cosmetic name change as ASEAN was actively seeking to govern the Internet better.

In 2021, as the digital economy continued to expand in the region, the ADGMIN adopted the ASEAN Data Management Framework to establish common frameworks and appropriate data protection measures. Besides this, it has also considered developing regional guidelines beyond the scope of Internet governance, such as those for AI governance and ethics.

Next Steps for ASEAN

It is uncommon for a diverse group of states with different levels of digital maturity to be interested in, and to play an active role in Internet governance. To strike while the iron is hot, ASEAN should and can do more to tackle the challenges of digital transformation and to enact more efficient Internet governance measures in the region, and in turn, share its experience globally.

In our opinion, the top three Internet governance issues that ASEAN should give priority to in 2024 are access and inclusion, cybersecurity cooperation, and content regulation.

Access and Inclusion

Firstly, there is an urgent need for the AMS to invest in infrastructure to improve connectivity, particularly in rural areas. The ASEAN Secretariat publication, ASEAN Rapid Assessment: The Impact of COVID-19 on Livelihoods Across ASEAN (2020), observed that “only 53% of rural children and adolescents have an internet connection” and “while mobile penetration is high in most ASEAN countries, many still do not have access to unlimited internet on their mobile devices”.

AMS also needs to explore domestic policies for Internet access to be made more affordable, while at the same time promoting digital literacy and skills development to ensure that their populations are ready for technological advancements that will occur in the near future.

Cybersecurity Cooperation

Secondly, ASEAN needs to continue strengthening its work in cybersecurity cooperation to cope with digitalisation in the region. ASEAN has developed the ASEAN Cybersecurity Cooperation Strategy to enhance cybersecurity cooperation among its member states.

In addition, the ASEAN-Singapore Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence (ASCCE) and the ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity Capacity Building Centre (AJCCBC) were set up to support cybersecurity cooperation and collaboration in the region.

Cybersecurity cooperation mostly takes on the form of information sharing, capacity building, and cooperation in research and development. For ASEAN to progress as an entity, more collaboration and harmonisation, and knowledge sharing are needed.

Content Regulation

Finally, ASEAN needs to pay attention to the challenges of content regulation as member states increase their connectivity. Content regulation is a delicate task requiring a multi-stakeholder approach that involves governments, civil society, think tanks, and tech companies in the policy discussion and development process.

ASEAN has already published the ASEAN Guideline on Management of Government Information in Combating Fake News and Disinformation in the Media (2023) to provide  guidelines for AMS. However, we should note that this only addresses fake news and disinformation and does not include the control of harmful online content, which may conflict with freedom of expression issues.

ASEAN could consider involving more stakeholders to leverage different expertise and resources for Internet governance and safer and more effective use of the Internet.

Conclusion

These three Internet governance issues are areas that ASEAN has already started work on and can provide global leadership for. Successfully resolved, they could form a development blueprint for developing states desiring to avoid tensions in cyberspace and bring ASEAN closer to what it hopes to achieve through ADM2025.

About the Authors

Eugene E. G. Tan is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Helena Yixin Huang is an Associate Research Fellow in the Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office at RSIS.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Technology and Future Issues

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info