Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Xi’s ‘Balance of Interest Solution’: Pre-empting an Asian NATO?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22033 | Xi’s ‘Balance of Interest Solution’: Pre-empting an Asian NATO?
    P. S. Suryanarayana

    31 March 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Chinese President Xi Jinping has suggested a “balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture” to manage the fallout of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and to ensure stability regionally and worldwide. He seems to suggest that the balance of national interests, not balance of power, is better at promoting a regional order for Asia or East Asia too.

    COMMENTARY

    US PRESIDENT Joe Biden spoke to his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on 18 March 2022 about “consequences if China provides material support to Russia” in its ongoing war against Ukraine. Xi emphasised, on his part, the need for “major countries to respect each other”. In his view, the best formula for an “enduring solution” is to “build step-by-step a balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture for the region and for the world”.

    By asking major countries to “refrain from bloc confrontation”, Xi showed disfavour for the balance-of-power approach to an “enduring solution”. He also urged Biden to help “ease the security concerns [a key national interest] of both Russia and Ukraine”. Together, these two aspects of an “enduring solution” reflect Xi’s advocacy of the viable balancing of relevant national interests.

    vid call
    Video call between President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Joe Biden, Xinhua News

    Credibility of Xi’s Proposal

    In emphasising the building of peace “step-by-step” in Europe and in the world, President Xi has also signalled the need for an Asian security architecture. Like Russia, China is wary of Washington’s expansionist moves into areas that directly affect Beijing’s strategic interests – Asia. Much like Russia, China is concerned about the ‘expansion’ of the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in Europe.

    Furthermore, by not endorsing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war, despite China and Russia being each other’s “strategic anchor”, Xi has sought to enhance his credibility as an equidistant leader more inclined towards world peace than global dominance. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, too, had told the international media in Beijing on 7 March 2022 that his country was adopting an “objective and impartial attitude” towards the invasion.

    This was evident even earlier when China abstained from voting on the US-sponsored resolution against Russia in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on 26 February.

    Putin’s objective was “demilitarisation…of the Ukrainian state”. In a veiled rebuttal, Chinese Ambassador Zhang Jun told UNSC that the security of one state could not come at the expense of another state. Supporting Russia, he also said that “Ukraine should become a bridge between East and West, not an outpost” of NATO.

    China’s Concern: An Emerging ‘5-4-3-2’ Indo-Pacific NATO

    To be sure, China has begun to sense multiple US strategies to contain it through the “disruptive” process of creating a NATO-like entity in Asia. America’s “real goal” was to “establish an Indo-Pacific version of NATO”, Wang said on 7 March.

    By “strengthening” the Five Eyes, “peddling” the Quad, “piecing together” AUKUS, and “tightening” bilateral military alliances, Washington was already creating a “sinister” “five-four-three-two formation”, Wang argued.

    Beijing monitors both the multipurpose Quad (comprising the US, Japan, India, Australia) and AUKUS, a military network among the US, the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. ‘Five Eyes’ is a grouping of the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand; they monitor China in the new science-and-technology domains.

    What makes China suspicious of the US? During the Obama presidency, President Xi explored the prospect of forming a US-China Group of Two (G2) at the apex of global governance. But, despite China’s rapid rise during 2009-2016 and America’s slowing dynamism as a superpower, Obama was not responsive. There is no US-China G2 at the UN or elsewhere today.

    Instead, China recognises that “the world is becoming a multipolar one” today. It is clear, therefore, that Asia too will need a balanced and effective security architecture to manage multiple national aspirations, as in Xi’s advocacy for Europe and the world.

    Balance of Interests, Not Balance of Power

    Balancing national interests will be more challenging than measuring balance of power which is largely sustained by military inventories and technology capabilities. However, multilateral diplomacy, at its baseline, is driven by national interest as perceived by each protagonist. Any ‘security architecture’ for Asia can, therefore, be negotiated on the basis of national interests.

    As the aspiring pivotal Asian power, China may have to take the lead in striving for the creation of a balanced, effective, and sustainable security mechanism for Asia. The downside is that China itself is seen as an expansionist power, especially in the South China Sea.

    The strategic situation in Asia is, therefore, complex. NATO is a living military alliance with an arguable ‘expansionist’ appetite in Europe. In contrast, the “Indo-Pacific version of NATO” is only a potential entity which, however, dominates Beijing’s worldview today.

    Japan, India, and South Korea – potential members of an “Indo-Pacific version of NATO” – matter to China in its vision of a multipolar Asia too. However, Beijing sees them as being wary of China and friendly towards the US.

    Not a Potential Paper Tiger

    Should a US-led military alliance (with or without India) emerge, say, as an Indo-Pacific treaty organisation, it will not be a paper-tiger. But balance of interests can still be the best basis for pragmatic interactions between China and this new entity (if it emerges).

    This scenario may resemble a bipolar world divided between a US-led Indo-Pacific formation and China (with or without allies or partners like Russia and Pakistan). However, Beijing appears willing to settle for a multipolar Asian order today (as in Wang’s exposition) in the absence of a collaborative US-China G2.

    Notions of either Washington or Beijing triumphing over the other are also difficult to imagine. “The need for common-sense guardrails” has been emphasised by Biden for US competition with China. But, by portraying Beijing’s security concerns in stark US-centric terminology, Wang is taking the debate beyond Washington’s ‘common-sense’.

    The ASEAN-initiated East Asia Summit (EAS) is probably a suitable forum to brain-storm the feasibility of a ‘balanced security architecture’ for Asia or at least East Asia. Whether China or some other stakeholder takes the lead for such a quest, it will be compatible with Xi’s proposal for regional and global security models.

    About the Author

    P.S. Suryanarayana is Adjunct Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is author of ‘The Elusive Tipping Point: China-India Ties for a New Order’, World Scientific, Singapore, 2021. He would like to thank the Editor RSIS Commentary for his valuable suggestions.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Chinese President Xi Jinping has suggested a “balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture” to manage the fallout of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and to ensure stability regionally and worldwide. He seems to suggest that the balance of national interests, not balance of power, is better at promoting a regional order for Asia or East Asia too.

    COMMENTARY

    US PRESIDENT Joe Biden spoke to his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on 18 March 2022 about “consequences if China provides material support to Russia” in its ongoing war against Ukraine. Xi emphasised, on his part, the need for “major countries to respect each other”. In his view, the best formula for an “enduring solution” is to “build step-by-step a balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture for the region and for the world”.

    By asking major countries to “refrain from bloc confrontation”, Xi showed disfavour for the balance-of-power approach to an “enduring solution”. He also urged Biden to help “ease the security concerns [a key national interest] of both Russia and Ukraine”. Together, these two aspects of an “enduring solution” reflect Xi’s advocacy of the viable balancing of relevant national interests.

    vid call
    Video call between President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Joe Biden, Xinhua News

    Credibility of Xi’s Proposal

    In emphasising the building of peace “step-by-step” in Europe and in the world, President Xi has also signalled the need for an Asian security architecture. Like Russia, China is wary of Washington’s expansionist moves into areas that directly affect Beijing’s strategic interests – Asia. Much like Russia, China is concerned about the ‘expansion’ of the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in Europe.

    Furthermore, by not endorsing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war, despite China and Russia being each other’s “strategic anchor”, Xi has sought to enhance his credibility as an equidistant leader more inclined towards world peace than global dominance. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, too, had told the international media in Beijing on 7 March 2022 that his country was adopting an “objective and impartial attitude” towards the invasion.

    This was evident even earlier when China abstained from voting on the US-sponsored resolution against Russia in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on 26 February.

    Putin’s objective was “demilitarisation…of the Ukrainian state”. In a veiled rebuttal, Chinese Ambassador Zhang Jun told UNSC that the security of one state could not come at the expense of another state. Supporting Russia, he also said that “Ukraine should become a bridge between East and West, not an outpost” of NATO.

    China’s Concern: An Emerging ‘5-4-3-2’ Indo-Pacific NATO

    To be sure, China has begun to sense multiple US strategies to contain it through the “disruptive” process of creating a NATO-like entity in Asia. America’s “real goal” was to “establish an Indo-Pacific version of NATO”, Wang said on 7 March.

    By “strengthening” the Five Eyes, “peddling” the Quad, “piecing together” AUKUS, and “tightening” bilateral military alliances, Washington was already creating a “sinister” “five-four-three-two formation”, Wang argued.

    Beijing monitors both the multipurpose Quad (comprising the US, Japan, India, Australia) and AUKUS, a military network among the US, the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. ‘Five Eyes’ is a grouping of the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand; they monitor China in the new science-and-technology domains.

    What makes China suspicious of the US? During the Obama presidency, President Xi explored the prospect of forming a US-China Group of Two (G2) at the apex of global governance. But, despite China’s rapid rise during 2009-2016 and America’s slowing dynamism as a superpower, Obama was not responsive. There is no US-China G2 at the UN or elsewhere today.

    Instead, China recognises that “the world is becoming a multipolar one” today. It is clear, therefore, that Asia too will need a balanced and effective security architecture to manage multiple national aspirations, as in Xi’s advocacy for Europe and the world.

    Balance of Interests, Not Balance of Power

    Balancing national interests will be more challenging than measuring balance of power which is largely sustained by military inventories and technology capabilities. However, multilateral diplomacy, at its baseline, is driven by national interest as perceived by each protagonist. Any ‘security architecture’ for Asia can, therefore, be negotiated on the basis of national interests.

    As the aspiring pivotal Asian power, China may have to take the lead in striving for the creation of a balanced, effective, and sustainable security mechanism for Asia. The downside is that China itself is seen as an expansionist power, especially in the South China Sea.

    The strategic situation in Asia is, therefore, complex. NATO is a living military alliance with an arguable ‘expansionist’ appetite in Europe. In contrast, the “Indo-Pacific version of NATO” is only a potential entity which, however, dominates Beijing’s worldview today.

    Japan, India, and South Korea – potential members of an “Indo-Pacific version of NATO” – matter to China in its vision of a multipolar Asia too. However, Beijing sees them as being wary of China and friendly towards the US.

    Not a Potential Paper Tiger

    Should a US-led military alliance (with or without India) emerge, say, as an Indo-Pacific treaty organisation, it will not be a paper-tiger. But balance of interests can still be the best basis for pragmatic interactions between China and this new entity (if it emerges).

    This scenario may resemble a bipolar world divided between a US-led Indo-Pacific formation and China (with or without allies or partners like Russia and Pakistan). However, Beijing appears willing to settle for a multipolar Asian order today (as in Wang’s exposition) in the absence of a collaborative US-China G2.

    Notions of either Washington or Beijing triumphing over the other are also difficult to imagine. “The need for common-sense guardrails” has been emphasised by Biden for US competition with China. But, by portraying Beijing’s security concerns in stark US-centric terminology, Wang is taking the debate beyond Washington’s ‘common-sense’.

    The ASEAN-initiated East Asia Summit (EAS) is probably a suitable forum to brain-storm the feasibility of a ‘balanced security architecture’ for Asia or at least East Asia. Whether China or some other stakeholder takes the lead for such a quest, it will be compatible with Xi’s proposal for regional and global security models.

    About the Author

    P.S. Suryanarayana is Adjunct Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is author of ‘The Elusive Tipping Point: China-India Ties for a New Order’, World Scientific, Singapore, 2021. He would like to thank the Editor RSIS Commentary for his valuable suggestions.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / International Politics and Security / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info