Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP21002 | Creating Synergies between the ADMM and Sub-regional Arrangements
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP21002 | Creating Synergies between the ADMM and Sub-regional Arrangements
    Sarah Teo, Tan Wei

    24 August 2021

    download pdf

    COMMENTARY

    Over the past 15 years, the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) has actively promoted dialogue and practical cooperation in the defence sector. Its three-yearly work programmes cover a range of shared challenges faced by ASEAN member states, and seek to improve communication and strengthen collaboration towards addressing issues of common regional concern, such as piracy.

    Amid these ASEAN-level efforts, the fact remains that the security challenges that each ASEAN member state faces could be vastly different from one another’s. Piracy, specifically, involves littoral countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, much more than landlocked Laos.

    Consequently, even as the ADMM has been useful for broad dialogue and confidence building involving the 10 ASEAN member states, sub-regional arrangements such as the Malacca Straits Patrol (MSP) — involving Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand — and the Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement (TCA) — involving Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines — have arguably been where most of the ground-level action happens when it comes to tackling piracy.

    While acknowledging that these sub-regional arrangements and the ADMM serve different functions, there may also be value in looking at the potential synergies between the two types of mechanisms. The ADMM itself has alluded to the need for increased coordination among relevant initiatives. Stronger linkages between sub-regional arrangements and the ADMM would be useful in bolstering ASEAN-level responses towards regional security threats.

    There are several ways that the ADMM could work together with sub-regional arrangements such as the MSP and TCA.

     

    ASEAN
    ASEAN members of an ADMM-Plus EWG review disaster scenarios and relief efforts at Kuala Lumpur in 2019. The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.

     

    Enhancing ADMM’s Role vis-à-vis Sub-regional Arrangements

    One option would be for the ADMM to coordinate and facilitate the exchange of best practices and lessons learnt from the various sub-regional mechanisms. Information-sharing networks certainly do already exist, such as in the form of the ASEAN Maritime Security Community Information-Sharing Portal (AMSCIP) and the Information Fusion Centre hosted by the Republic of Singapore Navy. Moreover, similar exchanges are facilitated by the Experts’ Working Groups (EWGs) of the ADMM-Plus, a platform for the ADMM to engage defence ministers from ASEAN’s eight Dialogue Partners (i.e., Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States). However, the lack of publicly available EWG documents makes it difficult to ascertain the extent of such sharing.

    Nevertheless, the ADMM could step up to be the central knowledge-sharing platform for regional defence-related arrangements. In working towards this objective, it would be useful for the ADMM to go beyond boosting its own links with individual sub-regional arrangements and consider how it could serve to foster exchanges between these various arrangements.

    Facilitating exchanges between the MSP and TCA via the ADMM, for instance, would not only help to anchor ASEAN’s central role in tackling a key security concern of the region; it would also supplement ASEAN’s capacity-building efforts in counter-piracy, as the related mechanisms would operate less in silos and may benefit from greater coordination.

    Another way to increase linkages between the ADMM and sub-regional mechanisms would be through encouraging other ASEAN member states to take up observership opportunities. This is indeed already occurring. Prior to its induction as an MSP participant in 2008, Thailand had held observer status for three years. Myanmar and Vietnam also have been MSP observers. Meanwhile, Thailand, Brunei and Singapore have been suggested as possible participants or observers in the TCA, with the latter two countries observing the launch of the Trilateral Maritime Patrols in 2017.

    It bears emphasising that this is not an argument for the expansion of MSP or TCA membership. Rather, it is about leveraging the flexibility that observership offers. Extending observership to all ASEAN member states — perhaps on a rotational basis — would support the ADMM’s attempts to build confidence and shape mutual understanding of security outlooks.

    Such operationally focused minilaterals, moreover, offer the advantage of cultivating more substantial rapport among participating states. These arrangements would therefore benefit from being reframed more prominently as an additional key tool for confidence building, complementing the plethora of measures that already exist under the ADMM framework.

     Last but not least, the ADMM could consider incorporating specific mentions of sub-regional arrangements into its three-year work programmes. The 2017–2019 work programme, for instance, called for the promotion of “maritime security cooperation among ADMM Member States and Plus countries and with other related regional maritime fora”, but did not specifically list the MSP and TCA.

    Formally including these sub-regional arrangements into the ADMM work programme might be a tentative first step towards creating greater synergies between the two types of mechanisms.

    Conclusion

    The raison d’être of most sub-regional arrangements has been the management of specific threats, with membership logically being exclusive to states sharing similar security concerns. In contrast, the ADMM has pursued a broader and more inclusive form of defence cooperation and dialogue among the 10 ASEAN member states.

    Precisely because of their different forms and functions, synergies between the ADMM and sub-regional mechanisms should be explored. A more concerted effort towards tackling challenges such as piracy would add value to the work conducted by individual sub-regional arrangements, as well as the ADMM’s efforts in that area and ASEAN’s role in regional security as a whole.

    About the Authors

    Sarah TEO is an Assistant Professor and Coordinator of the Regional Security Architecture Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), RSIS. TAN Wei is a former Intern with RSIS.

    Categories: IDSS Papers / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    COMMENTARY

    Over the past 15 years, the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) has actively promoted dialogue and practical cooperation in the defence sector. Its three-yearly work programmes cover a range of shared challenges faced by ASEAN member states, and seek to improve communication and strengthen collaboration towards addressing issues of common regional concern, such as piracy.

    Amid these ASEAN-level efforts, the fact remains that the security challenges that each ASEAN member state faces could be vastly different from one another’s. Piracy, specifically, involves littoral countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, much more than landlocked Laos.

    Consequently, even as the ADMM has been useful for broad dialogue and confidence building involving the 10 ASEAN member states, sub-regional arrangements such as the Malacca Straits Patrol (MSP) — involving Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand — and the Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement (TCA) — involving Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines — have arguably been where most of the ground-level action happens when it comes to tackling piracy.

    While acknowledging that these sub-regional arrangements and the ADMM serve different functions, there may also be value in looking at the potential synergies between the two types of mechanisms. The ADMM itself has alluded to the need for increased coordination among relevant initiatives. Stronger linkages between sub-regional arrangements and the ADMM would be useful in bolstering ASEAN-level responses towards regional security threats.

    There are several ways that the ADMM could work together with sub-regional arrangements such as the MSP and TCA.

     

    ASEAN
    ASEAN members of an ADMM-Plus EWG review disaster scenarios and relief efforts at Kuala Lumpur in 2019. The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.

     

    Enhancing ADMM’s Role vis-à-vis Sub-regional Arrangements

    One option would be for the ADMM to coordinate and facilitate the exchange of best practices and lessons learnt from the various sub-regional mechanisms. Information-sharing networks certainly do already exist, such as in the form of the ASEAN Maritime Security Community Information-Sharing Portal (AMSCIP) and the Information Fusion Centre hosted by the Republic of Singapore Navy. Moreover, similar exchanges are facilitated by the Experts’ Working Groups (EWGs) of the ADMM-Plus, a platform for the ADMM to engage defence ministers from ASEAN’s eight Dialogue Partners (i.e., Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States). However, the lack of publicly available EWG documents makes it difficult to ascertain the extent of such sharing.

    Nevertheless, the ADMM could step up to be the central knowledge-sharing platform for regional defence-related arrangements. In working towards this objective, it would be useful for the ADMM to go beyond boosting its own links with individual sub-regional arrangements and consider how it could serve to foster exchanges between these various arrangements.

    Facilitating exchanges between the MSP and TCA via the ADMM, for instance, would not only help to anchor ASEAN’s central role in tackling a key security concern of the region; it would also supplement ASEAN’s capacity-building efforts in counter-piracy, as the related mechanisms would operate less in silos and may benefit from greater coordination.

    Another way to increase linkages between the ADMM and sub-regional mechanisms would be through encouraging other ASEAN member states to take up observership opportunities. This is indeed already occurring. Prior to its induction as an MSP participant in 2008, Thailand had held observer status for three years. Myanmar and Vietnam also have been MSP observers. Meanwhile, Thailand, Brunei and Singapore have been suggested as possible participants or observers in the TCA, with the latter two countries observing the launch of the Trilateral Maritime Patrols in 2017.

    It bears emphasising that this is not an argument for the expansion of MSP or TCA membership. Rather, it is about leveraging the flexibility that observership offers. Extending observership to all ASEAN member states — perhaps on a rotational basis — would support the ADMM’s attempts to build confidence and shape mutual understanding of security outlooks.

    Such operationally focused minilaterals, moreover, offer the advantage of cultivating more substantial rapport among participating states. These arrangements would therefore benefit from being reframed more prominently as an additional key tool for confidence building, complementing the plethora of measures that already exist under the ADMM framework.

     Last but not least, the ADMM could consider incorporating specific mentions of sub-regional arrangements into its three-year work programmes. The 2017–2019 work programme, for instance, called for the promotion of “maritime security cooperation among ADMM Member States and Plus countries and with other related regional maritime fora”, but did not specifically list the MSP and TCA.

    Formally including these sub-regional arrangements into the ADMM work programme might be a tentative first step towards creating greater synergies between the two types of mechanisms.

    Conclusion

    The raison d’être of most sub-regional arrangements has been the management of specific threats, with membership logically being exclusive to states sharing similar security concerns. In contrast, the ADMM has pursued a broader and more inclusive form of defence cooperation and dialogue among the 10 ASEAN member states.

    Precisely because of their different forms and functions, synergies between the ADMM and sub-regional mechanisms should be explored. A more concerted effort towards tackling challenges such as piracy would add value to the work conducted by individual sub-regional arrangements, as well as the ADMM’s efforts in that area and ASEAN’s role in regional security as a whole.

    About the Authors

    Sarah TEO is an Assistant Professor and Coordinator of the Regional Security Architecture Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), RSIS. TAN Wei is a former Intern with RSIS.

    Categories: IDSS Papers

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info