Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • IP22048 | Three New Provinces: Consolidating Central Control in Papua
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    IP22048 | Three New Provinces: Consolidating Central Control in Papua
    Jefferson Ng Jin Chuan, Cahyo Pamungkas

    26 August 2022

    download pdf

    The Indonesian parliament has recently passed legislation to establish three new provinces in Indonesia Papua. While the stated intent is to improve the delivery of public services, a longer-term effort to consolidate central control over Indonesia Papua is afoot, argue JEFFERSON NG and CAHYO PAMUNGKAS.

    COMMENTARY

    On 30 June 2022, the Indonesian parliament passed three laws for the proliferation (pemekeran) of new provinces in Indonesia Papua: South Papua, Central Papua, and Highland Papua. This carves out three new provinces from the original Papua province. What remains of the original province is retained as a rump along the province’s northern coast, centred around the capital of Jayapura.

    Most crucially, the new provinces divide the Central Highlands area, the most remote and underdeveloped interior of the Indonesian half of Papua Island where many native Papuans live, into different administrative and electoral units.

    Regencies in the western half of the Central Highlands area, mainly populated by native Papuans, have merged with the coastal areas of Nabire and Mimika, where the majority of immigrants reside, to form the new Central Papua province. The eastern half of the Central Highlands area centred around Wamena, dominated by native Papuans, is now contained as the separate province called Highland Papua. For its part, the South Papua province is centred around the more urban Merauke regency, where some 70 per cent of the population are immigrants.

    Thus, the net effect of the creation of the new provinces appears to be the redistricting of the original Papua province, in a manner that dilutes the electoral power of native Papuans.

    Special Autonomy in Papua

    The five provinces of Indonesia Papua — West Papua, Papua, South Papua, Central Papua, and Highland Papua — enjoy the status of special autonomy (like the provinces of Aceh and Yogyakarta), giving the five provinces privileges not accorded to other Indonesian provinces. The 2001 Papuan Special Autonomy Law aimed to find a workable middle ground to accommodate Papuan aspirations and alleviate the prolonged secessionist armed conflict which has been ongoing since 1965.

    The law, which today also applies to the three newly created provinces, guarantees Papuan representation in formal institutions, as well as sizeable central transfers to close the existing developmental gap between Indonesia Papua and the rest of the country. Papuan governors and vice-governors must be native Papuans, and each province has its own special Papuan People’s Assembly empowered to protect indigenous rights, while non-elective seats are reserved for Papuan members of parliament in each provincial Papuan House of Representatives.

    Central transfers to Papuan regional (provincial, city, regency) governments include extra-large allocations of revenue-sharing for natural resource exploitation in Papua (for example, in oil and natural gas). The transfers also encompass an additional share of revenue for special autonomy, fixed at 2.25 per cent of the portion of the total national budget which is earmarked for regional governments’ general spending.

    During President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s term of office, he has visited Papua more than any previous president, symbolically spending New Year’s Eve in Papua in 2015, and having been proactive in efforts to reduce the developmental gap between Papua and the rest of Indonesia. As part of his Nawacita framework, which called for “Development from the Peripheries”, Jokowi expedited the completion of the Trans-Papua Highway, and invested heavily in port and airport infrastructure in Papua.

    Despite these efforts and more than two decades of special autonomy, general Papuan acceptance of special autonomy remains low in comparison to the situation of Aceh, another province with special autonomy. Indeed, discussions of the laws on new Papuan provinces in Indonesia’s national parliament were accompanied by widespread protests in Papua and even other parts of the country.

    Key reasons for strong opposition to special autonomy in Indonesia Papua, by Papuans themselves, include the persistently low levels of human development in Papua, the actual lack of genuine democratic consultation regarding Papuan aspirations under the aegis of special autonomy within Indonesian rule, and the cycle of local violence and reprisal by Indonesian security forces. Papuan community leaders have called for the resolution of violence through dialogue between the central government and the armed groups, as was successfully brokered with the Free Aceh Movement in 2005. Instead, the central government prefers to double down on its security-heavy and economic development strategy.

     

    IP22048 Papua asso myron unsplash
    Near the Lukas Enembe Stadium in Jayapura regency. What kind of future can Papuans point to after the proliferation of new provinces? Photo by Asso Myron on Unsplash.

     

    Immediate and Longer-term Implications for the New Provinces

    With the recent passage of the new laws, the next step will be for the Ministry of Home Affairs to appoint acting governors for all three new provinces. The acting governors will likely serve in their capacities until provincial elections in Indonesia Papua are held around the end of 2024. That means some areas previously under the authority of the elected Papuan governor will be transferred to the unelected, centrally appointed governors in South Papua, Central Highlands, and Central Papua until 2024. This new configuration gives the central government the opportunity to intervene more decisively in the management of provincial affairs.

    Furthermore, under the 2021 amendment of the Papuan Special Autonomy Law, a coordinating unit chaired by the Indonesian vice-president, along with three ministers and representatives from each Papuan province, will monitor the implementation of special autonomy and development in Papua. This adds an additional layer of oversight from the central government.

    At the same time, there are also significant political and economic incentives behind the proliferation initiative. Each new province is expected to obtain central transfers amounting to 700 billion to 1 trillion rupiah per year, and 80 per cent of all civil service jobs in the new provinces are expected to go to native Papuans. In addition, each new province requires the formation of a new Papuan People’s Assembly and a Papuan House of Representatives. This offers opportunities to co-opt local elites to newly created positions. Furthermore, the new provincial governors are likely to be more open to facilitating investment in extractive industries in Papua; more amenable to issuing mining and forestry permits.

    Finally, from an internal security perspective, the provinces will also support the creation of new security units, such as the formation of regional military and police commands. Two of the newly created provinces, Central Papua and Central Highlands, contain regions where there have occurred flashpoints between the Indonesian National Armed Forces and the West Papua National Liberation Army on multiple occasions.

    All that being said, the key development to pay attention to is the pending constitutional review of amendments to the Special Autonomy Law. If the review is approved, then the 2021 amendment to the 2001 law and the proliferation of the three new provinces will be found unconstitutional.

    Special Autonomy 2.0?

    Indonesia is developing a more graduated and multifaceted approach to intensifying central control over Papua.

    On one hand, the central government plans to soften its direct presence by recruiting local allies. This involves recruiting local Papuans to serve in the army and police, and the co-optation of local elites in newly formed provincial institutions. This may foster increased Papuan representation, but the details of implementation will determine whether it genuinely accommodates Papuan aspirations.

    On the other hand, the centre’s means of control is being expanded. The new provinces allow the central government to enhance its security presence, facilitate investments from other parts of Indonesia, and create new electoral boundaries that dilute the Papuans’ electoral power.

    Therefore, the next two years are critical for the longer-term political stability in Papua. If acting governors only represent central interests, this could inadvertently institutionalise discrimination against ordinary Papuans. However, if the Ministry of Home Affairs appoints acting governors who represent not only central interests but also safeguard political and economic rights of native Papuans, this could generate a great deal of positive momentum.

    About the Authors

    Jefferson NG is an Associate Research Fellow at the Indonesia Programme of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, RSIS, Singapore. Cahyo PAMUNGKAS is a Research Professor at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. He may be contacted at [email protected].

    Categories: IDSS Papers / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    The Indonesian parliament has recently passed legislation to establish three new provinces in Indonesia Papua. While the stated intent is to improve the delivery of public services, a longer-term effort to consolidate central control over Indonesia Papua is afoot, argue JEFFERSON NG and CAHYO PAMUNGKAS.

    COMMENTARY

    On 30 June 2022, the Indonesian parliament passed three laws for the proliferation (pemekeran) of new provinces in Indonesia Papua: South Papua, Central Papua, and Highland Papua. This carves out three new provinces from the original Papua province. What remains of the original province is retained as a rump along the province’s northern coast, centred around the capital of Jayapura.

    Most crucially, the new provinces divide the Central Highlands area, the most remote and underdeveloped interior of the Indonesian half of Papua Island where many native Papuans live, into different administrative and electoral units.

    Regencies in the western half of the Central Highlands area, mainly populated by native Papuans, have merged with the coastal areas of Nabire and Mimika, where the majority of immigrants reside, to form the new Central Papua province. The eastern half of the Central Highlands area centred around Wamena, dominated by native Papuans, is now contained as the separate province called Highland Papua. For its part, the South Papua province is centred around the more urban Merauke regency, where some 70 per cent of the population are immigrants.

    Thus, the net effect of the creation of the new provinces appears to be the redistricting of the original Papua province, in a manner that dilutes the electoral power of native Papuans.

    Special Autonomy in Papua

    The five provinces of Indonesia Papua — West Papua, Papua, South Papua, Central Papua, and Highland Papua — enjoy the status of special autonomy (like the provinces of Aceh and Yogyakarta), giving the five provinces privileges not accorded to other Indonesian provinces. The 2001 Papuan Special Autonomy Law aimed to find a workable middle ground to accommodate Papuan aspirations and alleviate the prolonged secessionist armed conflict which has been ongoing since 1965.

    The law, which today also applies to the three newly created provinces, guarantees Papuan representation in formal institutions, as well as sizeable central transfers to close the existing developmental gap between Indonesia Papua and the rest of the country. Papuan governors and vice-governors must be native Papuans, and each province has its own special Papuan People’s Assembly empowered to protect indigenous rights, while non-elective seats are reserved for Papuan members of parliament in each provincial Papuan House of Representatives.

    Central transfers to Papuan regional (provincial, city, regency) governments include extra-large allocations of revenue-sharing for natural resource exploitation in Papua (for example, in oil and natural gas). The transfers also encompass an additional share of revenue for special autonomy, fixed at 2.25 per cent of the portion of the total national budget which is earmarked for regional governments’ general spending.

    During President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s term of office, he has visited Papua more than any previous president, symbolically spending New Year’s Eve in Papua in 2015, and having been proactive in efforts to reduce the developmental gap between Papua and the rest of Indonesia. As part of his Nawacita framework, which called for “Development from the Peripheries”, Jokowi expedited the completion of the Trans-Papua Highway, and invested heavily in port and airport infrastructure in Papua.

    Despite these efforts and more than two decades of special autonomy, general Papuan acceptance of special autonomy remains low in comparison to the situation of Aceh, another province with special autonomy. Indeed, discussions of the laws on new Papuan provinces in Indonesia’s national parliament were accompanied by widespread protests in Papua and even other parts of the country.

    Key reasons for strong opposition to special autonomy in Indonesia Papua, by Papuans themselves, include the persistently low levels of human development in Papua, the actual lack of genuine democratic consultation regarding Papuan aspirations under the aegis of special autonomy within Indonesian rule, and the cycle of local violence and reprisal by Indonesian security forces. Papuan community leaders have called for the resolution of violence through dialogue between the central government and the armed groups, as was successfully brokered with the Free Aceh Movement in 2005. Instead, the central government prefers to double down on its security-heavy and economic development strategy.

     

    IP22048 Papua asso myron unsplash
    Near the Lukas Enembe Stadium in Jayapura regency. What kind of future can Papuans point to after the proliferation of new provinces? Photo by Asso Myron on Unsplash.

     

    Immediate and Longer-term Implications for the New Provinces

    With the recent passage of the new laws, the next step will be for the Ministry of Home Affairs to appoint acting governors for all three new provinces. The acting governors will likely serve in their capacities until provincial elections in Indonesia Papua are held around the end of 2024. That means some areas previously under the authority of the elected Papuan governor will be transferred to the unelected, centrally appointed governors in South Papua, Central Highlands, and Central Papua until 2024. This new configuration gives the central government the opportunity to intervene more decisively in the management of provincial affairs.

    Furthermore, under the 2021 amendment of the Papuan Special Autonomy Law, a coordinating unit chaired by the Indonesian vice-president, along with three ministers and representatives from each Papuan province, will monitor the implementation of special autonomy and development in Papua. This adds an additional layer of oversight from the central government.

    At the same time, there are also significant political and economic incentives behind the proliferation initiative. Each new province is expected to obtain central transfers amounting to 700 billion to 1 trillion rupiah per year, and 80 per cent of all civil service jobs in the new provinces are expected to go to native Papuans. In addition, each new province requires the formation of a new Papuan People’s Assembly and a Papuan House of Representatives. This offers opportunities to co-opt local elites to newly created positions. Furthermore, the new provincial governors are likely to be more open to facilitating investment in extractive industries in Papua; more amenable to issuing mining and forestry permits.

    Finally, from an internal security perspective, the provinces will also support the creation of new security units, such as the formation of regional military and police commands. Two of the newly created provinces, Central Papua and Central Highlands, contain regions where there have occurred flashpoints between the Indonesian National Armed Forces and the West Papua National Liberation Army on multiple occasions.

    All that being said, the key development to pay attention to is the pending constitutional review of amendments to the Special Autonomy Law. If the review is approved, then the 2021 amendment to the 2001 law and the proliferation of the three new provinces will be found unconstitutional.

    Special Autonomy 2.0?

    Indonesia is developing a more graduated and multifaceted approach to intensifying central control over Papua.

    On one hand, the central government plans to soften its direct presence by recruiting local allies. This involves recruiting local Papuans to serve in the army and police, and the co-optation of local elites in newly formed provincial institutions. This may foster increased Papuan representation, but the details of implementation will determine whether it genuinely accommodates Papuan aspirations.

    On the other hand, the centre’s means of control is being expanded. The new provinces allow the central government to enhance its security presence, facilitate investments from other parts of Indonesia, and create new electoral boundaries that dilute the Papuans’ electoral power.

    Therefore, the next two years are critical for the longer-term political stability in Papua. If acting governors only represent central interests, this could inadvertently institutionalise discrimination against ordinary Papuans. However, if the Ministry of Home Affairs appoints acting governors who represent not only central interests but also safeguard political and economic rights of native Papuans, this could generate a great deal of positive momentum.

    About the Authors

    Jefferson NG is an Associate Research Fellow at the Indonesia Programme of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, RSIS, Singapore. Cahyo PAMUNGKAS is a Research Professor at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. He may be contacted at [email protected].

    Categories: IDSS Papers / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info